Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics

  • SUE THE BASTARDS
  • AEAE
  • AEJE
  • AEIPR
  • Rentamark
  • Archrive
  • PAGE 2
 

THE SECOND CIRCUIT ISSUED A DECISION ON COPYRIGHT WHICH STOLLER DISAGREES WITH

6/22/2010

6 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-THE SECOND CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ISSUES A DECISION ON COPYRIGHT CASE. STOLLER DISAGREES WITH THAT DECISION BASED UPON THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS IN THE JANMARE CASE. The 2nd Circuit has certified to New York's highest court the question of whether a copyright infringement action can be brought in New York against an out-of-state party that uploaded to the Internet unauthorized copies of books and made them available to readers from servers located outside the state. The circuit said that "determining the situs of injury" for purposes of the long-arm statute "in a copyright case requires analysis of state law and policy considerations this court is ill-suited to make."  2nd Circuit Seeks Guidance on Use of Long-Arm Law for Copyrights
SIDEBAR: I have court appearences every day this week. It's 2:21am and I am finally blogging. I have to get up in 2 1/2 hours for a court hearing in Lake County Illinois. Over the Father's day week end in which I deprived of seeing my children again, since 2004, I drafted a 31 count  Malicious prosecution, false arrest, false imprision. defamation lawsuit which I filed yesterday. Today I have to battle with a Chancery Judge on an emergency motion. Tomorrow I have another court hearing. Appreicate your continued interest in this blog. Stay tuned, everything is heating up nicely!
6 Comments

ANOTHER FATHER'S DAY WITHOUT SEEING YOU GUYS!

6/20/2010

12 Comments

 
Picture
Picture
RUSSELL N. STOLLER THE BEST DAD
ELMWOOD PARK-IT HAS NOW BEEN  6 years since I have seen you guys on father's day. I have tried every day to seen you guys, but you know who has prevented me from being with you guys. Dad loves you guys very much and some day we will be together. I work on it every day. 

Jule sent me this email today:

"Hey Dad,

I sure am looking forward to seeing you this fall. Now that I haven't had a phone for a couple of weeks I'm not getting my Dad-time and I'm missing you. You're the best Dad a girl could ask for! I hope you have a good Father's Day, and know that you're being thought of with love.

Jule"








12 Comments

WHO REALLY IS TO BLAME OVER THE BP OIL SPILL?

6/19/2010

7 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-COMMENTARY-YESTERDAY CONGRESS GRILLED BP CHIEF EXECUTIVE TONNY HAYWORD. Is Mr. Hayward to blame? Is BP to Blame? No we all own the oil spill. Everyone who drives a car, uses oil heat, paint, sun tan oil etc is to blame. We are addicted to oil. BP was just attempting to fill our oil addiction when the spill occurred. Then our incompetent president, did nothing for 3 weeks while the oil poured out into the ocean  polluting our shores and killing our wild life. The indignation of congress is misplaced, they just lashed out at Mr. Hayward. Obama, like any lawyer, shook down BP for twenty billion in order to appease the victims. He has done nothing to stop the oil spill. He should have called the Navy immediately. They would have stopped the oil leak.
Congress grilled Mr. Hayward who represents “every man”. BP is not responsible for the Oil spill, we are all responsible for the Oil spill. Our addiction to oil caused the inevitable oil spill. A smart president would now use this event to move our country off of oil and on to other sources of energy. He would set a 20 year goal to have us off of oil. That would also have the side effect of ending Arab terrorism. We would no longer be sending billions of dollars to our Arab terrorist to purchase their oil and fund our enemies wars against us. BP CEO was just used as the sacrificial lamb by congress, but he was not responsible for the oil spill. We are all responsible for the oil spill. We own it. We should do something about it. We should kick our oil addiction. We should vote for individuals who will move us off of oil within 20 years and vote out of office those individuals who won't agree to move us off of oil!
7 Comments

THE DECLINE OF THE WHITE MALE

6/19/2010

3 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-COMMENTARY-AS EARLY AS 1970's, THE WHITE MALE dominance in our culture has been in decline. Before 1970 the U.S Congress was composed of over 99% white males. The NBA and the NFL were 90% white males. Law and Medical schools were 90% white males. Our military was over 98% white males. Today the National Football League and the National Basket Ball League have less than 25% white male athletes. Law and Medical Schools have only 50% White Males. Today the last bastion of white male hood is the National Hockey League. The Chicago Black Hawks Stanley Cup Champions were 100% while males. Some say that the real start of the fall of white male hood dominance began in 1920 when “white” males seeded to women the right to vote. History will record that date as the official date of the start of the decline of dominance of the white male in western civilization.
3 Comments

UNLEASHING ANOTHER 100 MILLION DOLLAR DEFAMATION LAWSUIT ON A DIVORCE ATTORNEYS AND THEIR CLIENT

6/18/2010

1 Comment

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-THE WASHINGTON D.C. LAW FIRM OF ROYLANCE, ABRAMS, BERDO AND GOODMAN LLC WWW.ROYLANCE.COM were sued for defamation after it was discovered that they wrote a per se defamatory paper and presented it to the California Trademark Bar. Likewise, a paper was just discovered that contains per se defamation which was written by the divorce lawyer. It is also being alleged in the new defamation complaint that the parties engaged in a conspiracy, extortion, malicious prosecution, false arrest and Civil Racketeering. “This complaint is bullet proof”, according to a University of Chicago Law Professor who has reviewed the first draft of the new complaint which will be filed on this Monday. “It is clear that even after five years these defendants have not yet learned their lesson.” according to one court room observer and “must be put out of business!”
1 Comment

VICKI L. D\'ANTONIO NAMED AEAE 2010 COURT REPORTER OF THE YEAR

6/17/2010

1 Comment

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-THE AMERICANS FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF ATTORNEY ETHICS (AEAE) an attorney ethics watch dog group since 1974 presents a annual award to the best court reporter in the nation. This year the price goes to Vicki L. D' Antonio. Ms Antonio has been a court reporter for the last 12 years. When she is on a case the attorneys can expect to get 100% of the record that actually is given by the respondents. Vicki also loves animals, has three beautiful boys who love baseball. Congratulations Ms. D'Antonion.
1 Comment

COURT HEARINGS TODAY BEFORE ILLINOIS CIRCUIT COURT JUDGES ELMER TOLAMIRE AND SUSAN ZWICK

6/16/2010

7 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-COURT HEARINGS ARE SCHEDULED TODAY BEFORE ILLINOIS CIRCUIT COURT JUDGES ELMER TOLAMIRE. Request for extensions of time, with a heavy Appellate Briefing schedule. Additional time is being requested on trial schedules.
An Appeal was filed today of Judge Schuster's June 15, 2010 decision. It is customary for State Circuit Court Judges to favor the side that has a attorney representing it and to disfavor the side that is pro se or is not represented by an attorney. Appellate courts on the other hand read briefs and made their decisions based upon legal arguments and not on what attorney is representing what party or if no attorney is representing a party. Leo Stoller is a trademark and appellate expert have been involved in over 400 appeals Ldms4@hotmail.com
7 Comments

SUPREME COURT ENDING ITS 2010 TERM WITH A BANG

6/15/2010

13 Comments

 
Picture
WASHINGTON, D.C. (AEAE)-The Supreme Court is approaching the home stretch in its dash to end the term, and it's a period when the big pending decisions start to emerge. But none of the marquee cases that would make big headlines were handed down today, so we'll have to wait for Thursday, when the Court will sit again, for the likes of Bilski v. Kappos, on business method patents, or the Second Amendment case McDonald v. Chicago. The justices issued four decisions, including two that pertain to lawyers and lawyering. Another 'Bilski'-Free Day at the Supreme Court    Leo Stoller is an expert on the U.S. Supreme Court Appellate Practice, having filed more Writ of Certs than any attorney in Illinois
13 Comments

COURT HEARINGS BEFORE ILLINOIS CIRCUIT COURT JUDGES SCHULSTER AND PRESTON TODAY

6/14/2010

13 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-UPDATED-A HEARING IS SET ON MONDAY BEFORE ILLINOIS CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE SCHULSTER FOR SUBSTITUTION OF JUDGE GERALD BENDER. Last Week two appeals were filed regarding Judge Schuster's Order and Judge Bernstein's order denying a motion to substitute Judge Schuster.  Justice Schuster continued the hearing until Tuesday.
 The Illinois Appellate Court now has exclusive jurisdiction and the case must as a matter of law be placed on the “Appellate Stay Calender”.
Today, before Judge Preston is the 100 million dollar malicious prosecution lawsuit against the Illinois Cook County Sheriff, several divorce lawyers, a divorcee and her parents, including the court appointed child psychologists. A year ago today Stoller was unlawfully incarcerated in the Illinois Cook County Jail for the ”crime” of publishing this “blog”. The parties responsible are now defendants in a $100 million dollar Section 1983 Civil Rights, false arrest, false Imprisonment, Civil Racketeering lawsuit. Total damages sought exceed 500 million dollars. Finally the Malicious prosecution case is heating up, the defendants have “no” valid defense other than procedural and sanctionable defenses. Stay tuned.


 
13 Comments

CHICAGO MALICIOUS PROSECUTION DEFENDANTS CHARGED IN A $200 MILLION DOLLAR DEFAMATION CLAIM

6/14/2010

5 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-DEFENDANTS IN A MAJOR MALICIOUS PROSECUTION LAW SUIT, NOW CHARGED WITH PER SE DEFAMATION. Generally speaking, defamatory words are those “that subject a person to ridicule or contempt, or that clearly sound to the disreputation of an individual.” Leang v. Jersey City Bd. of Educ., . To determine whether a statement is defamatory, a court should consider “(1) the content, (2) the verifiability, and (3) the context of the challenged statement.” ). Certain kinds of statements, however, “denote such defamatory meaning that they are considered defamatory as a matter of law.” The “false attribution of criminality” is a prime example of such a statement.. Therefore they were defamatory and libelous Per se.”); Hill v. Evening News Co., (“[C]ertain statements are defamatory per se, including statements that the subject of the statement committed a crime.”). The Plaintiff has just learned that the Defendant's published a per se defamatory letter containing the “false attribution of criminality”. The Plaintiff is now seeking an additional $200 million dollars. Stay tuned. This case gets more sensational every day!
5 Comments
<<Previous
Forward>>

    EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
    Internships not available now
    ​


     Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
    FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)
    ​
    YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
    Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
     The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
     Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that  supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
     The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a
    LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERT, valuations, expert
    witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert. 
    The author(s)  graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE  and attended the University of Iowa a  for a PHD. The Author(s)  are the nation's most renowned
    Legal Ethics experts  and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
    enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation  Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
    numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions.  AEAE, P.O.  Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email ldms4@hotmail.com
    312-545-4554
    Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE  Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
     "Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
    Litigation is the Air We Breathe
    Litigation is War,
    Welcome to the Front!"

     To Prove Defamation Case?
    What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm. 
    The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation 

    The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

    “[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30 
    AEAE argues it reports on the  law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

    ​AEAE has the legal  right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators,  business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE  18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

    VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

    DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.


    Archives

    March 2023
    February 2023
    July 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    October 2021
    July 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    April 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    June 2019
    April 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    January 2015
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010
    December 2009
    November 2009
    October 2009
    September 2009

    Categories
    Disclaimer This website is not a solicitation for business. All content on the AEAE website is intended to provide general information about AEAE and an opportunity for interested  persons to contact AEAE. The content of this website is not offered as legal advice or legal opinion and it should not be relied upon for any specific situation.  AEAE is not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney client relationship is intended.  This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a complete description of AEAE services. While AEAE endeavors to keep the information updated and correct, AEAE makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the information contained in this website. 

    All
    Jewelry Frauds
    Scams
    Yellow Diamonds

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.