Blog Archives - Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics

ILLINOIS FORMER GOVERNOR GEORGE RYAN LET OUT OF PRISON TO WATCH WIFE DIE

6/30/2011

CHICAGO-(AEAE)-FORMER ILLINOIS GOVERNOR GEORGE RYAN, 76, was convicted of corruption charges 3 1/2 years ago and was given permission to leave his prison cell to travel to a hospital where his wife was in critical shape to watch her die.
Former Illinois Governor Thompson asked President Bush to pardon Ryan before he left office, Bush declined to pardon his former campaign manager of the State of Illinois.
Senator Durban requested that Omama pardon Ryan on humanitarian reasons, his age 76, bad health and the fact that Ryan's wife was critically ill for over a year now. Obama refused to pardon Ryan, who has 3 1/2 years left on his sentence.
George Ryan is best known for pardoning 13 death roll inmates from dying in Illinois. Ryan suspended the death sentence in Illinois after 13 other inmates, who were all on death roll, were later exonerated. Legal experts say that Ryan and former Illinois Governor Blago should have pardoned themselves before leaving office in order to have avoided going to jail. Ryan got seven years. Blago who was just convicted on 17 corruption counts a few days ago is staring at 300 years in jail.
These Governors could have pardoned themselves before leaving office, failing to do so made them targets of agreesive prosecutors. Story continues http://www.pressmentor.com/state_news/x1957439796/Bernard-Schoenburg-Lura-Lynn-Ryan-was-always-a-class-act
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iOF-8BgaK7I7KNdvRc2CgEQH4O-A?docId=e8e249f863014d068f64c1ab568213fc

JUDGE ZEGAL TO DECIDE BLAGO\'S SENTENSE

6/29/2011

CHICAGO-(AEAE) -JUDGE ZEGAL IS THE MAN WHO WILL DECIDE HOW MUCH TIME BLAGO DOES IN JAIL. He could ge 200 years but experts say his sentence will more likely be 10 years. Blago would have to serve 8 1/2 years. Blago is 55 years old. He would get out of jail at age 63 years old. This Story continues http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/columnists/ct-oped-0629-page-20110629,0,3289390.column

ILLINOIS FORMER GOVERNOR ROD BLAGOJEVICH CONVICTS HIMSELF

6/28/2011

CHICAGO-(AEAE)-FORMER ILLINOIS GOVERNOR ROD BLAGOJEVIC (BLAGO) WAS FOUND GUILTY OF SEVENTEEN COUNTS OF CORRUPTION IN AN ILLINOIS FEDERAL COURT HOUSE TODAY. BLAGO IS NOW STARING AT 99 YEARS IN PRISION. In Blago's first trial a year ago he was found guilty of only one count, lying to an FBI Agent. That jury was unable to reach a decision on the other 23 counts of corruption. In that jury there was one courageous black jurier who held out because of her conviction that Blago was innocent. However the Government with its unlimited resources decided to retrie Blago a second time. Blago' initial team of lawyers lead by Sam Adams Jr., after bilking Blago out of over 2 million dollars, bailed out on Blago after the first trial concluded. In the second trial, Blago was forced to employ a new team of attorneys. The Government dropped Blago's brother from the first trial, cut the charges against Blago down to 20 and retried Blago. After this 6 week trial, the jury came back today and found Blago guilty on 17 counts, not guilty on one count and were dead locked on two other counts. In the second trial Blago took the stand. The Government on cross examination, called Blago a "convicted" liar, having been convicted of talking to a government agent and lying to him about the fact that Blago claimed that he was "not guilty" of the charges. When a target of a grand jury investigation makes an admission to a goverment agent that he is "not guilty" of whatever he is being charged with, that is called "lying" to a Government Agent. After the jury issued their guilty decision today, one of the juriers who was interviewed by the press said that "it was Blago's admission on the tape recorded telephone conversations that buried Blago!". Here we have a attorney Blagojevich talking to government investigators and making "damming" admissions on telephone conversations, all of which lead to give the jury enough evidence to "convict" Blagojevich. After the convition today Blagojevich said in an interview to the press that he was "stunned" by the jury verdict today!. However no one else who has been following this case for the last 2 1/2 years was "stunned" by the jury decision today, because everyone knew that Blago had convicted himself! http://beaconnews.suntimes.com/news/6210641-418/local-lawmakers-found-blago-guilty-too.html

