Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics

  • SUE THE BASTARDS
  • AEAE
  • AEJE
  • AEIPR
  • Rentamark
  • Archrive
  • PAGE 2
 

AEAE HONORS RANEE DOMENZ, MEGAN FOX AND ANGELINN JOLIE FOR THEIR PHILANTHROPY

5/20/2010

0 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-THE AMERICANS FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF ATTORNEY EHTICS (AEAE)-honors actress RANEE DOMENZ for her philanthropy. It is rare that a famous actress gives back to the community in the form of philanthropy, as Ms. Domenz has. The AEAE PHILANTHROPY awards will be presented to Ranee Domenz, Megan Fox and  Angelinn Jolie at the next AEAE conference.

Picture
0 Comments

ANOTHER LAWYER SUSPENDED FROM THE PRACTICE OF LAW

5/20/2010

7 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-THE AMERICA FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF ATTORNEY ETHICS (AEAE) CHARGED WITH BRYAN CAVE LLP, STEVEN R. SMITH AND MICHAEL WERICH WITH PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT. In another story of attorneys who have been charged with attorney misconduct, the attorney accused of ignoring "multiple warning signs" of a $17 million fraud carried out by his former partner has been suspended from the practice of law for three years. Robert V. Fonte argued he had no reason to suspect that Anthony Bellettieri was manipulating the firm's escrow accounts, but a New York appeals court held Fonte shirked his ethical obligation to safeguard the accounts. The panel imposed a six-month suspension on Tara Anne Laundonio, a limited partner who also failed to monitor Bellettier. Click here to read more
Lawyers Suspended for Ignoring 'Warning Signs' of Partner's $17 Million Fraud


 

7 Comments

CHARGE BRYAN CAVE LLC RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISIQUALIFY ILLINOIS JUDGE MARY ANN MASON LOADED WITH MISREPRESENTATION OF MATERIAL FACT AND LAW

5/19/2010

2 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-STOLLER HAS MOVED “THREE” TIMES FOR THE DISQUALIFICATION OF ILLINOIS CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE MARY ANN MASON ON THE GROUNDS THAT SHE IS BIAS AND PREJUDICE AND STOLLER CANNOT GET A “FAIR” TRIAL IN FRONT OF HER. Yesterday Illinois Bryan Cave LLP, attorneys Steven R. Smith and his “bag man” Michael Werich have filed their usually 100+ page response which in Stoller's opinion is pack filled with misrepresentations of material fact and law in violation of Illinois Rules of Professional Misconduct Rule 3.3(a) www.iardc.org Stoller will file an attorney disciplinary complaint against Steven R. Smith and “bag man” Michael Werich alleging fraud, misrepresentations and violations of ARDC Rules 3.3(a) and 8.4
Legal Disclaimer: Smith and Werich are considered innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of professional misconduct.

2 Comments

ANOTHER LAWYER CHARGED IN FRAUD SCHEME

5/18/2010

8 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-LAWYER CHARGED IN A FRAUD SCHEME. Lawyers are charged everyday in varies scheme to defraud their clients, to aid and abed their clients commit fraud and racketeering activities. Stoller has charged in Cook County Illinois Washington D.C. Attorneys Lance G. Johnson, David Abrams, Alfred Goodman from www.roylance.com . The law firm of Bryan Cave LLP and their Senior Partner Steven R. Smith in “three” Racketeering law suits along with his bag man Michael Werich. Also charged in a separate petition for indirect criminal contempt is the law firm of Gordon and Rees and senior partner Ryan Brown, Hayes Ryan, Chance Cooper. It should not surprise anyone that numerous lawyers are charged each day with corruption. Click on the attached article to read the lead story.
2 Attorneys Charged in $3 Million Real Estate Fraud

8 Comments

AEAE STUDY RATES THE FACIAL TRAITS OF SUCCESSFUL ATTORNEYS

5/17/2010

4 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-THE AMERICANS FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF ATTORNEY ETHICS (AEAE) a nationally known attorney ethics watch dog group since 1974 has just released the results of a study that identifies and rates the facial traits of successful attorneys. The study asked nearly 10,000 people, mostly college and graduate students to rate the facial traits of attorneys, male and females of large firms and those of smaller firms .The study was conducted on line and included only photos of males and females who were taken from a 2010 database of Attorneys. The participants did not know who the people were in the photos. All the photos were of attorneys, men and women in business dress in conventional poses in front of bland background.
Male attorneys which facial features which included a solid jaw line and small, piercing eyes were judged to be more effective.
The females were judged less effective and the “blonds” lest effective.
The results of the AEAE study suggest that looks do indeed matter in the trial court.
“Our results suggest that supper male lawyers who look like carnivores have higher pay and are more effective” wrote Law Professor Pork Rines.
“So that should be a matter of concern.”
Those male attorneys deemed less competent tended to be baby-faced, bald, with large round eyes, high eyebrows and a small chin.
Those female attorneys deemed less competent tended to be Blondand brunettes. The parties taking the survey tended to rate such attorneys as being more likable, more warm, even pretty, more trustworthy, but less competent," Professor Pork Rines said.
"For a Court Room Appearance, Judges don't have that much information, they look at a face and make some sort of judgment immediately.”
Professor Rines then turned to his “blond” associate and asked her to “bring me a cup of coffee.” The young blond associate attorney returned and said, Professor Porkie here's your drink.”
The professor took a sip and said, ”I told you that I wanted coffee, not coke!”

The study indicated that “although women now make up 50% of the law students, they should be regulated to doing clerical work, filing and serving coffee rather than any of the heavy lifting at any large law firm, if that firm was concerned about making profits!” said Professor Pork Rines.


 

4 Comments

LLINOIS CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE LEE PRESTON ISSUED ORDER FOR ALL OF THE DEFENDANTS, COOK COUNTY SHERIFF THOMAS DART ET ALL, TO APPEAR IN HIS COURT

5/16/2010

9 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-STOLLER FILED A MALICIOUS PROSECUTION, FALSE ARREST, FALSE IMPRISMENT, 1983 LAWSUIT AGAINST THE ILLINOIS COOK COUNTY SHERIFF, THE COOK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, COOK COUNTY, and a number of attorneys and parties who Stoller is barred from mentioning their names on this blog. Stoller was falsely incarcerated on Feb 25, 2009 until March 6, 2009 to take a BCX Examination at the Illinois Cook County Cermack Hospital. The Cermack Hospital does not perform BCX Examinations. In order to incarcerate Stoller the Cook County department of Corrections manufactured a false “charge” the other defendants were equally responsible and have been named in a law suit that there is irrefutable evidence of their guilt. The case has been now transferred to Judge Lee Preston who has set a date for all of the defendants to appear, “Failure of parties to appear, either in person or through counsel will result in the entry of an order of default.” This story continues http://www.rentamark.net/3/post/2010/03/chicago-child-psychologists-604-child-custody-evaluator-was-served.html
SIDEBAR: ANY DEFENDANTS WHO DO NOT APPEAR I WILL MOVE TO DEFAULT YOU RIGHT THERE AND THEN

9 Comments

TRIAL COURT JUDGES FIND THE CONSTITUTION A “HINDERANCE” TO THEIR ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE

5/15/2010

15 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-IN A 10 YEAR STUDY JUST RELEASED BY THE AMERICANS FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF ATTORNEY ETHICS (AEAE) an attorney ethics watch dog group since 1974, found that well over 80% of trial court judges have no respect for a parties U.S Constitutional Rights under the First, Fifth and fourteen amendments of the U.S Constitution. In Cook County Illinois the courts have an abysmal record for up holding a parties constitutional rights. During the 80's fifteen judges went to jail in Chicago, including the Chief Chancery Judge, David Shields. Today, the old time lawyers will tell you that “case law means nothing in the Court house known as the Chicago DALY CENTER, 30 floors), its who you know and who you contribute to, the judges political campaign”. That will determine the outcome of your case, not the merits.
The AEAE study found that the higher one moves up in the “food” chain the more respect shown to the U.S. Constitution and due process rights by appeals courts.
State Appellate Courts on average show only about 50% more deference to a parties constitutional rights when rendering an Opinion than a State Court Trial Judge.
For the following reason. Every party has an automatic right to Appeal a final judgment to an Appellate Court.

However, from that point forward to the State Supreme Court and the United States Supreme Court its like winning the lottery to even have one's case considered. State Supreme Courts select about 1% of the cases that are appealed and the U.S. Supreme Court accepts less than ½ of one percent of the cases that reach the high court. When the U.S. Supreme Court was founded in 1779 there were about 3 million Americans. Today we have 100 times more people (300 million) and still only “one” supreme court of nine justices to handle a million times more controversies. Consequently, the U.S. Supreme Court which only accommodates 50 to 60 appeals a year from over 10,000 submitted can only be considered a “show” court and not an actual court that a U.S. Citizen can rely on for obtaining justice. This story continues click on here to read “Why there is no justice in America” http://freedom-school.com/why_there_is_no_justice_in_america.pdf That is why new comers to the justice system will lose every time! Because no one cares about their constitutional rights.

