STOLLER FILES MOTION TO DISQUALIFY OPPOSING COUNSEL, THE LAW FIRM OF GORDON AND REES

10/22/2009

Ryan T. Brown

DISQUALIFICATION IN THIS CASE IS MANDATORY UNDER ILLINOIS SUPREME COURT RULES 1.7 CONFLICT OF INTEREST, 1.16(a)(1) DECLINING OR TERMINATING REPRESENTATION, 3.7 LAWYER AS A WITNESS AND RULE 8.4 MISCONDUCT

CHICAGO-STOLLER FILED A MOTION TO DISQUALIFY OPPOSING COUNSEL-THE LAW FIRM OF GORDON & REES, RYAN T. BROWN, HAYES RYAN AND CHANCE L. COOPER. Once Stoller filed his Petition for Indirect Criminal Contempt naming the. Respondents’ law firm of Gordon & Rees LLP and their attorneys Ryan T. Brown , Hayes Ryan and Chance L. Cooper, who are charged with Subornation of Perjury 720 ILCS 5/32-3 a class 4 Felony, for knowingly filing false sworn affidavits of Alfred Goodman , Lance G. Johnson and David Abrams, with the clerk of the Court of Cook County which were calculated to hinder or obstruct the court in its administration of justice, it became obvious that the law firm of Gordon and Rees should voluntarily recuse themselves under Illinois Supreme Court Rule 3.7(a) Lawyer as a Witness.” A lawyer shall not accept or continue employment in contemplated or pending litigation if the lawyer knows or reasonably should know that the lawyer may be called as a witness on behalf of the client.”. As a result the Lance G. Johnson's attornies, the law firm of Gordon and Rees, is now in violation of the Illinois Supreme Court Rule 3.7 by even addressing the court in defense of Petitioner’s Request for Leave to file its Petition for Indirect Criminal Contempt. Gordon and Rees know that the filing of a false affidavit by a process server or an attorney who is a defendant, falls under the category of contempt. Winning Moves, Inc. v. Hi! Baby, Inc., 238 Ill. App. 3d 834, 179 Ill. Dec. 12, 605 N.E.2d 1026 (2d Dist. 1992) which is punishable under Indirect Criminal Contempt. The filing of false affidavits by a process server and/or an attorney representing a party, denying service of process falls under the category of indirect criminal contempt and is punishable by the indirect criminal contempt as a separate criminal violation. Gordon and Rees attorneys are alleged to have filed the false affidavits of Alfred Goodman, Lance G. Johnson and David Abrams they are thus subject to being called as witnesses in this proceeding and are now conflicted out. Gordon and Rees refusal to recuse themselves is another violation of the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct. The law firm of Gordon and Rees, and their attorneys Ryan T. Brown, Hayes Ryan and Chance L. Cooper are also charged with the filing of Alfred Goodman, Lance G. Johnson and David Abrams the false affidavits denying service under Indirect Criminal Contempt for perjury and Subornation of perjury, 720 ILCS 5/32-3(a) and . 720 ILCS 5/32-2,
LEGAL DISCLAIMER: The law firm of Gordon & Rees, attorneys Ryan T. Brown, Hayes Ryan and Chance L. Cooper, Lance g. Johnson, Alfred Goodman and David Abrams are considered innocient of all charges until proven guilty at trial beyond a reasonable doubt.

This is your new blog post. Click here and start typing, or drag in elements from the top bar.

5 Comments

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
Internships not available now

Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)

YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a
LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERT, valuations, expert
witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert.
The author(s) graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE and attended the University of Iowa a for a PHD. The Author(s) are the nation's most renowned
Legal Ethics experts and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions. AEAE, P.O. Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email ldms4@hotmail.com
312-545-4554
Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
"Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
Litigation is the Air We Breathe
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front!"

To Prove Defamation Case?
What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm.
The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation

The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.

Shawn

10/21/2009 03:57:15 pm

Subornation of Perjury, sounds scary...

Anon

10/22/2009 12:27:42 am

Yes, Leo, I mean "Shawn," allegations so serious could be scary if they had any reality to them. But they come from you, Leo, someone who is far from scary. You're just weak and pathetic and about as frightening as a piece of toast. And about as smart as one too.

Jack

10/22/2009 03:59:37 am

You know how to "hurt" someone's feelings....

10/24/2009 02:38:55 am

Jack, Stoller long ago made himself an object of ridicule, scorn and revulsion, and did so all by his own devices.

adidas shoes outlet link

6/7/2010 03:42:12 pm

Hhe article's content rich variety which make us move for our mood after reading this article. surprise, here you will find what you want! Recently, I found some wedsites which commodity is colorful of fashion. Such as www.sec-torand.com that worth you to see. Believe me these websites won’t let you down.

Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics