Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics

  • SUE THE BASTARDS
  • AEAE
  • AEJE
  • AEIPR
  • Rentamark
  • Archrive
  • PAGE 2
 

STOLLER FILES HIS U.S. SUPREME COURT WRIT OF CERT AGAINST THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS

7/25/2010

6 Comments

 
Picture
WASHINGTON D.C. (AEAE) THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ISSUED A DECISION ON Dec. 4, 2009 imposing a "mack" filing bar. Stoller has appealed that decision before the U.S. Supreme  Court  http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/10-119.htm

6 Comments

BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CEO ROBERT P. KELLY SHOULD BE COMPELLED TO TESTIFY AT A DEPOSITION IN CHICAGO

7/24/2010

0 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST CO CEO ROBERT P. KELLY WHO IS REPORTED TO MAKE OVER $35 MILLION A YEAR HAS REFUSED TO TESTIFY IN A CHICAGO LAWSUIT WHERE HE IS A DEFENDANT. A motion to compel his testimony has been filed before Illinois Associate Judge McGrath in Chicago. Most Ceo's refuse to testify in order to avoid being charged for perjury.

0 Comments

THOSE CALLAWAYS LLP, JOANN CALLAWAY , KELLY CALLAWAY AND JOSEPH CALLAWAY CHARGED WITH FRAUD, CONSPIRACY AND CIVIL RACKETEERING IN CHICAGO

7/24/2010

1 Comment

 
Picture
PHOENIX-(AEAE)-THE WELL KNOWN REAL ESTATE FIRM KNOWN AS THOSE CALLAWAYS LLP AND RUN BY JOANN CALLAWAY , KELLY CALLAWAY AND JOSEPH CALLAWAY have been charged in a Chicago Lawsuit with WITH FRAUD, CONSPIRACY AND CIVIL RACKETEERING.
Legal Disclaimer: the Callaways are considered innocent until proven guilty.

1 Comment

COURTS ARE ALLOWING PLAINTIFF'S TO SUE PROSECUTORS, DEPRIVING THEM OF their QUALIFIED IMMUNITY

7/23/2010

6 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-MORE AND MORE COURTS TODAY ARE ALLOWING PLAINTIFF'S to sue over aggressive prosecutor, by depriving them of their qualified immunity. The 10th Circuit has revived a lawsuit against a prosecutor brought by a college student whose online column irked a professor and led to an unlawful search of the student's home. The court held that Susan Knox was not entitled to qualified immunity when as a deputy district attorney in Colorado she approved a search warrant of the home of Thomas Mink, the author of an editorial column by "Junius Puke," a fictional character that parodied Junius Peake, a professor at the University of Northern Colorado.
Lawsuit Revived Against Prosecutor in Web Parody Case

6 Comments

BRYANT CAVE LLP SENIOR PARTNER STEVEN R. SMITH IS THE BEST LAWYER IN CHICAGO IN A Ex Parte HEARING

7/23/2010

1 Comment

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-TODAY IN A ex parte HEARING BEFORE ILLINOIS ASSOCAITE JUDGE Mc Graph, Steven R.. Smith was able to convince Judge McGraph to quash notices of depositions and to strike a motion to amend the complaint. Good Job Mr. Smith. When Mr. Steven R. Smith does not have opposing counsel in a court room, he is able to get the judge to do exactly what he wants without opposition. This is exactly the kind of lawyer that every one wants. However, motions were filed later in the afternoon to set aside the ex parte orders entered today.

Mr. Steven R. Smith and his bag man Michael Werich have been charged in a pleading with Indirect Criminal Contempt for false swearing, perjury and subornation of perjury.
UPDATE: 7-22-10  Email from Steven R. Smith to Stoller
"We missed you in court yesterday.  What happened?  I have a practice of attending hearings when I have noticed up motions.  But I understand your chagrin.  You have done so well when you have appeared in our cases, like the hearing in front of Judge Martin (your SOJ motion denied when J. Martin said you had wasted his time), Judge Holderman (federal claims dismissed) and the various motions in front of Judge Mason.  See you next week before J. McGrath (if you show up) and I am looking forward to our date with J. Flynn that same morning.   Steven R. Smith
Partner "

Picture
1 Comment

BANK OF NEW YORK CEO ROBERT P. KELLY REFUSES TO TESTIFY AT DEPOSITION HEARING

7/22/2010

8 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON BANK CHAIRMAN ROBERT P. KELLY REFUSES TO TESTIFY AT A DEPOSITION HEARING IN CHICAGO UPON THE ADVISE OF HIS COUNSEL IN ORDER TO AVOID A “PERJURY” CHARGE. The Bank of New York Mellon was sued in Chicago for Civil Racketeering under the RICO statute, for fraud, conspiracy, deceptive trade practices. Bryant Cave LLP senior Partner Steven R. Smith and his “bag man” Michael Werich had sent email stating that they will not present the officer and directors of the Bank of New York Mellon Trust Co., nor the officers and directors of Bank of America for depositions today. Motions to Compel Robert P. Kelly and the others to present themselves at the depositions have been filed before Illinois Associate Court Judge McGrath. It has been reported that Robert P. Kelly is paid over $30 million a year by Bank of New York Mellon Trust Co.
Steven R. Smith
and Michael Werich have been charged in a pleading with Indirect Criminal Contempt in a pleading filed in the Illinois Cook County. Bryan Cave refused to return calls in reference to this story.

8 Comments

ILLINOIS LAKE COUNTY JUDGE MULLIN DECISION GOES STRAIGHT UP TO THE APPELLATE COURT FOR REVIEW

7/21/2010

8 Comments

 
Picture
WAUKEGAN-ILLINOIS-(AEAE)-IN A COURT HEARING BEFORE ILLINOIS LAKE COUNTY CHANCERY JUDGE MULLEN, WHO HEARD ORAL ARGUMENT ON THE REQUEST FOR SUBSTITUTION OF JUDGE WINTER, JUDGE MULLEN DENIED THE MOTION. Finding that there was no evidence to establish that Judge Winter was bias and prejudice. Judge Mullin gave a very well reasoned opinion at the end of the hearing on Tuesday July 20, 2010, sending the case back to Judge Winter. An appeal was filed shortly there after.

SIDEBAR: There are always four judges in very court room. One hearing the case and three Appellate Court Judges invisable and looming above the sitting judge. Many sitting judges disregard the three invisable Appellate court judges over their head. It is time to allow the three invisible judges in todays court room to show their heads and review Judge Mullen's decision denying the motion for substitution of Judge Winter.

Picture
8 Comments

ILLINOIS LAKE COUNTY JUDGE MULLEN SETS ORAL ARGUMENT TODAY ON DISQUALIFICATION OF JUDGE WINTER

7/20/2010

6 Comments

 
Picture
WAUKEGAN, ILLINOIS (AEAE)-ILLINOIS LAKE COUNTY CHANCERY JUDGE MULLEN SET THE ORAL ARGUMENT FOR SUBSTITUTION FOR CAUSE OF JUDGE WINTER. Monday Judge Mullen denied a request to continue the hearing to another day. Stating that "we are going to go forward, if you are not present, we will go forward anyway!" 

6 Comments

DEFAMATION OR FREE SPEECH?

7/19/2010

7 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-WHAT IS IT LIKE WHEN THE ENTIRE AUDIENCE OF AN INTERNET BLOG VISITS THAT BLOG FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE OF FINDING THAT “one” defamatory word in order to sue the blog owner? Would you believe that there are numerous blogs that are being monitored on a daily basis by the government, law enforcement officials, attorneys, judges looking to find just “one” defamatory word in order to sue the author. Would you believe that such blogs exists? We better ask Kilroy.

Kilroy says,”It must be very frustrating for the monitoring parties who come every day to a blog and cannot find that 'one' defamatory word, but are driven to keep trying for years? Now what you have been waiting for, per se defamation! You're a mother _ucking criminal who belongs in jail!”

Picture
7 Comments

TODAY EMERGENCY MOTION SET BEFORE JUDGE MULLEN at 9:00 a.m. be there!

7/19/2010

7 Comments

 
Picture
WAUKEGAN, ILLINOIS-(AEAE)-EMERGENCY MOTION IS SET BEFORE JUDGE MULLEN IN WAUKEGAN AT 9:00 AM. Seeking an extension of time for Oral argument on substitution of Judge Winters.

7 Comments
<<Previous
Forward>>

    EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
    Internships not available now
    ​


     Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
    FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)
    ​
    YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
    Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
     The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
     Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that  supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
     The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a
    LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERT, valuations, expert
    witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert. 
    The author(s)  graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE  and attended the University of Iowa a  for a PHD. The Author(s)  are the nation's most renowned
    Legal Ethics experts  and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
    enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation  Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
    numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions.  AEAE, P.O.  Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email ldms4@hotmail.com
    312-545-4554
    Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE  Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
     "Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
    Litigation is the Air We Breathe
    Litigation is War,

    Welcome to the Front!"


     To Prove Defamation Case?
    What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm. 
    The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation 

    The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

    “[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30 
    AEAE argues it reports on the  law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

    ​AEAE has the legal  right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators,  business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE  18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

    VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

    DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.



    Archives

    March 2023
    February 2023
    July 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    October 2021
    July 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    April 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    June 2019
    April 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    January 2015
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010
    December 2009
    November 2009
    October 2009
    September 2009

    Categories
    Disclaimer This website is not a solicitation for business. All content on the AEAE website is intended to provide general information about AEAE and an opportunity for interested  persons to contact AEAE. The content of this website is not offered as legal advice or legal opinion and it should not be relied upon for any specific situation.  AEAE is not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney client relationship is intended.  This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a complete description of AEAE services. While AEAE endeavors to keep the information updated and correct, AEAE makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the information contained in this website. 

    All
    Jewelry Frauds
    Scams
    Yellow Diamonds

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.