Leo Stoller

 
 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)- Today's posting involves the case law and argument that will force a “Apex” deponent ( the deposition of a CEO, President and/or Chairman of the Board) to appear and testify at a deposition despite the fact that the “CEO” claims that he is “too busy” and “has no knowledge” of the matter. Stoller once noticed Steven Spielberg while he was shooting the last Indian Jones movie for a deposition. Spielberg claimed he was “too busy”.

Recently the Northern District of Illinois U.S. Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Cole denied a company's motion for a protective order, rejecting the defendant's assertions that the CEO had no personal knowledge of the claim and was ''too busy'' to give a deposition. Johnson v. Jung, 242 F.R.D. 481 (N.D. Ill. 2007).
In that case the attorneys for the Defendant moved for a protective order barring a President's deposition. In support, the President of the large corporation submitted an affidavit asserting two grounds as good cause for a protective order:
He ''had no personal involvement'' with the claims in the suit.
He was too busy to sit for a deposition because he travels
In considering the motion, Judge Cole began by reviewing the test for a protective order:
''Contrary to the common law's sporting theory of justice, 6 Wigmore, Discovery, section 1845 at 490 (3d ed.
1940), the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provide for liberal discovery. Under Rule 26(b)(1), 'Parties may obtain discovery regarding any matter, not privileged, that is relevant to the claim or defense of any party.' As expansive as the definition of relevancy is under Rule 401 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, U.S. v. Murzyn, 631 F.2d 525, 529 (7th Cir. 1980), the standard under the discovery provisions of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure is even broader. '''The burden to show good cause is on the party seeking the protective order. Jepson Inc. v. Makita Electric Works Ltd., 30 F.3d 854, 858 (7th Cir. 1994). Conclusory statements of hardship are not sufficient to carry this
burden.
Noting the President,s claim of having ''no personal involvement'' in the matter is not the equivalent of having ''no information'' about the claim.
The test under the Rules is not whether a putative deponent had personal involvement in an event.
.Personal involvement' is not a prerequisite to the deposition of a corporate officer. A deposition of an officer of a corporation is not prohibited merely because the witness denies 'personal participation' in the matters involved in the litigation. No corporate officer is immunizes from discovery by virtue of that status or their travel schedules. See 8 Wright, Miller and Marcus, Federal Practice and Procedure: Civil 2d, section 2037 at 500-502.''
The bottom line that a Plaintiff does not have to drag that corporate officer into a deposition the court will order it when a  motion to compell is filed. Corporate officers naturally resist depositions, like Dracula resists the cross, because one wrong word and they get charged with perjury and can lose their multi million dollar job.

 


Comments

Purrins

Mon, 18 Jan 2010 22:03:35

CEO's have gone to jail for lying in a deposition

 

Q

Mon, 18 Jan 2010 22:15:47

The only one going to jail for perjury is you!

 

Anon

Mon, 18 Jan 2010 22:35:36

Funny how this lying sack Stoller fails to mention what happened when he tried to get Spielberg's deposition: Stoller predictably lost.

 

Webmaster

Tue, 19 Jan 2010 10:12:00

Leo your nose diving. Hits are down to you and I. Better to piss people off. I mean you taking on Spielburg? Come on now. Not possible.

 

TR

Tue, 19 Jan 2010 13:31:10

Leo doesn't just lose cases-- he loses them and then the courts go on record as stating he is a complete fraud. The only thing Leo Stoller does well ia play the part of village idiot. Too bad he doesn't realize the only reason people read his stuff is to laugh at the fact that he thinks he is taken seriously. Buffoon.

 

Rubber Spatula

Wed, 20 Jan 2010 22:33:02

Always gets the "last" laugh!

 

Tue, 08 Jun 2010 02:23:11

Very vivid appearance, perfect plot, challenging game. Many of us put this game as a very important part of life. Surprise,when I browse the web ,I found these website Pretty good. such as xxxxxx, go and see it that rich variety of fashion at a reasonable www.vibram five fingers kso price !recommended by friends.Personally

 

Sun, 29 Aug 2010 02:16:52

If I speak in the Cheap Authentic NFL Jerseys tongues of men and of angels, but have not love, I am only a resounding gong or a clanging cymbal. If I have the gift of prophecy and can fathom all mysteries and all Official NFL Jerseys knowledge, and if I have a faith that can move mountains, but have not love, I am nothing. If I give all I possess to the poor and surrender my USA Jerseys Shop body to the flames,but have not love, I gain nothing.Love is patient, NFL Jerseys love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud. It is not rude, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it NHL Jerseys keeps no record of wrongs. Love does not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth. It always protects, always trusts, always MLB Jerseys hopes, always perseveres.Love never NHL Hockey Jerseys fails. But where there are prophecies, they will cease; where there are tongues, they will be stilled; where there is knowledge, it will pass away. For we know in part and we prophesy in MLB Baseball Jerseys part, but when perfection comes, the imperfect disappea. When I was a child, I talked like a child, I thought like a child, I reasoned like a child. When I became NBA Basketball Jerseys man, I put childish ways behind me. Now we see but a poor reflection as in a mirror; then we shall see face to face. Now I know in part; then I shall know fully, even as I am fully known.And now these three remain: faith, hope and NFL Football Jerseys love. But the greatest of these is love. http://www.jersey-usa.com/sitemap.html LIJ

 



Leave a Reply

    Author

    Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) is a not for profit group that advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974. The button above allows you to be able to purchase books from AEAE.
    The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The author, Leo Stoller is a
    LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERT, valuations, expert
    witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert. Leo Stoller graduated
    from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE  and attended the University of Iowa a  for a PHD. Leo Stoller is the nation's most renowned
    Legal Ethics and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
    enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Expert and legal ethics expert. Leo Stoller is the Director of Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. Leo Stoller has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
    numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. Leo Stoller
    is ready to go to work for you: contact information: Leo Stoller, 7115 W. North Avenue #272, Oak Park, Illinois 60302. Email ldms4@hotmail.com
    312-545-4554
    Copyright Leo Stoller 2009, all rights reserved. I accept no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission. (For forty one years)
     "Litigation is the Sea I swim in,
    Litigation is the Air I Breathe
    Litigation is War,
    Welcome to the Front!"
    SEE YOU IN COURT!!!


    Archives

    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010
    December 2009
    November 2009
    October 2009
    September 2009

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed