Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics

  • SUE THE BASTARDS
  • AEAE
  • AEJE
  • AEIPR
  • Rentamark
  • Archrive
  • PAGE 2
 

FEDERAL COURT JUDGE JOHN DARRELL TO THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FILED TODAY

8/31/2010

0 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-AN APPEAL WAS FILED TODAY WITH THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS OF A DECISION MADE BY ILINOIS DISTRICT COUR JUDGE JOHN DARRELL.

This is your new blog post. Click here and start typing, or drag in elements from the top bar.
0 Comments

TELEVANGELIST SUES ABC FOR DEFAMATION- STOLLER SUES ILLINOIS ATTORNEYS MICHAEL GAUTHIER, RONALD O. ROSESER AND PETER R. VUCHA FOR A 100 MILLION DEFAMATION CASE NO. L 2296

8/31/2010

7 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-A federal appeals court reinstated a televangelist's defamation lawsuit suit claiming ABC used out-of-context footage portraying him as a wealthy braggart. The film of the Rev. Frederick Price was actually from a sermon on greed in which the preacher slips into the role of a fictional character who is wealthy but unhappy. A trial court judge had earlier tossed out the lawsuit, ruling that the video didn't leave the audience with the wrong impression of Price, who is wealthy and calls himself a "prophet of prosperity." 9th Circuit Rules Televangelist Can Sue ABC for Defamation
SIDEBAR: LEO STOLLER IS SUING ATTORNEYS LANCE G. JOHNSON, DAVID ABRAMS AND ALFRED GOODMAN www.roylance.com FOR DEFAMATION IN CHICAGO SEEKING DAMAGES OF 100 MILLION. STOLLER IS ALSO SUING ILLINOIS ATTORNEYS MICHEAL GAUTHIER, RONALD ROESER AND PETER R. VUCHA IN A SEPERATE 100 million dollar defamation lawsuit which now pend in Cook County Illinois before Judge Allen Goldberg in case No. 2010 L 2296

7 Comments

AEAE-NEW WEAPON IN FORCLOSURE ARSENAL TO STOP UNLAWFUL FORCLOSURES

8/30/2010

7 Comments

 
Picture
  CHICAGO-(AEAE)-MOST BANKS THAT ARE forclosuring on property owners fail to provide proper affidavits in pleadings in order to perfect a lawful forclosure lawsuit. Defense lawyers are increasingly attacking the validity of affidavits that owners of notes must file with the courts as part of the foreclosure process. Attorneys are successfully arguing that plaintiffs -- usually a trust that owns the note or the servicer of the note -- are violating court rules by filing affidavits with no records attached to support their foreclosure suits.

New Strategy in Foreclosure Battles Attacks Validity of Affidavits

7 Comments

LEGAL EXPERTS STATE THAT ROBERT BLAGOJEVICH NOW HAS VALID CLAIM AGAINST THE GOVERNEMENT FOR FALSE ARREST, MALICIOUS PROSECUTION AND VIOLATIONS OF CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER SECTION 1983

8/29/2010

8 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-ON THURSDAY FEDERAL PROSECUTORS DROPPED ALL CHARGES, TWO COUNTS OF ESTORTION CONSPIRACY, ONE COUNT EACH OF WIRE FRUD AND EXTORTION, AGAINST THE OLDER BROTHER OF FORMER ILLINOIS Gov. Rod Blagojevich . After a summer long trial, 14 days of deliberations the jury was deadlocked last week on all four corruption counts against Robert Blagojevich and 23 counts against the former Governor Rod Blagojevich. JoAnn Chiakulas, the one juror who held out from convicting both Robert and Rod said that, I never saw a the former Illinois Governor nor his brother formulate a clear plan to sell the Obama's former senate seat to anyone. The Government had no case.
Rod Blagojevich is lone target now that brother is cleared
Rod Blagojevich II is lone target now that brother is cleared
Many legal experts who followed the former Governor's case closely questioned why the trial court judge, Northern Illinois District Court Judge James Zagel just did not on his own enter a directed verdict for the defendants at the close of the governments merit less case.
Legal experts state that with the dropping of charges against Robert Blagojevich, now gives him good grounds to turn the tables and to go after the government for false arrest, malicious prosecution and violations of his civil rights under Section 1983. This story continues click here
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/chi-ap-us-blagojevichtrial-,0,2339978.story
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/chi-ap-il-blagojevichtrial-,0,1895010.story
Here is the latest Illinois news from The Associated Press, IL







8 Comments

ILLINOIS APPELLATE COURT AFFIRMS THAT STOLLER WAS NOT CHARGED WITH CONTEMPT ON FEB. 25, 2009

8/28/2010

15 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-ON FEBRUARY 25, 2009 Illinois Circuit Court Judge Renee Goldfarb unlawfully ordered Leo Stoller to be taken into custody by the Cook County Department of Corrections in order to take a BCX Examination. According to Stoller malicious prosecution complaint filed in Cook county Illinois against the Cook county Sheriff, the Cook County Department of Corrections and Cook County Illinois, Stoller alleges that the Cook County Sheriff Thomas Dart manufactured a charge of “contempt” on Feb. 25, 23009 in order to incarcerate Stoller, who was held for 9 days in the Cook County Jail.

Now the Illinois Appellate Court affirmed Stoller allegation that Stoller was not “charged” with contempt on Feb. 25, 2009.

But Stoller was in fact locked up on Feb. 25, 2009 under the false charge of contempt and held in custody until March 6, 2009.

Stoller malicious prosecution, false arrest, and false imprisonment now has become a strict liability case for the County of Cook and each defendant.

15 Comments

AEAE names K. Echenrode Paralegal of the Year 2010

8/27/2010

0 Comments

 
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-THIS YEAR THE CREAM ALWAYS RISES AND AEAE HAS SELECTED K.Echenrode as the 2010 Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) para legal of the year.
Again we invite parties to nominate para legals for the 2011 selection commitee. Please submit your nominations via email to ldms4@hotmail.com
0 Comments

ILLINOIS APPELLATE COURT ISSUED DECISION STOLLER V. JOHNSON CASE L 10766

8/27/2010

1 Comment

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-THE ILLINOIS APPELLATE COURT FIRST DISTRICT ISSUED A DECISION IN A APPEAL THAT STOLLER TOOK OF Illinois Judge Kathy Flanagan order quashing service of summons on Washington DC. Trademark attorneys Lance G. Johnson, David Abrams and Alfred Goodman www.roylance.com “Plaintiff Leo Stoller appeals from the circuit court's order granting the motion to quash service upon defendants Lance G. Johnson, David Abrams and Alfred Goodman. On Appeal Stoller argues that any objections to the method of service were forfeited by defendants actions in federal court and that defendants were properly served with notice of his complaint, We affirm”. A Petition for Leave to Appeal to the Illinois Supreme Court has been filed.
 Currently Stoller has several matters pending before the Illinois Supreme Court and three before the U.S. Supreme Court.
Leo Stoller is an Appellate Expert have prosecuted over 400 appeals.
 
SIDEBAR: TOMORROWS  story will discuss a decision handed down by the Illiniois Appellate Court August 25th, 2010, in a Stoller case where he appealed, a Feb. 25, 2009 decision by Illinois Judge Renee G. Goldfarb ordering Stoller to be taken into custody by the Cook County Department of Corrections for 9 days to take a BCX Examination which the Cook County Jail does not provide. Currently all of the Defendants who are responsible for the Malicious prosecution, false Arrest and False Imprisionment are defendants in a 100 million dollar Civil Rights Lawsuit. The Decision by the Illinois Appellate Court buries them. Stay tuned.

1 Comment

ILLINOIS RESIDENT FILED PETITION TO HOLD EX-WIFE BEAUTY QUEEN AND HER LAWYER IN INDIRECT CRIMINAL CONTEMPT

8/26/2010

5 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-AN ILLINOIS RESIDENT HAS FILED NEW CHARGES TO HOLD HIS EX-WIFE AND HER LAWYER IN INDIRECT CRIMINAL CONTEMPT IN COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS.  A report analyzing over 500 contentious divorce case found that they can last up to 19 years with most lasting at least ten years. The Divorce Bar was please to learn because through these hard time divorce and bankruptcy lawyers have not been complaining other then those who have been charged with disciplinary complaints and disbarred because of their unethical conduct associated with their "win" at all cost litigation approach.  One lawyer called a judge a "narcissists" and was suspended by the bar for 6 months. Even though the judge actually spent over 6 hours a day looking at herself in a mirror.

Picture
5 Comments

BRYAN CAVE LLC, SENIOR PARTNER STEVEN R. SMITH CHARGED WITH 137 SANCTIONS

8/25/2010

2 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-TODAY IN ILLINOIS COOK COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT A MOTION FOR 137 (Rule 11) sanctions was filed against the law firm of Bryan Cave LLC, Senior Partner Steven R. Smith and his "bagman" Michael Werich for filing a frivilous attorney fee petition, seeking $67,000 in Sanctions. Bryan Cave would not return phone calls. Any body with information on Bryan Cave LLC, Steven R. Smith or Michael Werich and would like to share it email Ldms4@!hotmail.com
Legal Disclaimer: Bryan Cave LLC, Steven R. Smith and Michael Werich are considered inocient until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

Picture
2 Comments

MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS IN COOK COUNTY SHERIFF THOMAS DART MALICIOUS PROSECUTION, FALSE ARREST CASE

8/25/2010

0 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-A MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS WAS FILED MONDAY IN A 100 MILLION DOLLAR FALSE ARREST, FALSE IMPRISIONMENT , LAWSUIT FILED AGAINST THE ILLINOIS COOK COUNTY SHERIFF THOMAS DART. ON FEBRUARY 25, 2009 Illinois Circuit Court Judge Renee Goldfarb unlawfully ordered Leo Stoller to be taken into custody by the Cook County Department of Corrections in order to take a BCX Examination. According to Stoller malicious prosecution complaint filed in Cook county Illinois against the Cook county Sheriff, the Cook County Department of Corrections and Cook County Illinois, Stoller alleges that the Cook County Sheriff Thomas Dart manufactured a charge of “contempt” on Feb. 25, 23009 in order to incarcerate Stoller, who was held for 9 days in the Cook County Jail.
Now the Illinois Appellate Court affirmed Stoller allegation that Stoller was not “charged” with contempt on Feb. 25, 2009.
A motion for judgment on the pleadings now pends before Illinois Circuit Court Judge Allen Goldberg. The defendants have no valid defense now that the Illinois Appellate Court has spoken.

0 Comments
<<Previous

    EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
    Internships available
    ​312-545-4554


     Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
    FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)
    ​
    YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
    Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
     The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
     Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that  supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
     The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a
    LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERT, valuations, expert
    witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert. 
    The author(s)  graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE  and attended the University of Iowa a  for a PHD. The Author(s)  are the nation's most renowned
    Legal Ethics experts  and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
    enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation  Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
    numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions.  AEAE, P.O.  Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email ldms4@hotmail.com
    312-545-4554
    Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE  Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
     "Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
    Litigation is the Air We Breathe
    Litigation is War,

    Welcome to the Front!"


     To Prove Defamation Case?
    What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm. 
    The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation 

    The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

    “[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30 
    AEAE argues it reports on the  law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

    ​AEAE has the legal  right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators,  business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE  18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

    VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

    DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.



    Archives

    July 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    October 2021
    July 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    April 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    June 2019
    April 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    January 2015
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010
    December 2009
    November 2009
    October 2009
    September 2009

    Categories
    Disclaimer This website is not a solicitation for business. All content on the AEAE website is intended to provide general information about AEAE and an opportunity for interested  persons to contact AEAE. The content of this website is not offered as legal advice or legal opinion and it should not be relied upon for any specific situation.  AEAE is not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney client relationship is intended.  This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a complete description of AEAE services. While AEAE endeavors to keep the information updated and correct, AEAE makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the information contained in this website. 

    All
    Jewelry Frauds
    Scams
    Yellow Diamonds

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.