Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics - SUE THE BASTARDS

AMERICANS FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF ATTORNEY ETHICS OFFERS A PARALEGAL CERTIFICATES TO QUALIFIED APPLICANTS BASED UPON 3 YEARS OR MORE OF LEGAL EXPERIENCE

4/9/2025

Chicago (AEAE) The Americans for the enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) which organized in 1974, as an attorney watch dog group that advocates the strict enforcement of the code of professional ethics offers Paralegal Certificates to qualified legal professionals who have been working for at least 3 years or more under the supervision of a Attorney, who qualifies to receive a Paralegal Certificate, based on successful legal work experience.
The applicant must certify that they have been employed as a legal secretary for a least 3 years, that they are qualified to receive a Paralegal Certificate, by education, training, experience or work experience. That they have contracts with or am employed by an attorney, law firm, corporation, governmental agency, or other entity, and have performed substantial legal work for 3 years or more, under the direction and supervision of an active member of the State Bar Association, or an attorney practicing law in the federal courts, that has been specifically delegated by the attorney to him or her. Tasks performed by Applicant include, but are not limited to, case planning, development, and management; legal research; interviewing clients; fact gathering and retrieving information; drafting and analyzing legal documents; collecting, compiling, and utilizing technical information to make an independent decision and recommendation to the supervising attorney; and representing clients before a state or federal administrative agency if that representation is permitted by statute, court rule, or administrative rule or regulation. See attached Application.
.

paralegal_application.pdf
File Size:	50 kb
File Type:	pdf

DuPage County Law Division Chief Judge Kenneth Popejoy, Judge Bonnie Weaton, Judge Maureen Riordan, Judge Timothy J. McJoynt All Charged with Violating the ADA Rights of a Disabled Plaintiff, in a Mandamus Action Filed with the Illinois Supreme Court

3/22/2025

Chicago (AEAE) a Petitioner, Leo Stoller, 78, a disable person, a protected person as defined by the Americans Disability Act (ADA) was compelled to petition the Illinois Supreme Court in a writ of mandamus, requesting that the court compel the Circuit Court of DuPage County, the chief Judge Bonnie Wheaton, Judge Kenneth Popejoy, Judge Maureen Riordan and Jillian Dicks, Illinois DuPage County Court Disability Coordinator, to permit the Petitioner, a disabled individual, to appear via Zoom for all court proceedings, in DuPage County Court, in accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., and Illinois law. See attached Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

capturpopejoy_bio.jpg
File Size:	102 kb
File Type:	jpg

emergency_petition_for_writ_of_mandamus.pdf
File Size:	3785 kb
File Type:	pdf

Legal Disclaimer: The Petition for Writ of Mandamus contains allegations, the chief Judge Bonnie Wheaton, Judge Kenneth Popejoy, Judge Maureen Riordan and Jillian Dicks, Illinois DuPage County Court Disability Coordinator denies the charges and are considered innocent until found guilty by the Illinois Supreme Court.

ATTORNEY DISBARMENT COMPLAINT HAS BEEN FILED AGAINST SPECIAL PROSECUTOR JACK SMITH

1/15/2025

NEW YORK (AEAE) A Attorney Disbarment Complaint has been filed against Special Prosecutor Jack Smith with the New York Attorney Discipline Bar Association. See Attached Complaint.
legal disclosure: Jack Smith denies the charges which are only allegations. Jack Smith is considered innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

attorney_disbarment_complaint4.pdf
File Size:	152 kb
File Type:	pdf

ATTORNEY DISBARMENT COMPAINT FILE AGAINST FILED AGAINST MERRICK B. GARLAND ATTORNEY GENERAL

1/15/2025

CHICAGO-(AEAE) An attorney Disbarment complaint has been filed against Attorney General Merrick B. Garland see attached Complaint.
LEGAL DISCLAIMER: Merrick B. Garland denies the charges, which are only allegations. Mr. Garland is considered innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

maryland_attorney_disbarment_complaint_mim.pdf
File Size:	8632 kb
File Type:	pdf

letter_january_23_2025.pdf
File Size:	341 kb
File Type:	pdf

Chicago City Attorney Matthew Spahr is Charged in a Professional Misconduct Complaint

