This story continues please click on this link http://www.rentamark.net/3/post/2010/01/aeae-and-the-equal-justice-party-endorces-illinois-attorney-general-lisa-madigan-for-re-election-in-2010.html
CHICAGO-(AEAE)- IT IS ESTIMATED THAT THERE WILL BE OVER 3 MILLION PROPERTY OWNERS FORCLOSURED ON THIS YEAR, LOSING THEIR PROPERTIES TO PREDITORY LENDERS. This is the worst foreclosure crisis since the great depression. The “bottom” feeders, Plaintiff Foreclosure attorneys, auctioneers, and companies like Bank of America's Reconstruct Company that deals in for closured properties are getting rich at the expense of the uninformed property owner victims. Attorney Generals throughout the United States have sued CountryWide Financial, Wells Fargo Bank, and other lenders. The complaint's brought by the State Attorney Generals evidence that these banks have engaged in deceptive trade practices, fraud and deceptive business practices violated Human Rights, violated Civil Racketeering Act. See the attached Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan complaint(s) filed against Wells Fargo Bank The People of the State of Illinois v. Wells Fargo and Company Illinois Chancery Case No. 09CH2634 http://www.filefront.com/15400587/WELLS%20AG%20COMPLAINT_07-31-2009.pdf People of the State of Illinois v. Countrywide Bank http://www.filefront.com/15400721/countrywide_complaint.pdf If what is true in these complaints against these banks is true, these banks in the Opinion of AEAE have and are engaging in the biggest consumer robbery in the history of this country dwarfing all of the bank robberies that ever have occurred since time immortal. The Banks have finally turned the tables and become the criminals. If only 5% of the foreclosure victims were to sue these banks based on complaints modeled after the two attached here, the foreclosure problem would be mitigated. Otherwise millions of American home owners will just become the banks “road” kill. The Banks have been tired of being robbed by the consumers since the beginning of time. Now its time for Banks to reek their revenge on the consumers, what we are seeing as millions of American consumers have their homes stolen from them. A Hollywood movie entitled “The Banks Revenge” with this plot would have been rejected as unbelievable a few years ago. Fortunately the Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan are on to the “Banks” fraud on the consumer and is doing something about it. That is why AEAE recommends Lisa Madigan for re-election in 2010. If any consumers would like to join a "class action" lawsuit against Bank of america and Well Fargo Bank please email Ldms4@hotmail.com This story continues please click on this link http://www.rentamark.net/3/post/2010/01/aeae-and-the-equal-justice-party-endorces-illinois-attorney-general-lisa-madigan-for-re-election-in-2010.html
7 Comments
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-A CRIMINAL CONTEMPT SUMMONS WAS ISSUED AGAINST THE CHICAGO LAW FIRM OF GORDON AND REES, ATTORNEYS RYAN T. BROWN, CHANCE L. COOPER AND HAYNES RYAN ON October 27, 2009. Click of the link to see a copy of the complaint. Up until today, Jan. 20, 2010 only Attorney Haynes Ryan accepted service of summons of the criminal contempt citation and he has filed a Motion to dismiss Stoller Indirect Criminal Contempt Complaint. Stoller has responded. Click on link to see Stoller's response. From October 09 until January 19, 2010 Gordon and Rees attorneys Ryan T. Brown and Chance L. Cooper have refused to accept and/or wave service of summons. The Process Server finally penetrated the Gordon and Rees locked Chicago Office door, got inside and made his service of process on the said respondents. http://www.filefront.com/14756757/Lance-G.-Johnson-Charged-with-perjury0001.pdf of There next court hearing in Chicago Illinois is January 26, 2010 on the Criminal Contempt. http://www.filefront.com/15157881/Dec-15-2009-Order0001.pdf/ Stoller response to Haynes Ryan attempt to strike Stoller's Criminal Contempt petition. http://www.filefront.com/15191477/responsetomotiontostrike_doc.pdf LEGAL DISCLAIMER: Haynes ryan, ryan brown, chance Cooper, Lance G. Johnson, David Abrams and Alfred Goodman are considered innocient until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of all charges. Even attorneys can only “run” from the law only so long, but eventually everyone gets nabs. Recently a An Indiana doctor Dec 18, 2009 accused of fraud and malpractice in the United States has been arrested while hiding on a mountain near a glacier in Italy ...Fugitive American Doctor (PHOTO & VIDEO) Arrested in Italy Doctor's long run ends on mountain - Mark Weinberger Gossip SIDE BAR: Stoller's Process Servers fanned accross the City of Chicago and served 15 different parties with service of process including the Gordon and Rees attorneys CHICAGO-(AEAE) TUESDAY WAS BUSY, STOLLER HAD SEVERAL HEARINGS. THE JUDGE IN ONE AGREED TO SEND OUT THE CASE TO ANOTHER JUDGE FOR DETERMINATION OF DISQUALIFICATION. Lance G. Johnson Esq., was a no show in his "criminal" contempt proceeding in Cook County on Tuesday. The case was continued until Jan. 26, 2010. Today within a few hours there will be another contested hearing which has required a lot of preparation. Tonight everyone will know what happened. Today Stoller's process server will serve 10 summons. Will post the pictures of the parties being served in that without the photographs, lawyers have a tendency to "deny" they were served ie the Lance G. Johnson crowd www.roylance.com SIDEBAR-So you though that I was up all night preparing for just one hearing today, huh, think again. We were preparing for a service of summons"blitzkrieg!" Last night was a "year" in the making! I expect another major "blitzkrieg" within the next 3 weeks, after all "spring" is coming, the flowers with be blooming and the filings have to be made before the statutes of limitations runs out! CHICAGO-(AEAE)- Today's posting involves the case law and argument that will force a “Apex” deponent ( the deposition of a CEO, President and/or Chairman of the Board) to appear and testify at a deposition despite the fact that the “CEO” claims that he is “too busy” and “has no knowledge” of the matter. Stoller once noticed Steven Spielberg while he was shooting the last Indian Jones movie for a deposition. Spielberg claimed he was “too busy”. Recently the Northern District of Illinois U.S. Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Cole denied a company's motion for a protective order, rejecting the defendant's assertions that the CEO had no personal knowledge of the claim and was ''too busy'' to give a deposition. Johnson v. Jung, 242 F.R.D. 481 (N.D. Ill. 2007). In that case the attorneys for the Defendant moved for a protective order barring a President's deposition. In support, the President of the large corporation submitted an affidavit asserting two grounds as good cause for a protective order: • He ''had no personal involvement'' with the claims in the suit. • He was too busy to sit for a deposition because he travels In considering the motion, Judge Cole began by reviewing the test for a protective order: ''Contrary to the common law's sporting theory of justice, 6 Wigmore, Discovery, section 1845 at 490 (3d ed. 1940), the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provide for liberal discovery. Under Rule 26(b)(1), 'Parties may obtain discovery regarding any matter, not privileged, that is relevant to the claim or defense of any party.' As expansive as the definition of relevancy is under Rule 401 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, U.S. v. Murzyn, 631 F.2d 525, 529 (7th Cir. 1980), the standard under the discovery provisions of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is even broader. '''The burden to show good cause is on the party seeking the protective order. Jepson Inc. v. Makita Electric Works Ltd., 30 F.3d 854, 858 (7th Cir. 1994). Conclusory statements of hardship are not sufficient to carry this burden. Noting the President,s claim of having ''no personal involvement'' in the matter is not the equivalent of having ''no information'' about the claim. The test under the Rules is not whether a putative deponent had personal involvement in an event. .Personal involvement' is not a prerequisite to the deposition of a corporate officer. A deposition of an officer of a corporation is not prohibited merely because the witness denies 'personal participation' in the matters involved in the litigation. No corporate officer is immunizes from discovery by virtue of that status or their travel schedules. See 8 Wright, Miller and Marcus, Federal Practice and Procedure: Civil 2d, section 2037 at 500-502.'' The bottom line that a Plaintiff does not have to drag that corporate officer into a deposition the court will order it when a motion to compell is filed. Corporate officers naturally resist depositions, like Dracula resists the cross, because one wrong word and they get charged with perjury and can lose their multi million dollar job. THE BANK OF AMERICA ACHILLES HEAL IN FENDING OFF FORCLOSURE IS THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 8021/19/2010 CHICAGO-(AEAE)-THERE DOES NOT HAVE TO BE 3 to 5 million foreclosures this year. Many of them are unlawful. However disadvantaged home owners who find themselves losing their homes do not know or realize that they are the victims of predatory lenders like Countrywide Financial who has been sued by the Illinois, California, Indiana and a number of other State Attorney Generals for predatory lending. See postings below. The Bank of America (BA) that owns Countrywide is in the business of profiting from the alleged deceptive trade practices that Countrywide and BA engage in by making deceptive loans to property owners who are then forced into foreclosure. After which Bank of America's other company Reconstruct Company swoops in like a scavenger and re-sells the foreclosured property to third parties. Thus Bank of America makes money on the predatory lending practices, drives the home owners into foreclosure and then profits from the re-sale through their Reconstruct Company in what clearly appears to be a Civil Racketeering scheme according to charges in a RICO lawsuit. The Achilles heal of Banks is the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Section 802 which was passed in 2002 as a result of the corporate scandals Enron etc. In addition the Banks lawyers go down also for their failure to report to the Security and Exchange Commission the “sins” of their masters. In order to fend off these unlawful foreclosures the parties must file Civil Racketeering lawsuits against these banks and their officers modeled after the Attorney General lawsuits. If every party who was being foreclosured upon filed Rico Actions it would solve the foreclosure crisis. Otherwise, everyone's real estate is going to be depreciated by an additional 25 to 50% within the next year. SIDEBAR: I wouldn't make fun of any party who is attempting to save their property by suing a predatory lendor. Unless you are of course a “fat” cat banker who took huge bonus on the backs of Americans Tax payers who bailed the bankers out. Then you can “laugh all the way to the Bank!” CHICAGO-(AEAE)-THE AMERICANS FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF ATTORNEY ETHICS (AEAE) an attorney ethics watch dog group head quartered in Chicago, Illinois since 1974 along with the Illinois Equal Justice Party (EJP) endorses Attorney General Lisa Madgian for re-election as Illinois Attorney General in 2010. The Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan is trying to help the Illinois home owners stay in their properties by suing Countrywide Financial, the troubled mortgage lender, contending that the company and its executives defrauded borrowers in the state by selling them costly and defective loans that quickly went into foreclosure http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/25/business/25mortgage.html . Countrywide Financial was also accused of using misleading advertising and other unfair business practices to trick borrowers into taking on risky home loans they didn't fully understand in a lawsuit filed by Jerry Brown the California attorney general office. http://cbs2.com/local/Countrywide.Financial.Jerry.2.756778.html Washington Gov. Chris Gregoire made her state the third to go after Countrywide Financial, announcing plans to fine Countrywide $1 million, force the company to pay $5 million in back assessments, and revoke its license to do business in the state. http://www.builderonline.com/mortgages-and-banking/illinois-california-sue-countrywide.aspx Yet Bank of America owners of Countrywide Financial make the claim in a Chicago lawsuit recently filed that Countrywide is innocient of all charges. Lisa Madigan also filed a lawsuit in Cook County Court against Wells Fargo Home Mortage.http://www.illinoisattorneygeneral.gov/pressroom/2009_07/20090731.html CHICAGO-(AEAE)-NOTICES for depositions of BANK OF AMERICA former CEO Kenneth D. Lewis, Chairman, Walter E. Massey and CFO Joe L. Price and Subpoenas issued to Defense Counsel have met with a motion for a Protective Order and Request to Quash Subpoenas, asserting that the request was an “effort to harass”. “Furthermore, deposing opposing counsel is a harassing technique to impose additional costs and burdens upon Defendants." Because of the broad scope of discovery in civil litigation, "it is exceedingly difficult to demonstrate an appropriate basis for an order barring the taking of a deposition." Naftchi v. New Fort Medical Center, etal., 172 F.R.D. 130 (S.D.NY 1997) citing, 8 Charles Alan Wright, Arthur R. Miller & Richard L. Marcus, Federal Practice and Procedure.-Civil 2D section 2037, at 494-95 (1994)(hereinafter "Wright"). "Nor, in ordinary circumstances, does it matter that the proposed witness is a busy person or professes lack of knowledge of the matters at issue, as the party seeking the discovery is entitled to test the asserted lack of knowledge." SEE YOU IN COURT 'boys" CHICAGO-(AEAE)-AMERICANS ARE FURIOUS AND HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ABOUT THE HEFTY BONUSES BANKS PAID OUT AFTER GETTING BILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN FEDERAL HELP, THE COMISSIONER TOLD THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE FOUR MAJOR BANKS YESTERDAY. In a lawsuit being filed in Chicago the officers of Bank of America including Brian Moynihan the CEO are charged with fraud, and Civil Racketerring as it relates to a "scheme" involving giving mortagages and then forclosing in the parties who were deceived. If any parties who would like to join this "class" action lawsuit please email Ldms4@hotmail.com LEGAL DISCLAIMER: BRIAN MOYNIHAN IS CONSIDERED INNOCIENT OF FRAUD AND CIVIL RACKETERRING UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT. CHICAGO-(AEAE) The California Attorney General and the Illinois Attorney General have sued http://www.illinoisattorneygeneral.gov/pressroom/2008_06/20080625.html Countrywide Financial which is now owned by Bank of America for using misleading advertising and other unfair business practices to trick borrowers into taking risky home loans they didn't fully understand. The lawsuits alleged Countrywide engaged in "unfair and deceptive" practices to get homeowners to apply for risky mortgages far beyond their means. lawsuit alleging Countrywide engaged in "unfair and deceptive" practices to get homeowners to apply for risky mortgages far beyond their means. n the complaint filed in Los Angeles Superior Court, California Attorney General Jerry Brown asserts Countrywide violated the state's unfair business practices and false advertising laws with just about every action it took to market and originate some of the most popular -- and potentially risky -- types of home loans in recent years. The lawsuit alleges Countrywide obscured the potential risks in the loans, misled consumers about payment terms, prepayment penalties and other obligations, and told borrowers they would be able to refinance before the interest rate on their loans adjusted. Story continues http://cbs2.com/local/Countrywide.Financial.Jerry.2.756778.html LEGAL DISCLAIMER: WALTER E. MASSEY IS CONSIDERED INNOCIENT OF ALL CHARGES UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT. CHICAGO-(AEAE)-LEO STOLLER IS AN EXPERT ON U.S.SUPREME COURT PRACTICE. The Supreme Court of the United States has adopted a revised version of the Rules of the Court. The revision will take effect on February 16, 2010. To review a synopsios of the rule changes, click here When your law firm need the services of a U.S Supreme Court consultant and/or legal printer, please contact us 312-545-4554. Ldms4@hotmail.com Leo Stoller can make those tight deadlines a little easier to meet. Stoller customers choose to use our services because we have: Knowledge of the Court Rules,Excellent quality Prompt and courteous service |
EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
|