CHICAGO-(AEAE) TODAY A CIVIL LAWSUIT was filed against the Chicago Law firm of Kovitz Shifrin Nesbit for Mail Fraud and other charges.
| complaint2___4-15-19.pdf |
|
0 Comments
 CHICAGO (AEAE) A complaint was filed with the Illinois Attorney General Office today alleging that the Chicago lawfirm of Kovitz Shifrin Nesbitz (KSN) aided and abetted their client, Oak Park, Illinois based Reliable Management Realty Ltd, Donald Fumo engaged in "false billing" and "mail fraud" . (KSN partner Nicholas Mitchell photo above) . Attorney disbarment complaints will be filed against each and every member of the Kovitz firm on Wednesday April 17, 2018.KERRY T. BARTELL, DAVID M. BENDOFF, JOHN H. BICKLEY III, JANELLE DIXON , WENDY DURBIN, KELLY C. ELMORE, SETH W. GOETTELMAN, KATHARINE W. GRIFFITH, RICHARD W. HILLSBERG, TIMOTHY C. JACOBS, JULIE A. JACOBSON, RONALD J. KAPUSTKA, ROBERT B. KOGEN, MICHAEL G. KREIBICH, OMAR K. MALIK, NICHOLAS MITCHELL, NICHOLAS MITCHELL, ROBERT P. NESBIT, THOMAS M. OLSON , MATTHEW J. O'MALLEY , JASON E. ORTH, NEHA A. PARIKH , PAMELA J. PARK, AMY K. PETERSELLI , CHRISTOPHER E. RALPH, JESSICA L. RYAN, DAVID B. SAVITT, JORDAN I. SHIFRIN , RYAN H. SHPRITZ , DIANE J. SILVERBERG , and GERALD J. SMOLLER LEGAL DISCLAIMER: The Kovitz firm, their lawyers, Reliable Management Realty Ltd, Donald Fumo all claim to not be guilty of any of the alleged charges and are considered Innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. 
 Lake Geneva, Wisconsin (AEAE) Sal Dimiceli Sr., Broker/Owner of Lake Geneva Area Realty https://www.lakegenevaarearealty.com/c/About-Our-Team is charged with deceptive trade practices. Sal Dimiceli Sr., has been involved in real estate for 30 years as a Real estate broker, investor, buying, selling and developing residential and commercial properties. See a copy of the complaint. Legal disclosure: Sal Dimiceli Sr., denies the charges and is considered innocent until proven guilty by a court of law.
  CHICAGO-(AEAE) A FEDERAL CIVIL RIGHTS LAWSUIT WAS FILED TODAY IN FEDERAL COURT IN CHICAGO CHARGING COSTCO AND ITS ATTORNEYS FOR violations, OF 42 U.S.C. § 1983[1], Americans’s With Disabilites Act of 1990, 42 USC s12101 et seq. (2000) (“ADA”), Equal Protection Clause, 42 U.S.C. § 1963 claim for “abuse of process”, which include false arrest, deprivation of rights, false imprisonment, conspiracy under §1983 and common law, failure to protect and prevent (by adequate training), malicious prosecution, abuse of process[2], assault and battery, negligence, intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress, abuse of process[3], willful and wanton misconduct, aiding and abetting, fraud, negligence, and defamation, which conduct was the legal cause of the injuries or damages to the Plaintiff.. [1] "42 U.S. Code § 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights". Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress [2] , [3]Abuse of process is a cause of action in tort arising from one party making misusing or perversion of regularly issued court process (civil or criminal) not justified by the underlying legal action. It is a common law intentional tort. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abuse_of_process The named defendants are: Costco Wholesale Corporation, James Hamilton, W. Craig Jelinch, Richard Galanti, Ron Galanti, Ron Vachri, Paul Moulton, Franz Lazarus, John McKay, James Murphy, Joseph Portera, Timothy Rose, Dennis Zook, Kenneth Denman, Chris Barbarino, Jeff Erickson, Greg Killian, Matt Harris, Christine Carlson, Patricio Omar Chavez, (Costco Defendants) Ronald M. Serpico, Mary Ann Paolantonio, Anthony N. Abruzzo, Sonny Hicotera, Jaime Angulano, Mary Ramiez Taconi, Arturo Mota, Anthony J. Prignano, Village of Melrose Park, Melrose Park Police Department, Sam C. Pitassi, Officer Michael DeCarlo Jr, Officer Marco Flores, Damico Law (Melrose Park Defendants) Law Offices of Lisa T Damico Esq., Lisa T Damico ., (Damico Defendants) Lipe Lyons Murrphy & Pontikis Ltd, Jeffrey H. Lipe, Raymond Lyons,Jr., Edward J. Murphy, Bradley C. Nahrstadt, Thomas J. Pontikis, (Lipe Defendants) Legal discliamer: All of the defendants deny the charges and are considered Innocent until proven quilty in a court of law.
 President Trump did something Tuesday night that he has rarely done since taking office: He used the presidential bully pulpit to reach beyond his hardcore base of supporters to make his case to the American people as a whole. Speaking from the Oval Office for the first time during his presidency, Trump embraced our country’s tradition as a nation of immigrants, declaring “America proudly welcomes millions of lawful immigrants who enrich our society and contribute to our nation.” He then offered a cogent explanation why he believes we face what he called “a humanitarian crisis — a crisis of the heart and a crisis of the soul” along our southern border. He pointed out the human cost of our broken system to illegal migrants themselves, expressing compassion for the “children [who] are used as human pawns by vicious coyotes and ruthless gangs” and the “women [who] are sexually assaulted on the dangerous trek up through Mexico.” He shared heartbreaking stories of Americans killed by criminal aliens who had no right to be here — including a police officer in California who was murdered, a 16-year-old girl who was brutally stabbed in Maryland, and an Air Force veteran who was raped and beaten to death. “I’ve held the hands of the weeping mothers and embraced the grief-stricken fathers,” Trump declared. “I will never forget the pain in their eyes, the tremble in their voices, or the sadness gripping their souls.” And he laid out his solution, which he explained was “developed by law enforcement professionals and border agents” and includes funds for cutting-edge technology, more border agents, more immigration judges, more bed space and medical support — and $5.7 billion for a “physical barrier” that he called “just common sense.” Without naming her, Trump responded to the absurd charge from House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) that a wall is “immoral.” Democrats voted repeatedly for physical barriers until he was elected president, he noted. If a wall is immoral, Trump asked, “why do wealthy politicians build walls, fences and gates around their homes? They don’t build walls because they hate the people on the outside, but because they love the people on the inside.” The president did not unilaterally declare a national emergency. Instead, he called for compromise and said, “To those who refuse to compromise in the name of border security, I would ask: imagine if it was your child, your husband, or your wife, whose life was so cruelly shattered and totally broken?” He was, in short, presidential. Democrats insisted on equal time, which is highly unusual for presidential addresses other than the State of the Union. It was a mistake. In contrast to Trump, Pelosi and Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer (N.Y.) came across as small and intransigent. While Trump spoke calmly and rationally from behind the Resolute Desk, the Democratic leaders accused him of “pounding the table” and having a “temper tantrum.” While Trump told human stories, they complained about process. They accused him of arguing that the women and children at the border were “a security threat” when he had just explained to the American people that they were victims, too. They charged him with using the “backdrop of the Oval Office to manufacture a crisis, stoke fear and divert attention from the turmoil in his administration.” They were partisan and petty, while Trump came across as reasonable and even compassionate. To normal Americans watching in the heartland, and who are not steeped in Trump hatred, the president must have seemed like the adult in the room. And, most important, Pelosi and Schumer failed to use the one word that millions of Americans were longing to hear — compromise. But Trump did. That is why the president won the night. Schumer and Pelosi appealed to their base, while Trump made an effective appeal to persuadable Americans. Until now, Trump has owned the 18-day government shutdown that prompted this address, because he’s the one who started it. But if Democrats continue to attack him, and won’t entertain any compromise, soon the shutdown will be all theirs — because they’re the ones who have refused to end it. Washington Post  CHICAGO (AEAE)-Michael Cohen, formerly an attorney for President Donald Trump, pleaded guilty on Aug. 21 to campaign finance charges that are not crimes, according to former Federal Elections Commission chair Bradley Smith. Cohen pleaded guilty to eight charges in a Manhattan court to charges of tax evasion, making false statements to banks, and campaign finance violations. The campaign finance charges are related to a $130,000 payment Cohen made in exchange for the silence of a woman who claims to have had an affair with Trump more than a decade ago. The prosecutors allege that the payment constitutes a campaign contribution and thus violates the law because it exceeds the individual contribution limit and was made using a corporation. In charging Cohen, the prosecutors cited a broad legal definition of what constitutes a campaign contribution but failed to mention a specific prohibition on the personal use of campaign funds, which disqualifies the payment as a contribution. Cohen did not commit any crimes, he was just hoodwinked into pleading guilty to crimes he did not commit in order to make Cohen testify against Trump. 
 CHICAGO- AEAE- December 5, 2018. In a 2-1 decision, a panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit refused to stop the enforcement of New Jersey’s 10-round magazine ban. The majority, in an opinion by Judge Patty Shwartz and joined by a black Judge Joseph Greenaway, both liberal, un qualified judges that have been appointed by President Obama, erroneously held that the ban did not violate the Second Amendment because it reasonably advanced the State’s interest in reducing mass shootings without severely burdening the rights of law-abiding citizens.A decision that made no legal sense whatsoever. On the other hand Judge Stephanos Bibas, appointed by President Trump, authored the correct decision in a forceful dissent, pointing out that the majority refused to apply standard constitutional principles to the case and instead treated the Second Amendment differently than any other constitutional right. Judge Bibas was right on the law and the facts. Judge Bibas observed: “The Second Amendment is an equal part of the Bill of Rights. We must treat the right to keep and bear arms like other enumerated rights, as the Supreme Court insisted in [District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008)].” He rejected what he termed the majority’s “watered down“ approach to the Second Amendment and is heralded by gun rights activits . Read more: https://www.ammoland.com/2018/12/third-circuit-tells-gun-owners-turn-in-gun-magazines/#ixzz5Z1E8Kn30 Chief Justice John Roberts was wrong when he stated that "there are no Obama judges and no Clinton judges. There are many "unfit" Obama judges unfortunately on the bench today, who were appointed by what authorities now claim is the "worst" president in American history, Barack Obama according to Professor Harold Goldenshalf.  CHICAGO — The U.S. Supreme Court hears a challenge Thursday to its long-standing rule that putting someone on trial more than once for the same crime does not violate the Constitution's protection against jeopardy.double The Fifth Amendment says no person shall be "twice put in jeopardy of life or limb" for the same offense, and most Americans are familiar with the term double jeopardy. But for more than 160 years, the Supreme Court has ruled that being prosecuted once by a state and again in federal court, or the other way around, for the same crime doesn't violate the provision because the states and the federal government are "separate sovereigns." Chicago AEAE- Former President George W. Bush says he told his father just before he died, over a loud speaker, that he had been a "wonderful dad" and that he loved him. Delivering a eulogy at the elder Bush's funeral on Wednesday, George W. Bush said his father's "last words on earth were 'I love you, too.'"    |
EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today! Archives
April 2019
Categories
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
RSS Feed
