Leo Stoller

 

LONDON-(AEAE)-THE AMERICANS FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF ATTORNEY ETHICS (AEAE) IS PREPARING TO OFFER ITS MEMBERS DISCOUNTED FLIGHTS AND CRUSES TO ENGLAND FOR THE 2012 LONDON OLYMPICS. AEAE was able to obtain an early list of New Rules of etiquette that the London National Tourism Agency will release next week. The following partial list of “New” Rules that have the Force of Law are designed to help create a “warm” welcome for visitors ahead of the 2010 London Olympics.

• Avoid saying “thank you” to a Chinese compliment. Instead, politely deny the compliment to show humility.
• Never call a Canadian an American. Canadians take offense at being mistaken for U.S. Citizens. Call them Canucks.
• Never imply that people from Poland drink excessively, despite the well known stereotype.
• Avoid winking at someone from Hong Kong, because it’s considered rude. Stick you tongue out instead which is not considered offensive, but a show of affection.
• Do not try to help a Japanese person cross a street, they can see out of those eyes.
• Remember a smiling Japanese person is not necessarily happy; they tend to smile when angry, embarrassed or disappointed. And do not remind them of World War II, or what happened to Nagasaki or Hiroshima.
• Do not forget that the cold war is over. Treat Russians with respect. But report any Russian that is seen near a military instillation.
• Remember to treat each Arab with respect too. They are not “all” terrorist, except those that may have something in their hands or look like they have a bulged under their shirt.
• It rumored that Osama Ben Laden may visit the 2012 London Olympics. If anyone see him or anyone looks like him please report it to the authorities
• Never call a Chinese person a “Goog!”
• Remember the American Revolution “Never” took place. We still own America. Please do not refer to Barak Obama as a Schvartze.
• Anyone who knowingly violates these etiquette rules is subject to a 500 pound fine and 6 month sentence to clean the tower of London and it has not been cleaned for Centuries. GOD SAVE THE QUEEN       

  CHICAGO-(AEAE)-TODAY ILLINOIS JUDGE CHARLES WRINKLER SET A BRIEFING SCHEDULE IN THE FAMOUS WELLS FARGO BANK CIVIL RACKETERRING LAWSUIT. Wells Fargo Bank, the Chairman Richard M. Kovacevich, President John G. Stumpf, Bank of America, Illinois attorney Ira T. Nevel, the Law firms of Pierce & Associates and the well known 1000 man of Bryan Cave LLP. Senior partner Steven R. Smith and his “bag man” Michael Werich along with the American Security Insurance Co have all been named in this 100 million dollar Civil fraud lawsuit.
The famous Illinois distinguished Jurist Charles R. Wrinkler is presiding. Judge Wrinkler has one of the finest reputations for issuing decisions on the facts and the merits of cases in the Chicago Cook County Court System. Judge Wrinkler is highly rated by the American Bar Association and the Chicago Bar Association. None of the parties would comment on the pending litigation

  CHICAGO-(AEAE)-HIGH SPORT IN ILLINOIS IS FOR THE GOVERNMENT TO GO AFTER GOVERNERS. Four Illinois Governors have in modern times been convicted. Former Governor Rod Blagojevich has been on trial for the last 8 weeks for attempting to sell the former senate seat of Barak Obama. The Government has not been able to demonstrate one crime that Blagojevich actually committed, other than not to properly comb his hair. Prediction-Blago found not guilty on all charges. Click on the link for the “rest of this story”
Blagojevich jury agrees on 2 counts

