Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics

  • SUE THE BASTARDS
  • AEAE
  • AEJE
  • AEIPR
  • Rentamark
  • Archrive
  • PAGE 2
 

STOLLER CHARGES DIVORCE LAWYER WITH VIOLATION OF ARDC RULES OF CONDUCT

4/28/2011

5 Comments

 
CHICAGO-(AEAE)- STOLLER HAS CHARGED A ILLINOIS DIVORCE LAWYER WITH VIOLATION OF THE ILLINOIS RULES OF CONDUCT FOR MAKING FALSE STATEMENTS UNDER OATH. Yesterday Stoller filed professional misconduct charges against an Illinois Divorce lawyer and a Registered medical professional with the Illinois Department of Registration!



5 Comments

LAWYER AND CLIENT CHARGED WITH FRAUD FOR FILING A FALSE ORDER OF PROTECTION

4/23/2011

3 Comments

 
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-AN ILLINOIS ATTORNEY AND HER CLIENT HAVE BEEN CHARGED WITH FRAUD FOR FILING A FRAUDULENT ORDER OF PROTECTION. The attorney an experienced divorce attorney filed a false order of Protection in Nov of 2010 which clearly violated the Illinois domestic Violence Act of 1986, listing parties who were not "family or household members" as protected parties under the order of protection. Fraud charges have now are being brough against the attorney and her client. The same attorney is being charged with perjury for false testimony that she gave under oath in a trial by giving "testimony that was intentionally evasive fase and misleading"!
In addition a law suit naming Raymond Weber of Carol Stream, charing him with fraud, conspiract, civil racketering and theft of property is being filed in Cook County Illinois. Stay tuned
SIDEBAR: Everthing is heating up!
3 Comments

ENRON PRESIDENT JEFFERY SKILLING VONVICTION CONFIRMED

4/18/2011

6 Comments

 
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-JEFFERY SKILLING, THE FORMER PRESIDENT OF ENRON CORPORATION CONVICTION FOR CONSPIRACY AND SECURITIES FRAUD IN 2006 in connection with the failure of energy company giant Enron corportion was confirmed by the U.S. 5th circuit court of appeals. This is dispite the fact that the U.S. Supreme Court invalidated the theroy underlying skillings conviction. The high court instructed the 5th Circuit to revisit Skilling's case to decide wheither it should be dismissed. However, the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals stated that the jury was presented with evidence that skilling "conspired"  to commit conspiracy and fraud, the guilty verdict and 24 years prision sentence will stand. There was no evidence every presented that Skilling was bribed or actually took any kick backs. However because Skilling must have "thought" about taking bribes and kick backs that was sufficient evidence to warrent a 24 year sentense to a man who had no prior convictions according to a U of Chicago Law Professor. "In our system it is no longer necessary to actually commit a crime thinking about is all that is necessary in the 21st Century to get convicted, sent to jail for 24 years."
6 Comments

BARRY BONDS CONVICTION FOR OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE WILL BE THROWN OUT?

4/14/2011

3 Comments

 
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-Barry Bonds has been convicted of one count of obstruction of justice.  A four man eight woman jury could not reach a unanimous verdicts on the three other counts of perjury about his alleged use of performance-enhancing drugs. The defense will move to throw out the conviction on the grounds that  you cannot have a conviction on obstruction of justice based upon perjury when there is no conviction of perjury. U.S. District Judge Susan Richard Illston declared a mistrial on the perjury charges and will throw out the Obstruction charge.
SIDEBAR:  The ones that should be going to jail is not Barry Bonds but the lawyers who allowed him to testify at the previous grand jury hearings according to a University of  Chicago Law Professor.  On the other hand, people who lie to a grand jury in order to falsely indict someone belong in jail. And those people know who they are!