15 Comments

STOLLER HAS CHARGED BANK OF AMERICA WITH BEING A \"CRIMINAL\" ENTERPRISE

5/14/2010

3 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-ILLINOIS ATTORNEY GENERAL LISA MADIGAN HAS SUED COUNTRY WIDE FINANCIAL NOW OWED BY BANK OF AMERICA AND WELLS FARGO BANK FOR DECEPTIVE LOAN PRACTICES. Stoller has filed Civil Rico Actions against both banks and their law firm of Bryan Cave LLP. Now the New York Attorney General is investigating 8 banks for wrong doing. The New York attorney general has launched an investigation into eight banks to determine whether they misled ratings agencies about mortgage securities, according to a person familiar with the investigation. Attorney General Andrew Cuomo is trying to figure out if banks provided the agencies with false information in order to get better ratings on the risky securities, said the individual, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the investigation has not been made public.
N.Y. AG Said to Be Investigating 8 Banks Over Securities


3 Comments

1000 MAN NATIONAL LAW FIRM, BRYAN CAVE LLP UNINSUREABLE?

5/13/2010

4 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-A EXPERT WHO IS AN UNDERWRITER FOR A LEGAL MALPRACTICE INSURER EXPRESSED AN OPINION THAT THE LAW FIRMS OF BRYAN CAVE LLP http://www.bryancave.com/, GORDON AND REES  http://www.gordonrees.com/AND ROYLANCE, ABRAMS BERDO AND GOODMAN www.roylance.com  MAY BE UNINSURABLE. Senior partners in each firm have been charged in Indirect Contempt Petitions and have been sued.  Those parties who have been sued and in some instances the entire law firm would no longer qualify for insurance coverage in his opinion.
LEGAL DISCLAIMER: There is no evidence that the above firms are actually uninsurable or not. It is only an "opinion" expressed here based the public record that the said law firms may not be insurable or some of the partners may not be insurable. Please contact the law firms directly to find out if they are in fact insured. AEAE does not recomend ever doing business with any law firm or lawyer who is NOT insurable or who has a record of being sued and/or being charged with Indirect Criminal Contempt.

4 Comments

STEVEN R. SMITH, MICHAEL WERICH > SPECIFIC ATTORNEY EXCLUSION ENDORSEMENT

5/13/2010

9 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-TO ALL OF THOSE ATTORNEYS AND OTHERS WHO ARGUE THAT THERE ARE NO CONSEQUENCES WHEN A LAWYER IS SUED CONSIDER THIS. The ISBA MUTUAL ATTORNEY INSURANCE COMPANY asks each attorney of a firm the following question. “During the past 5 years has any claim been made against: Applicant or a predecessor firm, any current member of Applicant or a predecessor firm; or to your knowledge, any former member of Applicant or predecessor firm? Yes No.” “Is any current member of applicant aware of any circumstance or incident that may result in a claim or suit Yes No”. If the answer is Yes. ISBA Mutual issues a policy to a law firm, but specifically excludes a certain attorney(s) from coverage. Under the “SPECIFIC ATTORNEY EXCLUSION ENDORCEMENT PROVISION. IT IS AGREED THAT THE POLICY IS AMENDED TO EXCLUDE THE FOLLOWINGT ATTORNEYS. The consequences of an attorney being sued a number of times can be “career ending”, according to a University of Chicago Law Professor. The law firm of Bryan Cave LLP, senior partner Steven Russell Smith and his “bag man” Michael Werich who have been sued for fraud, conspiracy, Civil Racketeering THREE times in the last 3 months think it is really “funny” according to one source and will not effect their careers one bit. According to one source Bryan Cave LLP, Steven R. Smith and Michael Werich can anticipate being named in several more complaints within the next month. Their failure to report that to their Firm's Bryan Cave LLP insurance carrier will result in the possibility of their firm losing all of their insurance. Bryan Cave LLP would not return calls regarding this story.

SIDEBAR: Today was the second time that attorney Steven R. Smith sent his “bag man” Michael Werich to court without him.

9 Comments
<<Previous
Forward>>

    EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
    Internships not available now
    ​


     Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
    FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)
    ​
    YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
    Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
     The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
     Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that  supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
     The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a
    LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERT, valuations, expert
    witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert. 
    The author(s)  graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE  and attended the University of Iowa a  for a PHD. The Author(s)  are the nation's most renowned
    Legal Ethics experts  and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
    enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation  Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
    numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions.  AEAE, P.O.  Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email ldms4@hotmail.com
    312-545-4554
    Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE  Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
     "Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
    Litigation is the Air We Breathe
    Litigation is War,

    Welcome to the Front!"


     To Prove Defamation Case?
    What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm. 
    The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation 

    The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

    “[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30 
    AEAE argues it reports on the  law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

    ​AEAE has the legal  right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators,  business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE  18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

    VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

    DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.



    Archives

    March 2023
    February 2023
    July 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    October 2021
    July 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    April 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    June 2019
    April 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    January 2015
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010
    December 2009
    November 2009
    October 2009
    September 2009

    Categories
    Disclaimer This website is not a solicitation for business. All content on the AEAE website is intended to provide general information about AEAE and an opportunity for interested  persons to contact AEAE. The content of this website is not offered as legal advice or legal opinion and it should not be relied upon for any specific situation.  AEAE is not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney client relationship is intended.  This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a complete description of AEAE services. While AEAE endeavors to keep the information updated and correct, AEAE makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the information contained in this website. 

    All
    Jewelry Frauds
    Scams
    Yellow Diamonds

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.