Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics

  • SUE THE BASTARDS
  • AEAE
  • AEJE
  • AEIPR
  • Rentamark
  • Archrive
  • PAGE 2
 

GOOGLE INC., ATTEMPTS TO BLOCK STOLLER'S APPEAL OF JUDGE VIRGINIA KENDELL\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'S DECISION

10/31/2009

1 Comment

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-GOOGLE INC. FILED A RESPONSE TO BLOCK STOLLER'S APPEAL BEFORE THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS of Judge Virginia Kendell Decision in the Google Inc., Civil Rico Action. Last time Stoller reversed Judge Kendell. Google Inc., is desperate and will do anything to “stop” Stoller from being able to reverse Judge Kendell again. They do not want to face a 100 billion dollar cross claim.

This week Stoller will be filing two more Indirect Criminal Contempt Citations against parties who are well aware that they are coming. The new criminal contempt pleadings will seek substantial “jail” time for the respondents. But according to reports the respondents in Stoller's new Indirect Criminal Contempt content Citation are not worried of being convicted and sent to jail because according to them “No one will believe Stoller!” We will see what happens when the jury gets the case. Stoller will be filing a jurisdictional Statement that the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals has ordered him to do. In another matter Stoller is filing a Motion to compel a Chicago Attorney to attend a deposition. This week end Stoller is preparing several subpoenas that will be sent out Monday. Judge Dennis Porter advised all of the parties in Stoller own Indirect Criminal Contempt in which Stoller was charged for the crime of publishing “Speech” on the Internet that Judge Porter will issue his decision on November 12, 2009. Stoller has several hearings this coming week. According to one media report Stoller has come out stronger every day since July 15, 2009 the day he was released from the custody of the Cook County Department of Corrections. Stoller's been drafting his Section 1983 lawsuit that he will file against all of the parties that were responsible for his unlawful incarceration. All of the defendants according to some reports were laughing about the prospect of becoming defendants in Stoller's Section 1983 Action. This is a big week. Stoller will becoming out blasting....Stay tuned you do not want to miss a moment of this weeks coming action.
1 Comment

STOLLER FILES A MOTION TO HOLD THE COOK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS IN CONTEMPT OF COURT FOR FAILURE TO HONOR A SUBPOENA

10/30/2009

13 Comments

 
Picture
Cook County Jail
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-STOLLER SERVERED A SUBPEONA ON THE ILLINOIS COOK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS (ICCDC)  . Today an official from the ICCDC called Stoller and informed Stoller that the ICCDC will not honor a subpoena only a court order. Stoller said that he would obligate the ICCDC and he would provide the court order by filing a motion immediately before the Illinois Circuit Court Judge to hold the ICCDC in “contempt” of court for failing to honor a subpoena. Stoller was incarcerated in the Illinois  Cook County Jail from June 8, 2009 until July 15, 2009 for the "crime" of publishing articles on his other blog rentamark.blog.com in violation of Stoller's first Amendment Rights of "Free Speech."  As a result, Stoller finds it to be no inconvience to file "contempt" charges against the CCDC for its failure to honor a valid subpoena in order to provide the ICCDC with the necessary court order that they requested on 10-29-09
13 Comments

GORDON & REES EVAIDING SERVICE OF PROCESS

10/29/2009

9 Comments

 
Picture
J. Haye Ryan
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-ON WEDNESDAY OCTOBER 28, 2009 STOLLER ATTEMPTED TO SERVE J.HAYES RYAN on behalf of Gordon & Rees LLP. Stoller went to the offices of Gordon and Rees located at 1 N. Franklin Suite 800 in Chicago Illinois. Gordon and Rees LLP, Ryan T. Brown, Chances L. Cooper, J. Hayes Ryan have been charged with criminal contempt along with their clients attorneys Lance G. Johnson, David Abrams, Alfred Goodman and their firm Roy lance, Abrams, Berdo and Goodman www.roylance.com The Criminal Contempt charges grew out of a 100 million dollar defamation case filed against attorneys Lance G. Johnson and the Roylance law partners. Johnson, Goodman and Abrams according to the charges have been avoiding service of process for over a year and half. Despite the fact that they were all eventually served, the firm of Gordon and Rees were still successful in persuading Illinois Judge Kathy Flanagan to grant their motion to vacate service. Gordon and Rees LLP lead by attorney J.Hayes Ryan http://www.gordonrees.com/lawyers/lawyerBiography.cfm?attyID=hayesryan refused to accept service on October 28, 2009 of the Criminal Contempt Summons. J.Hayes Ryan told Stoller, “Don't ever come to our office again!” And locked Stoller out in the hall way. It is obvious that Stoller is not welcome at the Offices of Gordon and Rees now that three of their attorneys Ryan T. Brown, Chances L. Cooper and J. Hayes Ryan have been charged with “criminal” contempt. If any one has information that they would like to share on Gordon & Rees or Roylance, Abrams, Berdo and Goodman please email Ldms4@hotmail.com
LEGAL DISCLAIMER: All of the parties named herein are considered innocient of all charges until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
9 Comments

ILLINOIS CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE KATHY FLANAGAN GRANTED STOLLER REQUEST TO FILE INDIRECT CRIMINAL CONTEMPT CHARGES AGAINST ATTORNEYS LANCE G. JOHNSON, DAVID ABRAMS AND ALFRED GOODMAN

10/28/2009

6 Comments

 
Picture


CHICAGO-(AEAE)-ON TUESDAY OCTOBER 27, 2009 COOK COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE KATHY FLANAGAN GRANTED STOLLER'S REQUEST TO FILE INDIRECT CRIMINAL CONTEMPT FELONY CHARGES AGAINST WASHINGTON D.C. LAW FIRM OF Roylance, Abrams, Berdo and Goodman www.roylance.com Attorneys Alfred Goodman, David Abrams, and Lance G. Johnson. Illinois attorneys also named in the Indirect Criminal Contempt Felony Petiton are Ryan T. Brown, Haynes Ryan and Chances L. Cooper along with their firm of Gordon and Rees LLP. You can down load copies of the court orders by clicking on the attached link: http://www.filefront.com/14809089/Lance-G.-Johnson--et-al-Perjury-Charges0001.pdf/ You can also down load a full copy of the Indirect Criminal Contempt Petition charging the respondents with several felonies which carry a 3 to 5 year jail sentence if convicted. Click the attached link http://www.filefront.com/14756757/Lance-G.-Johnson-Charged-with-perjury0001.pdf/ Stoller is in the process of drafting several additional Criminal Contempt Petitions which will be filed shortly. Stay tuned..
6 Comments

STOLLER MOVES TO COMPEL ILLINOIS ATTORNEY ROBERT TEPPER TO APPEAR AT A DEPOSITION

10/27/2009

12 Comments

 
Picture
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-ATTORNEY ROBERT TEPPER REFUSED TO ATTEND HIS DEPOSITION TODAY. Mr. Tepper was kind enough to call Stoller and inform him that he would not be attending his deposition noticed by Stoller. Stoller told Mr. Tepper that he would be move to “compel” his deposition.
Stoller's Motion for leave to file an Indirect Direct Criminal Contempt proceeding against Attorney Lance G. Johnson, Alfred Goodman and David Abrams from the Washington D.C Law firm of Roylance, Abrams, Berdo and Goodman www.roylance is up today before Illinois Circuit Court Judge Kathy Flanagan.
Stoller filed a Motion before Illinois Circuit Court Judge Michale Hyman in his divorce proceeding which is up on Nov 3rd 2009 at 9:30 AM.
In addition Stoller has released a barrage of Subpoenas, like Scud   
missiles into the enemys camp. Stoller is ready to file contempt charges against those who fail to properly respond.

