Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics

  • SUE THE BASTARDS
  • AEAE
  • AEJE
  • AEIPR
  • Rentamark
  • Archrive
  • PAGE 2
 

STOLLER APPEALS DECISIONS TODAY OF ILLINOIS JUDGE DANIEL T. GILLESPIE

1/30/2010

4 Comments

 
Picture
  CHICAGO-(AEAE)-IN A HEARING ON DEFENDANT HAYNES RYAN MOTION TO STRIKE STOLLER INDIRECT CRIMINAL CONTEMPT CITATIONS against attorneys Lance G. Johnson, David Abrams, Alfred Goodman, Haynes Ryan, Mr. Ryan in Stoller's opinion made numerous misstatements of material fact and/or law to Judge Gillespie. Although Stoller pointed those misstatements of material fact or law to Judge Gillespie, the Judge granted Haynes Ryan's motion to strike the Indirect Criminal Contempt Petitions against Lance G. Johnson, David Abrams, Alfred Goodman, Chance Cooper, Gordon and Rees and against the law firm of Roylance, Abrams, Berdo and Goodman www.roylance.com Judge Gillespie set a status hearing for the Indirect Criminal Contempt Petition which remains against Gordon and Rees attorney Ryan Brown. Stoller filed his notices of appeals on Friday January 29, 2010 and is confident that he will be able to reverse Judge Gillespie attached decision. Click on the attached link to down load a copy of Stoller's Notices of appeals and the Court Decision http://www.filefront.com/15458281/Notice%20of%20Appeal0001.pdf. Stoller has ordered a transcript of the hearing which he will post very shortly.

SIDE BAR: Chicago is a “clout” heavy city and Stoller was warned on Friday by an source that refused to give his name to “Go easy on Haynes Ryan because there are people in this town who like him and he is being groomed for bigger things! You take down Haynes Ryan and it will cost you!”
Picture
4 Comments

JUSTICE ALITO responds negatively when President Obama mentions recent decision

1/29/2010

8 Comments

 
Picture
WASHINGTON-(NBC)-- Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito didn't like hearing President Barack Obama publicly criticize the high court's ruling removing corporate campaign spending limits — and he didn't try to hide it.
Alito made a dismissive face, shook his head repeatedly and appeared to mouth the words "not true" or possibly "simply not true" when Obama assailed the decision Wednesday night in his State of the Union address.

The president had taken the unusual step of publicly scolding the high court, with some of its members in robes seated before him in the House. "With all due deference to the separation of powers," he said, the court last week "reversed a century of law that I believe will open the floodgates for special interests — including foreign corporations — to spend without limit in our elections."
8 Comments

GORDON AND REES ATTORNEY HAYNES RYAN ENTERS THE APPEARANCE OF DEFENDANTS ATTORNEYS LANCE G. JOHNSON DAVID S. ABRAMS, ALFRED N. GOODMAN, CHANCE COOPER IN CHICAGO CRIMINAL CONTEMPT CHARGE

1/29/2010

1 Comment

 
Picture
  CHICAGO-(AEAE)-A CRIMINAL CONTEMPT CHARGE WAS LEVELED AGAINST ATTORNEYS LANCE G. JOHNSON, DAVID S. ABRAMS, ALFRED N. GOODMAN, CHANCE COOPER, RYAN BROWN AND HAYES RYAN ON OCT. 15, 2009. Click on attached link to see the complaint.  http://www.filefront.com/14756757/Lance-G.-Johnson-Charged-with-perjury0001.pdf  Gordon and Rees attorney Haynes Ryan waived service of summons and entered his appearance on behalf of himself. It took over two months to serve the other defendants, Johnson, Abrams, Goodman, Cooper, Brown and their law firms.On January 22, 2010 Gordon and Rees attorney Haynes Ryan finally filed the appearances of defendants Lance G. Johnson, David S. Abrams, Alfred N. Goodman and Chance Cooper. Haynes Ryan set his motion to join Defendant(s) with Hayes Ryan Motion to Strike, which Stoller has responded to. If found guilty of criminal contempt attorneys Lance G. Johnson, David s. Abrams, Alfred N. Goodman, Chance Cooper ,Haynes Ryan and Ryan Brown could be sentenced up to 6 months in jail.
 There next court hearing in Chicago Illinois is January 29, 2010 on the Criminal Contempt. http://www.filefront.com/15157881/Dec-15-2009-Order0001.pdf/
Stoller response to Haynes Ryan attempt to strike Stoller's Criminal Contempt petition.
http://www.filefront.com/15191477/responsetomotiontostrike_doc.pdf

LEGAL DISCLAIMER: Lance G. Johnson, David S. Abrams, Alfred N. Goodman, Chance Cooper ,Haynes Ryan and Ryan Brown are considered innocent of all charges until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
1 Comment

STOLLER MOVES TO DISQUALIFY ILLINOIS CHANCERY JUDGE MARY ANN MASON

1/28/2010

2 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-STOLLER FILED A MOTION TO DISQUALIFY ILLINOIS CHANCERY JUDGE MARY ANN MASON AS A MATTER OF LAW OR FOR CAUSE. Judge Mary Ann Mason denied Stoller's motion for automatic disqualification, which Stoller appealed. Stoller than moved to disqualify Judge Mary Ann Mason for cause. In Illinois case law says those seeking a substitution of judge for cause must show “actual prejudice”. Stoller argues that the actual prejudice standard is at odds with the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co. Inc., which held that the Constitution does not require proof of actual prejudice for the substitution of a judge to be appropriate. Ldms4@hotmail.com
2 Comments

HOW A DEFENDANT CAN TURN A MALICIOUS PERJURY CHARGE INTO A MALICIOUS PROSECUTION, FALSE ARREST AND 1983 CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATION LAWSUIT

1/27/2010

4 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)- No person may be convicted of perjury unless the State has proved beyond a reasonable doubt each element of the crime. These elements are: First, making/subscribing;Second, a statement; Third, (known by the defendant(s) to be not true)/(believed by the defendant(s) to be not true)/ (with intent to avoid or obstruct the ascertainment of truth); Fourth, under oath/affirmation/(legally binding assertion);Fifth, authorized/required by law in a/an trial/hearing/investigation/ deposition/certification/declaration. Each elements which must be shown in order to obtain a conviction.

Perjury is the crime of lying under oath. To convict a person of perjury, the prosecution must establish that the defendant took an oath to tell the truth and knowingly made a false statement of fact. In addition, the false statement must be material to the matter at hand, in other words, capable of influencing the tribunal on the issues before it. Perjury is often said to be one of
the most difficult crimes to prove. Compounding the difficulty is the "two-witness rule" used in most jurisdictions. Under this rule the prosecution must show the falsity of a defendant's statements either by two witnesses or by one witness and corroborating documents. If the state cannot prove for example that the Defendant executed the document the State case evaporates and turns into a “False” arrest, malicious prosecution, section 1983 violation of the Defendant's civil rights lawsuit against the Plaintiff.
4 Comments

BANK OF AMERICA CEO BRIAN MOYNIHAN MAKES DAMMING ADMISSIONS UNDER OATH TO THE FINANCIAL CRISIS INQUIRY COMMISSION

1/25/2010

5 Comments

 
Picture
ON JANUARY 13, 2010 the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission www.fcic.gov , which Congress established last year to investigate the causes of the financial crisis, questioned the heads of four big banks -- Lloyd Blankfein of Goldman Sachs, Jamie Dimon of JPMorgan Chase, John Mack of Morgan Stanley and Brian Moynihan of Bank of America. http://www.usatoday.com/money/companies/regulation/2010-01-13-wall-street-hearing_N.htm

Wall Street executives admitted last Wednesday that they made mistakes before a housing boom went bust, leading to a $700 billion taxpayer bailout and the worst recession since the 1930s. CEO Brian Moynihan made a damming admission .“Over the course of this crisis, (Bank of America (BAC)) caused a lot of damage, Never has it been clearer how mistakes made by... (Bank of America )... can affect Main Street." These damming admissions were made under oath and give valid grounds for parties who have been victimized and/or foreclosed upon to obtain Mr. Moynohan's deposition. In order to see a video of the damming admissions click here Bank executives testify

The Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission (FCIC) was created in 2009 by Congress to investigate the country's financial meltdown. In its hearing on January 13, 2010 http://www.fcic.gov/hearings/01-13-2010.php, the commission received damming admissions out of all of the top bank executives.The commission's 10 members include six Democrats and four Republicans. Its chairman is Phil Angelides, a Democrat

Democrats have likened the FCIC hearings to the Pecora hearings, which were a series of hearings conducted by the Senate Banking Committee in 1932 to examine the causes of the 1929 stock market crash and which led to major reforms like the Glass-Steagall Act, which separated investment banks and commercial banks.

Click on the attached link to see the video of the January 13, 2010 FCIC hearings which should be played in every court room in which Bank of American is foreclosing on a property owners home. In the Opinion of AEAE it establishes that Bank of America should be held responsible and should be made to cancel all of the mortgages that it unlawfully issued to property owners from 2004 thru 2008 which now have resulted in the unlawful foreclosure of their homes.

http://www.usatoday.com/video/#/Bank+CEOs%3A+Sorry+for+risky+behavior%2C+bad+decisions/61620515001

FOR THOSE INTERESTED IN JOINING A CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT AGAINST BANK OF AMERICA AND COUNTRYWIDE FOR BEING VICTIMIZED BY A UNLAWFUL MORTGAGE PLEASE EMAIL YOUR information to Ldms4@hotmail.com
Picture
5 Comments

STOLLER APPEALS SEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT ORDER ENDERED ON JAN 20, 2010 TO THE U.S. SUPEREME COURT

1/25/2010

17 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)- JUSTICES FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, RICHARD A. POSNER DIANE S. SYKES ISSUED FROM THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ISSUED AN ORDER ON JANUAY 20, 2010 which Stoller has already moved to appeal it before the United States Supreme Court. Stoller has requested that the Seventh Circuit Court suspend the  appeals pending Stoller Writ of Cert before the U.S. Supreme Court. The Seventh Circuit denied Stoller motion and a appealed followed. Stoller has moved before the U.S. Supreme court to consolidate his new appeal with his prior pending appeal. 
Every adverse decision in every case, Stoller has appealed and  will appeal "until the last court speaks". Leo Stoller is one of the most esperienced U.S. Supreme Court procedural expert. Ldms4@hotmail.com  312-545-4554 
Picture
17 Comments

GORDON AND REES ATTORNEY RYAN BROWN REFUSES TO ATTEND HIS CRIMINAL CONTEMPT HEARING IN CHICAGO

1/24/2010

1 Comment

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-GORDON AND REES ATTORNEY RYAN BROWN REFUSES TO ATTEND HIS CRIMINAL CONTEMPT HEARING ON JANUARY 26, 2010. The following are emails that were exchanged between Leo Stoller and Illinois Attorney Ryan Brown:
From: Leo Stoller
To: Ryan Brown
Cc: Alfred Goodman ; David Abrams ; david.sams@uspto.gov
Sent: Thu Jan 21 18:17:01 2010
Subject: RE: Jan 26, 2010 your Next Court Hearing "criminal" Contempt
Re: Jan 26, 2010 your Next Court Hearing "criminal" Contempt‏ From: Ryan Brown Thank you Leo. As you know, proper service is a prerequisite for attendance/appearance. Further to the below emails, proper service has not been effectuated. Of course, I will respond as required by statute. My best, Ryan

Mr. Brown
 Judge Gelespie espects you, Chance and someone representing your firm Gordon and Rees to be present at the next hearing January 26, 2010. Please serve me immediately with any pleading that you plan on filing with the court as soon as possible. 
 
Most cordially
 
Leo Stoller
312-545-4554
7115 W. North Ave #272
Oak Park, Illinois 60302
312-545-4554
www.remtamark.net
1 Comment

OSAMA BEN Lin LADEN THEORY OF POWER “the Strong Horse!”

1/24/2010

8 Comments

 
Picture


CHICAGO-(AEAE)-OSAMA bin Laden laid out  his theroy of power. “When people see a strong horse and a weak horse, by nature they will take the strong house.”

In a study to be released by the Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney ethics watch dog group since 1974, AEAE found after reviewing over 5000 appeals of State Court Circuit Court Decisions that the Appellate Courts acts as the great equalizers. The study reveals that over 50% of the time Circuit Court Judges will rule in favor of the party that is represented by large law firm, believing in the “strong horse” theory. Which means that the judges rules in favor of what they perceive is the power, the large law firm, believing that they are more likely to be sustained if the judge rules in favor of the more powerful law firms. However, the Appellate courts rule more evenly, they look to reverse erroneous decisions, not with standing what firm drafted the pleadings. Consequently, AEAE recommends to young lawyers to master appellate practice in order to be able to deliver to their clients the justice they deserve. Leo Stoller is a trademark and an Appellate Expert ldms4@hotmail.com
8 Comments

NOTICE TO GORDON AND REES, HAYNES RYAN, CHANCE COOPER AND RYAN BROWN ESQ.

1/23/2010

2 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE) FRIDAY STOLLER FILED HIS NOTICE OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS ON THE LAW FIRM OF GORDON AND REES, RYAN BROWN AND CHANCE COOPER with the criminal division of the Illinois Cook County on the 10th Floor of the Chicago Daley Center Court House. Judge Gelespie is looking forward to seeing your faces this week in Court on the 13th Floor. The Charge is Indirect Criminal Contempt, if found guilty there is a sentence of up to 6 months in jail. The Process Server finally penetrated the Gordon and Rees locked Chicago Office door, got inside and made his service of process on the said respondents, know the court has been served notice of the effective service of the attached criminal charge click on the link:  http://www.filefront.com/14756757/Lance-G.-Johnson-Charged-with-perjury0001.pdf of  There next court hearing in Chicago Illinois is January 26, 2010 on the Criminal Contempt. http://www.filefront.com/15157881/Dec-15-2009-Order0001.pdf/
Stoller response to Haynes Ryan attempt to strike Stoller's Criminal Contempt petition.
http://www.filefront.com/15191477/responsetomotiontostrike_doc.pdf

LEGAL DISCLAIMER GORDON AND REES, RYAN BROWN AND CHANCE COOPER are considered inocient until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
2 Comments
<<Previous

    EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
    Internships available
    ​312-545-4554


     Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
    FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)
    ​
    YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
    Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
     The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
     Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that  supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
     The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a
    LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERT, valuations, expert
    witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert. 
    The author(s)  graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE  and attended the University of Iowa a  for a PHD. The Author(s)  are the nation's most renowned
    Legal Ethics experts  and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
    enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation  Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
    numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions.  AEAE, P.O.  Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email ldms4@hotmail.com
    312-545-4554
    Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE  Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
     "Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
    Litigation is the Air We Breathe
    Litigation is War,
    Welcome to the Front!"

     To Prove Defamation Case?
    What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm. 
    The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation 

    The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

    “[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30 
    AEAE argues it reports on the  law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

    ​AEAE has the legal  right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators,  business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE  18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

    VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

    DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.


    Archives

    July 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    October 2021
    July 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    April 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    June 2019
    April 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    January 2015
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010
    December 2009
    November 2009
    October 2009
    September 2009

    Categories
    Disclaimer This website is not a solicitation for business. All content on the AEAE website is intended to provide general information about AEAE and an opportunity for interested  persons to contact AEAE. The content of this website is not offered as legal advice or legal opinion and it should not be relied upon for any specific situation.  AEAE is not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney client relationship is intended.  This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a complete description of AEAE services. While AEAE endeavors to keep the information updated and correct, AEAE makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the information contained in this website. 

    All
    Jewelry Frauds
    Scams
    Yellow Diamonds

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.