Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics

  • SUE THE BASTARDS
  • AEAE
  • AEJE
  • AEIPR
  • Rentamark
  • Archrive
  • PAGE 2
 

ANOTHER TRANSCRIPT OF HEARING WHERE ATTORNEY PETER VUCHA ATTEMPTS TO \"DODGE\" SERVICE

2/20/2010

16 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-STOLLER SUED ILLINOIS ATTORNEY PETER VUCHA. Mr. Vucha has spend two years "dodging" service of process, like the Lance G. Johnson crew. When lawyers are sued they attempt to avoid service of process like Dracula avoids the cross. A hearing was held before Illinois law division Judge Allen Goldberg the other day that is a must read click on the attached link http://www.filefront.com/15615815/Transcript.pdf to see all of the action.

16 Comments

OFFICIAL JANUARY 29, 2010 TRANSCRIPT OF ATTORNEY LANCE G. JOHNSON HEARING ON INDIRECT CRIMINAL CONTEMPT NOW POSTED HERE

2/19/2010

13 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-STOLLER HAD CHARGED WASHINGTON D.C. ATTORNEYS LANCE G. JOHNSON, DAVID ABRAMS, ALFRED GOODMAN AND their lawyers with Indirect Criminal Contempt. Click on to see a copy of the complaint  http://www.filefront.com/14756757/Lance-G.-Johnson-Charged-with-perjury0001.pdf  The next court hearing in Chicago Illinois was held on January 29, 2010 on the Criminal Contempt. See a copy of the official transcript http://www.filefront.com/15606995/1-29-%202010%20Johnson%20Contempt%20hearing%20Transcript.pdf  Stoller filed his notices of appeals on Friday January 29, 2010 and is confident that he will be able to reverse Judge Gillespie attached decision. Click on the attached link to down load a copy of Stoller's Notices of appeals and the Court Decision . Stoller filed his notices of appeals on Friday January 29, 2010 and is confident that he will be able to reverse Judge Gillespie attached decision. Click on the attached link to down load a copy of Stoller's Notices of appeals and the Court Decision http://www.filefront.com/15458281/Notice%20of%20Appeal0001.pdf.

13 Comments

ELMWOOD PARK RESIDENT JANE DOE “1” CHARGED WITH PERJURY, FALSE SWEARING BY A WITNESS ALONG WITH ARLINGTON PARK ATTORNEY “JANE DOE”

2/18/2010

3 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-AN ILLINOIS ELMWOOD PARK RESIDENT JANE DOE “1” is charged with perjury , false swearing by a witness 720 ILCS 5/32-2(a) a Class 3 Felony along with her attorney “Jane Doe “2” with subornation of perjury. A court order prevents the publication of their names on this blog. Charges are also being filed on Feb 16, 2010 against an Illinois Waconda Attorney John Doe “1” and an Chicago Attorney John doe “2”. The court order that bars the publication of their names is on Appeal with the Illinois Appellate Court. It is anticipated that the order will be found unconstitutional and vacated for violating the authors' First Amendment Rights. Stoller spend 37 days in the Illinois cook county Jail form June 8th, 2010 until July 15, 2010 for publishing “speech” on his Internet Blog in violation of Stoller's First Amendment rights. On February 25, 2009 Stoller was unlawfully incarcerated as a result of misrepresentations made in open court by his opponents. Stoller has been writing his Section 1983 Civil Right Lawsuit, False Arrest and False Imprisonment Case which must be filed be fore Feb 25, 2009 in Order to preserve his state claims.

SIDEBAR: Judges, prosecutors, attorneys and lying witnesses can successfully “lock” of anybody they choose. Our prisons are filled today with parties who have been falsely arrested and imprisoned, but these individuals do not have the knowledge, money or means to be able to seek lawful redress for the crime that has been and is being committed against. If every party who was unlawfully locked up was able to bring Section 1983 lawsuits are prisons would not have ½ of their current populations.

3 Comments

STOLLER ON FILING A WELL PLEAD MALICIOUS PROSECUTION SECTION 1983 LAWSUIT

2/17/2010

10 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-The attorney must make certain that he  has a good grasp of the law and facts supporting each theory of recovery. The law and facts being relied on should be well documented. While the nature and extent of research and investigation are irrelevant under the objective standard for probable cause, they are directly relevant to the issue of malice. Additionally, a lawyer who has conducted an investigation and research makes a much better impression on the judge and the jury, should malicious prosecue. While an attorney is entitled to rely to a significant degree upon the factual information provided by the client, factual disputes sometimes arise as to what information the client provided. It is therefore important to carefully document what information is being relied on. Doing so can also assist in properly evaluating the merits of the claim, and can provide protection in the event malicious prosecution litigation results.

