Leo Stoller

CHICAGO-(AEAE)-SUNDAY-OCT. 11 2009-FIRE WORKS ARE SET TO GO OFF IN THE “FRIVILIOUS” GOOGLE INC., CIVIL RICO ACTION INVOLVING STOLLER'S COMPANIES ON TUESDAY. GOOGLE INC., IS SEEKING A PERMINATE INJUNCTION. STOLLER has fired back with “fraud” charges against Google Inc.'s famous trademark attorney Michael T. Zeller, his buddy, Lance G. Johnson and his crowd. People who are following this story are aware that Stoller has won the first round of this case before the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals. The case has been sent back to Judge Kendell. Michael T. Zeller Esq., and his buddy Lance G. Johnson have attempted to perpetrate a “fraud” on the Federal Court by submitting a “agreed” final judgment. The previous “agreed” judgment that was cut by Illinois Bankruptcy Trustee Richard M. Fogel was vacated by the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals. Google Inc., does not want to litigate their “frivolous” Rico action for fear they are going to be hit with a counter claim that could put them out of business. Remember Google Inc.,' mantra is “do no Evil”. Stoller according to charges in his counter claim that will be filed asserts that Google Inc., has themselves engaged in Racketeering, fraud, conspiracy, misrepresentation and should be liable for 100 billion an amount of money commensurate with their ability to “pay” and to have the court punish them for an “on going” fraud on the court. Google Inc., has a “short” memory. The Federal Court was successful in putting one of the world's largest accounting firms Arther Anderson out of business as a result of perceived “wrong doing”. Google Inc., is no exception. Google Inc., is nothing more than a modern day Titanic headed for the Ice berg and their attorney Michael T. Zeller is steering them right into the Ice Berg. Stay tuned to see the crash!
LEGAL DISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed here are those of Leo Stoller and GOOGLE INC, Michael T. Zeller, Richard M. Fogel and Lance G. Johnson are considered innocent of all charges until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.

CHICAGO-(AEAE)-COMMENTARY-RIGHT NOW THERE ARE OVER 500 people on Stoller's blog right now  from the following countries:   Num Perc. Country Name  
  466  93.20% United States
 20  4.00% United Kingdom
4 0.80% Hungary
 3 0.60% Sweden
 2 0.40% Puerto Rico
 2 0.40% Canada
1 0.20% Ireland
 1 0.20% Netherlands
 1 0.20% Germany

CHICAGO-(AEAE) ON FRIDAY STOLLER WENT TO TRIAL BEFORE ILLINOIS CRIMINAL COURT JUDGE DENNIS PORTER FOR THE “CRIME” OF PUBLISHING “SPEECH” ON THE INTERNET. For publishing stories on his former blog rentamark.blog.com . The trial was held at 26st and California in the Criminal Courts Building in Chicago, Illinois. The charge of indirect criminal contempt grew out of an underlying divorce proceeding, which barred Stoller from publishing “speech” on Stoller's blog in clear violation of the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution. The Divorce Judge ignored Stoller's First Amendment Arguments and held Stoller in “Civil” contempt resulting in having Stoller incarcerated in the Illinois Cook County Jail from June 8, 2009 until July 15, 2009. A second charge of indirect criminal contempt for the publication went to trial on Friday Oct. 9, 2009. The Plaintiff accused Stoller of making a “death” threat based upon an unrelated third party article written on this blog on Sept 5, 2009. At the conclusion of the trial Judge Porter said he would issue a ruling on Nov. 13, 2009. The prosecutor is seeking a “6 month jail sentence for Stoller's publication of “Speech” on the Internet. All of the underlying court orders are up on Appeal before the Illinois Appellate Court. “This criminal prosecution has Section 1983 written all over it” according to a University of Chicago Law Professor who did not want to give his name.

