ILLINOIS FORMER GOVERNOR ROD BLAGOJEVICH CONVICTS HIMSELF

6/28/2011

CHICAGO-(AEAE)-FORMER ILLINOIS GOVERNOR ROD BLAGOJEVIC (BLAGO) WAS FOUND GUILTY OF SEVENTEEN COUNTS OF CORRUPTION IN AN ILLINOIS FEDERAL COURT HOUSE TODAY. BLAGO IS NOW STARING AT 99 YEARS IN PRISION. In Blago's first trial a year ago he was found guilty of only one count, lying to an FBI Agent. That jury was unable to reach a decision on the other 23 counts of corruption. In that jury there was one courageous black jurier who held out because of her conviction that Blago was innocent. However the Government with its unlimited resources decided to retrie Blago a second time. Blago' initial team of lawyers lead by Sam Adams Jr., after bilking Blago out of over 2 million dollars, bailed out on Blago after the first trial concluded. In the second trial, Blago was forced to employ a new team of attorneys. The Government dropped Blago's brother from the first trial, cut the charges against Blago down to 20 and retried Blago. After this 6 week trial, the jury came back today and found Blago guilty on 17 counts, not guilty on one count and were dead locked on two other counts. In the second trial Blago took the stand. The Government on cross examination, called Blago a "convicted" liar, having been convicted of talking to a government agent and lying to him about the fact that Blago claimed that he was "not guilty" of the charges. When a target of a grand jury investigation makes an admission to a goverment agent that he is "not guilty" of whatever he is being charged with, that is called "lying" to a Government Agent. After the jury issued their guilty decision today, one of the juriers who was interviewed by the press said that "it was Blago's admission on the tape recorded telephone conversations that buried Blago!". Here we have a attorney Blagojevich talking to government investigators and making "damming" admissions on telephone conversations, all of which lead to give the jury enough evidence to "convict" Blagojevich. After the convition today Blagojevich said in an interview to the press that he was "stunned" by the jury verdict today!. However no one else who has been following this case for the last 2 1/2 years was "stunned" by the jury decision today, because everyone knew that Blago had convicted himself! http://beaconnews.suntimes.com/news/6210641-418/local-lawmakers-found-blago-guilty-too.html

0 Comments

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
Internships available
312-545-4554

Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)

YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a
LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERT, valuations, expert
witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert.
The author(s) graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE and attended the University of Iowa a for a PHD. The Author(s) are the nation's most renowned
Legal Ethics experts and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions. AEAE, P.O. Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email ldms4@hotmail.com
312-545-4554
Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
"Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
Litigation is the Air We Breathe
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front!"

To Prove Defamation Case?
What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm.
The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation

The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics