STOLLER FILES HIS U.S. SUPREME COURT WRIT OF CERT AGAINST THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS

7/25/2010

WASHINGTON D.C. (AEAE) THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ISSUED A DECISION ON Dec. 4, 2009 imposing a "mack" filing bar. Stoller has appealed that decision before the U.S. Supreme Court http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/10-119.htm

6 Comments

Leo the Zero

7/23/2010 06:43:25 pm

In related news, medical tests have confirmed that Leo Stoller, indeed, was born without a dick. When asked to comment on the story, an unidentified University of Chicago professor refused to comment, stating that an electron microscope powerful enough to confirm the findings had not yet been invented.

related news

7/23/2010 07:54:47 pm

In related news, The United States Supreme Court has issued a Writ of Destruction ordering the physical destruction of one Leo Stoller who has been adjudicated a worthless person,

Stooler was taken to the destruction center early this morning. His children who were there with many of thier friends having a party report Leo'd final words were, "I'll appeal"

Breaking News

7/23/2010 09:02:20 pm

It has just been reported that Leo Stoller, in vying to tie his own personal previous record in writs of certioraris not being heard, is actually honing his skills to make a run at the venerable writs of habeas corpus not being heard category. Stoller is said to be planning his attack on the basis that his constitutional rights are being abridged based on race, national origin, creed, and of course, possible counts rooted in the expanding area of sexual preference. An unidentied University of Chicago Law Professor, who refused to comment on this story for fear of reprisal from the National Circus Midgets Association, said: "It is believed Leo Stoller is going to claim he is a native chief of American Somoan
descent of a tribe of dwarves that pre-date the United States government, thereby depriving the United States of jurisdiction over his people, places, or things."

Five Star Final---Click Here link

7/24/2010 02:45:57 am

In other news Leo will be having another party at the Odyssey tonight. Please no blackberry's. Leo will be giving a talk about the effects of the industrial revolution on the testicle. Should be quite fun and educational.

Early Sunday News

7/24/2010 04:39:35 am

Further details are being released on the Supreme Courts decision to issue a writ of destruction for Leo Stoller.

During his final moments of life Stoller was heard to scream, "I'll sue"

In keeping with established procedures Stollers body was taken to the harvesting room for the removal of reusable parts, several startling discoveries were made.

None of his toenails could be harvested for soap making as they were two heavily encrusted in dirt. Secondly a newly created vagina was found where his penis was and lastly there was a tatoo of a naked black man on the right cheel of his buttocks. It appears that a picture of his father Russel Stoller a well known coward from WW II was posed with the naked black man who was performing an unnatural act on Russell.

Finally a summons was found inserted in Leo Stollers rectum. It was a suit filed by Leo's ex wife seeking a restraining order preventing Leo from begging to suck off her boyfriends

Comedy Central

7/24/2010 02:01:12 pm

I told you guys not to blog on this site

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
Internships available
312-545-4554

Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)

YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a
LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERT, valuations, expert
witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert.
The author(s) graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE and attended the University of Iowa a for a PHD. The Author(s) are the nation's most renowned
Legal Ethics experts and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions. AEAE, P.O. Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email ldms4@hotmail.com
312-545-4554
Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
"Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
Litigation is the Air We Breathe
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front!"

To Prove Defamation Case?
What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm.
The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation

The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.

Categories
Disclaimer This website is not a solicitation for business. All content on the AEAE website is intended to provide general information about AEAE and an opportunity for interested persons to contact AEAE. The content of this website is not offered as legal advice or legal opinion and it should not be relied upon for any specific situation. AEAE is not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney client relationship is intended. This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a complete description of AEAE services. While AEAE endeavors to keep the information updated and correct, AEAE makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the information contained in this website.

RSS Feed

Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics