Leo Stoller
  CHICAGO-(AEAE)-BANK OF AMERICA CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER KENNETH D. LEWIS, CHARIMAN WALTER E. MASSEY AND JOEL PRICE, CHIEF FIANANCIAL OFFICER ARE CHARGED WITH CIVIL RACKETERRING (“RICO”) and violations of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Section 302. Their Chicago law firm of Bryan Cave attorney Steven R. Smith and Michael J. Werich have been charged with aiding and abeding their clients in the commission of a tort. It is also alleged that the Bank of America Legal Department Outside counsel Procedures October 2009 manuals http://www.filefront.com/15346097/Bank%20of%20America%20Outside%20Counsel%20Procedures.pdfcontains requirements that attorneys who represent Bank of American, if followed violate the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct and the Securities and Exchange Commissions Rules. Attorneys Steven R. Smith and Michael J. Werich are being referred to the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission www.iardc.org Anyone who has any information on Bank of America or feels that they have been victimized by Bank of American and/or Countrywide Bank and would like to join in a class action lawsuit please email ldms4@hotmail.com LEGAL DISCLAIMER: Kenneth D. Lewis, Walter E. Massey, Joel Price, Steven R. Smith and Michael J. Werich are considered innocient of all charges until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt at trial.  CHICAGO-(AEAE)-THE AMERICANS FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF ATTORNEY ETHICS (AEAE) an attorney ethics watch dog group since 1974 released a study that advocates taking dificult controversy to “court” has an advantage. In court, control is taken away from the negotiators, with a judge or jury making the decisions. If you believe you are more likely to win the case in this kind of environment, then moving to this will gain you advantage. If the other person knows this, then the threat of doing this will get them to concede more. Court is a very public place where people's dirty washing gets aired. The thought of this loss of face can be very persuasive in getting people to think again about the agreements they are making and knowingly and willfully breach. SEE YOU IN COURT TODAY  CHICAGO-(AEAE)-THE YEAR WAS 1994. CALIFORNIA DISTRICT ATTORNEY GOES TO THE GRAND JURY WITH THE O.J. SIMPSON CASE. Mr. Garcettii appeared on the Sunday news show THIS WEEK with David Brinkley. On that news show Mr. Garcetti according to the attorney disciplinary complaint filed by the Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) charged that he violated the California Code of Professional Conduct by stating that O.J. Simpson was guilty prior to the trial. When a prosecutor goes on a national news show and states that a party that has not been formally charged with a crime, was “guilty” of that crime it poisons the jury pool and is a clear violation of the Professional Rules of Conduct. AEAE filed a attorney disciplinary against Mr. Garcetti, and Marcia Clark. The AP wire service picked up the story and it ran in every paper in American. Click on the attached link to see a copy of the story. http://www.filefront.com/15340013/scan0001.pdf Post Title. 01/11/2010
This is your new blog post. Click here and start typing, or drag in elements from the top bar. STOLLER FIRES JUDGE! 01/11/2010
 CHICAGO-(AEAE)-STOLLER HAS MOVED TO DISQUALIFY AN ILLINOIS CHANCERY JUDGE PURSUANT TO 725 ILCS 5/114 5) (from Ch. 38, par. 114 5) Sec. 114 5. Substitution of judge. (a) Within 10 days after a cause involving only one defendant has been placed on the trial call of a judge the defendant may move the court in writing for a substitution of that judge on the ground that such judge is so prejudiced against him that he cannot receive a fair trial. Upon the filing of such a motion the court shall proceed no further in the cause but shall transfer it to another judge not named in the motion. The Americans for the Enforcement of Judicial Ethics (AEJE) advocates that disqualified judges should be referred to the Illinois Judicial Inquiry Board for review in the event that the judges may be in violation of the Illinois Code of Judicial Conduct. Everyone is entitled to a fair and impartial hearing by a neutral independent judge  WASHINGTON-DC-(AEAE) On Friday President Obama declared “the buck stops with me” for the nation's security