Leo Stoller
 CHICAGO-(AEAE)-ONE READER OF THIS BLOG FOR MANY YEARS POSED AN INTERESTING LEGAL QUESTION. “ WHY DON'T YOU SUE THE ENTIRE HUMAN RACE FOR ALL OF THE MONEY IN THE WORLD?” How would someone go about suing the “entire” human race for all of the money in the world? Is such a cause of action possible? Where could someone sue? Who would we sue? What parties would be named? How would we establish damages? These are the same questions that must be asked and answered before even a simple Civil Racketeering sue can be brought against a single party. This is how I would answer the question. We sue in the Hague with a “class” action lawsuit, under a legal theory that the all the governments in the world that are party of the treaty that gives the International Court in the Hague Jurisdiction over “crimes against humanity suits” have at time throughout their history committed “crimes against humanity” crimes against their own populations. Some type of compensation should be provided to the descendants of victims of crimes against humanity. In the case of slavery for example we demand consideration for the coerced and uncompensated labor their ancestors performed over several centuries. We demand compensation from the governments for their crimes against humanity equal to all the money in the world, and of course we would be willing to settle the case for ½ of what we are asking for. After we got our judgment from the International Court in the Hague, we would then go after all of the governments that are not part of the International Treaty that gives the Court in the Hague their jurisdiction, like the U.S. And others. We may not end up with all the money in the world but we would be happy with 10% of all the money in the world. After all we do not want to be accused of being greedy! CommentsOascar 03/04/2010 11:45pm
All the money in the world can't buy happness, but suing can E 03/04/2010 11:48pm
Mr. Stoller... MR. TRADEMARK 03/05/2010 1:30am
Unfortunately no one can claim trademark rights to the letter E in the manor that you are claiming rights. No one can own a "letter" in the alphabet which is used in a “descriptive” manner as you claim to own the letter E. No court would sustain a trademark infringement action that you might bring to stop me or any other party from using the letter “E” in a descriptive, generic manner. However, if you wanted to retain my consulting services, I would be able to help you obtain trademark able rights in and to the mark “E” which a court would acknowledge. Until that time I will respectfully decline your licensing offer and I will continue to use the letter E. Cease and Desist 03/06/2010 8:53pm
Mr. Stoller, not only are you infringing upon the letter "E" trademark, but you are infringing my exclusive rights to the "vexatious litigant" brand. It has come to my attention that a slew of courts have identified you as a "vexatious litigant." This must stop immediately. Please confirm or else I will sue you. hi 03/06/2010 8:54pm
hi. iyrhjbkhik 03/06/2010 8:55pm
:P NARF 03/06/2010 8:56pm
NARF to you. NARF 03/06/2010 8:58pm
You're so stupid you don't even realize that every comment you post is highlighted in blue. :P Hurts so good 03/07/2010 2:12am
Please sue me, save me a "filing" fee. I'll open a file and I wave service of summons. Then prepare yourself for my counter claim(s) Leave a Reply | Author
Help the Equal Justice Party support conservative candidates. Contribute today! ArchivesOctober 2011 Categories |
RSS Feed