10 Comments

AEAE COURT REPORTER OF THE YEAR SERENA-HAPPY VALENTINE\\\'S DAY BABY

2/16/2010

9 Comments

 
Picture
9 Comments

BRYAN CAVE LLP PARTNER STEVEN R. SMITH AND APPOCIATE MICHAEL WERICH CHARGED WITH PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT

2/15/2010

1 Comment

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-THE AMERICANS FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF ATTORNEY ETHICS, an attorney watch dog group since 1974, Executive Director has filed a professional misconduct complaint against BRYAN CAVE LLP, partner Steven R. Smith and Michael Werich for making misrepresentations of material fact and or law to a tribunal Illinois Supreme court Rule Violation 3.3(a), and for perjury and subornation of perjury.  Mr. Smith is charged with filing a "false" affidavit which was known to Mr. Werich at the time. A tape recording of a conversation of Mr. Smith which he has approved will establish that Mr. Smith affidavit was false according to the charge 
 Neither Simith or Werich would return phone calls.
LEGAL DISCLAIMER: Steven R. Smith and Michael Werich are considered  inocient of all professional misconduct charges until proven guilty beyond any reasonable doubt.

1 Comment

AEAE GIVES KUDOS TO FINKELSTEIN THOMPSON LLP ATTORNEY MILA F. BARTOS

2/14/2010

3 Comments

 
Picture


CHICAGO-(AEAE)-THE AMERICANS FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF ATTORNEY ETHICS (AEAE) an attorney ethics watch dog group since 1974, AWARDS KUDOS TO EXEMPLARY ATTORNEYS. This month AEAE recognizes Ms. Mila F. Bartos http://www.finkelsteinthompson.com/mbartos.php as an AEAE EXEMPLARY attorney. Ms Bartos sued Johnson & Johnson and Wal-Mart (Click on the attached link to see a copy of the complaint) http://www.filefront.com/15571045/amended%20class%20action%20johnson%20complaint.pdf on behalf of Erika Levinson and Maria Watkins in the District of New Jersey Case No 09-cv-3317 (DMC). In a Class action suit Ms. Bartos was sucessful in obtaining Class Action Status and over coming the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. See a copy of U.s. District Judge Dennis Cavanaugh recent decision http://www.filefront.com/15571065/Judge%20Cavanaugh%20Opinion%20Feb%202%2C%202010.pdf Ms. Mila F. Bartos firm has also sucessfully sued CountryWide Financial in a class action lawsuit. If you are a Countrywide mortgage customer or have previously submitted a mortgage application to Countrywide and wish to discuss your rights and interests in this matter, please contact Karen Marcus in Finkelstein's Washington, D.C. office at 202.337.8000 or by email at contact@finkelsteinthompson.com






3 Comments

US SUPREME COURT NOW REQUIRES Briefer Briefs

2/13/2010

0 Comments

 
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-STOLLER HAS AT LEAST 10 APPEALS CURRENTLY BEFORE THE US SUPREME COURT. 
New rules (pdf) adopted by the Court last month set took effect Feb. 16 . One of the changes will require lawyers to keep their reply briefs at the merits stage to 6,000 words instead of the previous limit of 7,500.
STOLLER appeals all of his cases until "the last court speaks". Question, how many of the 80,000 Chicago  lawyers know about the new U.S. Supreme Court Rules? One Hundred? Probably more like 50. Now you know the U.S. Supreme Court Rule Changes.Stoller is an expert on U.S. Supreme Court Practice Ldms4@hotmail.com
0 Comments

CLASSIC EXAMPLE OF BRILLIANT LAWYERING TAKES DOWN WALMART AND JOHNSON AND JOHNSON WITH A CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT-BANK AMERICA NEXT TARGET

2/13/2010

1 Comment

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-TALK ABOUT THE POWER OF BRILLIANT LAWYERING AND THE ABILITY OF GOOD ATTORNEYS TO TAKE TAKE DOWN A 100 BILLION DOLLAR OPPONENTS. One only has to look to the law firm of Finklestein Thompson LLP from Washington. These guys brought a Class Action Lawsuit against Johnson & Johnson and Walmart for guess what?
Johnson's Baby Shampoo “No more tears” and WalMart's “Tear less” Baby Wash. These children's personal care products are made by Johnson & Johnson. Who in this world would every have though that Johnson's “No More Tears” shampoo would give a party a great cause of action even greater a “Class action” lawsuit against Walmart and Johnson & Johnson. Finkelstein Thompson LLP smelled it out and nailed Walmart and Johnson with the following complaint click on this link. Finkelstein found that Johnson's shampoo were contaminated with formaldehyde or 1,4-dioxanne. Finkelstein stated in its complaint “These Children's Personal Care Products, which contain chemicals linked to cancer and skin allergies, are anything but safe and gentle product that Defendants claim they are. Despite the fact that Finkelstein were not able to show that any body was injured from these products they convinced New Jersey Judge Dennis Cavanaugh to allow their Class Action Lawsuit to proceed. Click on the attached link to view Judge Cavanaugh decision avanaugh recent decision http://www.filefront.com/15571065/Judge%20Cavanaugh%20Opinion%20Feb%202%2C%202010.pdf   Kudos to Finkelstein. On the other hand Stoller in his coming Class Action Lawsuit Bank of America and CountyWide Financial will be able to show that thousands of Illinois Citizens were damaged by these predatory lenders. See a copy of the lawsuit that Illinois Attorney General Brought against Countrywide. If there is anyone who would like to join Stoller calls action lawsuit against Bank of America Countrywide please email ldms4@hotmail.com

1 Comment

BRYAN CAVE LP ATTORNEY MICHAEL WERICH CHARGED WITH SUBORNATION OF PERJURY

2/12/2010

9 Comments

 
Picture
  CHICAGO-(AEAE)-THE INDIRECT CRIMINAL CONTEMPT PETITION FILED IN CHICAGO ILLINOIS DESCRIBES the nature of the charges against MICHAEL WERICH from the firm of Bryan Cave LP, http://www.bryancave.com/michaelwerich/ as subornation of perjury 720 ILCS 5/32-3(a), a Class 4 felony, and a criminal conspiracy to present false evidence in support of Defendants’ Response to Plaintiff’s Motion for Substitution of Judge. MICHAEL WERICH is charged with conspiracy . MICHAEL WERICH entered into a conspiracy with COUNTRYWIDE BANK N.A., BANK OF AMERICA, WALTER E. MASSEY, KENNETH D. LEWIS, JOE L. PRICE, RECONSTRUCT COMPANY, N.A., BRYAN CAVE LLP., STEVEN R. SMITH, MICHAEL WERICH, BRIAN MOYNIHAN, and JOHN DOES 1-10, in which all the parties agreed among themselves to aid and abet STEVEN R. SMITH in production of a false affidavit (CLICK ON THE LINK TO VIEW THE FALSE AFFIDAVIT http://www.filefront.com/15555423/scan0001.pdf
n support of Defendants’ Response to Plaintiff’s motion for Substitution of Judge. Michael Werich is senior partner Steven R. Smith's “bag man”.

LEGAL DISCLAIMER: MICHALE WERICH COUNTRYWIDE BANK N.A., BANK OF AMERICA, WALTER E. MASSEY, KENNETH D. LEWIS, JOE L. PRICE, RECONSTRUCT COMPANY, N.A., BRYAN CAVE LLP., STEVEN R. SMITH, MICHAEL WERICH, BRIAN MOYNIHAN, are considered innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt

Picture
9 Comments
<<Previous
Forward>>

    EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
    Internships not available now
    ​


     Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
    FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)
    ​
    YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
    Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
     The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
     Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that  supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
     The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a
    LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERT, valuations, expert
    witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert. 
    The author(s)  graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE  and attended the University of Iowa a  for a PHD. The Author(s)  are the nation's most renowned
    Legal Ethics experts  and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
    enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation  Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
    numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions.  AEAE, P.O.  Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email ldms4@hotmail.com
    312-545-4554
    Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE  Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
     "Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
    Litigation is the Air We Breathe
    Litigation is War,

    Welcome to the Front!"


     To Prove Defamation Case?
    What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm. 
    The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation 

    The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

    “[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30 
    AEAE argues it reports on the  law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

    ​AEAE has the legal  right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators,  business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE  18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

    VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

    DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.



    Archives

    September 2023
    July 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    July 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    October 2021
    July 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    April 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    June 2019
    April 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    January 2015
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010
    December 2009
    November 2009
    October 2009
    September 2009

    Categories
    Disclaimer This website is not a solicitation for business. All content on the AEAE website is intended to provide general information about AEAE and an opportunity for interested  persons to contact AEAE. The content of this website is not offered as legal advice or legal opinion and it should not be relied upon for any specific situation.  AEAE is not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney client relationship is intended.  This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a complete description of AEAE services. While AEAE endeavors to keep the information updated and correct, AEAE makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the information contained in this website. 

    All
    Jewelry Frauds
    Scams
    Yellow Diamonds

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.