Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics

  • SUE THE BASTARDS
  • AEAE
  • AEJE
  • AEIPR
  • Rentamark
  • Archrive
  • PAGE 2
 

IMPORTANT SECOND AMENDMENT DECISION BY THE 3rd CIRCUIT

7/31/2010

2 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-In an important Second Amendment decision that charts a course for evaluating the validity of gun laws now that the Supreme Court has declared the right to be an individual one, the 3rd Circuit has refused to strike down a federal law that bans possession of guns with obliterated serial numbers. Perhaps the most important lesson to be gleaned from the 3rd Circuit opinion is that courts faced with unanswered questions in the Second Amendment arena should look to the extensive jurisprudence on First Amendment claims for guidance. Click on the attached link to read the rest of the story
In Wake of 'Heller,' 3rd Circuit OKs Ban on Unnumbered Guns

2 Comments

THE USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA ACCOUNTS ON THE NET WILL BURY MOST DEFENDANTS

7/31/2010

10 Comments

 
Picture


CHICAGO-(AEAE)-THE FIRST THING ATTORNEYS DO TODAY WHEN THEY GET A CASE AGAINST AN EMPLOYEE OR OTHER DEFENDANT IS TO LOOK THAT PARTY UP ON THE SOCIAL MEDIAL SITES ON THE NET FOR DAMMING ADMISSIONS. Unsophisticated defendants are prone to make damming admissions against their interest some where on line. Smart attorneys know this and use those admissions against their new “pray”. The popularity of this site and others like it are do to the fact that opposing parties scour these sits each day looking for that “one” damming admission or defamatory remark in order to built their cases. In response to the comment left the other day, “No one cares, that's who cares.” Click on the attached link for the rest of the story How Facebook Can Make or Break Your Case

10 Comments

ILLINOIS COOK COUNTY SHERIF THOMAS DART REFUSES TO TESTIFY

7/30/2010

0 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-COOK COUNTY SHERIFF THOMAS DART WHO WAS SUED FOR MALICIOUS PROSECTUION, FALSE ARREST, FALSE IMPRISIONMENT AND VIOLATIONS OF CIVIL RIGHTS HAS REFUSED TO TESTIFY AT A NOTICED DEPOSITION. A Illinois State's Attorney called today and stated that he would not produce the Cook County Sheriff for  deposition. He recomended that a motion to compell be filed because Sheriff Thomas Dart "would not be produced!" In November Sheriff Thomas Dart is running for a second term of Cook County Sheriff. Phone calls to the Illinois Cook County Sheriffs office were not returned.

0 Comments

ILLINOIS JUDGE McGrath OK'S AMENDMENT TO LAW SUIT CHARGING BRYANT CAVE, STEVEN R. SMITH ESQ., MICHAEL WERICH WITH CIVIL RACKETEERING

7/30/2010

13 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-TODAY IN A COURT HEARING BEFORE ILLINOIS ASSOCIATE JUDGE McGRATH ISSUED AN ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO TO STOLLER TO AMEND ITS COMPLAINT TO CHARGE the Bank of American officers, Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company officers and their law firm of Bryant Cave LLP, senior partner Steven R. Smith and Michael Werich Esq with Civil Racketeering (RICO).

Illinois Judge Peter Flynn denied a motion to substitute Illinois Chancery judge Mary Mason. An appeal was immediately filed.

The hearing before Illinois Judge Gerald Bender was continued until September 21, 2010.

Picture
13 Comments

THREE COURT HEARING TODAY BEFORE ILLINOIS CIRCUIT COURT JUDGES BENDER, McGRAPH AND FLYNN

7/29/2010

0 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-TODAY THERE ARE THREE HEARINGS BEFORE ILLINOIS JUDGES BENDER, McGRATH AND Judge Peter Flynn. The substitution for cause regarding Judge Mason is being argued today before Judge Flynn. An important Appeal brief of is also due today. Its another 24/7 day and night.  Stay tuned.
Bryan Cave LLP senior attorney Steven R. Smith made the statement that he will not file an appearence in the Stoller Writ of Cert that is currently pending before the U.S. Supreme Court. Smith told told yesterday that he "doesn't know what he is doing". Consequently Smith does not feel the need to file a brief before the Illinois Supreme Court. One source commented, "Steven R. Smith doesn't know how!" Smith would not respond to this article. 

0 Comments

AEAE gives Kudos goes to Mr. Warren Jeffs Appellate practitioner

7/28/2010

4 Comments

 
Picture
SALT LAKE CITY-Warren Jeffs, 54, was convicted in 2007 of two counts of first-degree felony rape as an accomplice. He was serving two consecutive terms of life in the Utah State Prison. The Utah Supreme Court on Tuesday reversed the convictions of polygamist leader Warren Jeffs and ordered a new trial, saying a jury received incorrect instructions before considering his role in the 2001 nuptials of a 14-year-old girl to her 19-year-old cousin. Which clearly evidences that the greatest legal skill in the law is the ability to file Appeals. All trial courts make reversible decisions every time they open their mouths. But it takes a very skilled appellate practitioner to frame the issues in order for an Appellate Court to reverse. AEAE gives Kudos goes to Mr. Warren Jeffs Appellate practitioner. Click here to read the “rest of the story” Polygamist Jeffs has rape conviction overturned