SIDEBAR: Trust is an important quality in a business partner, a spouse, a friend, a candidate. It is important for all the readers of this blog to note that when Stoller says on this blog that he is going to sue someone, hold them in contempt, charge them with attorney disciplinary charges and/or Indirect Criminal Contempt Charges, as sure as the sun will rise tomorrow, Stoller will follow through with all charges, motions, complaints which are acknowledge here. Stoller is a man of his word, if he says that he will sue a party, that party will be sued and the case will be litigated until the “last court speaks”! This sidebar is response to some readers who might have doubted Stoller's willingness to follow through with his prognostications of doom and gloom.
12 Comments

GOOGLE INC 'S ATTORNEY MICHAEL T. ZELLER MAKES DESPERATE ATTEMPT TO BLOCK STOLLER'S APPEAL OF GOOGLE DECISION

10/25/2009

20 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-GOOGLE INC'S ATTORNEY MICHAEL T. ZELLER HAS MADE A DESPERATE ATTEMPT TO BLOCK STOLLER'S APPEAL OF JUDGE VIRGINIA KENDELL'S DECISION IN THE GOOGLE INC., CASE TO THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS. Two years ago Illinois Northern District Judge Virginia Kendell who was just appointed to the bench, ruled against Stoller. Stoller appealed and reversed her. Now Judge Kendell has ruled against Stoller again. Stoller has appealed. Google's attorney Michael T. Zeller who is famous for his ability to concoct outragious defenses when Zeller has a client who can pay any amount demanded to create and  obfuscate  . Stoller made a great record before Judge Kendell who ruled that "Stoller made no cognizable argument."  Judge Kendell could not understand Stoller's argument the last time she ruled in favor of Google Inc. The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals did not buy the great Zeller's Appeal brief last time and Stoller is confident that he will reverse Judge Kendell again and Zeller's knows it. Consequently Zeller's last desperate attempt to block Stoller in forma pauperis Notice to the Court. This is what makes America jurisprudence so much fun, that a single individual with the knowledge of the law can be equal to an 80 billion dollar company and  defeat that company under the law because we are all "equal".
SIDEBAR- So what did Stoller do Friday and Saturday--Stoller spent the time preparing his motions in appeals courts and in his divorce proceeding and researching the law on certain felonies. Stoller spend 1/2 this summer in the Cook County Jail for the Publication of  articles on  his former blog. Stoller is still facing indirect criminal charges and a possible sentence of 6 months in the Cook County Jail for publishing Speech on his blog.  Stoller learned after 40 years in the litigation business that a person can go to jail for "nothing". Stoller spent the week-end preparing to file felony charges against the people who are responsible for Stoller's false arrest and false Imprisionment. Stay tuned within the next few weeks Stoller expects charge  his opponents with several felonies carring 3-5 years in prision. Litigation is War, Weclome to the Front! 
STOLLER IS GOING TO PUT THE PEOPLE WHO PUT HIM IN JAIL FOR 37 days for 3-5 years on two felony charges, waite and see...
20 Comments

WILL GOOGLE INC'S ATTORNEY MICHAEL T. ZELLER BE CHARGED WITH PERJURY? WILL STOLLER GO TO JAIL FOR THE "CRIME" OF PUBLISHING SPEECH ON THE INTERNET

10/25/2009

9 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-COMMENTARY- FOR THOSE READERS WHO HAVE BEEN FOLLOWING THE CONTROVERSIES ON THIS BLOG, THEY HAVE ALL BEEN HEATING UP. The Google Inc., case has moved to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 09-3569. Stoller won the last appeal. Will he win again? The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals has docketed Stoller's Appeal of a recent Tradmark Trial and Appeal Court Decision. Case No. 2010-1031. On the other side are the usual opponents the famous Washington D.C. Trademark Attorney Lance G. Johnson. That appeal where Stoller will plead a "fraud" case against good olde Lance G. Johnson. Will Lance G. Johnson be convicted of "fraud" on the Patent and Trademark Office or will the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals send Stoller packing? On Nov. 13, Illinois Criminal Court Judge Dennis Porter will issue his decision on whether Stoller will be convicted of Indirect Criminal Contempt for the "crime" of publishing articles on his blog and be sent to the Cook County Jail for six months? Stoller's opponents in his divorce proceeding would like nothing more than to see Stoller spend another 6 months in the Illinois Cook County Jail for there aware that Stoller intends to file "felony" charges against them for perjury and another charge which cannot be disclosed here at this time. Litigation is a "blood" sport and all those with a Coliseum  menality are welcome to watch the Lion  Devourer   the christians  or the christians devourer the Lion..
9 Comments

