 Chicago (AEAE) In a six-page filing formally responding to the impeachment charges, President Trump’s lawyers rejected the case against him as illegitimate and described the effort to remove him as dangerous. IMPEACHMENT TRIAL Read the trial memo from House managers and the response from President Trump’s legal team.  
0 Comments
 Chicago: (AEAE) Leo Stoller petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court today for a writ of certiorari to review the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit decision refusing to allow felons to possess fire arms. At Issue: Stoller case involves a Second Amendment challenge to 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), the federal law prohibiting gun ownership by first time offenders, people convicted of non violent felonies A majority of Third Circuit judges, sitting en banc, agreed that § 922(g)(1) is unconstitutional as applied to Daniel Binderup (who was convicted of corrupting a minor), and Julio Suarez (who was convicted of carrying an unlicensed handgun. Stoller argues that the Third Circuit decision on sustain the right for convicted criminals to retain Second Amendment Rights to possess fire Arms, should be the law in every Federal Circuit. Stoller argues that The Supreme Court’s intervention is necessary because there is a division in the federal appellate courts on the permissibility of as-applied challenges to § 922(g)(1). Stoller’s brief explains that the recent Third Circuit’s ruling invalidates § 922(g)(1) in many of its applications, and is in conflict with the other circuits. Stoller argues the U.S. Supreme Court should must accept the Petitioner’s Writ of Cert to clarify that the Third Circuit’s ruling that invalidates § 922(g)(1) in many of its applications, and will not allow dangerous felons to acquire firearms, contravening Congress’s intent to prohibit all criminals who committed crimes with at least the specified maximum sentence from acquiring firearms and does not create administrative burdens that undermine the efficacy of § 922(g)(1). and will not allow dangerous felons to acquire firearms, contravening Congress’s intent to prohibit all criminals who committed crimes with at least the specified maximum sentence from acquiring firearms. We also argue that the Third Circuit’s decision will not create administrative burdens that undermine the efficacy of § 922(g)(1). On the other hand if the Third Circuit’s decision becomes the law of the land it will. Stoller argues that the U.S. Supreme Cour must Declare that the felon-in-possession ban of 18 USC § 922(g)(1) is unconstitutional as applied to non violent, first time offenders. See a copy of his Supreme Court Brief which was filed today. 
 The following list unveils some of the most important lessons in life that people learn the hard way.
  Chicago (AEAE) Attorney(s) Harry N. Arger, Rosa M. Tumialan-Landy, Christina C. Brunty and Todd A. Gale were charged in an Attorney Disbarment Complaint before the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission in August of 2019. See below a copy of the Attorney Disbarment Complaint. The ARDC issued a decision. The ARDC stated "if in the future any court should make findings of wrongful conduct by the attorneys we invite you to notify the ARDC. See attached copy of the Attorney Disbarment Complaint . LEGAL DISCLAIMER: Harry N. Arger, Rosa M. Tumialan-Landy, Christina C. Brunty and Todd A. Gale, Joseph J. Tirello have denied all charges of wrong doing are are considered innocient until proven guilty in a court of law.  
 CHICAGO (AEAE) FAEGRE BANKER DANIEL'S ATTORNEY JOHN A. ROBERTS WAS CHARGED WITH SUBORNATION OF PERJURY while represents Berkshire Hathaway Inc., in a Civil Suit in Chicago. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| supplement3_to_mot_for_discovery_sanctions_6-26-19.pdf |
 | CHICAGO (AEAE) WARREN E. BUFFETT'S MODULAR HOME MANUFACTURER CHM MANUFACTURING INC., PRESIDENT KEITH HOLDBROOKS AND THEIR CFO JIM STARIHA have been charged in a civil suite with perjury. Legal disclaimer: Keith Holdbrooks and Jim Stariha both deny the charges and are considered Innocent until proven guilty by a court of law. |
| supplement2_to_mot_for_discovery_sanctions_6-24-19.pdf |
| fox_ardc_complaint_6-22-19.pdf |
| court_order_compressed.pdf |
| complaint2___4-15-19.pdf |
| cs_ag_complaint.pdf |
| exhibit_1_wcca_lease.pdf |
| exhibit_2_altered__lease_10-30-15.pdf |
| exhibit_3_judge_lee_10-13-17_sanction_order_s_2.pdf |
| exhibit_3_oct_13_2016_official_court_transcript.pdf |
| exhibit_4_reliable_invoice_3-26-19.pdf |
| costco_complaint_weebly.pdf |
Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)
YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a
LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERT, valuations, expert
witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert.
The author(s) graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE and attended the University of Iowa a for a PHD. The Author(s) are the nation's most renowned
Legal Ethics experts and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions. AEAE, P.O. Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email ldms4@hotmail.com
312-545-4554
Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
"Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
Litigation is the Air We Breathe
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front!"
To Prove Defamation Case?
What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm.
The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation
The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.
“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.
AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge
VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
June 2019
April 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
June 2017
May 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
January 2015
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
RSS Feed
