NOTICE TO READERS PLEASE CLICK ON THE ABOVE LINK TO LEO STOLLER'S BLOG FOR NEW POSITINGS
Click on Stoller Blog link above
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-Stoller Blog note please click on the above link to the Leo Stoller AEAE Blog link to see New Postings. Stoller is attempting to make his Blog Link his "First" page of his web site to avoid having to click on the above Link. However please bear with him pending this Web site construction. The "new" blog link is improved and the readers will enjoy it much better!
ARIZONA ATTORNEYS BRIAN J. SCHULMAN AND LAURA SIXKILLER CHARGED WITH PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT WITH THE ARIZONA BAR ASSOCIATION
Brian J. Schulman Esq.
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-AUGUST 16, 2009-WEDNESDAY-THE AMERICANS FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF ATTORNEY ETHICS (AEAE)-member has filed an attorney disciplinary complaint against Arizona Attorneys Brian J. Schulman http://www.gtlaw.com/People/BrianJSchulman and Laura SixKiller from the firm of Greenberg Traurig, LLP. Mr. Schulman and Ms. SixKiller are charged with making misrepresentations of material fact and/or law in a brief filed with the Arizona Court of Appeals. Mr. Schulman and Ms SixKiller deny the charges. Neither of them could be reached for comment. A spokesman from the firm of Greenberg Traurig said, “The firm does not comment on their attorneys who are charged with professional misconduct!”
Legal Disclaimer: Arizona Attorneys Brian J. Schulman and Laura SixKiller are considered innocent of professional misconduct charges until found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt by a fact finder.
Legal Disclaimer: Arizona Attorneys Brian J. Schulman and Laura SixKiller are considered innocent of professional misconduct charges until found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt by a fact finder.
Michael T.Zeller
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-SEPTEMBER 15, 2009 Tuesday-STOLLER CHARGED TRADEMARK ATTORNEY MICHAEL T. ZELLER ESQ., WITH FRAUD, CONSPIRACY AND AIDDING AND ABEDDING GOOGLE INCL, IN THE COMMISSION OF A TORT. Today Stoller filed his "reply" brief in the Google Inc., v. Central Mfg Co., Chicago District Court case in which Zeller and his crowd have accused Stoller's companies of Civil Rico. Stoller has identified in his reply brief where he alleges that Michael T. Zeller has committed a "fraud" on the Illinois District Court. Judge Virginia Kendell will decide the case, which has already been appealed once. At one time Stoller had his Blog with Google Inc., when he previously made charges against Zeller and Google Inc., Zeller told Google Inc., to "cancel" Stoller's blog according to one report Stoller received. However this blog has "nothing " to do with Google Inc., and Stoller can finally "speak truth to power" without fear of this blog being shut down by Google Inc.
Legal disclaimer: Zeller and Google Inc., are considered innoncient of all charges until proven guilty in court. Neither Google Inc., nor Zeller would comment on Stoller's charges..Litigation is War, Welcome to the Front! [email protected] 312-545-4554
Legal disclaimer: Zeller and Google Inc., are considered innoncient of all charges until proven guilty in court. Neither Google Inc., nor Zeller would comment on Stoller's charges..Litigation is War, Welcome to the Front! [email protected] 312-545-4554
AEAE SUPPORTER STAR PATRICK SWAYZE DEAD AT 57
Patrick Swayze
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-LONG TIME SUPPORTER OF THE AMERICANS FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF ATTORNEY ETHICS (AEAE) Patrick Swayze died today of pancreatic. He started in the movie "Dirty Dancing", in TV and on Stage. He will be missed.
Litigation is a Blood Sport- CHRISTOPHER KELLY KILLS HIMSELF
Christopher Kelly Dead, 51
LITIGATION IS A BLOOD “SPORT” - CHRISTOPHER KELLY, 51 KILLS HIMSELF
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 15, 2009-A CLOSE CONFIDENT OF FORMER ILLINOIS GOVERNOR ROD BLAGOJEVICH AND HIS CHIEF FUNDRAISER KILLED HIMSELF YESTERDAY. Kelly is a roofing contractor and consultant. He has helped to raise millions of dollars for former Illinois Governor Blagojevich's campaign and he could have given federal prosecutors an inside look at the workings of the governor's administration. Blagojevich has been charged with using his position to get personal and professional favors, including trying to sell off the U.S. Senate seat left vacant by President-elect Barack Obama.
Kelly was set to start the nearly 8-year federal sentence this week after being extorted by Chicago Federal Prosecutors into enter into a “guilty” plea to federal mail fraud in an $8,5 million kickback scheme at Chicago International Airport and previous tax offenses. Kelly faced intense pressure from federal prosecutors seeking help in their federal case against the impeached Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich. According to the Chicago Tribune, Kelly's girlfriend Clarissa J. Flores Buhelos, 30 of Chicago, told Chicago Police that “Kelly said he wanted to commit suicide in text messages he sent to her.” So who killed Christopher Kelly, the Fed's, Christopher Kelly, who? The Illinois District court Judge who gave Kelly a white color business man with “no” criminal record an eight year federal prison sentence?
Litigation is a “blood” sport...everyone including YOU are targets in our system of “justice”
.A University of Chicago psychiatrists who did not want to give his name said that it was the “Federal District Court Judge who killed Kelly in my opinion, by giving a 51 year old respected business man an 8 year sentence in jail was like taking a 38 caliber pistol and putting to Mr. Kelly's head and blowing his brains out!” “There is no justification to give such a long sentence to a person who was not a threat to our society there is no question that the Judge killed Kelly!” Litigation is War, Welcome to the Front! [email protected] 312-545-4554
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 15, 2009-A CLOSE CONFIDENT OF FORMER ILLINOIS GOVERNOR ROD BLAGOJEVICH AND HIS CHIEF FUNDRAISER KILLED HIMSELF YESTERDAY. Kelly is a roofing contractor and consultant. He has helped to raise millions of dollars for former Illinois Governor Blagojevich's campaign and he could have given federal prosecutors an inside look at the workings of the governor's administration. Blagojevich has been charged with using his position to get personal and professional favors, including trying to sell off the U.S. Senate seat left vacant by President-elect Barack Obama.
Kelly was set to start the nearly 8-year federal sentence this week after being extorted by Chicago Federal Prosecutors into enter into a “guilty” plea to federal mail fraud in an $8,5 million kickback scheme at Chicago International Airport and previous tax offenses. Kelly faced intense pressure from federal prosecutors seeking help in their federal case against the impeached Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich. According to the Chicago Tribune, Kelly's girlfriend Clarissa J. Flores Buhelos, 30 of Chicago, told Chicago Police that “Kelly said he wanted to commit suicide in text messages he sent to her.” So who killed Christopher Kelly, the Fed's, Christopher Kelly, who? The Illinois District court Judge who gave Kelly a white color business man with “no” criminal record an eight year federal prison sentence?
Litigation is a “blood” sport...everyone including YOU are targets in our system of “justice”
.A University of Chicago psychiatrists who did not want to give his name said that it was the “Federal District Court Judge who killed Kelly in my opinion, by giving a 51 year old respected business man an 8 year sentence in jail was like taking a 38 caliber pistol and putting to Mr. Kelly's head and blowing his brains out!” “There is no justification to give such a long sentence to a person who was not a threat to our society there is no question that the Judge killed Kelly!” Litigation is War, Welcome to the Front! [email protected] 312-545-4554
STOLLER CHARGES LAURA MYERS ESQ AND RAYMOND H. WEBER WITH INSURANCE FRAUD, LAURA MYERS FILES FOR SANCTIONS AGAINST STOLLER
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 14, 2009-STOLLER HAD CHARGED ILLINOIS ATTORNEY LAURA MYERS WITH PARIRIE STATE LEGAL SERVICES, INC., CAROL STREAM, ILLINOIS WITH A “SCHEME” to defraud the Great American Insurance Company http://www.greatamericaninsurance.com/ alone with her clients Raymond H. Weber and his wife Lusha Weber a United Air Lines Employee. In a pleading filed by Laura Myers she has asserted that “Stoller Makes a False, Scurrilous and Unsupported Allegation that Raymond H. Weber and Laura Myers Esq., are engaged in “fraud upon this court.” “On page 2 of Stoller's response to the Motion for Reconsideration Stoller made the totally inappropriate, untrue and completely, unsupported assertion that counsel of record, Laura Myers and Raymond H. Weber have committed a '..clear fraud upon this Court (Judge Thomas Dudgeon) and that Lusha Weber are engaged in a criminal conspiracy to defraud the surety company, Great American Insurance Company and Leo Stoller, such a charge is very serious, an offense, meriting the censure of this Court. It cannot simply be ignored.” Raymond H. Weber and his counsel are continuing to seek in excess of $30,000 from Great American Insurance. The attorney for Great American Insurance Michele L. Killebrew from the Illinois firm of Leo & Weber filed a response to Raymond H. Weber's motion requesting the additional funds from Great American Insurance stating, “Stoller has repeatedly denied that he ever had access to (Raymond H. Weber) monies..Laura Myers Esq has subpoenaed bank records of Stoller...None of the bank documents received to date show that any large deposits were made into Stoller's bank account at the time of the large cash withdrawals from Raymond H. Weber, a convicted felon, bank account.” Nonetheless Laura Myers continues to seek over $30,000 from the Great American Insurance Company. Stoller asserts that this is tantamount to “insurance” fraud by Raymond H. Weber and Laura Myers under the circumstances.
Legal Disclaimer: Laura Myers, Raymond H. Weber and his wife Lusha Weber are considered innocent of insurance fraud until found guilty at trial. Litigation is War, Welcome to the Front..
Legal Disclaimer: Laura Myers, Raymond H. Weber and his wife Lusha Weber are considered innocent of insurance fraud until found guilty at trial. Litigation is War, Welcome to the Front..
MICHAEL T. ZELLER ESQ., ATTEMPTS TO BESMIRCH STOLLER'S REPUTATION
Michael T. Zeller Esq.
CHICAGO--(AEAE)-MONDAY-SEPTEMBER 14, 2009-GOOGLE INC.,'S ATTORNEY MICHAEL T. ZELLER attempts to besmirch Stoller reputation before Judge Virginia Kendell in the Illinois District Court action where Stoller's companies are being sued for RICO. Stoller has moved to intervene as a matter of right claiming that "his reputation can be damaged" if Stoller is not able to intervene into the Illinois District Court Case. Judge Kendell denied Stoller's first request. The case went up on appeal. Stoller won the appeal. The case is now back before Judge Kendell to decide if Stoller has a right to Intervene. In a Reply filed by Michael T. Zeller he wrote,"The only purported interest that Stoller contends supports reconsideration of the Motion to Intervene is his purported "reputation" as a "trademark expert" Even apart from the argument's absurdity in light of this Court's, the Seventh Circuit's and many other Court's decisions repeatedly findings that Stoller's "reputation" is that of a vexatious litigant who has fabricated evidence and committed other acts of fraud and attempted fraud on the judicial system, Stoller's "reputation"--whatever he imagions it to be -- is not the type of concrete substantial interest that could support intervention of right. By Stoller's reasoning, he could interject himself into almost any litigation he chooses by proclaiming some vague impact on his self-declared and equally vague, claims about his supposed "reputation"."
Zeller provided no evidence that any court has ever found Stoller was guilty of "fraud" and attempted "fraud" on the judicial system.
Why do lawyers try to denigrate an opponent to elevate themselves?
Of course Stoller has charged Zeller with perpetrating a "fraud" on the court, but Stoller has produced "evidence" of Mr. Zeller's fraud. However, all of the parties are waiting for a Ruling by Judge Virginia Kendell.
Legal Disclaimer: Michael T. Zeller is considered innoncient of any fraud charges until found quilty in a court of law. Litigation is War, Welcome to the Front! [email protected] 312-545-4554
Zeller provided no evidence that any court has ever found Stoller was guilty of "fraud" and attempted "fraud" on the judicial system.
Why do lawyers try to denigrate an opponent to elevate themselves?
Of course Stoller has charged Zeller with perpetrating a "fraud" on the court, but Stoller has produced "evidence" of Mr. Zeller's fraud. However, all of the parties are waiting for a Ruling by Judge Virginia Kendell.
Legal Disclaimer: Michael T. Zeller is considered innoncient of any fraud charges until found quilty in a court of law. Litigation is War, Welcome to the Front! [email protected] 312-545-4554
ILLINOIS STATE BAR ASSOCIATION MUTUAL LEGAL MALPRACTICE INSURANCE IS "WORTHLESS"?
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-SATURDAY-SEPTEMBER 12, 2009-THE AMERICANS FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF ATTORNEY ETHICS (AEAE) a attorney ethics watch dog group since 1974 does "not" recomend any attorney to purchase his malpractice insurance from the Illinois State Bar Association Mutual Insurance (ISBA Mutual) http://www.isbamutual.com/. For example, the Illinois Naperville attorney law firm Brooks, Adams & Tarulis had their's firms insurance with ISBA Mutual. Shortly after they made a claim ISBA Mutual filed a declaratory judgment against them claiming that the insurance policy was obtained by way of misrepresentation. It is like having your medical insurance company deny your claim after you were diagnosed with cancer. AEAE recomends that law firms should purchase their legal malpractice else were. In the opinion of AEAE ISBA Mutual is "worthless" insurance, because when the law firm really needs it they get a "declaratory judgment lawsuit" instead. At one time Stoller was informed that ISBA Mutual had a disclaimer in their legal malpractice policy that if any Illinois Attorney with their Insurance represented Stoller they would not cover them for legal malpractice....Smells of discrimination...Huh...Why would any Legal Malpractice Insurance Company put a disclaimer that if any of their members represented Stoller they would not cover them for attorney malpractice? If you would like to share any ISBA Mutual stories with AEAE email them to [email protected]
SPPAS HAS RELEASED A STUDY THAT CONTAINS THE "CURE" FOR PARENTAL ALIENATION SYNDROME
LOVE YOU MOM
CHICAGO-(SPPAS) SATURDAY SEPTEMBER 12TH, 2009-THE SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF PARENTAL ALIENATION SYNDROME (SPPAS) has just released the results of a multi year study of Parental Alienation Syndrome (PAS). PAS is found in contested divorce situations involving children. Normally, the mother will brain wash the children against the father in order to secure an advantage in maintaining custody. PAS effects over 1,000,000 children in America today. It is very damaging to the children over a long time and some children "never" get over it. SPPAS study has show that the best way for parents to eliminate PAS is for the fathers to "continue" to "love" the mothers dispite what they preceive as "evil" "mean" acts that the mothers committ against the fathers. For SPPAS has found that the mothers will "not" allow their children to "love" the estranged "father" if the mother does not feel "loved" from the father. This find shocked the paychiatric community. In addition the "fathers" should attempt to continue to have activities with the children which include the "mom". When the children see that the mom's approve of the father PAS will disappear from our planet. Remember, love the "mom" and you have the "cure" to Parental Alienation Syndrome, according to the findings in a recently released study by the Society for the Prevention of Parental Alienation Syndrome (SPPAS). [email protected]
GOOGLE INC., FILES IT RESPONSE IN STOLLER DISTRICT COURT CASE
Where did Summer Go?
CHICAGO--(AEAE)-Friday, September 11, 2009- GOOGLE INC., FILES ITS RESPONSE TO STOLLER MOTION IN THE ILLINOIS DISTRICT COURT CASE. The case grew out of a Petition to Cancel that Stoller filed to cancel the term "google" which is not in the "dictionary" and should be removed from the principle register of the Patent and Trademark Office. Afterwards Google Inc., sued Stoller in the Northern District of Illinois on a "frivolous" Rico action. Stoller's Illinois Bankruptcy Trustee Richard M. Fogle refused to defend Stoller's corporations and breached his fiduciary responsibly. Judge Virginia Kendell granted a "consent" judgment to Google Inc., as a result of the bankruptcy Trustee's actions. Stoller appealed to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals. Stoller won his appeal.
The case was remanded back to Northern District of Illinois Judge Virginia Kendell. In a recent order Judge Kendell again denied Stoller's motion to intervene. Stoller filed a motion for reconsideration in order to give Judge Kendell another opportunity to correct her decision. Judge Kendell set a briefing schedule. Google Inc., has now responded. Stoller will Reply next week. There is no question that the United States Supreme Court will eventually decide this case. Stoller is an Appellate Expert and a Expert Trademark damage consultant. 312-545-4554. [email protected]
SIDEBAR--SHORT WEEK-FRIDAY, can you believe that. Where did this summer go? Where did the last 25 years go? It feels like we are all on a huge Merry-go-Round that has been speeding up every year and none of us can get off the Merry-go-Round, not for a second! See you in Court....until the "last" court speaks...
The case was remanded back to Northern District of Illinois Judge Virginia Kendell. In a recent order Judge Kendell again denied Stoller's motion to intervene. Stoller filed a motion for reconsideration in order to give Judge Kendell another opportunity to correct her decision. Judge Kendell set a briefing schedule. Google Inc., has now responded. Stoller will Reply next week. There is no question that the United States Supreme Court will eventually decide this case. Stoller is an Appellate Expert and a Expert Trademark damage consultant. 312-545-4554. [email protected]
SIDEBAR--SHORT WEEK-FRIDAY, can you believe that. Where did this summer go? Where did the last 25 years go? It feels like we are all on a huge Merry-go-Round that has been speeding up every year and none of us can get off the Merry-go-Round, not for a second! See you in Court....until the "last" court speaks...
Illinois Circuit Court Judge Elmer Tolmaire set Briefing Schedule today
Robert Tepper
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-Thursday, September 10, 2009-IN A HEARING BEFORE ILLINOIS CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE ELMER TOLMAIRE, opposing counsel Robert Tepper asked Judge Tolmaire to transfer or dismiss Stoller Counter Claim. Judge Tolmaire said that, "I don't believe that this court is where I should be dealing with this counter-claim. Mr. Tepper has a judgment and Stoller's counter claim is going to mutty the waters. Stoller said to Judge Tolmaire, "Deny my motion and give me 304 language and we will let the Illinois Appeals Court deal with the Issue." Judge Tolmaire said, " I don't think that will be necessary, how much time do you need Mr. Stoller to file your brief to Tepper's motion to sever?" Stoller responded, "30 days." Judge Tolmaire said, "Can you do it within 25 days?" Stoller responded, "Yes". Have you brief in by October 7, 2009 and we will set Oct. 14, 2009 for status." Stoller said, "Thank you Judge".
With that the hearing concluded. Opposing Counsel Robert Tepper introduced Stoller to a fine look young man, who Tepper said was a law student that Tepper was mentoring for the summer. Stoller told the law student that "he was fortunate to be working with a famous attorney Robert Tepper." Robert Tepper said, "No Stoller it is you that is famous!" Stoller responded, "No, Mr. Tepper I am notorious, you are famous!"
With that the hearing concluded. Opposing Counsel Robert Tepper introduced Stoller to a fine look young man, who Tepper said was a law student that Tepper was mentoring for the summer. Stoller told the law student that "he was fortunate to be working with a famous attorney Robert Tepper." Robert Tepper said, "No Stoller it is you that is famous!" Stoller responded, "No, Mr. Tepper I am notorious, you are famous!"
ILLINOIS CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE THOMAS DUDGEON SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE--TODAY HEARINGS BEFORE JUDGE ELMER TOLMAIRE AND JUDGE JORDAN KAPLAN
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-WEDNESDAY SEPTEMBER 10, 2009-ILLINOIS JUDGE THOMAS DUDGEON SET A BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON TUESDAY SEPTEMBER 9, 2009. Stoller had filed an appeal of his July 9th 2009 decision. Stoller moved to stay the proceeding pending the Appeal. Opposing counsel Laura Myers then files an "out" of time motion for reconsideration, requesting that the Judge Dudgeon triple a judgment to over $35,000. Stoller has charged Laura Myers Esw., an attorney with Prairie State Legal Services, Inc., Carol Streem Illinois 60188 with "aiding and abeding" her client a convicted felon Raymond H. Weber and his wife Lausha Weber a United Airlines Employe with defrauding a Insurance Company that is represented by the law firm of Leo and Weber P.C. Michele Killebrew. Judge Dudgeon set a "briefing" schedule on Stoller's motion to suspending the Appeal.
Today Stoller will appear before Illinois Judge Jordon Kaplan to set aside a divorce settlement that Stoller signed under undue influence in order to get out of the Cook County Jail. Had Stoller not agreed to the terms he would still today be in the Illinois Cook County jail for publishing "speech" on his former blog.
Stoller will also appear today before Illinois Judge Elmer Tolmaire to defend against attorney Robert Tepper who according to Stoller's charges is attempting to collect a judgment against assets that Mr. Tepper knows do not belong to the creditor. This is a common un lawful ploy in these tough times that lawyers employ when they think they will obtain a "default" judgment. But this time Mr. Tepper will be facing attorney disciplinary charges at the Illinois Attorney Disciplinary Commission (ARDC) www.iardc.org LITIGATION IS WAR, WELCOME TO THE FRONT
Today Stoller will appear before Illinois Judge Jordon Kaplan to set aside a divorce settlement that Stoller signed under undue influence in order to get out of the Cook County Jail. Had Stoller not agreed to the terms he would still today be in the Illinois Cook County jail for publishing "speech" on his former blog.
Stoller will also appear today before Illinois Judge Elmer Tolmaire to defend against attorney Robert Tepper who according to Stoller's charges is attempting to collect a judgment against assets that Mr. Tepper knows do not belong to the creditor. This is a common un lawful ploy in these tough times that lawyers employ when they think they will obtain a "default" judgment. But this time Mr. Tepper will be facing attorney disciplinary charges at the Illinois Attorney Disciplinary Commission (ARDC) www.iardc.org LITIGATION IS WAR, WELCOME TO THE FRONT
STOLLER APPEALS TTAB BAXLEY DECISION TO THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
Baxley is unfit to be a TTAB judge
WASHINTON-(AEAE)-SEPTEMBER 8TH, 2009, TUESDAY- INTERLOCKTORY ATTORNEY BAXLEY FROM THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD ISSUED A DECISION ON SEPTEMBERR 1ST, 2009 denying Stoller's motion for reconsideration in Opposition No. 91190926. Stoller moved to to interplead in an Opposition on the grounds that an trademark Application which was assigned to him give Stoller the right as the proper party to defend an the Opposition to Publish. Stoller made a case in his opinion that the Society for the Prevention of Trademark Abuse (SPTA)had no "standing" because no trademark rights were ever assigned to SPTA in a bankruptcy action because the Illinois Bankruptcy Trustee Richard M. Fogel issued a "naked" license and/or license in gross to SPTA in the bankruptcy assignment. Consequently SPTA had no rights to consent to a judgment. However Baxley in Stoller's Opinion does either not know the law regarding what a "naked" license and/or License in gross is or doesn't care. It is Stoller's position that Washington D.C. Lawyer Lance G. Johnson from the firm of www.roylance.com engaged in a scheme to defraud the Bankruptcy court in Illinois and the Patent and Trademark Office. Stoller has laid out carefully Johnson's scheme with 300 pages of the Official Bankruptcy Transcript and made it a part of the record. Stoller as the nationals leading trademark expert asserts in his opinion that Judges like Baxley who ignore "fraud" on the Patent and Trademark Office are unfit to hold a position of arbitrator at the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board and should be removed from office. Stoller has now moved to appeal Baxley's Sept 1, 2009 order before the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals. Stoller has significant experience with Baxley's previous decisions and expected that the Federal Circuit will have to decide this case. Stoller just wanted to go on record prior to the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals Ruling in this case so as to lay a foundation for making his "fraud" case against Baxley once the Federal Circuit makes it ruling in this case.
Legal disclaimer: TTAB Interlocktory Attorney (Judge) Baxley is considered innoncient of Stoller's Fraud charge pending a full hearing at trial. The opinions expressed here are those of Stoller.
Legal disclaimer: TTAB Interlocktory Attorney (Judge) Baxley is considered innoncient of Stoller's Fraud charge pending a full hearing at trial. The opinions expressed here are those of Stoller.
STOLLER ARE YOU SUEING ME FOR 37 MILLION DOLLARS?
REMEMBER ME, I AM STILL HERE!
ELM WOOD PARK, ILLINOIS-SEPTEMBER 7, 2009-MONDAY-YOU ASKED ME IF I AM SUING YOU FOR 37 MILLION DOLLARS? I am going to sue for the rest of my life those parties who are responsible for violating my civil rights under Section 1983, rest assured of that fact! However, "friends" do not normally sue "friends".
STOLLER WOULD "NEVER" SUE A FRIEND
WOULD YOU SUE ME?
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 8TH, 2009-STOLLER WAS ASKED IN A RECENT INTERVIEW, "You have a national reputation for sueing a lot of entities, until the last court speaks, would you ever sue a friend?" Stoller responded,"I will persue a valid cause of action against an enemy until the last court speaks, but I would never sue a friend?" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-lZ2IsmqvmI&feature=related
LEO STOLLER FILES APPEAL TO THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT OF COOK COUNTY JUDGES'S DECISION CRIMINALIZING INTERNET SPEECH
Justice Roberts
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-MONDAY SEPTEMBER 7, 2009-LEO STOLLER FILES A PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Certiorari WITH THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT. On June 8, 2009, Leo Stoller was ordered by Illinois Cook County Divorce Judge Carol K. Bellows to be taken into custody for publishing "Speech" on the Internet. Publishing articles on his blog. The United States Supreme Court had ruled in ACLU v. Janet Reno http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1996/1996_96_511that a citizen has a First Amendment Right to Publish Information on the Internet. Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union, 521 U.S. 844 (1997), is a United States Supreme Court case, in which all 9 Justices of the Court voted to strike down anti-indecency provisions of the Communications Decency Act (the CDA), finding they violated the freedom of speech provisions of the First Amendment. Two Justices concurred in part and dissented in part to the decision. This was the first major Supreme Court ruling regarding the regulation of materials distributed via Internet. The Illinois Supreme Court declined to hear Stoller appeal of Judge Bellows unconstitutional decison to incarcerate Stoller for 37 days in the Illinois Cook County Jail for the lawful publication of Speech on the Internet. Stoller now turns to the the Highest Court in the Land, the United States Supreme Court for relief. Stoller has previously filed over 15 Writ of Certiorari before the High Court and is an First Amendment Scholar and Appellate Expert.
When things go wrong, as they sometimes will,
When the road you're trudging seems all uphill,
When the funds are low and the debts are high,
And you want to smile, but you have to sigh,
When care is pressing you down a bit
Rest if you must, but don't you quit.
Life is queer with its twists and its turns,
As everyone of us sometimes learns,
And many a failure turns about
When they might have won, had they stuck it out.
Don't give up though the pace seems slow,
You may succeed with another blow.
Often the goal is nearer than,
It seems to a faint and faltering man,
Often the struggler has given up
When he might have captured the victor's cup;
And he learned too late when the night came down,
How close he was to the golden crown.
Success is failure turned inside out
The silver tint of the clouds of doubt
And you never can tell how close you are,
It may be near when it seems so far;
So stick to the fight when you're hardest hit,
It's when things seem worst that you must not quit!
C
When things go wrong, as they sometimes will,
When the road you're trudging seems all uphill,
When the funds are low and the debts are high,
And you want to smile, but you have to sigh,
When care is pressing you down a bit
Rest if you must, but don't you quit.
Life is queer with its twists and its turns,
As everyone of us sometimes learns,
And many a failure turns about
When they might have won, had they stuck it out.
Don't give up though the pace seems slow,
You may succeed with another blow.
Often the goal is nearer than,
It seems to a faint and faltering man,
Often the struggler has given up
When he might have captured the victor's cup;
And he learned too late when the night came down,
How close he was to the golden crown.
Success is failure turned inside out
The silver tint of the clouds of doubt
And you never can tell how close you are,
It may be near when it seems so far;
So stick to the fight when you're hardest hit,
It's when things seem worst that you must not quit!
C
HAPPY 52nd BIRTHDAY SWEETIE
The Birthday Girl '52'!
ELMWOOD PARK, ILLINOIS -(AEAE)-SEPTEMBER 5TH, 2009--HAPPY BIRTHDAY SWEETIE! You think that I don't love you, think again. I have never "stopped" loving you. "Who" I didn't forget your birthday Sept 1, 2009 either. Big Steers and I was there when you were born...love you too... and you "Jip" I didn't forget July 8, 2009, your birthday. "Who" and "Big Steers" and I were there when you were born on July 8, 1995....I love you all and miss you....look forward to seeing you soon....it won't be long now...
STOLLER SUES ANOTHER ILLINOIS ATTORNEY ROBERT R. TEPPER
ROBERT R. TEPPER ESQ.