SIDEBAR 2: While I was falsely held in prision  for the last 76 daysI continued to write articles for my blog every night although I was not able to publish them.  There is always more to write about each day than time to write. I also wrote a second book of my experience incarcerated this time. My previous book  was entitled Juice for Peanuts. The new book was hand written and it will take some time to transcribe. In addition I wrote a "Play" in Two Acts called Drum Circle.
 While at the University of Iowa I worked on a PHD in play writing.
However, the litigation controversy business has occupied all of my time since the 60's to the current date and I had not time to write any plays since then. However, when one sits in jail you get to write things that you would not ordinarily get to do. Dispite being absent for 2 1/2 months from blogging, I was surprised to learn that so many of the readers of this blog "never" stopped coming here. I do not know how many newspapers or TV stations would still have their audience if they were forced to close for 2 1/2 months.
 I lost about 20 pounds. The food was terriable. The living conditions in the Illinois Cook County Jail are not fit for a dog and being forced to live with "real" criminals  warrents the County having to pay an innocient person substantial damages when they are falsely arrested, falsely charged and maliciously prosecuted for a crime that a person did not commit, as was the case at bar.
3 Comments

THE JURY FOUND LEO STOLLER NOT QUITLY

4/13/2011

3 Comments

 
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-ON JANUARY 26, 2010 Leo Stoller was falsely arrested by the River Grove and Elmwook Park Police. At 11:30AM they falsely used an River Grove Water Department Driver, who approached Leo Stoller's office, claiming that he need to do a water meter inspection. When Leo Stoller opened his office door 3 River Grove Detectives and 4 Elmwook Park Detective forced there way into his office and told Leo Stoller was under arrest for a Order of Protection. The head River Grove Detective falsely attempted to induce Leo Stoller into committing a Agravated Battery on a Police Officer by asking Leo Stoller if he "wanted to shoot them!"  Leo Stoller remained silient. He was taken to the Elmwood Park Police station on January 26, booked and then taken to the Maybrook Court House in Maywood Illinois. His bond was set at $100,000.00. The prosecutor offered Leo Stoller 60 days in the Cook County Jail if he plead guilty. Leo Stoller stated that he does not plead guilty to crimes he did not commit. The Prosecutor stated that they would up grade Stoller's "false" second charge of phone herassment to a felony. Stoller refused to plead. Stoller was unlawfully  incarcerated for 71 days in the Illinois Cook County Jail in violation of Stoller Civil Rights under Section 1983. On April 5, 2010 Stoller and his attorney, former criminal court Judge Wayne Ryine picked a jury of 12 people. On April 6, 2011 a trial was held. At four O'clock the jury had the case. The returned 2 hours latter at 6:00PM with a finding of "not Guilty!"
Stoller has been released from jail and is now preparing his 3 rd  Malicious Prosecution, false arrest, false imprisionment, Section 1983 Lawsuit naming all of the police officers who participated, the Village of River Grover, its Mayor, the Village of Elmwood Park all of the Elmwood Park police officers who participated. This will be the second time that Leo Stoller will have sued the Elmwood Park Police for $100 million dollars.




3 Comments

    EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
    Internships available
    ​312-545-4554


     Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
    FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)
    ​
    YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
    Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
     The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
     Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that  supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
     The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a
    LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERT, valuations, expert
    witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert. 
    The author(s)  graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE  and attended the University of Iowa a  for a PHD. The Author(s)  are the nation's most renowned
    Legal Ethics experts  and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
    enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation  Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
    numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions.  AEAE, P.O.  Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email ldms4@hotmail.com
    312-545-4554
    Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE  Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
     "Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
    Litigation is the Air We Breathe
    Litigation is War,

    Welcome to the Front!"


     To Prove Defamation Case?
    What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm. 
    The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation 

    The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

    “[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30 
    AEAE argues it reports on the  law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

    ​AEAE has the legal  right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators,  business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE  18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

    VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

    DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.



    Archives

    July 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    October 2021
    July 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    April 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    June 2019
    April 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    January 2015
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010
    December 2009
    November 2009
    October 2009
    September 2009

    Categories
    Disclaimer This website is not a solicitation for business. All content on the AEAE website is intended to provide general information about AEAE and an opportunity for interested  persons to contact AEAE. The content of this website is not offered as legal advice or legal opinion and it should not be relied upon for any specific situation.  AEAE is not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney client relationship is intended.  This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a complete description of AEAE services. While AEAE endeavors to keep the information updated and correct, AEAE makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the information contained in this website. 

    All
    Jewelry Frauds
    Scams
    Yellow Diamonds

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.