Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics

  • SUE THE BASTARDS
  • AEAE
  • AEJE
  • AEIPR
  • Rentamark
  • Archrive
  • PAGE 2
 

DIVORCED WOMAN WHO WAS CHARGED WITH MAKING FALSE SEXUAL ALLEGATIONS AGAINST HER FORMER HUSBAND WAS EVICTED FROM HER HOME TODAY AFTER LOSING CUSTODY A WEEK BEFORE MOTHER\'S DAY

4/30/2010

6 Comments

 
Picture
NEW YORK-(AEAE)- A DIVORCED WOMAN WHO HAD MADE FALSE SEXUAL ABUSE ALLEGATIONS AGAINST HER FORMER HUSBAND TODAY WAS FINALLY EVICTED FROM THE FAMILY HOME WHEN THE NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS RULED FRIDAY. The court in a 6-1 ruling found the wife's conduct after the divorce to be “adulterous” when the court vacated the martial settlement agreement and final judgment. Since the parties were now considered “married” and the ex-wife engaged in an “affair” after the final martial judgment was entered into, the court held the wife's conduct “adulterous” when the final martial settlement agreement was set aside and ordered her out of the house! The court found that the wife's “adulterous behavior rose to egregious levels that gave rise to disturb the domestic relations law in favor of equitable distribution of martial actions. The wife was also forced to turn over custody of the minor children to the husband this afternoon. When the media asked the husband, "How long did it take to win your case?" The husband replied, "It took me five years of litigation to get the scum out of my house and away from my children!" Is it true that your ex-wife left with only the cloths on her back?" "Yes", replied the husband. "Now I am charging her in the criminal court, she and her lawyer are going to go to jail!".
6 Comments

RYAN BROWN WAVES SERVICE OF SUMMONS, STOPS RUNNING FROM THE LAW

4/30/2010

2 Comments

 
Picture
 
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-IN A HEARING TODAY IN THE ILLINOIS COOK COUNTY CRIMINAL CONTEMPT CASE, ATTORNEY HAYNES RYAN WAVED SERVICE OF THE INDIRECT CRIMINAL CONTEMPT SUMMONS FOR HIS PARTNER AND CLIENT ATTORNEY RYAN BROWN. Mr. Brown has been charged in a Indirect Criminal Contempt Petition in Chicago Cook County Court. Mr. Brown had been dodging service of process for 6 months. Today there was a hearing before Judge Gellespie in Court Room 1307 at 10:00am. Stoller brought his process server who was ready to testify. Stoller told Judge Gellespie that he wanted to call Gordon and Rees Attorney Haynes Ryan to the stand to testify. Haynes Ryan looked shocked and said, "Stoller wants to call opposing counsel?" Judge Gellespie said, "Go ahead, swear in the witness!" Haynes Ryan suddenly decided it would be in his "best" interest to sell his client, Ryan T. Brown down the river and agreed to simply waive service of summons on Ryan T. Brown rather than take the stand and have to testify under oath.
2 Comments

GORDON & REES ATTORNEY RYAN T. BROWN DODGING SERVICE OF PROCESS FOR 5 MONTHS

4/30/2010

24 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-GORDON & REES SENIOR PARTNER RYTAN T. BROWN HAS BEEN DODGING SERVICE OF SUMMONS OF AN INDIRECT CRIMINAL CONTEMPT PETITION FOR OVER FIVE MONTHS. Illinois Circuit Court Judge Gillespie has set a hearing today. Ryan T. Brown has moved to quash summons for failure to serve. Although Ryan T. Brown occupies the Chicago Offices of Gordon & Rees LLP at One North Franklin, Suite 800, Chicago, Illinois 60606, Brown slips in an out of his office and has been able to purposely avoided service of process. His clients Washington D.C. Attorneys David Abrams, Lance G. Johnson and Alfred Goodman from the law firm of Roylance, Abrams, Berdo and Goodman www.roylance.com have all hide from the process server. Currently there is an Appeal pending before the Illinois Appellate Court regarding Ryan T. Browns Clients avoidance of service. If any one knows where Ryan T. Brown is hiding please email [email protected]
24 Comments

ILLINOIS CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE MARY ANNE MASON TRANSFERRED STOLLER CASE TO CHIEF JUDGE DOROTHY K. KINNARD FOR REASSIGNMENT FOR HEARING ON PLAINTIFF\\\' MOTION FOR SUBSTITUTION

4/29/2010

3 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-LLINOIS CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE MARY ANNE MASON TRANSFERRED STOLLER CASE TO CHIEF JUDGE DOROTHY K. KINNARD http://www.cookcountycourt.org/   For REASSIGNMENT FOR HEARING ON PLAINTIFF' MOTION FOR SUBSTITUTION. This is the third request for substitution of judge. Thus far Judge Mary Anne Mason has refused to voluntarily recuse herself. Stoller has asserted that she is “bias and prejudice” against him that he cannot receive a fair trial before her. There was to be a hearing today, but Judge Mary Anne Mason issued an order sue sponte on Wednesday April 28, 2010 sending the case to the Chief Judge Kinnard for reassignment to a judge to hear Stoller's motion to disqualify Judge Mason.
In another case Judge Allen J. Goldberg granted defendants motion to transfer a case to Lake County after being litigated in Cook County for two years. Stoller today appealed Judge Goldberg's decision. Stoller is confident that he will be able to reverse Judge Goldberg's decision. http://www.cookcountycourt.org/divisions/chancery/GeneralChanceryCalendar.asp?id=64
3 Comments

U.S. SUPREME COURT COMES OUT STRONG FOR THE FIRST AMENDMENT

4/28/2010

3 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-First Amendment advocates applauded the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling Tuesday striking down a federal law that made it a crime to create, sell or possess certain depictions of animal cruelty. Chief Justice John Roberts Jr., writing for an 8-1 majority, called the law a "criminal prohibition of alarming breadth," and sharply criticized the government's defense of the law. STOLLER spend 37days in the Cook County Jail last summer from June 8 until July 15, 2010 for the “crime” of publishing speech on his blog. Stoller is confident that the Illinois Appellate will reverse Illinois Divorce Court Judge Carol K. Bellows decision that landed Stoller unlawfully in the Cook County Jail. He has filed a Section 1983 Complaint against the Illinois Cook County Department of Corrections, Thomas Dart, the Cook County Sheriff as well as the other defendants, who he still is barred from mentioning their names on this blog until of course the Appellate court strikes down Bellows unconstitutional decision. Click here for the entire story http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202448350014&src=EMC-Email&et=editorial&bu=Law.com&pt=LAWCOM%20Newswire&cn=NW_20100421&kw=High%20Court%20Strikes%20Down%20Animal%20Cruelty%20Law%20on%20First%20Amendment%20Grounds


 
3 Comments

LAWYERS WHO ARE SUED ARE MORE LIKELY TO LOSE THEIR LEGAL MALPRACTICE INSURANCE

4/28/2010

1 Comment

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)- IN A STUDY RELEASED BY THE AMERICANS FOR THE ENFOREMENT OF ATTORNEY ETHICS (AEAE), a legal ethics watch dog group in Chicago since 1974, has discovered that lawyers who are sued more than once in a year, will lose their mal-practice insurance policies at worst and at best their premiums will escalate. Lawyers who are sued for Civil Racketeering are not covered by any mal practice insurance policy. Lawyers who invite litigation and take a cavalier attitude when they are sued pay a huge price, the loss of their mal practice insurance and having to pay huge judgments out of their own pocket if they lose.


 
1 Comment

ILLINOIS ATTORNEY GENERAL LISA MADIGAN BLAMES BANKS FOR MORTGAGE PROBLEMS

4/27/2010

14 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-ILLINOIS ATTORNEY GENERAL LISA MADIGAN BLAMES THE BANKS FOR THE MORTGAGE PROBLEMS. “Wells Fargo, Countrywide, Ameriquest, Household Finance -- I've seen how their terrible, toxic loans were closed by any means necessary and eventually packaged, sold as securities and bet upon until they exploded and decimated our economy. They rigged the system so only they could possibly win -- while millions lost family homes and suffered the disastrous effects of the calculated housing crisis on our economy. More than 2 million Americans have lost their homes since 2006. Eight million have lost their jobs. Rather than show remorse, Wall Street and the big banks are on the offensive. They are lobbying furiously to weaken any real financial reforms at the federal level. They continue to blame the victims. They want you to believe that millions of scheming Americans took advantage of innocent mortgage lenders to purchase homes they knew they could not afford. That simply isn't true. In fact, an FBI study indicates 80 percent of mortgage fraud was committed by the lenders. A recent U.S. Senate investigation confirmed it. Eighty-three percent of loans originated by one of Washington Mutual's top-producing retail loan officers were fraudulent.” Click on the following link for the complete story. http://www.suntimes.com/news/otherviews/2196292,CST-EDT-open25b.article
SIDEBAR: AEAE SUPPORTS Lisa Madigan for re-election to the Illinois Attorney General Office.
14 Comments

A SECOND MOTION FOR SUBSTATION OF ILLINOIS COOK COUNTY JUDGE MARY ANN MASON AS BEEN FILED

4/26/2010

6 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-ILLINOIS CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE LEROY MARTIN HAD PREVIOUSLY DENIED A MOTION FOR SUBSTITUTION OF JUDGE MARY ANN MARTIN.  Today a second motion for substitution of Judge Mary Ann Mason has been lodged based upon new allegations of bias and prejudice actions.  According to the Americans for the enforcement of Judicial Ethics (AEJE) any judge who refuses to recuse himself or herself in the face of serious charges of bias and prejudice could be view as violating the Code of Judicial Conduct. "Citizens should vote these judges out of office", said one law professor who did not want to give his name.
6 Comments

ILLINOIS CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE RONALD F. BARTKOWICZ GRANTS STOLLER\'S MOTION FOR SUBSTITUTION OF JUDGE AND TRANSFERS CASES TO THE CHIEF JUDGE MADDOX FOR RE-ASSIGNMENT

4/24/2010

2 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-STOLLER FILED A MOTION BEFORE ILLINOIS JUDGE RONALD F. BARTKOWICZ for substitution of judge on the grounds that Judge Bartkowicz was bias and prejudice against Stoller. After the hearing on Friday, Judge Bartkowicz agreed with Stoller, and issued an order transferring two “Stoller” cases to the Chief Judge Maddox of the Law Division of Cook County Illinois. Michael Werich from the law firm of Bryan Cave unexpectedly show up in casual jeans to make the argument for Well Fargo Bank, a defendant in one of the cases. In an other case Stoller has charged Mr. Werich with Indirect Criminal Contempt before Illinois Judge Mary Ann Mason. That Motion is set for next week. Judge Mary Ann Mason, unlike Judge Ronald F. Bartkowicz, refused to grant a request for her to recuse herself from another Stoller case. Stoller has renew his motion for substitution of Judge Mary Ann Mason based upon recent prejudicial statements that Judge Mason is alleged to have made bias and prejudicial statement against Stoller, according to the charges in the said motion. Although there are about 400 Illinois Cook County Judges, Judge Mason refuses to recuse herself from Stoller's case. In 40 years Stoller has never had a judge “refuse” to recuse himself if a request was made of that judge to do so, until Judge Mason was assigned to one of Stoller's cases. Illinois Judge Mary Ann Mason is married to Northern District of Illinois Judge Michael T. Mason. http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/home/JudgeInfo.aspx
2 Comments

ILLINOIS ATTORNEY RYAN BROWN ATTEMPTS TO STIR UP TROUBLE WITH THE ILLINOIS APPELLATE COURT BY FILING A FRIVOLOUS RULE TO SHOW CAUSE

4/23/2010

2 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-THE NOTORIOUS PROCESS SERVER DODGER FROM THE LAW FIRM OF GORDON AND REES, PARTNER RYAN BROWN HAS ATTEMPTED TO AGAIN MISLEAD THE ILLINOIS APPELLATE COURT by filing a frivolous Rule to Show Cause. Ryan Brown http://www.gordonrees.com/lawyers/lawyerBiography.cfm?attyID=rtbrown has been charged with a Petition for Indirect Criminal Contempt and has been dodging service of summons for 5 months despite the fact that he is a practicing lawyer with the law firm of Gordon and Rees in down town Chicago. Ryan Brown represents the law firm of Roylancer, Abrams, Berdo and Goodman in a 100 million dollar defamation lawsuit which is current on appeal with the Illinois Appellate Court. The named partners of www.Roylance.com David Abrams, Alfred Goodman and Lance Johnson all have attempted to dodge service of process as well, according to the allegations in the pleadings

REWARD: To be paid for information leading to the service of process of Ryan Brown. If anyone has information on the wear abouts of Illinois Gordon and Rees attorney Ryan Brown please email [email protected] .
2 Comments
<<Previous

    EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
    Internships not available now
    ​


     Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
    FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)
    ​
    YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
    Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
     The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
     Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that  supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
     The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a attorney rating Service. The comments made by AEAE are not actionable because they are statements of opinion Moriarty v. Greene 732 N.E.2d 730, 740 Ill.App), citing Owen  v. Can 497 N.E.2d 1145, 1148 (Ill.1986) see Law offices of David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al No 18-3216 Seventh Circuit No 18-3216 decided 01-28-2022.
    Ratings are non-actionable opinion statements     David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al citing  Syngenta Seeds Inc v. Bung North America,Inc 773 F.3d 58  (8th Cir 2014) Illinois Law  on expressions of Opinion , an unexplained  one star review simply could not be actionable as defamation David Freydin case citing  Cf. Kimzey v. Yelp!Inc. 836  F. 3d 1263, 1269-70 (9th Cir 2016)
    AEAE LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERTS, valuations, expert
    witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert. 
    The author(s)  graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE  and attended the University of Iowa a  for a PHD. The Author(s)  are the nation's most renowned
    Legal Ethics experts  and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
    enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation  Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
    numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions.  AEAE, P.O.  Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email [email protected]
    312-545-4554
    Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE  Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
     "Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
    Litigation is the Air We Breathe
    Litigation is War,
    Welcome to the Front!"

     To Prove Defamation Case?
    What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm. 
    The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation 

    The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

    “[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30 
    AEAE argues it reports on the  law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

    ​AEAE has the legal  right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators,  business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE  18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

    VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

    DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.


    Archives

    April 2025
    March 2025
    January 2025
    March 2024
    February 2024
    September 2023
    July 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    July 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    October 2021
    July 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    April 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    June 2019
    April 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    January 2015
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010
    December 2009
    November 2009
    October 2009
    September 2009

    Categories
    Disclaimer This website is not a solicitation for business. All content on the AEAE website is intended to provide general information about AEAE and an opportunity for interested  persons to contact AEAE. The content of this website is not offered as legal advice or legal opinion and it should not be relied upon for any specific situation.  AEAE is not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney client relationship is intended.  This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a complete description of AEAE services. While AEAE endeavors to keep the information updated and correct, AEAE makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the information contained in this website. 

    All
    Jewelry Frauds
    Scams
    Yellow Diamonds

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.