SIDEBAR: 9:30am
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-ILLINOIS CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE CHARLES WRINKLER ENTERED AN EXPARTE ORDER which a Motion for Reconsideration has been filed. A motion for substitution of Judge Charles Wrinkler was denied earlier in the proceeding. Even though a Motion for an Extension of Time was pending before the court, Judge Wrinkler issued an ex parte order disregarding the Pending Motion for an Extension of time. Attorney Michael Werich was the only attorney present. SIDEBAR: 9:30am
0 Comments
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-BEFORE THE 2008 acquisition of Countrywide Financial Corp. Bank of America was a modest player in the mortgage servicing industry. After the take over BofA was servicing 14 million loans from four million loans. Now 85% of banks 1.3 million mortgage customer now are at least 60 days behind on their payments. Investors like Western Asset Management Co., Federal Reserve Bank of New York , Neuberger Berman Group LLC, Alliance Se's Pacific Investment are sounding like they would like to force Bank of America into Bankruptcy. Bank of America iv being investigated by all 50 State Attorney Generals for Mortgage fraud, deceptive trade practices. Bof A is being sued in Chicago for Civil Racketeering, fraud, conspiracy along with its attorneys Bryan Cave LLC, Senior partner Steven R, Smith and his “bag man” Associate Attorney Michael Werich. LOOK AT STOLLER'S NEWEST BOOKS http://www.lulu.com/product/paperback/legal-manual-for-the-pro-se-litigant/14001302 Leo Stoller is the nations top Intellectually property AND MALICIOUS PROSECUTION expert witness that will help you win you’re infringement at the trial level contact him at Ldms4@hotmail.com Stoller is also the author a new book Juice for Peanut By Leo This is your new blog post. Click here and start typing, or drag in elements from the top bar.
CHICAGO-(AEAE) The Federal Circuit's unanimous panel ruling in Stauffer v. Brooks Brothers Inc. reversed a Southern District of New York decision that Raymond Stauffer, a pro se litigant and patent attorney in Chatham, N.J., did not have standing to sue Brooks Brothers for making adjustable bow ties that are marked with expired patent numbers. Frisbee maker Wham-O Inc. is mounting a constitutional challenge in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit to a statute that allows whistleblowers to sue companies for falsely labeling their products as covered by patents. Wham-O's notice claims the false marking statute violates the constitution's "take care" clause, which calls for the president to "take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed." SIDEBAR-The law allows parties to make good faith arguments to over turn bad law. In this case I don’t think that the “take care” clause will fly. Click on the following link TO LOOK AT STOLLER'S NEWEST BOOKS http://www.lulu.com/product/paperback/legal-manual-for-the-pro-se-litigant/14001302 Leo Stoller is the nations top Intellectually property AND MALICIOUS PROSECUTION expert witness that will help you win you’re infringement at the trial level contact him at Ldms4@hotmail.com Stoller is also the author a new book Juice for Peanut By Leo Stoller View this Author's Spotlight CHICAGO-(AEAE)-LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS VIOLATE THE LAW EVERY DAY WHEN THEY ARE FALSELY ARRESTING AND INCARCERATING INNONCIENT CITIZENS UNDER THE FALSE ASSUMPTION THAT THEY HAVE ABSOLUTE AND/OR QUALIFIED IMMUNITY FROM THEIR UNLAWFUL ACTS. The defense of qualified immunity attempts to protects "government officials . . . from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.” "Therefore, regardless of whether the constitutional violation occurred, the officer should prevail if the right asserted by the plaintiff was not `clearly established' or the officer could have reasonably believed that his particular conduct was lawful." The qualified immunity test requires a two-part analysis: "(1) Was the law governing the official's conduct clearly established? (2) Under that law, could a reasonable officer have believed the conduct was lawful?" Officers are not immune from suit even if they "could have reasonably believed that his particular conduct was lawful." The law does not protect “stupid” cops! Click on the following link TO LOOK AT STOLLER'S NEWEST BOOKS http://www.lulu.com/product/paperback/legal-manual-for-the-pro-se-litigant/14001302 Leo Stoller is the nations top Intellectually property AND MALICIOUS PROSECUTION expert witness that will