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-FRIDAY-SEPTEMBER 4, 2009-STOLLER HAS FILED A LAWSUIT AGAINST A ILLINOIS ATTORNEY ROBERT R. TEPPER, 11 W. Washington Suite 1900, Chicago, Illinois. Tepper a long time listed with the AMERICANS FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF ATTORNEY ETHICS (AEAE) a attorney rating and ethics "watch dog" group, as "not" recomended. Tepper is charged with filing a "false" lien against real estate in which he knew or should have known was not owed by the party where Tepper placed his lien. Illinois Case No. 04-L-3226. Tepper has moved to sever the Stoller's cross complaint from Case No. 04 L 3226 despite the fact that the case should not be servered. Stoller had previously filed several attorney disciplinary complaints against Robert R. Tepper with the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission (ARDC) www.iardc.org . Stoller anticipates filing another ARDC against Tepper next week.
THE STAKES ARE HIGHER THAN EVER
SEE YOU IN COURT!
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-THURSDAY-SEPTEMBER 3 2009-THE STAKES IN STOLLER CASES ARE HIGHER THAN EVER. COURT HEARING ON WEDNESDAY WENT IN STOLLER'S DIRECTION. The Lance G. Johnson Esq 100 Million dollar defamation is on appeal. Judge Kathy Flanagan set a status for Dec 1, 2009. Stoller has appealed his final divorce settlement agreement which Stoller was forced to sign on July 15, 2009 while he was in the custody of the Cook County Department of Corrections. The Elmwood Park Malicious prosecution case is also on appeal. Stoller was forced to sign a "agreed" order of dismissal as a condition precedent to get out of the Cook County Jail. Judge Chjarles Wrinkler dismissed Stoller's malicious prosecution case on July 22, 2009. Stoller is well positioned to "reverse" all of these erroneous decisions.
In The Illinois Cook County Law Division the average case can take from 5 to 7 years to resolve. As opposed to the Northern District of Illinois Federal Court where the average case is resolved in 6 months. This fall on the Rentamark blog there will be more detailed case studies from the "front" revealed. There are more law suits planed. and you will follow the "blow" by "blow" legal action seven days a week right here...so stay tuned..
.Litigation is the sea I swim in,
Litigation is the air I breath,
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front.
In The Illinois Cook County Law Division the average case can take from 5 to 7 years to resolve. As opposed to the Northern District of Illinois Federal Court where the average case is resolved in 6 months. This fall on the Rentamark blog there will be more detailed case studies from the "front" revealed. There are more law suits planed. and you will follow the "blow" by "blow" legal action seven days a week right here...so stay tuned..
.Litigation is the sea I swim in,
Litigation is the air I breath,
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front.
HEARING SET TODAY BEFORE ILLINOIS FEDERAL JUDGE GERALDINE SOAT BROWN
SEE YOU IN COURT
CHICAGO-AEAE-WEDNESDAY-SEPT 2, 2009-STOLLER WILL APPEAR BEFORE ILLINOIS FEDERAL JUDGE GERALDINE SOAT BROWN AND REQUEST THE APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL. The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals appointed Judge Brown to hear a matter in which Stoller is entitled to have, in this case counsel represent himself. Stoller previously made an oral request and this time set a hearing today before Judge Geraldine Brown http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/judge/BROWN/gsbpage.htm for the appointment of counse in the Federal Court House at 219 s. Dearborn in Chicago, Illinois 60606.
TODAY ILLINOIS CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE KATHY FLANAGAN GRANTS STOLLER'S MOTION TO STAY PENDING APPEAL.
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-Tuesday, September 1, 2009--TODAY ILLINOIS CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE KATHY FLANAGAN GRANTED STOLLER'S MOTION TO STAY THE LANCE G. JOHNSON www.roylance.com 100 MILLION DOLLAR DEFAMATION PENDING STOLLER'S APPEAL of Flanagan's decision granting Johnson's Motion to quash Service. Judge Flanagan set a status date of Dec. 1, 2009. Gordon and Rees representes Lance G. Johohson, David Abrams and Alfred Goodman who all face charges of per se defamation of Stoller.
I RATHER BE ON THE BEACH
"NOW I GOT YOU RIGHT WERE I WANT YOU!"
I got you were I want you!
CHICAGO—COMMENTARY-SEPTEMBER 1, 2009-IT WAS 1991, I WAS ATTENTING THE CHICAGO BULLS V. NEW YORK KNICKS FINAL BASKETBALL GAME AT THE OLD STADIUM IN CHICAGO. I was seated right next to the Chicago Bulls Bench. At half time, the Bulls were losing by 12 points to the Knicks. As Michael Jordon and Scottie Pippen walked right by me, to the locker room, I heard Scottie Pippen say to Michael Jordon, “We got'em right were we want them!”
The Chicago Bulls came out in the Second half and beat the Knicks by 15 points. The Bulls went on to win the 1991 NBA Championship.
I feel the same way that Scottie Pippen felt. “I got you in the Appeals Court, I got you where I want YOU!” See you in Court!
The Chicago Bulls came out in the Second half and beat the Knicks by 15 points. The Bulls went on to win the 1991 NBA Championship.
I feel the same way that Scottie Pippen felt. “I got you in the Appeals Court, I got you where I want YOU!” See you in Court!
ILLINOIS CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE KATHY FLANAGAN TO RULE IN THE 100 MILLION LANCE G. JOHNSON ESQ., DEFAMATION CASE SEPT 1, 2009
LITIGATION IS THE SEA I SWIM IN, THE AIR I BREATH
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-MONDAY-AUGUST 31, 2009-ILLINOIS CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE KATHY FLANAGAN SET A HEARING IN THE LANCE G. JOHNSON ESQ. www.roylance.com 100 million dollar defamation case for Tuesday. Johnson's attorny Ryan attemped to ambush Stoller at the last hearing on Friday. Judge Flanagan requested that Stoller bring into court all of his "appeal" documents. The case is currently on appeal with the Illinois Appellate Court. Johnson's attorney ignores that fact and wants to proceed before Judge Flanagan dispite the fact that Johnson claims that he as "not" been served, although Stoller has evidence and an affidavit from his process server show that Johnson and his law partners David Abrams and Alfred Goodman have been served. In order for Johnson, Abrams and Goodman to avoid the defamation judgment that is coming they have spent over one year denying and litigating over service of process, notwithstanding the fact that they have been served. This is the game that anyone who sues attorneys can expect to deal with. When they have "no" defense to the claims, the defendant attorneys will attempt to deny service of process, as is the case at bar.
On Wednesday Stoller will appeal before Federal Judge Brown on a hearing.
Stoller is waiting for a decision from the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board on his motion for reconsideration as to Stoller request to substitute. The Board is looking for any reason to "deny" Stoller's constitutional right to be substituted in an Opposition brought by Best Co. Stoller is confident that he has the law, the facts and the constitution on his side. In that case Stoller has not only to fight the legal issues but a clearly bias and prejudice Trademark Trial and Appeal Board panel of judges who will do anything to prevent Stoller from aserting his trademark rights before the Board. With Stoller's motion for reonsideration he has made his "record" and is prepared to go immediately to the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals once the Board rules against Stoller. Stoller is confident he will prevail before the Federal Circuit....LITIGATION IS WAR, WELCOME TO THE FRONT...SEE YOU IN COURT....Stoller can always be reached at 312-545-4554 [email protected] http://www.almexperts.com/ExpertWitness/experts_and_consultants/expert/8550060.html
A
On Wednesday Stoller will appeal before Federal Judge Brown on a hearing.
Stoller is waiting for a decision from the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board on his motion for reconsideration as to Stoller request to substitute. The Board is looking for any reason to "deny" Stoller's constitutional right to be substituted in an Opposition brought by Best Co. Stoller is confident that he has the law, the facts and the constitution on his side. In that case Stoller has not only to fight the legal issues but a clearly bias and prejudice Trademark Trial and Appeal Board panel of judges who will do anything to prevent Stoller from aserting his trademark rights before the Board. With Stoller's motion for reonsideration he has made his "record" and is prepared to go immediately to the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals once the Board rules against Stoller. Stoller is confident he will prevail before the Federal Circuit....LITIGATION IS WAR, WELCOME TO THE FRONT...SEE YOU IN COURT....Stoller can always be reached at 312-545-4554 [email protected] http://www.almexperts.com/ExpertWitness/experts_and_consultants/expert/8550060.html
A
STOLLER MOVES TO SET ASIDE DIVORCE SETTLEMENT
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-SUNDAY-AUGUST 30, 2009- STOLLER HAS MOVED TO SET ASIDE A FINAL DIVORCE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT THAT STOLLER WAS "FORCED" TO SIGN while he was in the Custody of the Cook County Department of Corrections in order to be "released" from the Illinois Cook County Jail. On June 8, 2009 Leo Stoller was taken into custody by the Illinois Department of Corrections for the "crime" of blogging. Stoller was held for 37 days in maxium security at the Illinois Cook County Jail located at 26th and Calfornia, in Chicago, Illinois. In order to be released from jail Stoller was extorted into "signing" a martial settlement agreement in which Stoller was forced to give up his entire interest in his martial estate to his wife. Illinois divorce Court Judge Carol K. Bellows asked Stoller in open court while Stoller was still in his jail uniform if he though the "agreement" was "fair". Stoller with hand cuffs on said, "Yes judge, I believe that this agreement is "real" fair!". The hand cuffs were removed, Stoller signed the marital settlement agreement. Stoller was then returned to the Cook County Jail where he was released at about 1:00AM July 16, 2009. Stoller has now, finally gotten his "sea" legs back and filed to set aside the agreement that was a product of undue influence, fraud and extortion. Everyone who reads this blog and was responsible for violating Stoller civil rights are being named in a Section 1983 Civil Rights lawsuit. They believe because they have not been served yet that they will "never" be served. Think again, the processor server will find you and will serve you. You will get your opportunity in a court of law to make your defense, but you are going to served any day now....You don't think that you can unlawfully lock someone up for 37 days in the Cook County Jail and get away with it, especially someone who has 41 years experience in suing people just like you....
SPPAS DEFINES PARENTAL ALIENATION AS SOCIETY'S GREATEST "EVIL"
ELMWOOD PARK, ILLINOIS (SPPAS)-SATURDAY, AUGUST 29, 2009- THE SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF PARENTAL ALIENATION SYNDROME as "a disorder that arises primarily in the context of child-custody disputes. Its primary manifestation is the child's campaign of denigration against a father, a campaign that has no justification. It results from the combination of a evil mother programming (brainwashing) mother's indoctrination and the child's own contributions to the vilification of the Father." To better understand PAS and help prevent the damage its causes children and families, SPPAS is suggesting that parents and the courts must understand the process that leads to PAS. Therefore SPPAS defines parental alienation (PA), rather than PAS, as any constellation of behaviors, whether conscious or unconscious, that could evoke a disturbance in the relationship between a child and the other parent. Mother's who engage in PAS are "evil" "ugly" and do not deserve to be called "mother!" Society must know who these evil, ugly mothers are, if you have the name of any please email [email protected] so SPPAS can let the world know who these ugly women are.
ILLINOIS JUDGE KATHY FLANAGAN SETS HEARING FOR SEPT FIRST IN LANCE G. JOHNSON 100 MILLION DOLLAR DEFAMATION LAWSUIT
THIS FOGEL IS NOT A BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE
CHICAGO--(AEAE)-FRIDAY AUGUST 28th 2009--IN A HEARING TODAY, ILLINOIS CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE SET A HEARING FOR SEPT 1, 2009 IN THE LANCE G. JOHNSON ESQ. 100 million dollar defamation lawsuit. A Gordon & Rees Attorney representing Johnson insisted today on a briefing schedule. However, Judge Flanagan gave Stoller until Sept 1, 2009 to bring into court his entire appeal file. There is a question as to whether Judge Flanagan still has jurisdiction of this proceeding pending Stoller's appeal of Judge Flanagan's motion to vacate service.
ILLLINOIS ATTORNEY LAURA MYERS DENIES AIDING AND ABEDING RAYMOND H. WEBER DEFRAUDING AN INSURANCE COMPANY
NO BODY BEATS STOLLER
CHICAGFO-(AEAE)- Friday, August 28, 2009-YESTERDAY LAURA MYERS ESQ. FROM PRAIRE STATE LEGAL SERVICES, INC., DENIED ENGAGING IN INSURANCE FRAUD WITH HER CLIENT, RAYMOND H. WEBER, A CONVICTED FELON. Ms. Myers objected to being posted on this blog. Stoller told Ms. Myers in response to “file a defamation lawsuit against Stoller, if Ms. Myers doesn't like what is written about her on this blog, save Stoller a filing fee!”
Further Stoller issued a ban on Ms. Myers coming to this blog again. Stoller told Ms. Myers to inform her client that Raymond H. Weber and his wife Lusha Weber are also banned from visiting this site.
In the Lance G. Johnson Esq. www.roylance.com 100 million Defamation case there is a hearing today before Illinois Judge Kathy Flanagan.
Illinois District Court Judge Virginia Kendell issued another decision in the Google Inc., RICO case setting a briefing schedule on Stoller's Motion for Reconsideration.
Stoller filed a Motion before Illinois Special Master Judge Brown for appointment of attorney, the hearing is set for net week.
The Illinois Appellate Court granted a slue of Stoller's motions today, permitting Stoller to file records, docketing statements and to consolidate records. While Stoller was unlawfully held in the custody of the Illinois C ook County Department of Corrections from June 8, 2009 until July 15, 2009 for “blogging” Stoller was unable to make some filing dates in various courts. However, since Stoller's release from the Cook County Jail he has filed motions in all of the court room proceedings in order to permit his “late” filings under the excusable neglect doctrine. Please stay tuned..here is a lot of legal “fire works going on...Litigation is War, Welcome to the Front...[email protected] Leo Stoller is an Appellate Expert, Tradement Expert 312-545-4554
Further Stoller issued a ban on Ms. Myers coming to this blog again. Stoller told Ms. Myers to inform her client that Raymond H. Weber and his wife Lusha Weber are also banned from visiting this site.
In the Lance G. Johnson Esq. www.roylance.com 100 million Defamation case there is a hearing today before Illinois Judge Kathy Flanagan.
Illinois District Court Judge Virginia Kendell issued another decision in the Google Inc., RICO case setting a briefing schedule on Stoller's Motion for Reconsideration.
Stoller filed a Motion before Illinois Special Master Judge Brown for appointment of attorney, the hearing is set for net week.
The Illinois Appellate Court granted a slue of Stoller's motions today, permitting Stoller to file records, docketing statements and to consolidate records. While Stoller was unlawfully held in the custody of the Illinois C ook County Department of Corrections from June 8, 2009 until July 15, 2009 for “blogging” Stoller was unable to make some filing dates in various courts. However, since Stoller's release from the Cook County Jail he has filed motions in all of the court room proceedings in order to permit his “late” filings under the excusable neglect doctrine. Please stay tuned..here is a lot of legal “fire works going on...Litigation is War, Welcome to the Front...[email protected] Leo Stoller is an Appellate Expert, Tradement Expert 312-545-4554
STOLLER TODAY APPEALED ILLINOIS JUDGE DENNIS PORTER'S AUGUST 24, 2009 DECISION DENYING STOLLER'S MOTION TO DISMISS AN INDIRECT CRIMINAL CONTEMPT PROCEEDING SEEKING A SIX MONTHS JAIL TIME FOR BLOGGING
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-THURSDAY AUGUST 27, 2009. STOLLER FILED AN APPEAL OF ILLINOIS CRIMINAL COURT JUDGE DENNIS PORTER'S AUGUST 24, 2009 DECISION DENYING STOLLER'S MOTION TO DISMISS AN INDIRECT CRIMINAL CONTEMPT PROCEEDING IN WHICH STOLLER IS STAIRING AT 6 MONTHS JAIL TIME FOR PUBLISHING SPEECH ON THE INTERNET (“Blogging”). On April 16, 2008 the “Plaintiff filed her Amended Third Petition for Adjudication of Indirect Criminal Contempt regarding Stoller's alleged violations of temporary orders entered March 31, 2006 and July 18, 2007, in the parties underlying dissolution of marriage case. Said temporary orders provided for injunctive relief limiting the Stoller's communication via the Internet and e-mail.
On June 8, 2009 the Leo Stoller was found in civil contempt of court by the Honorable Carole K. Bellows and was ordered incarcerated in the Cook County Jail for violations relating to the same orders that serve as the basis for the Amended Third Petition for Adjudication of Indirect Criminal Contempt. Stoller remained incarcerated for 37 days.
On July 15, 2009 the parties’ underlying dissolution of marriage case was concluded by entry of a final Judgment for Dissolution of Marriage entered by Judge Bellows and then Stoller was released from jail. In the context of a dissolution proceeding, injunctive orders terminate when the trial court granted respondent’s motion to dismiss petitioner’s petition for dissolution. In re Marriage of Ignatius, 273 Ill.Dec. 203 (Ill. App., 2003). Since the Plaintiff’s two count Amended Third Petition for Adjudication of Indirect Criminal Contempt relies solely on previous court orders that have been terminated and thus are no longer enforceable, her petition does not state an offense and should be dismissed. 725 ILCS 5/114-1(a)(8). Judge Dennis Porter, a well known and respected Criminal Court Judge operating out of 26 and California, disagreed and denied Stoller's motion to dismiss.
Today Stoller appealed and looks forward to having the Illinois Appellate court weigh in on the Issue. Stoller also today filed a Motion before the Illinois Supreme Court requesting that the Illinois Supreme Court stay the criminal proceeding pending Stoller's Appeal regarding the free speech issue. When someone is unlawfully attempting to put Stoller in jail you can be sure that he will exercise all of his rights in all of the courts to make sure that does not happen...”Litigation is War, Welcome to the Front....” 312-545-4554 [email protected] Stoller is an Appellate Expert..
On June 8, 2009 the Leo Stoller was found in civil contempt of court by the Honorable Carole K. Bellows and was ordered incarcerated in the Cook County Jail for violations relating to the same orders that serve as the basis for the Amended Third Petition for Adjudication of Indirect Criminal Contempt. Stoller remained incarcerated for 37 days.
On July 15, 2009 the parties’ underlying dissolution of marriage case was concluded by entry of a final Judgment for Dissolution of Marriage entered by Judge Bellows and then Stoller was released from jail. In the context of a dissolution proceeding, injunctive orders terminate when the trial court granted respondent’s motion to dismiss petitioner’s petition for dissolution. In re Marriage of Ignatius, 273 Ill.Dec. 203 (Ill. App., 2003). Since the Plaintiff’s two count Amended Third Petition for Adjudication of Indirect Criminal Contempt relies solely on previous court orders that have been terminated and thus are no longer enforceable, her petition does not state an offense and should be dismissed. 725 ILCS 5/114-1(a)(8). Judge Dennis Porter, a well known and respected Criminal Court Judge operating out of 26 and California, disagreed and denied Stoller's motion to dismiss.
Today Stoller appealed and looks forward to having the Illinois Appellate court weigh in on the Issue. Stoller also today filed a Motion before the Illinois Supreme Court requesting that the Illinois Supreme Court stay the criminal proceeding pending Stoller's Appeal regarding the free speech issue. When someone is unlawfully attempting to put Stoller in jail you can be sure that he will exercise all of his rights in all of the courts to make sure that does not happen...”Litigation is War, Welcome to the Front....” 312-545-4554 [email protected] Stoller is an Appellate Expert..
WHERE WERE YOU WHEN KENNEDY DIED?
CHICAGO—COMMENTARY (AEAE)-AUGUST 27, 2009 THURSDAY—WHERE WERE YOU WHEN KENNEDY DIED? When John F. Kennedy was killed in 1963, I was a senior in Weber High School. It was about noon, I was in the cafeteria eating lunch. An announcement came over the loud speaker,”the President was shot today!” All of the students cheered, we though it was the president of our student class and we thought it was a “Joke”. When we found out that it was President John F. Kennedy that was killed no one thought it was funny.
In June of 1968 I was a graduate student at North Dakota State University in Fargo, North Dakota. Where I met Robert Kennedy, the day before he was killed in California. Roberta Kennedy few to North Dakota to campaign there before going on to California where he was killed.
On Tuesday evening, August 25, 2009, when Edward Kennedy died I was writing a Illinois Appellate Brief.
Although, as a life long Republican, I never supported any Kennedy, as part of the loyal opposition I did respect them and their family for the service they gave our county. Stoller can be contacted at [email protected] 312-545-4554
In June of 1968 I was a graduate student at North Dakota State University in Fargo, North Dakota. Where I met Robert Kennedy, the day before he was killed in California. Roberta Kennedy few to North Dakota to campaign there before going on to California where he was killed.
On Tuesday evening, August 25, 2009, when Edward Kennedy died I was writing a Illinois Appellate Brief.
Although, as a life long Republican, I never supported any Kennedy, as part of the loyal opposition I did respect them and their family for the service they gave our county. Stoller can be contacted at [email protected] 312-545-4554
STOLLER FILES MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION IN GOOGLE INC RICO ACTION
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-WEDNESDAY AUGUST 26, 2009-STOLLER FILED A MOTION FOR REONSIDERATION BEFORE ILLINOIS DISTRICT COURT JUDGE VIRGINIA KENDELL EXTENDING AN OPPORTUNITY FOR THE JUDGE TO RECONSIDER HER DECISION IN THE GOOGLE INC., CIVIL RICO ACTION. The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals has already reversed Judge Kendell once and Stoller was attempting to avoid another trip to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals. Stoller set the hearing for tomorrow Thursday, in front of Judge Kendell. On Friday Stoller has a hearing before a probate Judge Dudgeon on another Motion for Reconsideration which was filed by Laura Myers Esq. Stoller has charged her with insurance "fraud" aiding and abeding her client Raymond H. Weber in the commission of insurance fraud. The case is already before the Illinois Appellate Court and Stoller is confident of a reversal of Judge Dudgeon's July 9th, 2009 exparte order. Stoller is an Appellate and Trademark Expert email [email protected] 312-545-4554 "Litigation is War, Welcome to the Front!"
STOLLER FILES MOTION BEFORE THE ILLINOIS SUPREME COURT TO STAY INDIRECT CRIMINAL CONTEMPT PROCEEDING PENDING ILL SUPREME COURT APPEAL
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-TUESDAY-AUGUST 25, 2009-STOLLER FILED A MOTION BEFORE THE ILLINOIS SUPREME COURT TO STAY AN INDIRECT CRIMINAL CONTEMPT PROCEEDING PENDING STOLLER'S APPEAL TO THE ILLINOIS SURPEME COURT. An Illinois Divorce Court Judge Carol K. Bellows issued a order of comittment on June 8, 2009 ordering Leo Stoller into the custody of the cook County Department of Corrections for publishing "speech" on the Internet. Stoller spend 37 days in the Cook
County Jail over the principle of free speech. Judge Bellows forced Stoller to remove his other blog that he had thousands of articles on. In Stoller's Opinion Judge Bellows criminalized "Speech" in clear violation of Stoller's First Amendment Rights. The unlying case was a divorce proceeding in which Stoller ex-wife and her divorce lawyer charged Stoller also with Indirect Criminal Contempt for the publcation of "speech" on the Internet (Blogging).
On Monday August 24, 2009 Criminal Court Judge Dennis Porter set a trial date for October 9th, 2009. Stoller has now moved to have the trial "stayed" pending his appeal of all of Judge Bellows unlying Orders "criminalizing" Speech on the Internet in violation of the U.S. Supreme Court findings in the ACLU v. Reno case.
Stoller has raised the alert to the Illinois Supreme Court that they must resolve the First Amendment Issues and give instructions to Illinois Judges regarding the error of "criminalizing" speech on the Internet. Stay tuned...Stoller's ex-wife and her divorce attorney are looking to have him incarcerated for 6 months. Stoller is preparing a Section 1983 Civil Rights Lawsuit against them...Litigation is War Welcome to the Front
County Jail over the principle of free speech. Judge Bellows forced Stoller to remove his other blog that he had thousands of articles on. In Stoller's Opinion Judge Bellows criminalized "Speech" in clear violation of Stoller's First Amendment Rights. The unlying case was a divorce proceeding in which Stoller ex-wife and her divorce lawyer charged Stoller also with Indirect Criminal Contempt for the publcation of "speech" on the Internet (Blogging).
On Monday August 24, 2009 Criminal Court Judge Dennis Porter set a trial date for October 9th, 2009. Stoller has now moved to have the trial "stayed" pending his appeal of all of Judge Bellows unlying Orders "criminalizing" Speech on the Internet in violation of the U.S. Supreme Court findings in the ACLU v. Reno case.
Stoller has raised the alert to the Illinois Supreme Court that they must resolve the First Amendment Issues and give instructions to Illinois Judges regarding the error of "criminalizing" speech on the Internet. Stay tuned...Stoller's ex-wife and her divorce attorney are looking to have him incarcerated for 6 months. Stoller is preparing a Section 1983 Civil Rights Lawsuit against them...Litigation is War Welcome to the Front
ATTORNEY LAURA MYERS, PRAIRIE STATE LEGAL SERVICES AND RAYMOND H. WEBER CHARGED WITH INSURANCE FRAUD
STOLLER CHARGES ATTORNEY LAURA MYERS WITH AIDDING AND ABEDING HER CLIENT RAYMOND H. WEBER WITH INSURANCE FRAUD
WHEATON, ILLINOIS (AEAE)-MONDAY-AUGUST 24, 2009-STOLLER CHARGES ATTORNEY LAURA MYERS AND PRARIE STATE LEGAL SERVICES, INC., WITH AIDING AND ABEDING HER CLIENT RAYMENT H. WEBER WITH INSURANCE FRAUD. In a civil case in Du page County, Illinois Case No. 2007 P 28 Laura Myers obtained an ex parte judgment of $16,000 against Stoller while he was incarcerated in the Cook County Jail for the publication of Speech on the Internet. The Probate case involves an accounting of the Estate of Raymond H. Weber, a convicted felon, who falsely claims that the guardian removed over $75,000 from his Citi Bank Account, although Raymond H. Weber “never” gave the guardian access to any of his checking accounts and is now according to charges by Stoller engaged in a “scheme” to defraud the surety company along with his attorney Laura Myers. The Judge presiding is Thomas Dudgeon. Laura Myers filed a frivolous motion to reconsider the “$16,000” judgment and requested that Judge Dudgeon grant a judgment of over $35,000 despite the fact that during the trial the convicted felon Raymond H. Weber presented “no” evidence that the Guardian removed any funds from the bank accounts of Raymond H. Weber. There is a hearing this week...Stay tuned...This case is being referred to the justice department for an investigation of attorney Laura Myers, the convicted felon Raymond H. Weber and his wife Lusha Weber, an employee of United Airlines . Attorney Michele Killebrew from the Illinois law firm of Leo & Weber represent the surety company. If you have any information Laura Myers, Raymond H. Weber or Lausha Weber, an employee of United Air Lines please email it to us at [email protected]
Legal Notice: Laura Myers, Raymond H. Weber and Lausha Weber are considered innoncient of all charges of Insurance fraud until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt at trial.
WHEATON, ILLINOIS (AEAE)-MONDAY-AUGUST 24, 2009-STOLLER CHARGES ATTORNEY LAURA MYERS AND PRARIE STATE LEGAL SERVICES, INC., WITH AIDING AND ABEDING HER CLIENT RAYMENT H. WEBER WITH INSURANCE FRAUD. In a civil case in Du page County, Illinois Case No. 2007 P 28 Laura Myers obtained an ex parte judgment of $16,000 against Stoller while he was incarcerated in the Cook County Jail for the publication of Speech on the Internet. The Probate case involves an accounting of the Estate of Raymond H. Weber, a convicted felon, who falsely claims that the guardian removed over $75,000 from his Citi Bank Account, although Raymond H. Weber “never” gave the guardian access to any of his checking accounts and is now according to charges by Stoller engaged in a “scheme” to defraud the surety company along with his attorney Laura Myers. The Judge presiding is Thomas Dudgeon. Laura Myers filed a frivolous motion to reconsider the “$16,000” judgment and requested that Judge Dudgeon grant a judgment of over $35,000 despite the fact that during the trial the convicted felon Raymond H. Weber presented “no” evidence that the Guardian removed any funds from the bank accounts of Raymond H. Weber. There is a hearing this week...Stay tuned...This case is being referred to the justice department for an investigation of attorney Laura Myers, the convicted felon Raymond H. Weber and his wife Lusha Weber, an employee of United Airlines . Attorney Michele Killebrew from the Illinois law firm of Leo & Weber represent the surety company. If you have any information Laura Myers, Raymond H. Weber or Lausha Weber, an employee of United Air Lines please email it to us at [email protected]
Legal Notice: Laura Myers, Raymond H. Weber and Lausha Weber are considered innoncient of all charges of Insurance fraud until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt at trial.
STOLLER SET TO RE-LAUNCH HIS FORMER "BLOG"
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-SUNDAY AUGUST 23, 2009. STOLLER SET TO RE-LAUNCH IS FORMER BLOG. On June 8, 2009 Illinois Divorce Court Judge Carol K. Bellows issued an "unconstitutional" order of comitment having Stoller taken into custody by the Illinois Cook County Department of Corrections for publishing "speech" on his blog in violation of Stoller's First Amendment rights. Stoller was held for 37 days in maxium security jail cell 1306 locked down 18 hours a day. Stoller was freed from jail only after he was extorted into entering into a divorce settlement in which he was forced to give us all of his entire martial estate to his wife in exchange for his freedom. In addition. Stoller under protest was forced to have his entire blog with thousands of articles removed completely from the Internet. Now Stoller has appealed Judge Carol K. Bellows decisions to the Illinois Supreme Court. Stoller expects the Illinois Supreme Court to strike down Judge Carol K. Bellows unconstitutional orders restricting the publishing articles on the Internet. Stoller expects all of judge Bellows unconstitutional orders including his marital settlement to be striken down. The day that happens Stoller is ready to re-post his former blog, all of his 44 youtube videos and legal pleadings back on line. This is in response to all of Stoller's readers who have asked Stoller when is he going to re-post his former blog. Stay Tuned...it coming back
THE SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF PARENTAL ALIENATION SYNDROME IS AGAINST MOTHERS WHO REFUSE TO ALLOW THEIR DAD'S BE WITH THEIR CHILDREN
CHICAGO--(SPPAS)-THE SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF PARENTAL ALIENATION SYNDROME finds that "back to school and holidays" are the days that Mothers engage in parental alienation syndome. These women who are currently engaged in contested divorce proceedings on days like today prevent their children from visiting their Dads. These evil women destroy their children's love for their father by brainwashing them according to Dr. Fisher. . These "evil" women do not deserve the title "mother" and deserve public disgrace. Fathers find these women so ugly that these fathers "stop looking in the faces of these "ugly" women and "never" will look in their face(s) again....For the name of the SPPAS 2009 worst mother in America email [email protected]
ELMWOOD PARK FATHER DEPRIVED OF SEEING HIS CHILDREN SINCE JUNE 6, 2009 AS A RESULT OF "PARENTAL ALIENATION"
CHICAGO--(SPPAS)- Saturday, August 22, 2009-THE SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF PARENTAL ALIENATION SYNDROME (SPPAS) IS NOW RECOMENDING THAT FATHER'S EXPLORE USING THE CIVIL RACKETTERING STATUTE TO SUE EX-WIFES AND THEIR AIDS, LAWYERS WHO PARTICIPATE IN PREVENTING A FATHER FROM BEING WITH HIS CHILDREN IN CUSTODY/DIVORCE PROCEEDINGS. Women have engaged in parental alienation, preventing the fathers from being with their children in contested custody divorce proceedings with impunity. One father from Chicago is suing his ex-wife now and her lawyer under a Civil Racketeering Statute (RICO). A RICO action is the most costly to defend against and if successful plaintiff's can be awarded treble damages. Parental Alienation initiated by women will only come to an end when they are forced to spend $100's of thousands of dollars defending themselves in legal proceedings that are driven to the highest courts in the land for final decisions.
SPPAS believes that this may be the only way to bring parental alienation to an end, is to drive these evil women, and the people that aid them, their parents and their lawyers into bankruptcy in order to rid our society of its greatest evil Parental Alienation Syndrome. Children need the love of their dad's. It is reported that the woman that is the target of this RICO action keeps her doors and windows shut in fear of the process server who is now instructed to serve her at her work...he's comming....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=idd_92ajjwY
Fathers find these women so ugly that these fathers "stop looking in the faces of these "ugly" women and "never" will look in their face(s) again....For the name of the SPPAS 2009 worst mother in America email [email protected]
UPDATE: SEPT 9, 2009 -SPPAS has come up with the "cure" Parental Alienation Syndrome..."Love the mother and she will then allow the children to love the "Dad". Hate and fight the mother and she will "never" allow the children to "love" the DAD...
SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF PARENTAL
ALIENATION SYNDROME REPORTED ON ONE OF THE
WORST CASES OF PAS, an A ELMWOOD PARK FATHER
HAS BEEN DEPRIVED OF SEEING HIS three minor CHILDREN
FOR OVER four years.SINCE JUNE 6, 2005 TO THE
CURRENT DATE, over s265 week ends, FOR OVER 1567 DAYS:
If there is anyone who has atory of a evil mother engaged in PAD
please email [email protected]
SPPAS believes that this may be the only way to bring parental alienation to an end, is to drive these evil women, and the people that aid them, their parents and their lawyers into bankruptcy in order to rid our society of its greatest evil Parental Alienation Syndrome. Children need the love of their dad's. It is reported that the woman that is the target of this RICO action keeps her doors and windows shut in fear of the process server who is now instructed to serve her at her work...he's comming....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=idd_92ajjwY
Fathers find these women so ugly that these fathers "stop looking in the faces of these "ugly" women and "never" will look in their face(s) again....For the name of the SPPAS 2009 worst mother in America email [email protected]
UPDATE: SEPT 9, 2009 -SPPAS has come up with the "cure" Parental Alienation Syndrome..."Love the mother and she will then allow the children to love the "Dad". Hate and fight the mother and she will "never" allow the children to "love" the DAD...
SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF PARENTAL
ALIENATION SYNDROME REPORTED ON ONE OF THE
WORST CASES OF PAS, an A ELMWOOD PARK FATHER
HAS BEEN DEPRIVED OF SEEING HIS three minor CHILDREN
FOR OVER four years.SINCE JUNE 6, 2005 TO THE
CURRENT DATE, over s265 week ends, FOR OVER 1567 DAYS:
If there is anyone who has atory of a evil mother engaged in PAD
please email [email protected]
STOLLER PREPARES TO FILE REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY BRIEF WITH THE ILLINOIS SUPREME COURT TODAY
CHICAGO-(AEAE) AUGUST 21, 2009 TODAY STOLLER WILL FILE A MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE HIS REPLY BRIEF WITH THE ILLINOIS SUPREME COURT regarding his Rule 383 pending appeal. Stoller was locked up for 37 days in the Cook County Jail for publishing articles on his blog in violation of Stoller's first Amendment rights. Stoller does not want to see citizens and bloggers of Illinois or any other state go to jail for "blogging" Consequently Stoller spent all of thursday drafting his Motion for Leave to file a Reply brief with the Illinois Supreme Court. This intense work did not leave any time for Stoller to blog. Stoller expects to reveal the names of attorneys that Stoller believes are ingaging in insurance fraud stay tuned...See you in Court [email protected] 312-545-4554
UPDATE The Illinois Supreme Court denied hearing Stoller Appeal on August 25, 2009 as to whether it is unconstitional to publish "speech" on the Internet during a divorce proceeding. That never deters Stoller. Stoller now moves to the U.S. Supreme Court to answer the question as to whether the "First" Amendment is what it says it is...."until the last court speaks..." the Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE)...
UPDATE The Illinois Supreme Court denied hearing Stoller Appeal on August 25, 2009 as to whether it is unconstitional to publish "speech" on the Internet during a divorce proceeding. That never deters Stoller. Stoller now moves to the U.S. Supreme Court to answer the question as to whether the "First" Amendment is what it says it is...."until the last court speaks..." the Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE)...
JUDGE VIRGINIA KENDELL RULES IN GOOGLE CASE
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-August 24, 2009 Thursday-ILLINOIS DISTRICT COURT JUDGE VIRGINA KENDELL ISSUED A RULING IN THE GOOGLE CASE WHERE STOLLER MOVED TO INTERVENE. Judge Kendell required the parties to file positions papers within 21 days.
The Divorce lawyer in another case has moved to oppose Stoller 383 Motion before the Illinois Supreme Court on the gounds that Stoller could have appealed the decisions that he has put before the Illinois Supreme Court. Stoller asserts that the issue of "free" speech as to whether a party has a right to publish "speech" on the Internet during a divorce proceeding is of such importance that the Illinois Supreme Court should take Stoller's appeals directly. After all Stoller spent 37 days in the Cook County Jail from June 8, 2009 until July 15, 2009 for publishing "Speech" on the Internet. Illinois citizens should not have to go to jail for writing a "blog" on the Internet. The Illinois Supreme Court has "never" ruled on the issues that Stoller has raised and the Citizens of Illinois are entitled to have the Illinois Supreme Court weigh in on the issue as to Wheither a blogger should go to jail for blogging in the the State of Illinois.
In another case, Raymond H. Weber and his wife Lusha of Carol Stream, Illinois are attempting to defraud the probate court in Dupage County Illinois by falsely asserting that a Insurance company should pay them over $50,000 in a dispute when they spent the funds that they are seeking from the Insurance company according to pleadings filed in the case.
The Divorce lawyer in another case has moved to oppose Stoller 383 Motion before the Illinois Supreme Court on the gounds that Stoller could have appealed the decisions that he has put before the Illinois Supreme Court. Stoller asserts that the issue of "free" speech as to whether a party has a right to publish "speech" on the Internet during a divorce proceeding is of such importance that the Illinois Supreme Court should take Stoller's appeals directly. After all Stoller spent 37 days in the Cook County Jail from June 8, 2009 until July 15, 2009 for publishing "Speech" on the Internet. Illinois citizens should not have to go to jail for writing a "blog" on the Internet. The Illinois Supreme Court has "never" ruled on the issues that Stoller has raised and the Citizens of Illinois are entitled to have the Illinois Supreme Court weigh in on the issue as to Wheither a blogger should go to jail for blogging in the the State of Illinois.
In another case, Raymond H. Weber and his wife Lusha of Carol Stream, Illinois are attempting to defraud the probate court in Dupage County Illinois by falsely asserting that a Insurance company should pay them over $50,000 in a dispute when they spent the funds that they are seeking from the Insurance company according to pleadings filed in the case.
SUMMER IS JUST ABOUT OVER
STOLLER FILES MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION WITH THE TTAB ESTABLISHING RIGHTS IN THE STEALTH MARK
CHICAGO--(AEAE)-WEDNESDAY-AUGUST 19, 2009-BEST DATA PRODUCTS, INC FILED AN OPPOSITION NO 91190926 against Stoller's STEALTH FEDERAL TRADEMARK APPLICATION S.N. 75-423924. Stoller moved to substitute as the Proper party. Lance G. Johnson who is alleged to have purchased Stoller's trademarks at a bankruptcy auction on August 7 2007 with a "sham" entity the Society for the Prevention of Trademark Abuse, (SPTA) which does not exists. Never sold any products or services and was merely set up to defraud the Patent and Trademark Office according to Stoller charges in a disciplinary complaint filed against Lance Johnson. The TTAB issue an second Order on August 5, 2009 in which they got their facts wrong. Lance G. Johnson "never" owned any of Stoller's trademarks as well known to the Judges at the Tradmark Trial and Appeal Board. Notwithstanding the fact that the Bankruptcy Judge Jack Schmetterer authorized a sale of Stoller's trademark assets. It is clear that the Trademark Assignment made by the Bankruptcy Trustee Richard M. Fogel to the Society for the Prevention of Trademark Abuse was a "naked" license and/or an assignment in gross. Consequently, the moment that Lance G. Johnson was to accept the alleged assignment, represented an abandonment of the alleged trademark rights. When a bankruptcy trustee abandons a creditors assets, they revert back to the Creditor. Stoller accepts that members of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board will ignore the law and that this matter will have to be resolved by the Federal Circuit for once and for all. However let it be known that the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Judges know what a "naked" trademark license is. Secondly, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board members known that a "license" in gross does not transfer any valid trademark rights to any party. That is what we have here. No vaild trademark trights were ever assigned to Lance G. Johnson's phony trademark entity SPTA as well known to each and every Trademark Judge sitting at the Board. Stoller has forwarded to each of they a copy of the Office of Enrollement and Disciplinary Complaint filed against Lance G. Johnson containing the clear evidence, which the Board members have choosen to ignore. The show down is coming though, but a public record of what the Board knows about the Lance G. Johnson alleged "fraudulent" trademark assignment scheme. Stoller's expects the truth to right itself and has no problem speaking truth to power. [email protected] This story is the most important trademark registration case this year which calls into question the integrity of Board members who refuse to rule on the law and the Lanham Act as it relates to the valid assignment of trademark rights and the invalid assignment of trademark rights through a license in gross and/or a "naked" trademark license that Lance G. Johnson recieved from Illinois Bankruptcy Trustee Richard M. Fogel. We have all been in the trademark game for over 35 years, we are all experts in this tgame and the Federal Circuit is going to decide wheither the TTAB is ruling on the law or making up the law as they go on....Stay tuned
AEAE SUPPORTER ROBERT NOVAK DEAD AT 78
WASHINGTON - LONG TIME SUPPORTER OF THE AMERICANS FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF ATTORNEY ETHICS (AEAE) Conservative columnist and TV commentator Robert Novak died Tuesday morning after a battle with brain cancer. He was 78. Novak had returned to his home after being hospitalized for two weeks last month. His brain tumor was discovered in July 2008. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32461900/ns/politics-more_politics/?GT1=43001
LEO STOLLER RELEASING NEW TELL ALL BOOK "JUICE FOR PEANUTS
YOU KNOW WHO YOU ARE
CHICAGO--(AEAE)--AUGUST 18, 2009 TUESDAY--LEO STOLLER IS RELEASING HIS 500 PAGE EX-PO-SE telling the detailed story of an "evil" cabal of lawyers, judges who have collaborated to defraud the legal system. Stoller names names and gives specific instances of legal corruption. The book will be available where real books are sold [email protected]
ARIZONA APPELLATE COURT RE-OPENS STOLLER APPEAL
PHOENIX-(AEAE)--MONDAY August 17, 2009 THE ARIZONA APPELLATE COURT RE-OPENED A STOLLER APPEAL. Stoller sued a leading Arizona Bank for breach of contract in a re estate deal. The Bank agreed to sell a property formely valued at $900,000 for $150,000. However when it came time to close the Bank found a buyer who offered $300,000 and refused to sell. Stoller sued. The Bank's lawyers won the lower court case and Stoller appealed. The Arizona Appellate court just re-opened Stoller case. Stoller filed it's opening Appellate Court brief and expects to win this case for the lower court clearly errored by dismissing Stoller's case. Opposing Attorneys moved to dismiss Stoller's Appeal based upon the fact that the trial court "never" signed the final order. Stoller moved to dismiss based upon the fact that Stoller was not responsible for the court's failure to "sign" the final order. The Appeals Court ruled in Stoller's favor and re-opened Stoller's Case. Stoller is an Appellate Expert having been involved in over hundreds of appeals over 40 years and is consulated by attorneys all of the time on proper appellate court procedure. No body can beat Stoller. The Bank will spend more on its legal fees by the time this case is over than what they would have spend if they went through with the agreement. At best the Bank will spend more on legal fees than the contract called for, at worst the bank will have to pay millions of dollars in damages and suffer perminate damage to it's reputation. There is "no" entity in over 40 years that has ever beaten Stoller. Just ask the so called "winners" what it cost them to beat Stoller over a 40 year career of litigation. They will always tell you that it cost 10 times more to win then if they lost or settled....Let it be known, let it be written...Stay tuned. Stoller will release the name of the Bank after the Appellate court creams the bank. The public has a right to no who the "bad" banks are...comments [email protected] 312-545-4554 7115 W. North Ave #272, Chicago, Illinois 60302
Would this woman put you in jail? For Blogging?
STOLLER WAS ARRESTED FOR THE "CRIME" OF BLOGGING
CHICAGO-(AEAE) AUGUST 15, 2009 Saturday-ON MONDAY JUNE 8TH, 2009 Leo Stoller was arrested for the "Crime" of blogging. He was held for 37 days in the Illinois Cook County Maxium Security Division 10 by the Cook County Department of Corrections in Cell 1306, locked down 18 hours a day. Stoller was only released on July 15, 2009, 37 days latter after he was coerced into signing in "open" court a divorce settlement giving up "all" of his property rights. Stoller currently has his Appeal pending before the Illinois Supreme Court Case No. 108915. Stoller has alleged that Illinois divorce Judge Carol K. Bellows has "criminalized" the publishing of "Speech" on the Internet, when she had Stoller locked up on June 8th 2009. Stoller argues that Judge Bellows November 25, 2008 Protective Order restricting Stoller's Speech, amounted to a prior restraint, a rare restriction of speech before publication and a violation of Petitioner's constitutional right to free speech. Stoller argues that such an "unconstitutional" protective order has invited the Illinois Supreme Court to enter Stoller's case to resolve the First Amendment constitutional issues for Illinois Citizens and to set a standard for judges of Illinois to follow in similar future cases. The Illinois Supreme Court has "never" previously weighted in on this "free speech issue that Stoller is not presenting (i.e., whether a party in a divorce proceeding still has a First Amendment right to air a grievance on the Internet?" What do you think? Send your opinions to [email protected]
HELLO IT IS NICE TO SEE THAT YOU HAVE COME TO VISIT ME TONIGHT. IT IS AMAZING THAT WE HAVE COMMUNICATED MORE THIS WAY OVER THE LAST FOUR YEARS THAN WE DID OVER THE PREVIOUS four years. You certainlty have forced me to go through more hoops than any other Defendant I have ever come in contact with in my 41 years of litigation experience..... so may torts and continuing to commit torts against me, we will just have to let the courts and/or juries decide the damages....
TTAB ISSUES SECOND ERRONEOUS DECISION IN STOLLER CASE
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-FRIDAY AUGUST 14, 2009. ACCORDING TO A SOURCE WITHIN THE PATENT AND TRADEMARK, TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD (TTAB) STOLLER FACE IS ABOUT AS WELCOME TO THE TTAB AS A CROSS IS TO DRACULA. The TTAB issued a "second" decision sue sponte, in an opposition to make the Board's record for the Federal Circuit.
Andrea K. Zollett Receive Kudos from AEAE
CHICAGO-(AEAE)- August 14, 2009 Friday-THE AMERICANS FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF ATTORNEY ETHICS (AEAE) received a report today from an opponent of Foley & Lardner attorney Andrea K. Zollett. The report stated that Attorney Andrea K. Zollett in court the other day could have "removed" both eyes of her opponent but only removed "one" according to a source that did not want to be identified. When ever an attorney says anything good about another attorney, especially who they are opposed to, says something "nice" about another attorney, AEAE feels that information should be passed on to the Public. If you have any information about Andrea K. Zollet that you would like to share please email [email protected]
STOLLER APPEALS MALICIOUS PROSECUTION DISMISSAL
SHE THINGS THAT WILL ALWAYS GET WHAT SHE WANTS, THINK AGAIN
CHICAGO--(AEAE)-AUGUST 12, 2009 WEDNESDAY-STOLLER FILED AN APPEAL OF HIS MALICIOUS PROSECUTION CASE THAT WAS UNLAWFULLY DISMISSED ON JULY 22, 2009. Stoller was incarcerated on June 8, 2009 by a Chicago Divorce Judge for publishing articles on Stoller's blog. Stoller was held in a maxium security Cook County Jail for 37 days in violation of his first amendment rights. The only way Stoller was able to get released from jail was to sign several agreements while he was in the custody of the Cook County Department of Corrections. But for being held a prisioner Stoller "never" would have agreed to sign any such agreements as well known to all of the parties. Currently Stoller has an appeal pending before the Illinois Supreme Court. Stoller went from his jail cell on July 15, 2009 and presented his issue to the Illinois Supreme Court within 16 days of his release from prision. Leo Stoller is an appellate Expert and Trademark expert witness [email protected] 312-545-4554 7115 W. North Ave #272, Oak Park, Illinois 60302
STOLLER ESTABLISHES RIGHTS TO TRADEMARK APPLICATION
CHICAGO--(AEAE) STOLLER ESTABLISHES RIGHTS TO TRADEMARK APPLICATION AND MOVES THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD TO REOPEN OPPOSITION
AMERICANS FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF ATTORNEY ETHICS AEAE DOES NOT RECOMEND RYAN T. BROWN AND THE LAW FIRM OF GORDON & REES LLP
CHICAGO--(AEAE)- August 1, Wednesday-THE AMERICANS FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF ATTORNEY ETHICS (AEAE) a not for profit attorney ethics watch dog group held there annual meeting last week and has issued a list of attorneys and law firms for 2009 that are "not" recomended. Ryan T. Brown, Hayes Ryan and the law firm of Gordon & Rees LLP are on that list.
Legal Disclaimer: the fact that AEAE does not recomend any lawyer or law firm does not mean that they are unfit to practice law only that AEAE would not hire them. AEAE's opinion of lawyers that are rated as "not" recomended comes from public records, citizens complaints, disciplinary reveiw reports etc.
Legal Disclaimer: the fact that AEAE does not recomend any lawyer or law firm does not mean that they are unfit to practice law only that AEAE would not hire them. AEAE's opinion of lawyers that are rated as "not" recomended comes from public records, citizens complaints, disciplinary reveiw reports etc.
STOLLER AMENDING COMPLAINT TO SUE LANCE J. JOHNSON FOR FRAUD, TORTUROUS INTERFERENCE IN TRADEMARK OWNERSHIP
CHICAGO--(AEAE) August 12, 2009 STOLLER IS AMENDING HIS 100 MILLION DOLLAR DEFAMATION LAWSUIT TO ADD ADDITIONAL CLAIMS AGAINST THE LAW FIRM OF ROYLANCE, ABRAMS, BERDO AND GOODMAN AND ATTORNEYS LANCE G. JOHNSON, DAVID ABRAMS AND ALFRED GOODMAN OF FRAUD, TORTUROUS INTERFERENCE IN TRADEMARK OWNERSHIP. Johnson and his crowd recently interferred in a Opposition Proceeding regarding a claim to a trademark application that he clearly did not own. There are some parties who cannot be sued enough for the commission of torts, Stoller believes that Lance G. Johnson, David Abrams and Alfred Goodman www.roylance.com falls into that class
TTAB ISSUES ERRONEOUS DECISION IN OPPOSITION NO. 91190925
ALEXANDRIA--(AEAE) AUGUST 11, 2009 TUESDAY--ON AUGUST 5, 2009 the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board issued a decision stating that "On August 5, 2009 Leo Stoller filed a combined motion to be substituted as a party defendant herein and to extend his time to file an answer and proposed change of correspondence address. Mr. Stoller's motion to be substituted is based on an alleged assignment of involved application Serial No. 75423924 to him from Bernice M. Stoller..because the USPTO records do not indicate that the involved applicationwas ever assigned to Ms. Stoller, there is nothing in the record to indicate that she had any trademark rights in the involved mark to assign to Mr. Stoller. Accordingly, the Board finds no basis for substituting Mr. Stoller as a party defendant in this proceeding and his motion to be substituted as a party defendant is denied." The Board is well aware that the record can be "rectified" to reflect the correct owner of the said application. Stoller has moved to "rectify" the record to reflect his ownership and moves for a motion for reconsideration before the Board.
ILLINOIS JUDGE KATHY M. FLANAGAN DENIES LANCE G. JOHNSON EMERGENCY MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER
CHICAGO-(AEAE)- Monday August 10, 2009 10:45AM. IN A HEARING THIS MORNING AT 9:00AM Illinois Circuit Court Judge denied Lance G. Johnson's Emergency Motion for a Protective Order. Gordon & Rees, Johnson's attorney's have attempted to "stop" Stoller from publishing Speech on this blog and were attempting to obtain a "protective order" requiring Stoller to remove all articles on this blog about Gordon and Rees and Lance G. Johnson. A divorce lawyer was sucessful in obtaining such an "unconstitutional" protective order on Nov. 25, 2008 against Stoller. Stoller's previous blog was removed. Stoller did 37 days in the Illinois Cook County Jail over this "Free Speech" Issue. Stoller had filed a Emergency Motion before the Illinois Supreme Court under Rule 383 regarding the Nov. 25, 2009. Over this last week end Stoller prepared a Motion to Supplement his pending Emergency 383 Motion with the Johnson Appeal. Stoller filed his Motion to Supplement his 383 motion, moments before Johnson's Emergency Motion was to be heard before Judge Flanagan. Stoller then informed Judge Kathy Flanagan that she did not have jurisdiction over Johnson's motion for a protective order because that matter was now pending before the Illinois Supreme Court. Judge Flanagan then denied Johnson's Motion. Gordon & Rees attorney Ryan T. Brown was in court today to argue the Johnson motion. Stoller handed Ryan T. Brown copies of his Illinois Supreme Court pleading and Stoller's response to Johnson's Emergency Motion. Mr. Brown refused to accept service. Stoller said, "If you refuse to accept service, I will inform the Illinois Supreme Court." Brown then accepted service. Stoller said," Mr. Brown, you and your law firm Gordon and Rees are baned from going to this blog under the terms and conditions, which Gordon and Rees have violated. Mr. Brown said, "Your a mental case!" Stoller said, "I will amend my 100 million dollar defamation case to include you and your law firm for defaming me in the Illinois Cook County Daley Center Court House, who are your lawyers so I can serve them?
STOLLER IS "READY" FOR LANCE G. JOHNSON EMERGENCY MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER HEARING TODAY
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-AUGUST 10, 2009 MONDAY-LANCE G. JOHNSON'S LAW FIRM GORDON & REES filed an emergency motion to have an unconstitutional protective order entered to bar Stoller from publishing "speech" on this blog. Stoller sued Lance G. Johnson, David Abrams and Alfred Goodman www.roylance.com for 100 million dollars in a defamation lawsuit. Johnson has been commiserating with a divorce lawyer who believes that she was successful in barring Stoller from publishing "speech" on his blog by obtaining an "unconstitutional" protective order, which was acting as a prior restraint on speech and was clearly unconstitutional. Nonetheless, after a series of hearings before a divorce judge this attorney believes that she was correct in having Stoller locked up for 37 days in the Illinois Cook County (June 8 to July 15, 2009) Jail for Stoller's alleged violation of publishing articles on his blog and the alleged violation of the "unconstitutional" protective order. Now Johnson is attempting to do the same thing by having Judge Flanagan enter another "unconstitutional" protective order against Stoller, in order for Stoller to stop publishing articles about Johnson and the his lawyers from Gordon and Rees. However, this time Stoller is ready for this "unconstitutional " attack which will be held at 9:00AM before Judge Kathy Flanagan today. Stoller has a "surprise" for Gordon and Rees..stay tooned...to hear all about Stoller's counter-attack....
ILLINOIS COOK COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE KATHY FLANAGAN TO HEAR LANCE G. JOHNSON'S EMERGENCY MOTION TO BAND STOLLER FROM PUBLISHING "SPEECH" ON THIS BLOG
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-Saturday August 8, 2009--STOLLER FILED A 100 MILLION DOLLAR DEFAMATION AGAINST LANCE G. JOHNSON, DAVID ABRAMS AND ALFRED GOODMAN FROM THE LAW FIRM OF ROYLANCE, ABRAMS BERDO AND GOODMAN. On Monday Johnson's lawfirm Gorden and Rees will present their emergency motion to have Judge Flanagan enter an order of protection against Stoller for the publication of "speech" on this blog. Stoller has a pending appeal before the Illinois Supreme Court and is moving to consolidate Johnson's motion with Stoller's current appeal regarding a unconstitutional order of protection that another Cook County Judge had entered against Stoller. Stay tuned. This is a First Amendment issue that effects everyone.
THE SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF PARENTAL
ALIENATION SYNDROME (PAS) REPORTED ON ONE OF THE
WORST CASES OF PAS, an A parent
HAS BEEN DEPRIVED OF SEEING HIS CHILDREN
FOR OVER four years. over 225 week ends, FOR OVER 1401 DAYS:
If there is anyone who would like to know more about this story or
has a story of a parent engaged in PAD
please email [email protected]
THE SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF PARENTAL
ALIENATION SYNDROME (PAS) REPORTED ON ONE OF THE
WORST CASES OF PAS, an A parent
HAS BEEN DEPRIVED OF SEEING HIS CHILDREN
FOR OVER four years. over 225 week ends, FOR OVER 1401 DAYS:
If there is anyone who would like to know more about this story or
has a story of a parent engaged in PAD
please email [email protected]
STOLLER APPEALS TWO DECISIONS OF JUDGE CHARLES WRINKLER TODAY
CHICAGO--(AEAE) August 7, 2009 Friday-STOLLER FILED TWO APPEALS WITH THE APPELLATE COURT TODAY FROM DECISIONS RENDERED BY ILLINOIS CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE CHARGLES WRINKLER. Stoller was never even served with the motions that resulted in the judgments that were rendered by the parties who obtained the judgments from judge Wrinkler. Any judgment that is rendered without proper service is void ab initio. Stoller is well known to the Illinois appellate Court where these cases were headed anyway. There is no case that Stoller is either prosecuting or defending that is ever been resolved by a trial court judge in 40 years. Stoller is an appellate expert and Trademark professional.
In another matter Stoller is defending a "frivilious" opposition proceeding with will be detailed in the weeks and months to come. There is a very large trademark law firm on the other side which is really the only opponents that Stoller enjoys facing, on account of the fact that they "believe" they that "no one can possibly know the Lanham Act like they do. Stoller has prevailed in over 200 oppositions and cancelation proceedings at the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. You can contact Stoller at 312-545-4554 [email protected] See you in court!
In another matter Stoller is defending a "frivilious" opposition proceeding with will be detailed in the weeks and months to come. There is a very large trademark law firm on the other side which is really the only opponents that Stoller enjoys facing, on account of the fact that they "believe" they that "no one can possibly know the Lanham Act like they do. Stoller has prevailed in over 200 oppositions and cancelation proceedings at the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. You can contact Stoller at 312-545-4554 [email protected] See you in court!
GORDON & REES ATTORNEY RYAN T. BROWN FILES AN EMERGENCY MOTION FOR A UNCONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTIVE ORDER WHICH CONSTITUTES AN OVERLY BROAD PRIOR RESTRAINT ON SPEECH
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-August 6, 2009-RYAN T. BROWN AN ATTORNEY FROM GORDON AND REES filed a Emergency Motion before Illinois Circuit Court Judge Kathy Flanagan seeking a Protective Order barring Stoller from publishing “Speech” on the Internet. Stoller has already a pending Appeal before the Illinois Supreme Court Case No 108915 regarding this identical issue where a Illinois Divorce Court Judge entered a similar protective order on Nov. 25, 2008 which amounted to a prior restraint, a rare restriction of speech before publication and a violation of Petitioner’s constitutional right to free speech. Gordon and Rees is seeking a order of protection from Judge Flanagan which is unconstitutional for it is similar to a probation condition that prohibits a probationer from engaging in defamatory or demeaning communications clearly impinges on probationer’s first amendment right of free speech. See People of the State of Michigan v. Edward Pinkney, at pg. 36, “…A probation condition (and/or a Order of Protection ) that prohibits a probationer (or Stoller in this case) from engaging in defamatory or demeaning communications clearly impinges on the probationer’s (and/or Stoller's first amendment right of free speech. The prior condition in the order of protection is similar to a “probation” condition. See also, e.g., Garrison v. Louisiana, 379 US 64, 75; 85 S Ct 209; 13 L Ed 2d (1964) (The First…Amendment [] embod[ies] our profound national commitment to the provincial that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open, and that it may well include vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks on government and public officials.”) (quotation omitted). STOLLER will ask the Illinois Supreme Court to join the Gordon and Rees firm as necessary parties to Stoller current pending Illinois Supreme Court Case No. 108915. The Illinois Supreme Court is being asked to resolve the question as to whether whether a party in litigation proceeding still has a First Amendment right to air a grievance on the Internet).
. Such an unconstitutional protective order has invited the Illinois Supreme Court to enter the case in order to resolve the First Amendment Constitutional issues for Illinois citizens and to set a standard for judges of Illinois to follow in similar cases. The Illinois Supreme Court has never previously weighed-in on the free speech issue that Stoller is now presenting (i.e., whether a party involved in litigation still has a First Amendment right to air a grievance on the Internet). Gordon and Rees's believe otherwise. Stay tuned the Lance G. Johnson 100 million dollar defamation case has now turned into a First Amendment Case for the Plaintiff... [email protected] Leo Stoller is a trademark expert and First Amendment Scholar 312-545-4554 7115 W. North Ave #272, Oak Park, Illinois
. Such an unconstitutional protective order has invited the Illinois Supreme Court to enter the case in order to resolve the First Amendment Constitutional issues for Illinois citizens and to set a standard for judges of Illinois to follow in similar cases. The Illinois Supreme Court has never previously weighed-in on the free speech issue that Stoller is now presenting (i.e., whether a party involved in litigation still has a First Amendment right to air a grievance on the Internet). Gordon and Rees's believe otherwise. Stay tuned the Lance G. Johnson 100 million dollar defamation case has now turned into a First Amendment Case for the Plaintiff... [email protected] Leo Stoller is a trademark expert and First Amendment Scholar 312-545-4554 7115 W. North Ave #272, Oak Park, Illinois
HEARING FOR STOLLER'S MALICIOUS PROSECUTION LAWSUIT FOR AUG 6, 2009
CHICAGO--(AEAE)-JULY 5, 2009-STOLLER WAS FORCED TO SIGN A AGREEMENT WHILE HE WAS IN THE CUSTODY OF THE COOK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS DISMISSING HIS MALICIOUS PROSECUTION LAWSUIT AGAINST THE PARTIES WHO UNLAWFULLY LOCKED STOLLER UP ON JUNE 6-8, 2005. These same parties, who Stoller is barred by a divorce court order from mentioning on this blog, for which Stoller spent 37 days in the Cook County Jail from June 8, 2009 until July 15, 2009 for placing their names on Stoller's blog, used undue influence to get Stoller to agree to drop the 2007 lawsuit. As soon as Stoller was released from custody, he filed an emergency motion before Judge Chargles Wrinkler requesting that the alleged agreement to dismiss his Malicious prosection suit was void ab initio because it was the product of undue influence. Stoller set a hearing for August 6, 2009 before Judge Wrinkler for a full hearing on this matter. Stoller also has a Appeal pending with the Illinois Supreme Court Case No. 108915. Stoller intends to sue all of the responsible parties for 37 million dollars, a million dollars for each day that Stoller was unlawfully locked up in the Cook County Jail form June 8 until July 15, 2009 37 days. Look forward to seeing you in Court on aUGUST 6, 2009.
FOLEY & LARDNER LLP DODGING SERVICE
CHICAGO--(AEAE)-JULY 5, 2009-IN A HARING YESTERDAY JUDGE CHARGLES WRINKLER ASKED STOLLER TO MAKE SURE THAT FOLEY & LARDNER law firm was served with Stoller's Motion for Reconsideration. When Stoller was locked up in the Cook County Jail for the "crime" of publishing "speech" on his "blog" Attorney Andrea K. Zollett went before Judge Wrinkler and got Stoller's class action lawsuit against Lighthouse Financial group Inc., dismissed. When Stoller learned upon his release from jail on July 15, 2009, Stoller filed a motion for reconsideration. That motion is up before Judge Wrinkler on August 6, 2009. On August 4, 2009 Judge Wrinkler asked Stoller to make sure that Foley & Lardner were served. Stoller walked over to 321 N. Clark Street, in Downtown Chicago. He was stopped by a black security guard Andre Padge who called Foley & Lardner' attorney Andrea K. Zollett. Stoller was informed Mr Padge and his boss Teresa Standord that Andrea K. Zollett would not allow Stoller to go up to the offices of Foley & Lardner to serve her. Stoller asked Mr. Padge to call for attorney William J. McKenna, the other Foley and Lardner attorney assigned to the Lighthouse case. Mr. Padge said that "No attorney called William J. McKenna works for Foley and Lardner." Stoller said,"Unless you allow me to serve Foley & Lardner that he would call the Chicago Police". Page said, "Call the Chicago Cops!" After the police came, Stoller explained to the Officer that Foley & Lardner is a law firm and is refusing to allow me to serve them with a pleading". The Chicago Cop said,"Hire a Sheriff and let him serve Foley & Lardner." Stoller placed calls to Andrea K. Zollett and William J. McKenna and has not received any calls back. Stoller then faxed the pleading to the Chicago Office of Foley & Lardner. Stoller can be reached at 312-545-4554 [email protected]
ILLINOIS JUDGE CHARLES WRINKLER TO CONDUCT HEARING IN STOLLER'S MALICIOUS PROSECUTION PROSECUTION CASE TODAY
FROM JAIL TO THE ILLINOIS SUPREME COURT IN 16 DAYS
CHICAGO-(AEAE) August 4, 2009 Tuesday- STOLLER WAS HELD IN THE COOK COUNTY JAIL FOR THE CRIME OF BLOGING ON THE INTERNET FROM JUNE 8, 2009 UNTIL JULY 15, 2009. Within less than 16 days Stoller has filed his Appeal Briefs directly before the Illinois Supreme Court. The question of a blogger being placed in jail for publishing "speech" on the Internet is such an important legal question that the Illinois Supreme Court has been requested to hear Stoller's appeals directly. Stoller is a trademark and Appellate Expert who can be reached at 312-545-4554 [email protected] 7115 West North Ave #272, Oak Park, Illinois 60302
CHANCE L. COOPER TO BE CHARGED WITH PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT
CHICAGO-(AEAE)- STOLLER PUT ATTORNEY CHANCE L. COOPER FROM THE LAW FIRM OF GORDON & REES ON NOTICE that unless she takes the necessary remedial action under the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct to with draw what is in Stoller's opinion a "frivilious" Motion to Dismiss filed in the Lance G. Johnson 100 million dollar Defamation Lawsuit. Stoller will file disciplinary charges against her and all of the partners of Gordon & Rees in each state where they pratice along with the ususal suspects, Lance G. Johnson, David Abrams and Alfred Goodman who according to a Gordon & Rees attorney are the who are really making all of the decisions in their case. Chance L. Cooper http://www.gordonrees.com/atty/atty_bio_template.cfm?counter=2943has until this Monday to take the necessary remedial action or face a Illinois Attorney disciplinary complaint www.iardc.org
LEO STOLLER TALKS DIRECTLY TO HIS READERS
CHICICAG-(AEAE) JULY 31, 2009--COMMENTARY--NORMALLY IT HAS BEEN THE POLICY OF THE FORMER BLOG OF LEO STOLLER rentamark.blog.com never to talk directly to it's readers. Over the years my blog became very popular. It developed its own audience. But I never wanted to address you personally. However, that blog rentamark.blog.com was unlawfully "ordered" to be removed from the net by a Chicago Judge. That case is on appeal. I believe that I will "reverse" that judge. Then that judge will be subjected to all of the "laws" that protect us from unlawful "acts". However, we must wait for the Appellate Court or the Supreme Court to Rule on the violations of my First Amendment Rights. For all you other wonderful, thoughful friends who helped put me unlawfully in the Cook County Jail for 37 days, you will also feel the rath of the law. Because the law cuts both ways. I was suprised to see just how fast all of my readers fround my "new" blog. Some of you will remember a couple of years ago I had the blog rentamark.blogspot.com from Google. However after I sued Google they pulled the plug on that blog. It took me over one year to get my blog traffic counts back to were with my new blog rentamark.blog.com. However this time I lost my blog it only took about "one" week after I got out of jail, for all of you faithful readers to come back.
I do have to say that until I can reverse that Illinouis Cook County Judge for unlawfully infringing my First Amendment rights, I am encumbered from mentioning certain "names" on this "new" blog which pains me no end. But being in jail pained me more, even if my incarceration was unjust, unlawful and criminal, until an Appellate Court affirms my appeals I have to abide by all of the current court orders. However, I believe that I wrote the best brief I have ever written and I am confident that the Illinois Supreme Court will take my case in order to give guidance to the Illinois Judges on how to handle bloggers rights to place speech on the Internet.
This is Friday, I was so busy drafting my Illinois Supreme Court Briefs that I missed a court date on Tuesday. I filed a motion for reconsideration in that case. Yesterday I filed "two" new Appeals in the Second Illinois Appellate Court.
I like the Appeals Courts. I feel most confortable in the Appeals Courts. That is were all my cases are decided.
I was not able to blog yesterday.
There are few activities as intense as writing an appeal brief to the State Supreme Court. Each word has to "cut" glass in order for the Illinois Supreme Court to want to hear you case. After all they get over 6000 appeals and take only about 1%. I know some Illinos Appellate Court Judges who have gone into the private practice of law doing appeals work and have "never" had the Illinois Supreme Court take one of their cases. Over the years the Illinois Supreme Court has been kind enough to assign one of their Clerks to handle all "Stoller" matters. I don't know of any Appellate Lawyer in the State of Illinois who the Illinois Supreme Court has assigned a special "clerk" to handle all of their appeals. Once last year the Illinois Supreme Court had hearings one day with four appeals on their calander. Three of them were "Stoller" matters. I hold the Illinois Supreme Court in very high esteem.
Untill I have my Frist Amendment rights sustained, you can expect this blog to be a little "less" formal. I just want you, my friend to know, that I understand that you were successful in having me locked up in jail for 37 days for the "lawful" activity of publishing speech on my blog. I just want you not to forget that you have made an enemy for life. If I can do the same to you, I will. I will also try to get you disbarred from the practice of law for violating the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct.
My friend I will do every thing lawful to expose you for the corrupt person I believe you to be. I also want you to know my friend, that I will "never" stop exposing you, complaining to the authorties and suing you for however God gives me to walk this earth, I will never "stop" seeking redress for the wrongs that I believe that you have committed, in the same way that Arabs will "never" going after the jews...Just a friendly note on a Friday afternoon, the last Friday in July of 2009...I am look forward to seeing you in court again soon. I will work this entire week end in studing the law as to how I can be better prepared to convince the Highest Court in the land that you do not deserve to pervail and to receive your appellate briefs...see you anon..One last thought I will never forget what you have done to me until I can repay the favor to you...
I do have to say that until I can reverse that Illinouis Cook County Judge for unlawfully infringing my First Amendment rights, I am encumbered from mentioning certain "names" on this "new" blog which pains me no end. But being in jail pained me more, even if my incarceration was unjust, unlawful and criminal, until an Appellate Court affirms my appeals I have to abide by all of the current court orders. However, I believe that I wrote the best brief I have ever written and I am confident that the Illinois Supreme Court will take my case in order to give guidance to the Illinois Judges on how to handle bloggers rights to place speech on the Internet.
This is Friday, I was so busy drafting my Illinois Supreme Court Briefs that I missed a court date on Tuesday. I filed a motion for reconsideration in that case. Yesterday I filed "two" new Appeals in the Second Illinois Appellate Court.
I like the Appeals Courts. I feel most confortable in the Appeals Courts. That is were all my cases are decided.
I was not able to blog yesterday.
There are few activities as intense as writing an appeal brief to the State Supreme Court. Each word has to "cut" glass in order for the Illinois Supreme Court to want to hear you case. After all they get over 6000 appeals and take only about 1%. I know some Illinos Appellate Court Judges who have gone into the private practice of law doing appeals work and have "never" had the Illinois Supreme Court take one of their cases. Over the years the Illinois Supreme Court has been kind enough to assign one of their Clerks to handle all "Stoller" matters. I don't know of any Appellate Lawyer in the State of Illinois who the Illinois Supreme Court has assigned a special "clerk" to handle all of their appeals. Once last year the Illinois Supreme Court had hearings one day with four appeals on their calander. Three of them were "Stoller" matters. I hold the Illinois Supreme Court in very high esteem.
Untill I have my Frist Amendment rights sustained, you can expect this blog to be a little "less" formal. I just want you, my friend to know, that I understand that you were successful in having me locked up in jail for 37 days for the "lawful" activity of publishing speech on my blog. I just want you not to forget that you have made an enemy for life. If I can do the same to you, I will. I will also try to get you disbarred from the practice of law for violating the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct.
My friend I will do every thing lawful to expose you for the corrupt person I believe you to be. I also want you to know my friend, that I will "never" stop exposing you, complaining to the authorties and suing you for however God gives me to walk this earth, I will never "stop" seeking redress for the wrongs that I believe that you have committed, in the same way that Arabs will "never" going after the jews...Just a friendly note on a Friday afternoon, the last Friday in July of 2009...I am look forward to seeing you in court again soon. I will work this entire week end in studing the law as to how I can be better prepared to convince the Highest Court in the land that you do not deserve to pervail and to receive your appellate briefs...see you anon..One last thought I will never forget what you have done to me until I can repay the favor to you...
WELCOME BACK
CHICAGO--(AEAE) JULY 9, 2009 STOLLER WELCOMES BACK ALL OF HIS FAITHFUL READERS BACK AFTER BEING OFF THE NET FOR OVER 37 days. Stoller was forced to remove his blog rentamark.blog.com by an Illinois court Order. As a result of his previous blogging Stoller was incarcerated in the Cook County Jail for 37 days from June 8 until July 15, 2009. Stoller under protest removed all of the alleged "speech" that was required by him under the court order, but the divorce court judge still locked Stoller up in a maxium security jail for blogging, the Cook County Jail. On July 15, 2009 after Stoller agreed under undue influence to relaease all claims in his marital property the judge allowed Stoller to be released from jail. Stoller is confident that this judges "order of commitment" and other orders will be reversed by the Illinois Appeals Court and/or the Illinois Supreme Court. Stoller is also working hard on his Section 1983 Civil Rights Action against all of the parties that Stoller feels is responsible for his "unlawful" incarceration. There will be a lot of extra counts in his multi-party lawsuit which make no mistake is coming sooner than one might expect. The parties responsible for Stoller's false arrest, false imprisionment (you know who you are) can expect to spend the next decade defending themselves in State and Federal Courts and before every disciplinary commission that has any authority to discipline, dispar or imprison them.
Stoller notices that many them and his other faithful readers are already back reading this blog and that should fulfill both of our addictions, Stoller's to write, prosecute, sue and the readers, defendants to have an idea just when the other shoe is going to drop.
One national authority said recently, "If you want to know what someone is thinking or is going to do just read his blog." Readers if you want to know what Stoller is going to do next, "just read this blog, and you will find out before the process servers do!"
Stoller notices that many them and his other faithful readers are already back reading this blog and that should fulfill both of our addictions, Stoller's to write, prosecute, sue and the readers, defendants to have an idea just when the other shoe is going to drop.
One national authority said recently, "If you want to know what someone is thinking or is going to do just read his blog." Readers if you want to know what Stoller is going to do next, "just read this blog, and you will find out before the process servers do!"
LEO STOLLER NEW BLOG IS WWW.RENTAMARK.NET.
CHICAGO--JULY 28,2009 LEO STOLLER WAS ORDERED TO REMOVE HIS BLOG RENTAMARK.BOG.COM STOLLER HAS STARTED A NEW BLOG CALLED WWW.RENTAMARK.NET STOLLER HAS APPEALED THE ORDER REMOVING HIS OLD BLOG AS A VIOLATION OF HIS FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS FOR WHICH STOLLER WAS INCARCERATED IN THE COOK COUNTY JAIL FOR FROM JUNE 8, 2009 UNTIL July 15, 2009 for blogging!
STOLLER FILED A 383 MOTION BEFORE THE ILLINOIS SUPREME COURT TODAY
CHICAGO-(AEAE) July 28, 2009-STOLLER WAS RECENTLY INCARCERTED FOR 37 DAYS FROM JUNE 8, 2009 UNTIL JULY 15, 2009 FOR THE CRIME OF BLOGGING ON THE INTERNET. STOLLER'S PREVIOUS BLOG www.rentamark.blog.com. His 44 youtube videos had to come down according to an order of a Illinois Divorce Court Judge who has criminalized publishing "speech" on the Internet. Stoller's unlawful incarceration for publishing "speech" on the Internet is similar to case that was just decided by a Michigan appeals court that just overturned a ruling that had sent a minister, the Rev Edward Pinkney to prison for six months after waring a judge that he could be tortured by God. In the Pinkney's case the court said, "a probation rule barring defamatiory or demeaning statements against anyone went too far." Stoller has moved to place his Illinois Appeals directly before the Illinois Supreme Court because of the importance of the First Amendment Rights of his that have been violated. Stoller argues that the Illinois Supreme Court should accept his appeals because of the importance of the issues raised that effect everyone in the State of Illinois and in the United States, the right to publish "speech" on the Internet. Stoller argues that the divorce court judgment which was forced upon Stoller inorder for Stoller to "get out" of jail also constitutes a prior restraint and is too broad to be constitutional especially since it was procured by fraud and undue influence. A law professior at Duke University Erwin Chemerinsky said, "That in the past , courts could not enjoin speech in the context that (Stoller's divorce court judge has) and that a defamation suit would have to come first. If the statementrs were found to be false, Professor Chemerinsky said, "damages, not an injunction, would be the typical remedy." Leo Stoller is an Appellate Expert, first amendment scholar and Trademark Expert 312-545-454 [email protected]
STOLLER SUE ANOTHER ATTORNEY TODAY.
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-JULY 28, 2009-STOLLER FILED A LAWSUIT AGAINST ANOTHER ATTORNEY IN COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS FOR FRAUD, DECEPTIVE TRADE PRACTICES AND INTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL STRESS. Currently Stoller is suing eight different attorneys for various causes of action from defamation to conspiracy and fraud. Every day attorneys our being indicted by the Justice Department for various crimes. It is not unusual for attorneys to be brough to justice but most parties who are victimized by an attorney are reluctant to sue. Stoller is not. Currently Stoller is preparing to sue several more attorneys but before a party sues an attorney he better have all of his cards in order otherwise he going to pay a hugh price because attorneys like to sue but hate to be sued. When they are sued it is like traping an elephant in a trap. Stoller is a Trademark Expert 312-545-4554 [email protected]
STOLLER SERVES ADDITIONAL COPIES OF APPEALS ON ALL PARTIES
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-STOLLER HAS SERVED HIS NOTICES OF APPEAL ON ALL PARTIES REGARDING THE JUDGMENT THAT A DIVORCE JUDGE ENTERED AGAINST STOLLER ON JULY 15, 2009. Litigation is war welcome to the front. Stoller is preparing his 9 appeals currently. Stoller is still recovering from his 37 days of unlawfull incareration in the Illinois Cook County Department of Corrections. As damages Stoller is asking for $1,000,000.00 for each day of his unlawful incarceration or $37 million dollars. All of the defendants know who they are. It is not helpfuly to post there names here on this blog. Stoller is looking forward to a Appellate Court victory on his first amendment rights so that he will be able to re-post all of the "speech" that he and/or his attorney were forced to be removed from the Internet. However until the Appellate Court speaks Stoller will abide by all court orders that have not been set aside.
STOLLER FILES TWO APPEALS WITH THE ILLINOIS APPELLATE COURT TODAY
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-JULY 22, 2009-STOLLER FILED TWO APPEALS WITH THE ILLINOIS APPELLATE COURT TODAY. On July 15, 2009 Stoller while in the custody of the Cook County Department of Corrections was coerced into entering into a divorce settlement agreement relinguishing all of his marital assets in exchange for "getting out of the Cook County Jail". Stoller today has appealed that Judgment and Settlement on the grounds of undue influence. In another Case where Stoller is suing several Washington D.C. Lawyers, Lance G. Johnson, David Abrams and Alfred Goodman from the lawfirm of Roylance, Abrams, Berdo and Goodman www.roylance.com for 100 million dollar defamation lawsuit, Illinois Circuit Court Judge Kathy Flanagan granted the defendant's motion to quash service despite the fact that Stoller had these lawyers served personally. Stoller filed his appeal in the Lance G. Johnson Defamation case today with the First District Appellate Court. The defamation case has been going on for almost two years with the parties arguing over service of process. The issues in that case have not even been joined. The average law division case in Cook County Illinois last between 5 and 10 years. There is no doubt that Stoller's 100 million dollar defamation case will eventually be decided by the Illinois Appellate Court. Stoller is an Appellate Court Expert and Trademark Expert [email protected]
LEO STOLLER NEW BLOG IS WWW.RENTAMARK.NET
CHICAGO-JULY 19, 2009-(AEAE) LEO STOLLER'S NEW BLOG URL IS www.rentamark.net Stoller was forced to remove his previous blog rentamark.blog.com by court order. Stoller removed his blog under protest and is appealing the Illinois State Court Judges Ruling, which Stoller has argued is unconstitutional under U.S Supreme Court Case ACLU v. Janet Reno. Stoller is a trademark expert and constitutional scholar he can be reached at 7115 W. North Ave Suite 272 Oak Park, Illinois 60302 312-545-4554 his email is [email protected]
STOLLER IS BACK IN THE LITIGATION GAME
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-JULY 19, 2009-STOLLER WAS UNLAWFULLY INCARCERATED IN THE COOK COUNTY JAIL MAXIUM SECURITY FROM JUNE 8, 2009 UNTIL JULY 15, 2009 when Stoller was forced to sign a divorce settlement releasing all claims to his marital estate. Stoller was held in a maxium security Division 10 of the Cook County Jail in Chicago for publishing articles on Stoller's former blog rentamark.blog.com. Stoller was forced to remove his blog with thousands of articles, forced to remove his 44 youtube video's, all of his pleadings and photographs from the Internet in violation of Stoller First Amendment Rights and in complete violation of the finding in the U.S. Supreme Court Case ACLU v. Janet Reno where the entire U.S. Supreme Court held that it is a violation of the First Amendment to restrict "Speech" on the Internet. However, how the law works is that a State Circuit Court Judge's order stands as the law until it is reversed. All the First Amendment scholars were shocked that in the year 2009 a blogger could be locked up in a maxium security prision for publishing Speech on the Internet. Stoller has an appeal pending and looks forward to reversing the Illinois circuit court judge's Order of Commentment on constitutional grounds. Stoller is also still facing "indirect criminal contempt" charges for publishing speech on the Internet. It is now been only four days since Stoller's release from prison. Stoller is catching his breath and has a big "litigation" Monday to start curing and preparing his pleadings for his counter attack. Although Stoller was locked up in prision for 37 days all was not lost, Stoller wrote a 500 page book called Juice for Peanuts detailing each and every 1983 Civil Rights Violation that Stoller is now drafting his Civil Complaints against all of the responsible parties. Stoller's book is called Juice for Peanuts
WHAT HAPPENED TO STOLLER'S BLOG RENTAMARK.BLOG.COM?
CHICAGO--(AEAE). ON JUNE 5, 2009 Stoller was ordered in a Chicago divorce proceeding to remove "speech" from his Internet Blog www.rentamark.blog.com. Under Protest Stoller removed all of the alleged "speech" that the court wanted removed. However on June 8, 2009, the parties supporting Stoller's contempt for publishing speech on the Internet stated in open court that Stoller did not remove all of the alleged offensive "speech" on the Internet. Stoller's Attorney Barry Boygin argued that Stoller had removed all of the "speech" in his control and that he was not able to remove "links" from search enegins Like Google and Yoohoo. The court order Leo Stoller taken into custody on June 8, 2009. Stoller was hand cuffed in open court in the Chicago Daley Center Court House and taken to the Cook County Jail at 26th & California in Chicago. Stoller was placed in a maxium secuity prison deck and locked down 18 hours a day. Stoller's attorney Barry Boygin filed a Motion to abate Stoller comitment to the Cook County Jail. The Court denied Stoller's motion to abate his comitment on June 15, 2009. Stoller remained incarcerated. A hearing was set for July 15, 2009. Stoller was lead into the Cook County Court Room while still in custody of the Cook County Department of Corrections was forced to release all claims to his marital estate and Stoller was put under undue influence when he executed a series of agreement which he only executed for the sole purpose of being released from prision. Stoller was in ill health, he had lost over 20 pounds while in custody. Had a cardiac event in the Cook County Jail. In addition to forcing Stoller to execute a one sided maritial settlement agreement Stoller was forced to sign documents dismissing his appeals and a previous Section 1983 Civil Rights Action for a previous incident when the same parties had Stoller falsely incarcerated on June 6-8 2005 in the Cook County Jail. Stoller his retaining new counsel to set aside all of the agreements based on the doctrine of undue influence
THE AMERICANS FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF ATTORNEY ETHICS (AEAE)
AEAE is an attorney watch dog group that advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics and judicial ethics since 1974. AEAE is located in Chicago, Illinois 7115 W. North Ave #272 Oak Park, Illinois 60302.
LEO STOLLER BLOG IS BACK
CHICAGO--(AEAE)--LEO STOLLER'S BLOG IS BACK. HOWEVER UNTIL ALL APPEALS ARE HEARD STOLLER'S BLOG WILL NOT MENTIONED ANY NAMES CONTAINED IN A COURT ORDER BANNING STOLLER FROM PUBLISHING VAVARIOUS NAME ON HIS INTERNET BLOG. STOLLER JUST SPENT 37 DAYS IN THE ILLINOIS COOK COUNTY JAIL FOR PUBLISHING "SPEECH" ON THE INTERNET. STOLLER VOWS TO ABIDE FOR BY THE EXISTING COURT ORDER AND WILL COOPERATE WITH THE PARTIES TO MAKE SURE THAT THE COURT ORDER IS NOT VIOLATED. THE COURT ORDER IS ALSO THE SUBJECT OF AN APPEAL WITH THE ILLINOIS APPELLATE COURT FIRST DISTRICT. THAT DECISION WILL BE POSTED HERE.
