Leo Stoller
Brooke Mueller now is demanding an additional $1 million from Charlie Sheen in order to \"make\" up 12/31/2009
 CHARLES SHEEN'S wife Brooke Mueller now is demanding an additional $1 million to her prenuptial agreement according to a report. Brooke said if Tiger Woods wife got 78 million, Charlie Sheen can give me at least another million. Brooke said that she would then have her lawyer Yale Galanter file a motion to modify the restraining order against Sheen so that they can get together and try to resolve their issues privately in their bedroom. Brooke said that they are very much in love however before she is willing to attempt work anything out she wants to see Charlie's “good” faith by depositing a million dollars in her private checking account according to a report. Brook said, “I might start to like Charlie again.” UPDATE: January 1, 2010 And another one bites the dust! It looks like Charlie Sheen and his wife Brooke Mueller are headed to divorce court after all. We have now learned that “Brooke’s been wanting a divorce for at least two months, but she was holding out until Charlie signed a new contract [for his sitcom],” according to one source. Charlie reportedly threatened to kill Brooke on Christmas with a knife after she told him that she wanted a divorce . Just days after the altercation, Brooke was seen partying at a club with another younger movie star that she has been spending her nights with according to the same source, "Brooke is such a "sweet" girl."  ASPEN, COLORADO-CHRISTMAS DAY 2009 Charlie Sheen, 44, who starred in films including Platoon and Wall Street, was arrested in the ski resort of Aspen following an argument with his wife of 19 months, Brooke Mueller, 32. Charlie Sheen's was arrest in Aspen, Colo., for allegedly placing a knife against wife Brooke Mueller's throat after he sat down for dinner. His wife told Sheen, “I have something to tell you.” Sheen said, “Don't bother me I watching a football game.” Brooke said, “I want a divorce!” Sheen said, “I can't hear you, my team is on the one yard line.” Brooke screemed “I want a divorce!” “You what?” “I want a divorce!” “You tell me this while I'm watching my football game on Christmas!” “I want a divorce!” It is reported that Sheen then took a knife and held it to Brooke's neck and said, “I sue you for the rest of you life if you divorce me!” Brooke said, “I rather have you kill me!” Sheen said, “Suing you would be more fun!” Brooke called 911 and had he husband locked up. Sheen posted $8,000 bond and was released. Threatening to have Brooked sued for the rest of her life isn't enough to break up their marriage. Seems they have decided reconciliation is the way to go. "Brooke and Charlie are very passionate about each other, they love each other and want to try and save their marriage," Mueller's attorney, Yale Galanter, told People magazine on Wednesday. "They had a bad night and want to get beyond it. Some women who can't, do spend the “rest of their lives in court as defendants” according to a report at www.law.com  LOS ANGELS- A US District judge in LA sided with the student, saying the school went too far. Amid rising concerns over cyber-bullying, and even calls for criminalization, some courts, parents, and free speech advocates are pushing back - students, they say, have a First Amendment right to be nasty in cyberspace . A recent LA Times article reported that a Beverly Hills school suspended an 8th grade student who posted a video on YouTube with several other students calling yet another student "spoiled," a "brat," and a "slut." Read the article here. The suspended student took the case to federal court, saying her free speech rights had been violated. See J.C. v. Beverly Hills Unified School District, Case No. 08-cv-03824, California, U.S. District Court (2009). Last month, U.S. District Court Judge Stephen V. Wilson sided with her. "To allow the school to cast this wide a net and suspend a student simply because another student takes offense to their speech, without any evidence that such speech caused a substantial disruption of the school's activities, runs afoul of the law," wrote Judge Wilson in a 60 page opinion. Click here to read the court's decision http://lawyersusaonline.com/wp-files/pdfs/jc-v-beverly-hills.pdf mohttp://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2009/12/14/judge_rules_students_cruel_remarks_online_are_not_unconstitutional/This decision. This decisionhis decision “  CHICAGO-(AEAE)-WASHINGTON D.C. ATTORNEY LANCE G. JOHNSON, DAVID ABRAMS AND ALFRED GOODMAN HAVE FINDLY BEEN SERVED WITH SUMMONS AND A CRIMINAL CONTEMPT PETITION. CHICAGO-(AEAE)-WASHINGTON D.C. ATTORNEY LANCE G. JOHNSON, DAVID ABRAMS AND ALFRED GOODMAN HAVE FINDLY BEEN SERVED WITH SUMMONS AND A CRIMINAL CONTEMPT PETITION http://www.filefront.com/14756757/Lance-G.-Johnson-Charged-with-perjury0001.pdf/. Today their Chicago Law firm of Gordon and Rees, who also have been charged in the same criminal contempt petition refuse to acknowledge if they will continue to represent Johnson, Abrams and Goodman. A spokesman for the Law firm who called Stoller refused to comment any further. Stoller is exploring a Civil Racketeering count against Gordon and Rees and Lance G. Johnson, David Abrams and Alfred Goodman and is currently researching the law on that issue. In Stoller's opinion he feels he can plead a RICO count in an amended complaint but want to devote some addition time in his law library to make sure that the RICO count will “stick”. Legal Disclaimer: Lance G. Johnson, David Abams, Alfred Goodman and the Gordon and Rees law firm are considered inocient until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.  JOHN WELCH TO PLAY CHRISTOPHER STOLLER 12/30/2009