CHICAGO-(AEAE)-IN THE SPRING OF 2008 STOLLER WAS CHARGED WITY INDIRECT CRIMINAL CONTEMPT GROWING OUT OF A DIVORCE PROCEEDING, ALLEGING  THE IMPROPER PUBLICATION OF "SPEECH" ON THE  INTERNET.  The allegations in the Indirect Direct Criminal Contempt Complaint are at odds with the U.S. Supreme Court Finding in   Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union, 521 U.S. 844 (1997), is a United States Supreme Court case, in which all nine Justices of the Court voted to strike down anti-indecency provisions of the Communications Decency Act (the CDA), finding they violated the freedom of speech provisions of the First Amendment. Two Justices concurred in part and dissented in part to the decision. This was the first major Supreme Court ruling regarding the regulation of materials distributed via Internet.
Question: Did certain provisions of the 1996 Communications Decency Act violate the First and Fifth Amendments by being overly broad and vague in their definitions of the types of internet communications which they criminalized?
Conclusion:  Yes. The Court held that the Act violated the First Amendment because its regulations amounted to a content-based blanket restriction of free speech. The Act failed to clearly define "indecent" communications, limit its restrictions to particular times or individuals (by showing that it would not impact on adults), provide supportive statements from an authority on the unique nature of internet communications, or conclusively demonstrate that the transmission of "offensive" material is devoid of any social value. Stoller asserts that the charge of Indirect Criminal Contempt has Section 1983 written all over it! 

This is your new blog post. Click here and start typing, or drag in elements from the top bar.

CHICAGO-(AEAE)-STOLLER MOVES BEFORE ILLINOIS DISTRICT COURT JUDGE VIRGINIA KENDELL TO DISQUALIFY GOOGLE INC'S ATTORNEY MICHAEL T. ZELLER, ON THE GROUNDS OF "FRAUD" ON THE COURT. Michael T. Zeller has moved before Judge Kendell for a frivilious permanent Injunction and Final Judgment as to Defendant's Central Mfg Inc., and Stealth Industries, Inc., in the Google Inc's Civil Rico Action against Stoller's companies. Stoller asserts that Judge Kendell should disqualify Michael T. Zeller in order to seperate him from his "cash" cow client, Google Inc., who will pay everything and anything to "stop" Stoller from canceling Google's "generic" Federal Trademark "google" which is now in the dictionary and is the only Federal Trademark Registration still on the Principle Register that is in the dictionary for the services listed in the dictionary definition of the "google" term. The hearing is next Tuesday when the real fire works will hit the stage. Stay tunned

This is your new blog post. Click here and start typing, or drag in elements from the top bar.

 
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-STOLLER HAS ALLEGED THAT ILLINOIS BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE RICHARD M. FOGEL ENTERED INTO A SCHEME WITH WASHINGTON D.C. ATTORNEY LANCE G. JOHNSON TO SELL THE STOLLER'S TRADEMARK ASSETS THROUGH A “NAKED” ASSIGNMENT AND/OR ASSIGNMENT IN GROSS AS WELL KNOWN TO GOOGLE INC'S ATTORNEY MICHAEL T. ZELLER. As a result of the August 20, 2007 “naked” assignment no valid trademark rights or other corporate assets were ever lawfully assigned to Lance G. Johnson “scam” entity called the Society for the Prevention of Trademark Abuse (SPTA).
The name SPTA is an oxymoron. Because SPTA was set up to defraud the Illinois Bankruptcy court and the Patent and Trademark Office according to Stoller's Position Paper filed in the Google Inc., v Central Mfg Inc Civil Rico Case No 07 CV 385. Jonathan M. Cyrluk from the Illinois law firm of Stetler & Duffy LTD 312-336-0299 filed a copy of a Permanent Injunction and Final Judgment as to Defendants Central Mfg Inc., and Stealth Industries Inc., on Sept 30, 2009 that was just served upon Stoller today. The “Final Judgment was signed by Michael T. Zeller and Lance G. Johnson knowing that the underlying assignment dated August 20, 2007 written by Illinois Bankruptcy Trustee Richard M. Fogel is a “naked” assignment, invalid on its face and did not assign any lawful trademark rights or corporate assets to SPTA/Lance G., Johnson. What we really have here is a repeat of Hans Christian Anderson famous children's story the Emperor Cloths. But in this story everyone is pretending that Fogel's August 20, 2007 “naked” assignment of Stoller's assets was a “valid” assignment transferring all of Stoller assets to Lance G. Johnson when in fact the said August 20, 2007 Assignment was a “naked” assignment and no lawful assets were ever assigned to Lance G. Johnson as well known to Google Inc., their attorney Michael T. Zeller, Lance G. Johnson and Illinois Bankruptcy Trustee Richard M. Fogel and Zeller's “new” bag man Jonathan M. Cyrluk. Mr. Cyrluk has the temerity to promote himself as the “big” defense attorney that defendants “white” collar criminals from the Federal Prosecution, yet he involves himself in a conspiracy to defraud Illinois District Court Judge Virginia Kendell along with Zeller, Fogel and Johnson according to allegations in Stoller's Positions Paper and Illinois Attorney Disciplinary Complaints. Legal Disclaimer: Zeller, Fogel, Johnson and Cyrluk are considered innocent of any charges until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

. 

