Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics

  • SUE THE BASTARDS
  • AEAE
  • AEJE
  • AEIPR
  • Rentamark
  • Archrive
  • PAGE 2
 

SANTA CLAUS SHOT DOWN BY A MODERATE MUSLIM OVER RUSSIA

12/26/2009

10 Comments

 
Picture
THE MUSLIMS KILLED SANTA
Picture
WASHINGTON D.C-(AEAE)-IN A SAD REPORT OUT OF WASHINGTON A FEW MINUTES AGO WAS NOT ABOUT THE FACT THAT THE UNEMPLOYMENT RATE IS HIGHEST SINCE THE GREAT DEPRESSION, IS NOT THAT THE SENATE JUST PASSED OBAMA'S HEALTH CARE BILL THIS CHRISTMAS EVE, but that Al Gaea, the Taliban, Hamas, the Palatine P.LO, and a large group of U.S Muslims from numerous local masks, met in June and planned to kill Santa Claus. According to the report the Muslims wanted to punish the Jewish business men through out the world who own or control the “toy” business. A short time ago, Santa's slay was hit with a shoulder fired missile, bring down Santa Claus some where near Russia. Stay tuned for additional details.

Earlier today a Muslim woman tried to knock down the 81 year Old Pope just prior to his saying the Mid Night Mass. According to a Cardinal who was standing next to the Pope when the female Muslim attacked, reported that the Pope who had learned karate during his early days in the Hitler Youth Movement in Nazi Germany during the second world war, was able to deliver a karate kick to the Muslim woman's face disabling the woman. The Pope was able to continue with his Mid Night Mass. After the mass the Pope was saying that he forgave the Muslim woman who obviously didn't know who she was dealing with, as she was removed on a stretcher with a possible broken neck. The Cardinal also said that the Pope is praying for Santa Claus
10 Comments

AEAE-STUDY FINDS THAT IN ORDER TO STOP FORCLOSURES LOOK TO CIVIL RICO AND THE PROVISIONS OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

12/25/2009

4 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-IT IS ESTIMATED THAT THERE COULD BE AS HIGH AS 5 million foreclosures this coming year of 2010. Although the President Obama give lip service to assisting people in foreclosure, the president is really helpless to assist parties who are losing their homes as a result of predatory lenders who may have also engaged in violations of the Civil Racketeering Act and violations of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) is releasing some guide lines for assisting victims of predatory lenders. Especially in States like Arizona that does not even mandate a court foreclosure process. All a “Trustee” has to do in Arizona to foreclose in Arizona is to mail a notice to a party then conduct a public auction. Arizona is a slaughter house for home owners who purchased properties with the assistance of the predatory lenders like Country Wide, which is now owned by Bank of America. Bank of America also owns the company that does the actual foreclosures. Consequently, according to a recent lawsuit filed against Bank of America charging them with Civil Racketeering Scheme for making available through Country Wide predatory loans, forcing home owners into foreclosure and then profiting on the foreclosures through their alleged “shell” company Reconstruct Company.  
4 Comments

LANCE G. JOHNSON, DAVID ABRAMS AND ALFRED GOODMAN WERE SERVED WITH SUMMONDS AND \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"CRIMINAL CONTEMPT\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\" COOK COUNTY COMPLAINTS TODAY

12/25/2009

3 Comments

 
Picture
Picture
WASHINGTON D.C.-TODAY STOLLER'S WASHINGTON D.C. PROCESS SERVER FINALLY REPORTED THAT SERVICE OF SUMMONS OF THE ILLINOIS COOK COUNTY CRIMINAL CONTEMPT CITATIONS  http://www.filefront.com/14756757/Lance-G.-Johnson-Charged-with-perjury0001.pdf/ WERE served ON ATTORNEYS LANCE G. JOHNSON, DAVID ABRAMS AND AFRED GOODMAN. www.roylance.com  An indirect criminal contempt petition was filed before Illinois Cook County Circuit Court Judge Kathy Flanagan in October. Circuit Court Judge Flanagan granted an order sending Stoller Indirect Criminal Contempt Petition to Chief Judge Maddox for assignment and trial. Lance G. Johnson, David Abrams and Alfred Goodman have sucessfully avoided service of process in the underlying 100 million dollar defamation lawsuit pending against them in Cook County Illinois. Now these respondents are under the Jurisdiction of the Illinois Cook County Courts with the next hearing in Chicago, Illinois on January 19, 2010 http://www.filefront.com/15157881/Dec-15-2009-Order0001.pdf/ before Illinois Judge Gellespie. The Respondents could not be reached. Click on the attached link to see Stoller response brief to Gordon and Rees Attorney Hayes Ryan Motion to Strike Stoller's Indirect Criminal Contempt Petition http://www.filefront.com/15191477/responsetomotiontostrike_doc.pdf 

LEGAL DISCLAIMER: Lance G. Johnson, David Abrams and Alfred Goodman are considered innocient until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of all charges.
 