help you win you’re infringement at the trial level contact him at Ldms4@hotmail.com Stoller is also the author a new book Juice for Peanut By Leo Stoller View this Author's Spotlight CHICAGO-(AEAE)-DARK STAR PRESS HAS JUST RELEASED STOLLER'S LATEST BOOK A Legal Manual for the Pro Se (Self represented) person to help him navigate the U.S. Legal System form the simple filing of a law suit in a State Court, to appealing all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court by one's own self saving thousands of dollars from having to be represented by an attorney when it is not possible . Click on the following link http://www.lulu.com/product/paperback/legal-manual-for-the-pro-se-litigant/14001302 Leo Stoller is the nations top Intellectually property expert witness that will help you win you’re infringement at the trial level contact him at Ldms4@hotmail.com Stoller is also the author a new book Juice for Peanut By Leo Stoller View this Author's Spotlight CHICAGO-(AEAE)-THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT HAS AGREED TO HEAR MICROSOFTS APPEAL OF WHAT THEY CLAIM IS THE LARGEST PATENT VERDICT EVER LEVED AGAINST A COMPANY FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT. The judgment springs from the fact that Microsoft was found guilty of infringing upon another’s company software patent effecting Microsoft’s popular Word software. Microsoft is crying foul because they claim that their opponents patent should have been invalidated because it was “obvious”. However, the Federal Circuit Court of appeals disagreed and affirmed the $300 million dollar judgment. Microsoft in reality did not have a qualified intellectual property expert explain properly to the jury in terms that they could understand. This is the most common reason why Intellectually property suits are won or lost, based upon expert testimony or lack of creditable testimony. Click here for the full story After Amicus Flood, Justices Take Up Microsoft Patent Case Leo Stoller is the nations top Intellectually property expert witness that will help you win you’re infringement at the trial level contact him at Ldms4@hotmail.com Stoller is also the author a new book Juice for Peanut By Leo Stoller View this Author's Spotlight United States Supreme Court Rule: 44.2 Chicago-(AEAE)-The petition shall be presented together with certification of counsel (or of a party unrepresented by counsel) that it is restricted to the grounds specified in this paragraph and that it is presented in good faith and not for delay; one copy of the certificate shall bear the signature of counsel (or of a party unrepresented by counsel). The certificate shall be bound with each copy of the petition. The Clerk will not file a petition without a certificate. The petition is not subject to oral argument. Leo Stoller is a U.S. Supreme Court Expert on Procedure. Leo Stoller is the nations top Intellectually property expert witness that will help you win you’re infringement at the trial level contact him at Ldms4@hotmail.com Stoller is also the author a new book Juice for Peanut By Leo Stoller View this Author's Spotlight HOLLYWOOD-(AEAE)-THE INK IS NOT YET DRY ON SPEILBERG' DEAL TO MAKE A MOVE OUT OF LEO STOLLER NEW BOOK "JUICE FOR PEANUTS". A prison diary account of a false arrest, false imprisionment and violation of Civil rights and the law suit that resulted. According to a close associate of Speilberg, he has been looking for the right false imprisonment story to produce a film for some time. He believes he may have found it in Stoller's new book Juice for Peanuts.
Although Stoller had previously sued Spielberg in the 90's over the trademark Havoc that appears to be no bar from Spielbergs current decision.Juice for Peanut By Leo Stoller View this Author's Spotlight CHICAGO-(AEAE)-ILLINOIS COOK COUNTY JUDGE GERALD C. BENDER PASSED AWAY ON NOVEMBER 28, 2010. Judge Bender was 73 years old. He was put on the bench
in 1996 '' Co-founder Jewish Judges Association. Past President of Decalogue Society of Lawyers. Personal attorney for Simon Weisenthal. Vice-President of Holocaust Memorial Foundation of Illinois. Village of Lincolnwood Trustee ' ' One old time Chicago Divorce Lawyers said, "Judge Bender really valued "friendship". He was an "Old School" Cook County Judge, you won't find many of his kind left, he will be missed, especially by me." http://legacy.suntimes.com/obituaries/chicagosuntimes/obituary.aspx?n=gerald-bender&pid=146848763&fhid=202 By Leo Stoller View this Author's Spotlight |
EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
|