INSIDE STORY-REASON WHY GEORGE CLOONEY GOT DUMPED BY ELISABETTA CANALIS

6/27/2011

HOLLYWOOD-(AEAE)-EXCLUSIVE-With exclusive information regarding the break of George Clooney 50, from the Italian model Elisabetta Canalis 32. The following conversation took place at the Air Port in Rome a few days ago. Just before Clooney was going to get in his Private Lear Jet.
“Look Baby we don't need to get married we are having a lot of fun these last two years!”
“But I want a baby and I want to get Married!”
“Sweetie, us Hollywood types never get married very long any way and we are having a blast, right babie!”
“George I have you two years of my life and my biological clock is ticking..”
“Sweetie lets go to the French Reveria, forget about your biological clock, I'll show you a good time.”
“George this is the last straw, unless you agree to marry me and have a babie with you, I am dumping you!”
“Liz, I shoot another movie this week and I got to get going babie.”
“George I mean it, were through, I dumping you today!”
“I can't hear you babie my Lear Jet is making to much noise, I got to go now, see you later!”
With that last comment Clooney got into his private Lear Jet and flew back to Hollywood, where there were about 10 young starlets waiting for his plane to arrive in LA. It was reported that Clooney already has a new girl friend who is 25, she is staring with him in his next move and she is not asking about marriage or babies according to Clooney.
Now you have the “Rest of the Story”.
Read More: Elisabetta Canalis Breakup

PRO SE SUES SUE SEYFARTH SHAW

6/26/2011

BOSTON-(AEAE)-A FEDERAL JUDGE GAVE THE GO AHEAD TO A PRO SE PARTY TO SUE A LARGE LAW FIRM SEYFARTH SHAW.
SUDEBAR: More and more parties are starting to wake up and to sue more and more law firms for malpractice and other violations http://www.law.com/jsp/law/sign_me_in.jsp?article=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.law.com%2Fjsp%2Fnlj%2FPubArticleNLJ.jsp%3Fid%3D1202498243763&Pro_se_plaintiff_gets_green_light_to_sue_Seyfarth_Shaw=&src=EMC-Email&et=editorial&bu=Law.com&pt=LAWCOM%20Newswire&cn=nw20110624&kw=Pro%20Se%20Plaintiff%20Gets%20Green%20Light%20to%20Sue%20Seyfarth%20Shaw&slreturn=1&hbxlogin=1

PRO SE SUES SUE SEYFARTH SHAW

6/26/2011

CONRAD BLACK GOES BACK TO JAIL

6/25/2011

CHICAGO (AEAE) — Conrad M. Black, once a media mogul was re sentenced to prison today after a successful appeal to the supreme court after a federal judge ruled on Friday that he had not served enough time for defrauding investors. Judge Amy J. St. Eve of United States District Court in Chicago, sentenced Mr. Black to three and a half years in prison, saying that Black had not served enough time in jail (for which he had already served two years). Judge St. Eve had originally sentenced Mr. Black to six and a half years in prison after he was convicted in 2007 of defrauding investors in Hollinger International. A crime of which no one could even understand. Former Illinois Governor Thompson is suppose to even have approved the transactions for which Black was later charged. Black's wife hit the floor upon hearing the re sentencing. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/25/business/media/25black.html

LAWYER FREINDING VIOLATES RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT

6/24/2011

SAN FRANCISCO —(Law.com) Enterprising lawyers beware: using Facebook as an investigative tool may get you into trouble with the bar, says an ethics opinion from the San Diego County Bar Association.

The opinion concludes that sending a Facebook "friend request" to a represented party violates California Rule of Professional Conduct 2-100 and could be cause for discipline. The opinion's author, Daniel Eaton, said it's the first to confront ex parte communication through social media

NOW IS NOT THE TIME TO GET OUT OF AFGHANISTAN

6/23/2011

CHICAGO-(AEAE)-OBAMA SPEECH TONIGHT MAKES A MISTAKE TO REMOVE TROOPS OUT OF AFGHANISTAN, ACCORDING TO McCane. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/06/22/obama-speech-afghanistan-_n_882682.html#s296719&title=Mitt_Romney

SUPREME COURT DENIES CLASS ACTION STATUS TO WALMART CASE

6/22/2011

WASHINGTON-(AEAE)-THE U.S. SUPREME COURT IN A 5-4 DECISION denied class action status to a Walmart Case. Walmart was pleased. On the other hand Microsoft was not pleased with the decision that up held a 300 million dollar patent award.
SIDEBAR: The Supreme Court only takes 1/2 of 1% of the cases filed with the court. That is 50 out of 10,000. In order to get one's case heard it appears that a party has to be a Walmart or Microsoft to get a hearing. Otherwise it is like winning the lottary to get a hearing before the High Court.

joomla counter

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
Internships not available now

Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)

YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a
LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERT, valuations, expert
witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert.
The author(s) graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE and attended the University of Iowa a for a PHD. The Author(s) are the nation's most renowned
Legal Ethics experts and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions. AEAE, P.O. Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email ldms4@hotmail.com
312-545-4554
Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
"Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
Litigation is the Air We Breathe
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front!"

To Prove Defamation Case?
What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm.
The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation

The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.

Archives

March 2023
February 2023
July 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
October 2021
July 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
April 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
June 2019
April 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
June 2017
May 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
January 2015
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009

Categories
Disclaimer This website is not a solicitation for business. All content on the AEAE website is intended to provide general information about AEAE and an opportunity for interested persons to contact AEAE. The content of this website is not offered as legal advice or legal opinion and it should not be relied upon for any specific situation. AEAE is not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney client relationship is intended. This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a complete description of AEAE services. While AEAE endeavors to keep the information updated and correct, AEAE makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the information contained in this website.