3 Comments

STOLLER FILES HIS RESPONSE TO GORDON AND REES MOTION TO STRIKE HIS CHARGE OF INDIRECT CRIMINAL CONTEMPT

12/24/2009

6 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-STOLLER'S CHARGE OF INDIRECT CRIMINAL CONTEMPT PETITION http://www.filefront.com/14756757/Lance-G.-Johnson-Charged-with-perjury0001.pdf/ILLINOIS AGAINST THREE WASHINGTON D.C. ATTORNEYS LANCE G. JOHNSON, DAVID ABRAMS AND ALFRED GOODMAN AND THREE CHICAGO ATTORNEYS RYAN T. BROWN, HAYES RYAN, CHANCE L. COOPER AND THEIR LAW FIRM GORDON AND REES LTD HAS ATTRACTED NATIONAL ATTENTION. Stoller charged these attorneys with Indirect Criminal Contempt. The Washington D.C. firm of Roylance, Abrams, Berdo and Goodman www.roylance.com has been dodging service of process as they did in the underlying 100 million dollar per se defamation lawsuit. Respondent's Ryan T. Brown, Chance L. Cooper and the law firm of Gordon and Rees LTD refused in open court to accept service of process. Hayes Ryan  told judge Gellespie that he would "refuse" to accept service on behalf of his partners and his lawfirm. Gordon and Rees LLP, a firm of about 300 lawyers, sent in their youngest attorneys Hayes Ryan who waived service of process and filed his motion to strike Stoller's Indirect Criminal Contempt Petition. The five other respondents are hoping against hope that they will not have to defend against the Indirect Criminal Contempt Charge if the junior attorney Hayes Ryan motion to strike is sucessful. Today Stoller filed his response which can be down loaded by clicking on the attached link  http://www.filefront.com/15191477/responsetomotiontostrike_doc.pdf
The next cout hearing is January 19, 2010 http://www.filefront.com/15157881/Dec-15-2009-Order0001.pdf/
6 Comments

LANCE G. JOHNSON, DAVID ABRAMS AND ALFRED GOODMAN YOUR NUMBER IS UP TODAY!

12/22/2009

1 Comment

 
Picture
1 Comment

ILLINOIS ATTORNEY HAYES RYAN OF GORDON AND REES ADMIT THEY \"CAUSED TO BE FILED CERTAIN AFFIDAVITS CONTESTING PERSONAL SERVICE WHICH STOLLER ALLEGES WERE PERJURIOUS IN CRIMINAL CONTEMPT PETITION

12/22/2009

4 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-IN A MOTION TO STRIKE STOLLER INDIRECT CRIMINAL CONTEMPT PETITION  http://www.filefront.com/14756757/Lance-G.-Johnson-Charged-with-perjury0001.pdf/ILLINOIS ATTORNEY HAYNES RYAN ADMITS THAT "GORDON & REES LLP CAUSED TO BE FILED CERTAIN AFFIDAVITS CONTESTING PERSONAL SERVICE OF THE COMPLAINT. LEO STOLLER PRODUCED CERTAIN AFFIDAVITS OF THE PROCESS SERVER WHICH CONRADICT THE DEFENDANT (ALFRED GOODMAN) AFFIDAVIT.  GORDON AND REES ATTORNEY HAYNES RYAN FILED A MOTION TO STRIKE STOLLER'S PETITION CHARGING HAYES RYAN WITH INDIRECT CRIMINAL CONTEMPT. In Haynes motion to strike Haynes Ryan asserted Stoller citation “is designed solely to harass me as opposing counsel and delay the underlying (defamation) litigation. Accordingly, the Petition should be stricken and Leo Stoller should be sanctioned under Illinois Supreme Court Rule 137”.

STOLLER HAS ASSERTED THAT HAYNES RYAN CHARGES OF INDIRECT CRIMINAL CONTEMPT SHOULD NOT BE STRIKEN BECAUSE HAYNES RYAN KNOWINGLY AND WILLFULLY FAILED TO TAKE REASONABLE CORRECTIVES STEPS NECESSARY TO CORRECT THE PRESENTATION OF GOODMAN’S PERJURED AFFIDAVIT AND FALSE MATERIAL EVIDENCE WHICH RYAN ADMITTS THAT GORDON AND REES CAUSED TO BE FILED.