and suggested he would not fire anyone that worked for him for the Christmas attack on a Detroit bound airliner. He did say that he would only fire himself since Security lapses that led to the near-disaster were not the fault of a singe individual or agency, Obama said, vowing they would be corrected by someone else. Because Obama said, “As of today I have fired myself from having anything to do with Home Land Security. Obama said that someone who he did not mention his name will have to deal with it. And I won't tell that intelligence officer to change what they're doing. Instead Obama said that the new intelligence officer can do it better and faster. Obama will leave it to them to figure out how. After hear Obama speech the Darwin Nomination Committee decided that they did not have to wait to the end of 2010 to award the Darwin prize , they had their man, Barak Obama, the 2010 winner of a “Double” Darwin Award. This Story continues click on this link http://www.rentamark.net/3/post/2010/01/2010-darwin-award-barak-obama-nominations-announced.html STOLLER AIMS TO SILENCE CRICKETS IN 2010 01/09/2010
 CHICAGO-(AEAE)-At a recent Gala event were Stoller was invited to speak at the annual Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics convention, he announced that 2010 was the year in which he was going to silence the aristarch, attackers, backseat drivers, belittlers, blamers, carpers, complainers, defamers, disapprovers, disparagers, disputers, doubters, fretters, hypercritics, maligners, muckrakers, mud-slingers, naggers, nit-pickers, panners, quibblers, revilers, scolders, sidewalk superintendents, slanderers, vilifiers, worriers and zappers. The entire audience cheered. Happy Birthday Jule 01/08/2010
 WASHINGTON D.C.-(AEAE)-AFFIDAVIT OF PROCESS SERVER WHO SERVED WASHINGTON D.C. ATTORNEYS LANCE G. JOHNSON, DAVID ABRAMS, ALFRED GOODMAN AND THEIR LAW FIRM ROYLANCE, ABRAMS, BERDO AND GOODMAN www.roylance.com Johnon, Abrams and Goodman were charged “criminal” contempt click on the attached affidavits of the process server who served these lawyers: http://www.filefront.com/15311951/Affidavit%20of%20service%20of%20Lance%20G.%20Johnson%20et%20al.0001.pdf. Lance G. Johnson, David Abrams and Alfred Goodman a “Criminal” contempt petition can be down loaded by clicking the attached link. http://www.filefront.com/14756757/Lance-G.-Johnson-Charged-with-perjury0001.pdf of There next court hearing in Chicago Illinois is January 19, 2010 on the Criminal Contempt matter click on the attached court order. http://www.filefront.com/15157881/Dec-15-2009-Order0001.pdf/ Stoller response to Johnson's attorney attempt to strike Stoller's Criminal Contempt petition. http://www.filefront.com/15191477/responsetomotiontostrike_doc.pdf LEGAL DISCLAIMER: Lance G. Johnson, David Abrams and Alfred Goodman are considered innocient until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of all charges.  CHICAGO-(AEAE)- The Fourth District Illinois Appellate Court refused to rule on the members’ argument that they were entitled to amend their third-party complaint. The court ruled that the members’ failure to proffer the amended third-party complaint to the trial court resulted in forfeiture of the question. “The pool members did not include a proposed amended complaint with supporting facts in the trial court. The failure to do so ‘significantly diminishes our ability to determine whether the proposed amendment’ would provide them with a viable theory against RMA and Murray [third party defendants] … The failure to tender the proposed amendment forfeits review of the trial court's decision.” So the lesson is: to assure there is a complete record for appeal, always proffer your proposed amended pleading to the trial court. Failing to do so may be a forfeiture of an argument on appeal that you improperly were not allowed leave to amend. You can read the whole case, Illinois Non-Profit Risk Management Assn. v. Human Service Center of Southern Metro-East, No. 4-07-0472 (1/9/08), by clicking here. This is your new blog post. Click here and start typing, or drag in elements from the top bar. | AuthorAmericans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) is a not for profit group that advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974. The button above allows you to be able to purchase books from AEAE. ArchivesJune 2010 Categories |
RSS Feed