CHICAGO-(AEAE)-GOOGLE INC'S ATTORNEY MICHAEL T. ZELLER FILES FOR A PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANTS CONETRAL MFG INC., AND STEALTH INDUSTRIES INC., IN STOLLER CIVIL RICO ACTION BEFORE ILLINOIS DISTRICT COURT JUDGE VIRGINIA KENDELL. Zeller bases his Motion for a Permanent Injunction and final judgment on an agreement with attorney Lance G. Johnson www.roylance.com .  Zeller asserts that Lance G. Johnson the sole member of a "sham" entity that never bought or sold anything and was set up to participate in a "fraudulent" bankruptcy auction sale according to charges contained in Stoller Position Paper filed in the same case according to a court order of Judge Kendell. The fraudulent bankruptcy assignment that Illinois Bankruptcy Trustee Richard M. Fogel drafted according to Stoller's pleading is a "naked" license and/or a "license in gross" that under the Lanham Act transferred "no" valid trademark assets to Lance G. Johnson. Now the issue of Zeller, Fogel and Lance G. Johnson alleged "fraud" on Illinois Bankruptcy Judge Jack Schmetterer is squarely before Illinois District Court Judge Kendell a former prosecutor who is well equiped to make a fair and impartial decision in the Tradmark Case of the 21st Century. Stoller attempted to cancel the term "google" which is now and has been for years in the "dictionary" is descriptive and no longer is entitled to Federal Trademark Protection. Of Course Google Inc., took offense at the "nerve" of Stoller attempting to "cancel" their precious "generic" trademark and filed a Civil Rico
Action against first Stoller and then against only Stoller's companies. Having "cut" an inside deal with Illinois
Bankruptcy Trustee Richard M. Fogel to accept a "default" judgment against Stoller's companies. Stoller moved to intervene in the Rico Action when it became obvious that Illinois BAnkruptcy Trustee Richard M. Fogel breached his fudiciary duty to Stoller's Estate. Judge Kendell entered judgment against Stoller's companies. Stoller won an Appeal before the Seventh Circuit. The case was sent back to Judge Kendell where now sits. Judge Kendell finally has the opportunity to expose Zeller, Fogel and Lance G. Johnson for the "frauds" they are according to Stoller's charges in his pleadings filed before Judge Kendell. Stay tuned. For those who have Pacer the Illinois District Court Case No. 07 CV 385 

 

 

Chicago-(AEAE)-CHICAGO-STOLLER PREPARES TO FILE HIS APPEAL IN THE LANCE G. JOHNSON 100 million dollar Defamation case. Illinois Circuit Court Judge Kathy Flanagan issued a ruling granting Johnson's Motion to quash Service. Dispite the fact that Stoller had Lance G. Johnson, David Abrams and Alfred Goodman the three attorneys from the law frim of Roylance, Abrams, Berdo and &Goodman www.roylance.com 

CHICAGO-(AEAE)-ILLINOIS DISTRICT COURT JUDGE WILLIAM J. HIBBLER ISSUED AN ORDER ON 10/02/2009 stating," The Court  DENIES Appellant's Motion for Reconsideration. As indicated on Pure Fishing's Certificate of Service, Pure Fishing served Appellant with a copy of its motion to dimiss".  Stoller claimed that he never received a copy of the pure fishing Motion and that Judge Hibbler had "no" jurisdiction. Judge Hibbler wrote ,"The Court lacked jurisdiction is unfounded..." "The fact that a party mails a document creates a rebutable presumption that the addressee actually received the mailing" Hagen v. US .  However, it is NOT conclusive evidence that the receiving party actually received the mailing. Stoller will ask the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals  to decide the case today by filing his Appeal. Ldms4@hotmail.com

This is your new blog post. Click here and start typing, or drag in elements from the top bar.

CHICAGO-(AEAE)-SUNDAY-OCTOBER 4TH, 2009-A COURT HEARING IS SET FOR TUESDAY, OCT 6TH 2009 BEFORE ILLINOIS DISTRICT COURT JUDGE HIBBLER. Judge Hibbler issued a decision granting Stoller's Opponent  motion to dismiss. Stoller has filed a motion for reconsideration, having "never" been served with the motion to dismiss. Judge Hibbler is being asked to "vacate" his order dismissing Stoller's appeal from a decision issued by Bankruptcy Judge Jack Schemetterer. Stay tuned...

This is your new blog post. Click here and start typing, or drag in elements from the top bar.