Stoller argued that Haynes Ryan, who knew that his client Alfred Goodman, with the consent and approval of Respondents, Lance G. Johnson and David Abrams, presented false evidence ( Alfred N. Goodman’s perjured affidavit dated May 18, 2009) failed to take any reasonable corrective steps, including informing the trial court judge Kathy Flanagan1 of the deception. Respondent Hayes Ryan by his failure to take any corrective action actually aided and abided the other Respondents, Alfred G. Goodman, Lance G. Johnson and David Abrams in their Indirect Criminal Contempt and fraud on the court. Attorney Haynes Ryan knew that the burden was on him, the attorney who knew of his Goodman’s dishonesty, to take corrective action, but failed to do so. Romano Brothers Beverage Co. v. D Agostine-Yerow Assoc,. Inc., 1996 U.S. DIST. LEXIS 10730 47 (N.D. Ill. 1996) . Disclosure of Alfred N. Goodman’s perjury was required where respondents Haynes Ryan, Ryan T. Brown, Chance L. Cooper and the Law firm of Gordon & Rees LLP offered material evidence (Goodman’s perjured Affidavit) to the trial court judge Kathy Flanagan and all of the respondents including Mr. Ryan knew or came to know of its falsity, or when disclosure of Goodman’s perjured affidavit was necessary to avoid assisting a criminal or fraudulent act by Goodman, all of the respondents did nothing.Haynes Ryan knew that his duty to disclose Goodman’s perjury to the trial court judge Kathy Flanagan superseded his responsibility to keep client confidences. Haynes Ryan’s failure to “disclose” Alfred Goodman’s perjured affidavit, this material evidence, was necessary to avoid assisting Goodman, Abrams and Johnson in their crime of fraud and Indirect Criminal Contempt on the court.

Which has provoked the said Indirect Criminal Contempt Citation against the respondents, for their unlawful conduct was done “outside” of the purview of the court which has subjected all of the respondents to a valid charge of Indirect Criminal Contempt in the case at bar that was approved by the trial court judge Kathy Flanagan.

Thus far Lance G. Johnson, David Abrams and Alfred Goodman have evaded service of summons, but that day is coming to a rapid end. When they see the process server coming they can run but their not that fast that they can avoid the jurisdiction of the Illinois Cook County Courts much longer. They have a date with the Illinois Cook County Judge on January 19, 2010 http://www.filefront.com/15157881/Dec-15-2009-Order0001.pdf/

LEGAL DISCLAIMER: Haynes Ryan, Ryan T. Brown, Chance L. Cooper and the Law firm of Gordon & Rees LLP Alfred G. Goodman, Lance G. Johnson and David Abrams are considered innocent of all charges until proven guilty beyond any reasonable doubt.






1
4 Comments

STOLLER APPEALS SEVENTH CIRCUIT DECISION CLAIMING THAT IT IS UNCONSTITUIONAL

12/21/2009

2 Comments

 
Picture
  1. CHICAGO-(AEAE)-ON DECEMBER 4. 2009 the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals Justices Frank H Easterbrook, Richard A. Posner and Diane S. Sykes issued a decision re-imposing a “mack” bar on Stoller. The decision stated, “...We discharged the rule to show cause after Stoller responded that his brother provided the funds to pay the sanction. We denied Stoller's motion for leave to proceed in format paupers, however, and Stoller paid the $455 filing. We warned that if we concluded that Stoller had falsely claimed to be indigent we would reimpose a prior Mack bar against him. Stoller insisted he had been truthful, so we referred the matter to a special master to take “testimony” and consider the apparently conflicting evidence. Magistrate Judge Geraldine Soat Brown, as special master, devoted considerable time to the matter, filed a written report and now seeks guidance this court regarding whether additional proceedings are necessary....We accept Judge Brown's thorough report and conclude that no further proceedings are necessary...This is enough to establish that Stoller has been deceptive...the Mack bar against Stoller is reinstated”.

  2. In Stoller appeal to the United Supreme Court Stoller asserts that the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals decision was unconstitutional. It violated Stoller's right to a fair trial, to present evidence, to call witnesses, due process and equal protection. Since the Judge Brown was allowed to proceed , unabated, in prosecuting the Seventh Circuit' case against Stoller without Stoller ever being allowed to testify, or present witness or cross examine witnesses, then a “wrongful” conviction is definitely the end result. The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, a appeals court, acting as a “super” trial court merely looked a “written” report of Judge Geraldine Soat Brown which was not a final report, just seeking “guidance from this court regarding whether additional proceedings are necessary.” The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals then found, without ever allowing a “real” trial to take place, found “this is enough to establish that Stoller has been deceptive...the Mack bar against Stoller is reinstated”.