CHICAGO-(AEAE) SEVERAL DEFENDANTS IN A MAJOR MORTGAGE FRAUD, RICO LAW SUIT THAT HAS BEEN WRITTEN ON THIS BLOG HAS AGREED TO ROLL OVER ON THE OTHER DEFENDANTS. Without giving away any of the important details, the first real break in the Chicago Civil Racketeering law suit against several banks and numerous attorneys, several of the defendants have agreed to now testify against the other defendants in exchange for being dismissed out  of the litigation. Normally defendants in criminal cases accept a plea, a reduced sentence in exchange for testifying against the main defendant that the government wants to nail. In the instant case,  several defendant that has been charged agreed to testify in order to accept a release from the litigation. It will be just a matter of time before the main defendants are found guilty of the major allegations in Stoller's complaint. Stay tuned. The main defendants in this case are worth over 2 trillion dollars!  If there are any other defendants who would like to settle in exchange for testimony against the others. Stoller will make you an offer that "you can refuse!" Email Ldms4@hotmail.com  or call Stoller at 312-5445-4554 for a confidential discussion.
SIDEBAR: I was in the Chicago, Illinois Cook County Court house, the Daley Center today. I was filing some pleadings as I do every day, for many years. I was standing next to the self filing stamping device. When a clerk approached me. She looked at some of my pleadings, as I was stamping them, and throwing them into a box.
She said, "Are you the Plaintiff?"
I said, "Yes."
 She said, "YOU'RE LEO STOLLER!"
 I said,"Yes I am Leo Stoller."
 She looked shocked, staired at me for a minute, than walked away. When the Clerk said my name it sounded more like she was talking about a "brand" rather than a real person's name. As if the name LEO STOLLER  was really a "brand" rather than the name of a live person.

HENDERSON, NEVADA-(AEAE)-THE LAW FIRM OF MILES BAUER BERGSTROM & WINTERS LLP along with each and evey attorney in the firm,  
D. Miles, J. Bergstrom, R. Bauer, F. Winter, K. McClenahan, M.Domeyer ,T. Crosby, L. Jaquez, D. Carter, G. Corena, W. Rash, R. Jung, V. Pham, K. Nielson, M. Braun, H. Seyed-Ali, R. Nguyen, J. Garabedian, T. Morlan, K. Webb, B. Tran, A. Ghajar, C. Jones, and M. Seebach, were charged with Civil Racketerring, fraud conspiracy today individually and in their office capacity.
 LEGAL DISCLAIMER: All of the above attorneys are considered innoicent until proven guilty beyond a resonable doubt.

CHICAGO-(AEAE)-It may have been the result of some crafty legal maneuvering by the now-retired Wachtell partner Peter McKenna, or it may have simply been part of his tempestuous marriage to a "European Playmate" nearly 30 years his junior. Whatever the reason, McKenna has thwarted a second bid by his ex-wife to invalidate a prenuptial agreement and collect a share of the $1 million-plus in annual retirement payments that he receives from the firm Wachtell Retiree's 'Playmate' Not Entitled to Share in Pension

  CHICAGO-(AEAE)- A 14 YEAR OLD DUTCH GIRL LAURA DEKKER is attempting to sail around the world. This is a criminal for parents to permit a minor child such as this girl to attempt to sail around the world. They should be charged with “child abuse”! In June the 16 year old American Girl Abby Sunderland has to be rescued in a remote section of the Indian Ocean during an attempt to circle the globe by herself. Parents of these teenagers should be charged with criminal child abuse for permitting their minor children to take the unnecessary risk of attempting to sail around the world alone in a boat. When Barak Obama and his wife Michelle were asked about letting their daughters, Malia 10 and Sasha 7 attempt to sail around the world alone, Obama replied, “I see nothing wrong with allowing my children to attempt to sail around the world alone if they wanted to do that.” Michelle Obama said, “Sasha is 7 going on 21!”

