![]() CHICAGO-(AEAE)-ATTORNEY ROBERT TEPPER REFUSED TO ATTEND HIS DEPOSITION TODAY. Mr. Tepper was kind enough to call Stoller and inform him that he would not be attending his deposition noticed by Stoller. Stoller told Mr. Tepper that he would be move to “compel” his deposition. Stoller's Motion for leave to file an Indirect Direct Criminal Contempt proceeding against Attorney Lance G. Johnson, Alfred Goodman and David Abrams from the Washington D.C Law firm of Roylance, Abrams, Berdo and Goodman www.roylance is up today before Illinois Circuit Court Judge Kathy Flanagan. Stoller filed a Motion before Illinois Circuit Court Judge Michale Hyman in his divorce proceeding which is up on Nov 3rd 2009 at 9:30 AM. In addition Stoller has released a barrage of Subpoenas, like Scud missiles into the enemys camp. Stoller is ready to file contempt charges against those who fail to properly respond. SIDEBAR: Trust is an important quality in a business partner, a spouse, a friend, a candidate. It is important for all the readers of this blog to note that when Stoller says on this blog that he is going to sue someone, hold them in contempt, charge them with attorney disciplinary charges and/or Indirect Criminal Contempt Charges, as sure as the sun will rise tomorrow, Stoller will follow through with all charges, motions, complaints which are acknowledge here. Stoller is a man of his word, if he says that he will sue a party, that party will be sued and the case will be litigated until the “last court speaks”! This sidebar is response to some readers who might have doubted Stoller's willingness to follow through with his prognostications of doom and gloom. CommentsPerry Mason 10/26/2009 7:52pm
Willingness to follow through on an action and achieving a successful verdict are two very different things. Jack 10/26/2009 8:16pm
Thats why they call you Perry Mason...knowing what you want is the first step to getting it... Perry Mason 10/26/2009 9:44pm
Clint Eastwood as Dirty Harry said, "Man's got to know his limitations." Leo The Toadstool 10/26/2009 11:27pm
More delusional Stoller drivel. Stoller is the very definition of lack of credibility. Just look up the court decisions about him. Just like his posts, they make clear the buffoon that he is. Jack 10/27/2009 12:40am
Toad without darkness there is "no" light, without "evil" Toad, there is "no" goodness, and without Stoller you wouldn't exist... Leo The Toadstool 10/27/2009 1:03am
Jack, your delusions expose you as Stoller (and of course the fact that your comment is highlighted in blue). Chip Douglas 10/27/2009 1:45pm
Have you noticed how Leo talks in circles and never directly answers a question? Dan Web 10/28/2009 12:37am
One man's bogus litigation is another man "just" cause. I remember a case where I represented a small child who fell off a Santa Claus's lap in a shopping center breaking her leg. Everyone thought it was a "frivilious" law suit suing Santa, accept the parents of the injured girl. There is no such thing as "bogus" litigation only anarchy when a party has "no" court system to address their controversies like Iraq.... Anon 10/28/2009 2:42am
Leo/Rita/Dan, once I got past all your random quotation marks and wholesale lack of grammar, I realized just how illuminating your example is. But I suspect you're misrembering the story. I'm pretty sure what really happened was that when you were a small child, you sat on Santa's lap and Santa, startled by your attempt to serve him with a meritless lawsuit, accidentally dropped you, which resulted in the untreated, rampant brain damage we all see in you to this day. Rita 10/29/2009 2:37am
I believe that Anon must have been a film critic at one time who "never" gave any movie review over one star, was fired and now finds himself in a position in which he cannot give Stoller even "1" star for anything...It is obvious that he can't stay away from that California "water"... Anon 10/30/2009 8:17am
Stoller isn't a "man of his word." He isn't a man at all. He's Rita. Jean 10/31/2009 2:13am
Rita Haywood Leave a Reply |