  3. Stoller further asserts to the United States Supreme Court that there are clear grounds why a “Mack” bar is unconstitutional


 
2 Comments

CHARLIE GIBSON TO RETIRE FROM ABC-LANCE G. JOHNSON WILL BE SERVED BEFORE CHRISTMAS

12/19/2009

7 Comments

 
Picture
NEW YORK -AEAE- The veteran journalist who came to be known as "Charlie" to millions of viewers during his 34 years at ABC News -- which also included two extended stints as co-host of "Good Morning, America" -- signs off at the end of tonight's newscast, ceding his anchor responsibilities to Diane Sawyer, his former "GMA" partner, predicts that Lance G. Johnson, David Abrams and Alfred Goodman from www.roylance.com will finally be served with their "criminal" contempt citations before Christmas 
7 Comments

NOTICE TO LANCE G. JOHNSON, DAVID ABRAMS AND ALFRED GOODMAN OF COURT ORDER ENTERED BY JUDGE GILLESPIE ON DEC 15, 2009

12/18/2009

2 Comments

 
Picture
Court date 1-19-10 Chicago
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-LANCE G. JOHNSON, DAVID ABRAMS, ALFRED GOODMAN WWW.ROYLANCE.COM  PLEASE FINDE A COPY OF THE COURT ORDER ENTERED BY JUDGE DANIEL T. GILLESPIE SETTING THE NEXT HEARING IN YOUR CRIMINAL CONTEMPT ILLINOIS CITATION FOR JANUARY 19, 2009. YOU CAN DOWN LOAD YOUR OWN COPY BY CLICKING ON THE ATTACHED  LINK http://www.filefront.com/15157881/Dec%2015%202009%20Order0001.pdf
2 Comments

LANCE G. JOHNSON, DAVID ABRAMS AND ALFRED GOODMAN WERE \"NO\" SHOWS IN THEIR FIRST HEARING ON DEC. 15, IN THEIR CRIMINAL CONTEMPT CHARGE

12/17/2009

6 Comments

 
Picture
JOHNSON YOU BETTER BE THERE!
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-IN A HEARING ON DECEMBER 15, 2009 IN CHICAGO DALEY CENTER IN COURT ROOM 1307 NONE OF THE DEFENDANTS IN A CRIMINAL CONTEMPT CHARGE SHOWED UP. MISSING WAS THE WELL KNOWN WAHINGTON D.C. ATTORNEYS LANCE G. JOHNSON, DAVID ABRAMS AND AFRED GOODMAN WWW.ROYLANCE.COM . There attorneys from the famous law firm of Gordon and Rees were no shows as well. Judge Gillespie agreed to continue the hearing until January 19, 2010 when he said, “I want to see all of the defendants in my court room at 9:30am.” The question is will Lance G. Johnson and his crew still defy the jurisdiction of the Illinois Cook County Court System to avoid facing the “criminal” contempt citation? How long will these famous attorneys “run” from the law?

SIDEBAR: MR. LANCE JOHNSON, DAVID ABRAMS AND AFRED GOODMAN YOUR PRESENTS IS REQUIRED ON JANUARY 19, 2010 in downtown Chicago at the Daley Center, 50 W. Washington, court Room 1307 at 9:30AM. Be there!

NOTICE: Stoller was unable to blog for the last two days. He was involved in court hearings, drafting appeals and an extended legal “fire fight” with several multi million dollar defendants which took him a couple of days to bring  them under control. More later...
6 Comments
<<Previous
Forward>>

    EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
    Internships not available now
    ​


     Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
    FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)
    ​
    YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
    Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
     The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
     Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that  supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
     The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a
    LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERT, valuations, expert
    witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert. 
    The author(s)  graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE  and attended the University of Iowa a  for a PHD. The Author(s)  are the nation's most renowned
    Legal Ethics experts  and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
    enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation  Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
    numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions.  AEAE, P.O.  Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email ldms4@hotmail.com
    312-545-4554
    Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE  Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
     "Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
    Litigation is the Air We Breathe
    Litigation is War,
    Welcome to the Front!"

     To Prove Defamation Case?
    What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm. 
    The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation 

    The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

    “[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30 
    AEAE argues it reports on the  law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

    ​AEAE has the legal  right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators,  business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE  18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

    VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

    DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.


    Archives

    March 2023
    February 2023
    July 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    October 2021
    July 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    April 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    June 2019
    April 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    January 2015
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010
    December 2009
    November 2009
    October 2009
    September 2009

    Categories
    Disclaimer This website is not a solicitation for business. All content on the AEAE website is intended to provide general information about AEAE and an opportunity for interested  persons to contact AEAE. The content of this website is not offered as legal advice or legal opinion and it should not be relied upon for any specific situation.  AEAE is not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney client relationship is intended.  This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a complete description of AEAE services. While AEAE endeavors to keep the information updated and correct, AEAE makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the information contained in this website. 

    All
    Jewelry Frauds
    Scams
    Yellow Diamonds

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.