  WASHINGTON-(AEAE)-By a 63-37 vote the Senate confirmed Kagan to the U.S Supreme Court. 58 Democrats including five Republicans voted for Kagan. Justice Kagan is not expected to shift the court's ideological makeup because she succeeded the liberal justice, John Paul Stevens. Now for the first time there are three women on the U.S. Supreme Court, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor. The Kagan was a polarizing nomination. The out come was preordained in view of the Democratic majority in the Senate. President Obama Introduces New SCOTUS Justice Elena Kagan
It will behoove you to pay attention to this blog which will cover the important cases that the Supreme Court has agreed to hear. VIOLENT VIDEO GAMES -Whether a California law barring the sale and rental of violent video games to minors violates constitution-free speech rights. ANIT-GAY PROTESTS AT MILITARY FUNERALS- Whether constitutional free speech rights protects anti-gay protests by members of a Kansas church at funerals for U.S. Military members killed in Iraq. BUSINESS IMMGRATION LAW IN ARIZONA- Whether business civil rights and immigration groups can succeed in their legal challenge to a Arizona law that punishes employers who knowingly hire illegal immigrants. Keeping tabs on the U.S Supreme Court you can stay right here.
 The U.S Supreme Court is also considering three Stoller Petitions for Writ of Cert this up coming term. Leo Stoller is an expert on U.S. Supreme Court practice. The model of AEAE is clearly, “Until the last court speaks!”

SIDEBAR- I filed an appeal with the Illinois Appellate Court Second Division. A clerk in returning a stamped copy of my notice of appeal she wrote, “The court does not have jurisdiction, there is no 304 language!” 
I wanted to write her back or call her to inform her that the only way I can get to the High Court is for me to go through them. Let them find that that the Illinois Appellate court had not jurisdiction because some trial court judge did not allow 304 language, what a joke that is. We will see what the Illinois Supreme Court says about that and what the U.S. Supreme Court says about the Illinois Appellate court violating the due process rights of a Appellant because some trial court did not include 304 language in a final order. For the record it costs about a million dollars to get to the U.S. Supreme. 99% of all lawyers in America do not have the skill level to file a Appeal with the U.S. Supreme Court. Stoller has been there 25 times and counting. http://www.filefront.com/17177730/July-30-2010-Supreme-Court-Order0001.jpg/ 
http://www.filefront.com/17149297/Supreme    http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/10-119.htm
For the students of law remember it is not so important what any trial court judge rules, they violate the constitutional rights of the parties in front of them each time they open their mouths, the important thing to remember is always to make your record for appeal.

WASHINGTON-(AEAE)-JUSTICE STEPHEN BREYER GRANTED STOLLER'S MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI. Stoller filed a mandamus action against the Illinois Appellate Court with the Illinois Supreme Court. The Illinois Appellate Court deprived Stoller of his due process by refusing to hear several divorce appeals. Stoller sued the Illinois Appellate Court First division before the Illinois Supreme Court by way of a mandamus action. Stoller has appealed the Illinois Supreme Court decision directly to the U.S. Supreme Court. Stoller already has a pending fully briefed Writ of Certiorari pending before the U.S. Supreme Court in the Stoller v. the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals case. Leo Stoller is an Appellate Court Expert especially trained in the Rules of the U.S. Supreme Court.

The model of AEAE is “Until the last court speaks!” Stoller takes every case to the High Court because it is only when the U.S. Supreme Court Rules that counts, every other decision by every other court is meaningless! Copy of Judge Breyer's order  http://www.filefront.com/17177730/July-30-2010-Supreme-Court-Order0001.jpg/

BARRINGTON, ILLINOIS (AEAE) TODAY IS THE HEARING THE MARY T. GRIFFIN DIRECT CRIMINAL CONTEMPT CHARGE. Attorney Griffin according to the charge filed for a false lien to be place on an asset. In Iliniois the filing for a false lien is a disbarable offense. Lawyers attempt to file liens against any asset they think will help them collect a debt. However when a lawyer knowingly files a "false" lien that can me the end of the line for that attorney's practice of law.
Legal disclaimer: Mary T. Griffin is considered inocient until proven guilty.
In a Chicago case yesterday, an appeal was filed for an Order that Illinois Chancery Judge Mary Ann Mason issued. Dispite the fact that three motions for substitution for cause were filed to disqualify Judge Mary Ann Mason, which are on appeal. Judge Mason refused to suspend the proceeding pending the appeal and issued an order which was espected and was appealed.