1/10/2025

Chicago- Today Chicago City Attorney Matthew Spahr was Charged in a Professional Misconduct. Mr.Spahr denies the charges which are only allegations. Chicago City attorneys Office says "No comment". See a copy of the complaint below.

complaint.pdf
File Size:	252 kb
File Type:	pdf

AIDAN NUTTALL ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL AT THE ILLINOIS ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE IS RATED 1/2 STAR

3/17/2024

CHICAGO-(AEAE) AIDAN NUTTAL ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL AT THE ILLINOIS ATTORNEY AGENERAL'S OFFICE IN THE OPINION OF THE AMERICANS FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF ATTORNEY ETHICS is rated 1/2 Star.

Aidan Nuttall is an Assistant Attorney General assigned to the General Law Bureau, Civil Prosecutions Division at the Office of the Illinois Attorney General. Aidan Nuttall claims that he has experience litigating in both criminal and civil cases, including bench trials and motion practice.
See attached documentation:

email__3-15-24.pdf
File Size:	164 kb
File Type:	pdf

email_2_3-15-24.pdf
File Size:	239 kb
File Type:	pdf

court_order.pdf
File Size:	42 kb
File Type:	pdf

Illinois Department of Human Services (IDHS) Attorney Rory A. Cannon is rated 1/2 Star

3/12/2024

Chicago-(AEAE) The Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) in their opinion have issued a 1/2 star rating to Rory A. Cannon Esq, an attorney that is employed by the Illinois Department of Human Services (IDHS).

rory_a._cannon_attorney_disbarment_complaint.pdf
File Size:	392 kb
File Type:	pdf

decision.pdf
File Size:	2616 kb
File Type:	pdf

Attorney John Schomberg General Counsel for the Illinois Department of Human Services is Rated 1/2 Star

3/12/2024

Chicago-(AEAE) The General Counsel for the Illinois Department of Human Resources John Schomberg is rated 1/2 star in the opinion of the American's for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE).
If anyone has any information on Mr. John Schomberg that they would like to share now is the time to do it email [email protected].

decision.pdf
File Size:	2616 kb
File Type:	pdf

corrected_attorney_john_schomberg_attorney_disbarment_complaint.pdf
File Size:	7511 kb
File Type:	pdf

john_f._schomberg_disbarment_complaint.pdf
File Size:	451 kb
File Type:	pdf

complaint_filed_2-29-24.pdf
File Size:	1706 kb
File Type:	pdf

CIERA HARVEY IDHS EMPLOYEE CHARGED WITH CONTEMPT OF COURT

3/12/2024

CHICAGO (AEAE) CIERA HARVEY A SENIOR REHABILITATION COUNSELOR, employed with the Illinois Department of Human Services (IDHS), Wood Street Office has been charged with Contempt of Court.
On August 17, 2024 Ciera Harvey conducted a redetermination hearing of a severally disabled "adult child" 32 year old male who had been receiving 15 hours of daily care pursuant to two court orders. Ciera Harvey, in direct violation of the two court orders, reduced the disabled person's hours of care by about 40% .
Ciera Harvey works out of the IDHS 1151 S Wood St Chicago, IL 60612.
Ciera Harvey has also been named in a Circuit Court lawsuit filed on February 27, 2024. See attached.
If anyone has any information on Ciera Harvey that they would like to share please email [email protected].
Ciera Harvey is represented by IDHS Attorney Rory Cannon, who has been charged with professional misconduct before the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission (ARDC) as well as his supervisor Attorney John Schomberg see attached complaints.
Legal Disclaimer: The charges are "allegations" Ciera Harvey, Cory Cannon and John Schomberg denies the charges and are considered innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

complaint_filed_2-29-24.pdf
File Size:	1706 kb
File Type:	pdf

rory_a._cannon_attorney_disbarment_complaint.pdf
File Size:	392 kb
File Type:	pdf

john_f._schomberg_disbarment_complaint.pdf
File Size:	451 kb
File Type:	pdf

Rory A. Cannon Illinois Department of Human Services Attorney has been Charged with Professional Misconduct Before the Illinois Attorney Registration Discipline Commission

3/10/2024

Chicago-(AEAE) Rory A. Cannon has been charged in a Professional Misconduct Disbarment Complaint with the Illinois Attorney Registration and Discipline Commission (ARDC). See attached complaint below.

Rory A Cannon is an Assistant General Counsel for the
Illinois Department of Human Services
Illinois Department of Human ServicesJun 2015 - Present · 8 yrs 10 most
Jun 2015 - Present · 8 yrs 10r Chicago Area

- Assistant General Counsel for Litigation. Manage high-volume litigation caseload for largest state agency in state and federal courts related to employment discrimination, civil rights, administrative reviews, injunctions and temporary restraining orders, torts, mental health court proceedings, and collections. Represent the Department in administrative proceedings before the Human Rights Commission, Department of Healthcare and Family Services, and IDHS Bureau of Administrative Hearings for employment discrimination claims, grant funds recovery actions, license revocations, Health Care Worker Registry hearings, and other administrative actions requiring attorney representation.
  
  Rory A. Cannon previously served as Assistant General Counsel for IDHS Division of Developmental Disabilities. Advised program staff on wide range of issues with concentration on HIPAA and Illinois mental health law. Drafted and reviewed contracts.
- Legal Disclaimer: The complaint contains "allegations". Rory A. Cannon denies the charges and is considered innoncient until proven guilty in a court of law.
- See a copy of the ARDC Complaint:

rory_a._cannon_disbarment_complaint.pdf
File Size:	198 kb
File Type:	pdf

joomla counter

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
Internships not available now

Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)

YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a attorney rating Service. The comments made by AEAE are not actionable because they are statements of opinion Moriarty v. Greene 732 N.E.2d 730, 740 Ill.App), citing Owen v. Can 497 N.E.2d 1145, 1148 (Ill.1986) see Law offices of David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al No 18-3216 Seventh Circuit No 18-3216 decided 01-28-2022.
Ratings are non-actionable opinion statements David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al citing Syngenta Seeds Inc v. Bung North America,Inc 773 F.3d 58 (8th Cir 2014) Illinois Law on expressions of Opinion , an unexplained one star review simply could not be actionable as defamation David Freydin case citing Cf. Kimzey v. Yelp!Inc. 836 F. 3d 1263, 1269-70 (9th Cir 2016)
AEAE LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERTS, valuations, expert
witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert.
The author(s) graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE and attended the University of Iowa a for a PHD. The Author(s) are the nation's most renowned
Legal Ethics experts and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions. AEAE, P.O. Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email [email protected]
312-545-4554
Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
"Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
Litigation is the Air We Breathe
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front!"

To Prove Defamation Case?
What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm.
The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation

The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.

Archives

April 2025
March 2025
January 2025
March 2024
February 2024
September 2023
July 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
July 2022
March 2022
February 2022
October 2021
July 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
April 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
June 2019
April 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
June 2017
May 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
January 2015
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009

Categories
Disclaimer This website is not a solicitation for business. All content on the AEAE website is intended to provide general information about AEAE and an opportunity for interested persons to contact AEAE. The content of this website is not offered as legal advice or legal opinion and it should not be relied upon for any specific situation. AEAE is not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney client relationship is intended. This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a complete description of AEAE services. While AEAE endeavors to keep the information updated and correct, AEAE makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the information contained in this website.