STOLLER'S INDIRECT CRIMINAL CONTEMPT TRIAL TESTING THE FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHT TO PUBLISH ON \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"SPEECH\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\" ON THE INTERNET SET TO GO T

STOLLER'S INDIRECT CRIMINAL CONTEMPT TRIAL TESTING THE FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHT TO PUBLISH ON \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"SPEECH\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\" ON THE INTERNET SET TO GO T 10/09/2009

3 Comments

CHICAGO-(AEAE)-IN THE SPRING OF 2008 STOLLER WAS CHARGED WITY INDIRECT CRIMINAL CONTEMPT GROWING OUT OF A DIVORCE PROCEEDING, ALLEGING THE IMPROPER PUBLICATION OF "SPEECH" ON THE INTERNET. The allegations in the Indirect Direct Criminal Contempt Complaint are at odds with the U.S. Supreme Court Finding in Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union, 521 U.S. 844 (1997), is a United States Supreme Court case, in which all nine Justices of the Court voted to strike down anti-indecency provisions of the Communications Decency Act (the CDA), finding they violated the freedom of speech provisions of the First Amendment. Two Justices concurred in part and dissented in part to the decision. This was the first major Supreme Court ruling regarding the regulation of materials distributed via Internet.
Question: Did certain provisions of the 1996 Communications Decency Act violate the First and Fifth Amendments by being overly broad and vague in their definitions of the types of internet communications which they criminalized?
Conclusion: Yes. The Court held that the Act violated the First Amendment because its regulations amounted to a content-based blanket restriction of free speech. The Act failed to clearly define "indecent" communications, limit its restrictions to particular times or individuals (by showing that it would not impact on adults), provide supportive statements from an authority on the unique nature of internet communications, or conclusively demonstrate that the transmission of "offensive" material is devoid of any social value. Stoller asserts that the charge of Indirect Criminal Contempt has Section 1983 written all over it!

This is your new blog post. Click here and start typing, or drag in elements from the top bar.

Comments

Ralph Retunza

10/09/2009 10:53am

Gee, Leo, I thought that libel was "not" protected by the First Amndment?

Perry Mason

10/09/2009 6:45pm

I didn't go to Harvard Law but I'm going to guess that the first amendment doesn't give you unlimited power to libel and harass your ex via an Internet blog.

Bobby

10/09/2009 11:25pm

CHICAGO-(AEAE)-IN THE SPRING OF 2008 STOLLER WAS CHARGED WITY INDIRECT CRIMINAL CONTEMPT

wity = with

Author

Help the Equal Justice Party support conservative candidates. Contribute today!
FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH.
YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) is a not for profit group that supports Equal Justice and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The author, Leo Stoller is a
LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERT, valuations, expert
witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert. Leo Stoller graduated
from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE and attended the University of Iowa a for a PHD. Leo Stoller is the nation's most renowned
Legal Ethics and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Expert and legal ethics expert. Leo Stoller is the Director of Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. Leo Stoller has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. Leo Stoller
is ready to go to work for you: contact information: Leo Stoller, 7115 W. North Avenue #272, Oak Park, Illinois 60302. Email ldms4@hotmail.com
312-545-4554
Copyright Leo Stoller 2009, all rights reserved. I accept no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission. (For forty one years)
"Litigation is the Sea I swim in,
Litigation is the Air I Breathe
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front!"
SEE YOU IN COURT!!!

Leo Stoller

Comments

Leave a Reply

Author

Archives

Categories