 CHICAGO-(AEAE)-IN THE NEW MOVIE THE LEO STOLLER STORY, IT WAS SUGGESTED THAT JOHN WELCH be offered the role of Stoller's brother, Christopher. John is originally from Chicago and is still a White Sox fan, just like Christopher Stoller. The producer thinks John would be perfect for the part. John has been an "actor" all of his life playing the lead part as a trademark authority. John writes the www.ttablog.com What do you think? Please leave your comments  CHICAGO-(AEAE)-STOLLER WAS INCARCERATED IN THE ILLINOIS COOK COUNTY JAIL FOR 37 days from June 8, 2009 until July 15, 2009 for the “crime” of blogging on the Internet. In order for Stoller to be released he was forced, under undue influence, to sign a series of agreements in a domestic case. Agreements that he “never” would have agreed to but for the fact that “if he agreed to sign those agreements, he would be released from the custody of the Cook County Department of Corrections”. Stoller was released on July 16, 2009 at 1:00AM. In the morning of that day Stoller filed an appeal with the Illinois Appellate Court to set aside the coerced agreements. One of the attorneys on the other side filed a motion before the Appellate Court requesting that the Illinois Appellate Court dismiss Stoller's appeal based upon the alleged “agreed” order of dismissal that Stoller under pressure signed. Today the Illinois Appellate Court denied the Appellee's motion to dismiss Stoller's appeal based upon the “phony” agreements. Stay tuned this case is heating up  WASHINGTON D.C. (AEAE)- U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia has said the federal statute for honest services fraud is too broad, joking that it could make a crime out of an employee phoning in sick so he could slip off to a ball game. A recent hearing before the U.S. Supreme Court has many legal experts believing the high court is poised to strike down the statute, which makes it illegal for public officials to fraudulently deprive constituents of honest services. GEORGE CLOONEY TO PLAY LEO STOLLER? 12/29/2009
 HOLLYWOOD, CALF (AEAE)- SOME OF THE PRODUCERS WHO CLAIM TO HAVE MADE THE MOVIE, JULIE AND JULIA, THE STORY OF A BLOGGER WHO PREPARED ALL OF JULIA CHILD'S RECEIPTS ON HER BLOG. JULIA POWELL STORY WAS MADE INTO A MOVIE. THE PRODUCERS CONTACTED A REPRESETATIVE OF LEO STOLLER IN ORDER TO DISCUSS FILMING STOLLER'S NEW BOOK JUICE FOR PEANUTS. Stoller's blog www.rentamark.net has attracted the attention of several Hollywood Producers who have offered to make a movie of Stoller's story. George Clooney was suggested to play Stoller and the movie would be directed by Guentin Tarantiono. No final script has been approved yet and no deal has been finalized. Stay tuned...who do you think should play Stoller "love" interest, leave your comments below... STOLLER MOVES BEFORE THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR RECONSIDERATION OF MACK BAR 12/28/2009
 CHICAGO-(AEAE)-STOLLER HAS MOVED BEFORE THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THEIR Mack” bar. Stoller argues that the said Mack bar is unconstitutional on its face. It deprives a party of its due process and equal protection guaranteed under the 5th and 14th Amendments of the U.S. Constitution. In the alternative Stoller argues that the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals should stay its Mack bar, pending Stoller's appeal to the United States Supreme Court. Thirdly Stoller argues that in the alternative, Stoller should be allowed to proceed with its current court actions and the Mack bar should be modified to comply with the U.S Constitution.  CHICAGO-(AEAE)-ILLINOIS CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE THOMSA DUDGEON ISSUED AN EX PARTE ORDER ON JULY 9, 2009 GRANTING A JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF RQYMOND H. WEBER FOR Sixteen Thousand Dollars in a contested guardianship case. Raymond H. Weber a convicted felon and “ward” sought an accounting in a guarding ship case. Judge Dudgeon granted judgment in favor of Weber stating that the Probate Act “trumps” the Illinois Power of Attorney Act. Stoller has filed his Appeal brief. Weber who is represented by Prairie Legal Services filed a cross appeal. Stoller had charged Weber and his attorney Laura Myers Esq., with indirect criminal contempt for attempting to defraud the court and the surety company out of over $30,000. Judge Dudgeon denied Weber's motion for reconsideration and denied awarding Weber any additional funds. Notwithstanding Weber and Prairie Legal Services filed a cross appeal seeking an additional $30,000 which according to Stoller brief is a “clear” fraud on the Court and the Surety Company. Weber's appeal brief is due January 26, 2010. Stay tuned this is an interesting case which should make “new” law. | AuthorAmericans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) is a not for profit group that advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974. The button above allows you to be able to purchase books from AEAE. ArchivesJune 2010 Categories |
RSS Feed