블로그 아카이브

Illinois Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul and Assistant Attorney General Aidan Nuttal Charged in a Motion to Disqualify

8/26/2025

Chicago (AEAE) Plaintiff Leo Stoller[1], requests the court to disqualify the Office of the Illinois Attorney General, Attorney General Kwame Raoul and Assistant Attorney General Aidan Nuttal from representing the Multiple Defendants, Illinois Department of Human Services, David Stonecipher, Ciera Harvey and Danica Jackson, Daniel Chung (Collectively DHS Defendants)   multiple clients with conflicting interests in this case, and to strike their Motion to Dismiss having been presented by attorneys who are disqualified as a matter of law from representing the said Multiple defendants, with competing interests,
The representation by the Office of the Illinois Attorney General and their attorneys Attorney General Kwame Raoul, Assistant Attorney Aidan Nuttall , all of these multiple clients, Illinois Department of Human Services, David Stonecipher, Ciera Harvey and Danica Jackson, Daniel Chung (Collectively DHS Defendants) all with competing and conflicting interests, all with adverse interests violated the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct.
Attorney Aidan Nuttall is a named defendant in The Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint and is per se unqualified because he is a named defendant and a “witness”. Pursuant to the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct any attorney who is a “Witness” cannot represent clients in a case in which he may be called to testify against the other defendants.
The Office of the Illinois Attorney General Office, and their attorneys, Attorney General Kwame Raoul, Assistant Attorney Aidan Nuttall by representing these multiple and conflicting, clients, Illinois Department of Human Services, David Stonecipher, Ciera Harvey and Danica Jackson, Daniel Chung all with competing and conflicting interests: and Defendant Aidan Nuttal all with competing and conflicting interests all with adverse interests with different conflicting interests, is in violation of ARDC Rule 1.7,

notice_of_filing.pdf
File Size:	1670 kb
File Type:	pdf

Download File

filed_copy_motion_to_disqua.pdf
File Size:	3156 kb
File Type:	pdf

Download File

2 Comments

Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul and Associate Lee Barrington Stark Charged with Professional Conduct

8/14/2025

3 Comments

motion_filed__for_rule_137_sanctions_against_illinois_attorney_general.pdf
File Size:	6022 kb
File Type:	pdf

Download File

notice_of_filing.pdf
File Size:	1670 kb
File Type:	pdf

Download File

"A 79-year-old disabled Chicago whistleblower says four DuPage County judges violated his civil rights by denying him access to court via Zoom — forcing a 40-mile trip despite his disability. The lawsuit claims the judges acted to protect a bribery scheme inside the Illinois Department of Human Services. Attorney General Kwame Raoul and his lawyer, Lee Stark, are accused of filing a fraudulent motion to cover it up. Critics say this is proof that judicial corruption in Illinois is still alive — just more subtle than in the Operation Greylord days."

Chicago-IL -- Allegations of judicial corruption have resurfaced in Illinois as a 79-year-old disabled Chicago resident files suit against four DuPage County judges for allegedly blocking his access to court via Zoom, forcing him to endure a physically burdensome 40-mile trip to the courthouse.
The plaintiff — a whistleblower who reported an alleged bribery scheme inside the Illinois Department of Human Services — says these judges acted in concert with “powerful interests” determined to shut down his case. Judges Bonnie Weaton, Kenneth Popejoy, Maureen Riordan, and Timothy J. McJoynt are accused of violating his civil rights in the process.
Rather than protect the whistleblower’s rights, Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul appointed part-time attorney Lee Barrington Stark to defend the judges. Stark, allegedly acting under Raoul’s orders, filed what the plaintiff calls a “fraudulent” Motion to Dismiss — a legal maneuver that invoked doctrines the plaintiff says clearly do not apply when judges commit misconduct.
Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul appointed part-time attorney Lee Barrington Stark to defend the judges. Stark filed a Motion to Dismiss, citing “Judicial Immunity” and the “Sister Court Doctrine.” The plaintiff asserts those doctrines do not apply because the judges’ actions constitute judicial misconduct, calling the motion a “fraudulent cover-up.”
Raoul and Stark declined to withdraw the motion when given the chance and have not commented publicly.

The refusal of Raoul and Stark to withdraw their motion has fueled accusations of a cover-up at the highest levels of Illinois’ legal system.
Editor’s Note: While judicial corruption may be more discreet than during the notorious “Operation Greylord” scandal of the 1990s, critics say it remains a persistent, systemic problem in both Cook and DuPage Counties.

V. SHAKESPEAREAN OBSERVATION
O, noble Court — shall the shepherd lead the wolf into the fold? Shall the watchman sleep whilst the thief slips in?
Justice, like the sun, must shine unclouded, and truth must not be fettered by the will of those sworn to protect it.

Legal disclaimer: Judges Bonnie Weaton, Kenneth Popejoy, Maureen Riordan, and Timothy J. McJoynt, Attorneys Kwame Raoul, Lee Stark denies all charges, which are only allegations and are all innocents until prove guilty in a Court of Law.

kwame_civil_rights_complaint_8-26-25.pdf
File Size:	2154 kb
File Type:	pdf

Download File

3 Comments

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
Internships not available now

Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)

YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a attorney rating Service. The comments made by AEAE are not actionable because they are statements of opinion Moriarty v. Greene 732 N.E.2d 730, 740 Ill.App), citing Owen v. Can 497 N.E.2d 1145, 1148 (Ill.1986) see Law offices of David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al No 18-3216 Seventh Circuit No 18-3216 decided 01-28-2022.
Ratings are non-actionable opinion statements David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al citing Syngenta Seeds Inc v. Bung North America,Inc 773 F.3d 58 (8th Cir 2014) Illinois Law on expressions of Opinion , an unexplained one star review simply could not be actionable as defamation David Freydin case citing Cf. Kimzey v. Yelp!Inc. 836 F. 3d 1263, 1269-70 (9th Cir 2016)
AEAE LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERTS, valuations, expert
witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert.
The author(s) graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE and attended the University of Iowa a for a PHD. The Author(s) are the nation's most renowned
Legal Ethics experts and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions. AEAE, P.O. Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email [email protected]
312-545-4554
Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
"Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
Litigation is the Air We Breathe
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front!"

To Prove Defamation Case?
What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm.
The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation

The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.

Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics

Illinois Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul and Assistant Attorney General Aidan Nuttal Charged in a Motion to Disqualify

Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul and Associate Lee Barrington Stark Charged with Professional Conduct

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTYInternships not available now​

Archives

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
Internships not available now