4 Comments

OBAMA RESEARCHER NOW CLAIMS THAT THE BP OIL SPILL WAS GOOD FOR THE GULF

7/27/2010

1 Comment

 
Picture
WASHINGTON-(AEAE)-IN A STUNNING REVERSAL OF FORTUNE A GOVERNMENT RESEARCHER HIRED BY TONY HAYWARD NOW CLAIMS THAT THE OLD SPILL WAS GOOD FOR THE GULF. According to the study that was just released the oil that was spilled into the gulf contained a special enzine that is assisting the Gulf marine life quadruple in size. In just a few months since the oil spill began fisherman have observed that the game fish that are still alive are 5 to 10 times their natural size. Causing a all time demand for big game fishing. The photo of a new species of fish that was created by the enzine being ingested is 20 times larger than the species that was wiped out by the spill. Tony Haywood is hopeful that the new findings my save his job or at least lead to a severance package five times what it might have otherwise been.

Picture
1 Comment

RICHARD FOGEL, MICHAEL T. ZELLER, STEVEN R. SMITH, LANCE G. JOHNSON BRIEF IN OPPOSITION IS DUE 8-23-10

7/27/2010

4 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-THE BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO STOLLER'S WRIT OF CERT IN LEO STOLLER V. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. SUPREME COURT NO 10-1219 is due on Monday August 23, 2010. This is a notice to all counsel of record. Please click on the attached link to see the U.S. Supreme Court Order  http://www.filefront.com/17149297/Supreme Court Appearance0001.pdf   All of the counsel of record do not have the skill set to draft a response to a U.S. Supreme Court Appeal or are not members of the U.S. Supreme Court Bar or just too dumb to be able to put pen to paper, according to one source who did not want to give his name. http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/10-119.htm

Picture
4 Comments

AEAE ISSUES ITS WORST ATTORNEY AWARD FOR 2010 TO DAVID J. STERN

7/27/2010

6 Comments

 
Picture
FLORIDA-(AEAE)-THE WORST ATTORNEY IN THE U.S. IN 2010 IS NOT LANCE G. JOHNSON, DAVID ABRAMS, ALFRED GOODMAN, STEVEN R. SMITH OR MICHAEL WERICH. The Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics awards attorney David J. Stern its worst attorney of 2010 award. David J. Stern handles 20 percent of all foreclosure cases in the nation's fourth-most-populous state. It's from Stern's law firm that well over 100,000 Floridians have received the dreaded notice to pay up or face losing their homes. While the foreclosure business has been good to Stern, however, controversies have grown along with his caseload. During the last year AEAE has received received hundreds of emails from alleged victims of theDavid J. Stern Law Office. Click on the following link. For the "rest of the story" Housing Crisis Brings Wealth, Rebukes for Florida's 'Foreclosure King'





 

6 Comments

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN LOSE AGAIN The Bratz doll is back in business

7/26/2010

17 Comments

 
Picture
  CHICAGO-(AEAE)- The 9th Circuit put The Bratz doll back in business. A panel on Thursday vacated Mattel's hard-won injunction on behalf of its Barbie doll, finding the remedy too broad. The litigation arose because Bratz's creator, Carter Bryant, worked for Mattel before decamping for the competition. The district court erred when it found Mattel's employment agreement covered the idea for Bratz, wrote Chief Judge Alex Kozinski, who concluded: "America thrives on competition; Barbie, the all-American girl, will too." Leo Stoller is the nations leading intellectual property expert witness. Stoller is facing off against Quin Emanuel senior partner Michael T. Zeller who has been discribed as the  "Hannibal Lector of the law". Mr. Zeller represents Google Inc., in a RICO Action against Stoller. click on the link below for the “rest of the story” In Huge Loss for Mattel, 9th Circuit Sides With Bratz Over Barbie

Picture
17 Comments
<<Previous

    EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
    Internships not available now
    ​


     Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
    FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)
    ​
    YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
    Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
     The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
     Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that  supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
     The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a
    LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERT, valuations, expert
    witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert. 
    The author(s)  graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE  and attended the University of Iowa a  for a PHD. The Author(s)  are the nation's most renowned
    Legal Ethics experts  and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
    enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation  Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
    numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions.  AEAE, P.O.  Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email ldms4@hotmail.com
    312-545-4554
    Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE  Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
     "Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
    Litigation is the Air We Breathe
    Litigation is War,

    Welcome to the Front!"


     To Prove Defamation Case?
    What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm. 
    The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation 

    The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

    “[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30 
    AEAE argues it reports on the  law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

    ​AEAE has the legal  right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators,  business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE  18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

    VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

    DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.



    Archives

    March 2023
    February 2023
    July 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    October 2021
    July 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    April 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    June 2019
    April 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    January 2015
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010
    December 2009
    November 2009
    October 2009
    September 2009

    Categories
    Disclaimer This website is not a solicitation for business. All content on the AEAE website is intended to provide general information about AEAE and an opportunity for interested  persons to contact AEAE. The content of this website is not offered as legal advice or legal opinion and it should not be relied upon for any specific situation.  AEAE is not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney client relationship is intended.  This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a complete description of AEAE services. While AEAE endeavors to keep the information updated and correct, AEAE makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the information contained in this website. 

    All
    Jewelry Frauds
    Scams
    Yellow Diamonds

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.