THE 2010 EQUAL JUSTICE ILLINOIS CANADIDATE FOR GOVERNOR PETER KAUS AND FOR SENATOR IS LEO STOLLER

10/25/2009

8 Comments

 
Picture
Picture
CHICAGO-(EJ)-THE  2010 EQUAL JUSTICE ILLINOIS CANDIDATE FOR ILLINOIS GOVERNOR IS PETER KAUS, FOR ILLINOIS SENATOR WILL BE LEO STOLLER. PETER KAUS IS A LONG TIME CHICAGO RESIDENT. His father ran the was involved in the Chicago Water system chief of Inspectors. The last two Illinois Governor, George Ryan, a Republican is current in jail and Democratic Rod Blagojevich  www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/.../AR2009040201763.html -  
has been indicted. It is time for PETER KAUS to be elected to the Governor's office to bring "clean" government back to Illinois. Mr. Kaus is running on a campaign to bring jobs to the state of Illinois. He will bid on having the World Fair return to Chicago in 2014 bringing in over 200,000 jobs to Illinois. Leo Stoller is also running on the Equal Justice Ticket for Illinois Senator Rolan Buris seat. Mr. Burris was selected by former Illinois Governor Blagojevich to fill the seat previously held by Barak Obama. Burris
said that he will not seek a second term. Stoller will run for Burris's seat on a conservative platform to also bring jobs to Illinois. This is probably the first time in a century when a third party has a chance to seat canadidates in state wide office in Illinois because of the corruption that exists in both the Democratic and Republican parties.  Please support  Peter Kaus for Illinois Governor and Leo Stoller for Senator.   Equal Justice Party, 7115 W. North Ave #272, Oak Park, Illinois 60302
312-545-4554
8 Comments

OBAMA IS UP SET OVER EXECUTIVE PAY but not over the fact that the U.S. Navy is spending over 25 billion dollars for ships that we don\\\\\\\'t need

10/23/2009

1 Comment

 
WE'RE GOING BROKE WITH OBAMA!
Picture
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-(COMMENTARY)-OBAMA IS UP SET OVER EXECUTIVE PAY
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33428472/ns/business-us_business 
but not over the fact that the U.S. Navy is spending over 25 billion dollars for ships  http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33431534/ns/us_news-military
that go over 50 miles an hour that we don't need. Everyone should understand that the current situation of these Littoral Combat Ships  costing in excess of half a billion dollars cannot continue. There are too many other needs and too little resources to pour money into ships that are 100 yards long and can go 50 miles per hour. These ships cannot out run a cruse missile, cannot even out run a shoulder fired missil. Instead of building 300 foot ships for ½ billion each. The Navy should build 100 yard ships that can go 30 miles an hour which can carry three Harrier Jet planes. Harrier jets go 600 miles an hour can land like a helicopter and carry cruse missiles and 1000 pounds bombs. They cost 30 million each. Do the math. Three Harrier jets $90 million and a $30 million dollar ship that can go 30 miles an hour will cost us $120 million each. We will get 3 ships for each Littoral Combat Ship with 100 times more fire power. I believe that its time for the Navy to have more down sized ships with greater fire power and to start eliminating the large carrier ships that hold 5000 men and cost billions to build and maintain. If we lose one we lose 5000 men. 
We have a trillion and half budget deficit and this country is going broke. Obama is sitting there just like the Captain of the Titanic just before the boat hit the ice berg and sank. The 2010 mid term elections are coming and they look real good for the Republicans best since 1994. Go out and send a message to Obama that we all are not going to stand by and watch Obama's sinking ship go under...


 
1 Comment

STOLLER FILES MOTION TO DISQUALIFY OPPOSING COUNSEL, THE LAW FIRM OF GORDON AND REES

10/22/2009

5 Comments

 
Picture
Ryan T. Brown
DISQUALIFICATION IN THIS CASE IS MANDATORY UNDER ILLINOIS SUPREME COURT RULES 1.7 CONFLICT OF INTEREST, 1.16(a)(1) DECLINING OR TERMINATING REPRESENTATION, 3.7 LAWYER AS A WITNESS AND RULE 8.4 MISCONDUCT

CHICAGO-STOLLER FILED A MOTION TO DISQUALIFY OPPOSING COUNSEL-THE LAW FIRM OF GORDON & REES, RYAN T. BROWN, HAYES RYAN AND CHANCE L. COOPER. Once Stoller filed his Petition for Indirect Criminal Contempt naming the. Respondents’ law firm of Gordon & Rees LLP and their attorneys Ryan T. Brown , Hayes Ryan and Chance L. Cooper, who are charged with Subornation of Perjury 720 ILCS 5/32-3 a class 4 Felony, for knowingly filing false sworn affidavits of Alfred Goodman , Lance G. Johnson and David Abrams, with the clerk of the Court of Cook County which were calculated to hinder or obstruct the court in its administration of justice, it became obvious that the law firm of Gordon and Rees should voluntarily recuse themselves under Illinois Supreme Court Rule 3.7(a) Lawyer as a Witness.” A lawyer shall not accept or continue employment in contemplated or pending litigation if the lawyer knows or reasonably should know that the lawyer may be called as a witness on behalf of the client.”. As a result the Lance G. Johnson's attornies, the law firm of Gordon and Rees, is now in violation of the Illinois Supreme Court Rule 3.7 by even addressing the court in defense of Petitioner’s Request for Leave to file its Petition for Indirect Criminal Contempt. Gordon and Rees know that the filing of a false affidavit by a process server or an attorney who is a defendant, falls under the category of contempt. Winning Moves, Inc. v. Hi! Baby, Inc., 238 Ill. App. 3d 834, 179 Ill. Dec. 12, 605 N.E.2d 1026 (2d Dist. 1992) which is punishable under Indirect Criminal Contempt. The filing of false affidavits by a process server and/or an attorney representing a party, denying service of process falls under the category of indirect criminal contempt and is punishable by the indirect criminal contempt as a separate criminal violation. Gordon and Rees attorneys are alleged to have filed the false affidavits of Alfred Goodman, Lance G. Johnson and David Abrams they are thus subject to being called as witnesses in this proceeding and are now conflicted out. Gordon and Rees refusal to recuse themselves is another violation of the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct. The law firm of Gordon and Rees, and their attorneys Ryan T. Brown, Hayes Ryan and Chance L. Cooper are also charged with the filing of Alfred Goodman, Lance G. Johnson and David Abrams the false affidavits denying service under Indirect Criminal Contempt for perjury and Subornation of perjury, 720 ILCS 5/32-3(a) and . 720 ILCS 5/32-2,
LEGAL DISCLAIMER: The law firm of Gordon & Rees, attorneys Ryan T. Brown, Hayes Ryan and Chance L. Cooper, Lance g. Johnson, Alfred Goodman and David Abrams are considered innocient of all charges until proven guilty at trial beyond a reasonable doubt.
This is your new blog post. Click here and start typing, or drag in elements from the top bar.
5 Comments
<<Previous

    EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
    Internships not available now
    ​


     Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
    FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)
    ​
    YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
    Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
     The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
     Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that  supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
     The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a
    LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERT, valuations, expert
    witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert. 
    The author(s)  graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE  and attended the University of Iowa a  for a PHD. The Author(s)  are the nation's most renowned
    Legal Ethics experts  and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
    enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation  Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
    numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions.  AEAE, P.O.  Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email ldms4@hotmail.com
    312-545-4554
    Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE  Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
     "Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
    Litigation is the Air We Breathe
    Litigation is War,
    Welcome to the Front!"

     To Prove Defamation Case?
    What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm. 
    The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation 

    The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

    “[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30 
    AEAE argues it reports on the  law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

    ​AEAE has the legal  right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators,  business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE  18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

    VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

    DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.


    Archives

    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    July 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    October 2021
    July 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    April 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    June 2019
    April 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    January 2015
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010
    December 2009
    November 2009
    October 2009
    September 2009

    Categories
    Disclaimer This website is not a solicitation for business. All content on the AEAE website is intended to provide general information about AEAE and an opportunity for interested  persons to contact AEAE. The content of this website is not offered as legal advice or legal opinion and it should not be relied upon for any specific situation.  AEAE is not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney client relationship is intended.  This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a complete description of AEAE services. While AEAE endeavors to keep the information updated and correct, AEAE makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the information contained in this website. 

    All
    Jewelry Frauds
    Scams
    Yellow Diamonds

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.