LEGAL EXPERTS STATE THAT ROBERT BLAGOJEVICH NOW HAS VALID CLAIM AGAINST THE GOVERNEMENT FOR FALSE ARREST, MALICIOUS PROSECUTION AND VIOLATIONS OF CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER SECTION 1983

8/29/2010

CHICAGO-(AEAE)-ON THURSDAY FEDERAL PROSECUTORS DROPPED ALL CHARGES, TWO COUNTS OF ESTORTION CONSPIRACY, ONE COUNT EACH OF WIRE FRUD AND EXTORTION, AGAINST THE OLDER BROTHER OF FORMER ILLINOIS Gov. Rod Blagojevich . After a summer long trial, 14 days of deliberations the jury was deadlocked last week on all four corruption counts against Robert Blagojevich and 23 counts against the former Governor Rod Blagojevich. JoAnn Chiakulas, the one juror who held out from convicting both Robert and Rod said that, I never saw a the former Illinois Governor nor his brother formulate a clear plan to sell the Obama's former senate seat to anyone. The Government had no case.
Rod Blagojevich is lone target now that brother is cleared
Rod Blagojevich II is lone target now that brother is cleared
Many legal experts who followed the former Governor's case closely questioned why the trial court judge, Northern Illinois District Court Judge James Zagel just did not on his own enter a directed verdict for the defendants at the close of the governments merit less case.
Legal experts state that with the dropping of charges against Robert Blagojevich, now gives him good grounds to turn the tables and to go after the government for false arrest, malicious prosecution and violations of his civil rights under Section 1983. This story continues click here
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/chi-ap-us-blagojevichtrial-,0,2339978.story
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/chi-ap-il-blagojevichtrial-,0,1895010.story
Here is the latest Illinois news from The Associated Press, IL

8 Comments

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
Internships not available now

Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)

YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a attorney rating Service. The comments made by AEAE are not actionable because they are statements of opinion Moriarty v. Greene 732 N.E.2d 730, 740 Ill.App), citing Owen v. Can 497 N.E.2d 1145, 1148 (Ill.1986) see Law offices of David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al No 18-3216 Seventh Circuit No 18-3216 decided 01-28-2022.
Ratings are non-actionable opinion statements David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al citing Syngenta Seeds Inc v. Bung North America,Inc 773 F.3d 58 (8th Cir 2014) Illinois Law on expressions of Opinion , an unexplained one star review simply could not be actionable as defamation David Freydin case citing Cf. Kimzey v. Yelp!Inc. 836 F. 3d 1263, 1269-70 (9th Cir 2016)
AEAE LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERTS, valuations, expert
witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert.
The author(s) graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE and attended the University of Iowa a for a PHD. The Author(s) are the nation's most renowned
Legal Ethics experts and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions. AEAE, P.O. Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email [email protected]
312-545-4554
Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
"Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
Litigation is the Air We Breathe
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front!"

To Prove Defamation Case?
What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm.
The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation

The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.

To Leo

8/28/2010 09:02:50 am

God you are soooooooooooooo boring

Leo Sucks Cock

8/28/2010 03:18:46 pm

Yawn. I've stopped looking at this site much anymore. Used to be unintentionally funny but now it just looks sad and low-rent like Stoller himself.

Blazzaro

8/28/2010 04:07:53 pm

Haven't missed you a day.

Had over 20,000 visitors since your were last here
on June 18, 2010,
expect to hit a total of over 90,000
to night
at this site,

Over 1/4 million visitors have come
here
which makes everthing all right

One moment does not creep
slowly like a year,
Our life is more worth while
since you are not here
Stay off the site,
Rite
And you will make everything
all Right

Seriously

8/28/2010 05:21:50 pm

Seriously, this guy Leo Stoller is mentally retarded, right? I mean, one of these guys who is too stupid to realize the only reason people watch is to see how big of a fool he is willing to make of himself, right? There is a YouTube video with over a million hits showing an idiot who was trying to move a piano by himself and it fell three stories onto his head. That sort of thing, right?

Stoller sucks cock

8/29/2010 01:24:34 am

Stoller, you continue to misunderstand even elementary facts. You don't have anywhere that number of visitors. The counter number is page views, not separate visitors. You really are a lying moron looking to aggrandize yourself in totally delusional ways. Go back to something you know, like sucking prison cock.

8/29/2010 02:14:45 am

Stoller sucks cock is right. The proof is in the pudding. All you have to do is Google(tm) or do a search on any of the other search engines for Leo Stoller, and 90:/: of the results are facts about what a complete fraud Stoller is. You have a better chance of finding an elephant wandering around the Loop than you do of finding one document substantiating Leo's claims of being any type of legal expert.

8/29/2010 12:42:34 pm

I found one!

8/29/2010 01:19:24 pm

XX (Fat Boy Leo), your certificate of completion from the Ringling Brothers' Clown College doesn't count.

Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics