Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics

  • SUE THE BASTARDS
  • AEAE
  • AEJE
  • AEIPR
  • Rentamark
  • Archrive
  • PAGE 2
 

EX-CHICAGO COP JON BURGE FOUND GUILTY OF PERJURY AS A RESULT OF Incompetent Counsel

6/30/2010

3 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-Ex-Chicago Cop Convicted of Lying About Torturing More Than 100 Black Men ... cop Jon Burge of lying in connection with the torture of dozens of criminls. Burge was found guilty of perjury for lying under oath about his role in the torture and beating of confessions out of over 100 criminals.Burge was fired from the police department in 1993 over the alleged mistreatment of a suspect, but he never was criminally charged in that case or any other, leading to widespread outrage in Chicago's black neighborhoods. The Chicago community anger intensified when Burge moved to Florida on his police pension and his alleged victims remained in prison. Burge was never charged criminally because the statute of limitations had run out. However, one of the criminals brough a civil case against Burge. In an Interrogatory response Burge's “civil” lawyer provided the following response, “I have no knowledge of anyone being tortured.”
The Fed then charged Burge with “perjury”.
 Burge's incompetent Civil lawyer failed to instruct Burge to take the “fifth amendment” on each interrogatory response.
Burge would never have been charged with perjury had Burge only taken the fifth amendment in response to his civil interrogatories. That was the first mistake that Burge's stupid civil lawyers made.
The second mistake Burge's criminal lawyers made, that buried Burge, was to allow him to take the stand and testify in his perjury trial. The one  jury member  later said that Berg's "nervousness on stand was clincher in conviction!" That failure to properly advise Burge not to take the stand in his criminal trial lead to his conviction for perjury and will result in additional perjury charges now that Burge was found guilty.

SIDEBAR: This case stands for the serious proposition that perjurious responses in civil interrogatories can lead to criminal convictions. In a related type of case. There is evidence that a Bryan Cave senior partner Steven R. Smith and his bag man Michael Werich could be charged with “false swearing” and subornation of perjury for providing a false affidavit in the Stoller v. Countrywide Civil litigation in Cook County, Illinois. A petition for indirect criminal contempt has been filed against Bryan Cave, Steven Smith and Michael Werich. News for Guilty Ex-cop Jon burge convicted of lying ...
Picture
3 Comments

Abraham Lincoln admits that the Emancipation Proclamation was Wrong

6/29/2010

10 Comments

 
Picture
SPRINGFIELD ILLINOIS -RECENTLY DISCOVERED DOCUMENTS BELIEVED TO BE IN ABRAHAM LINCOLN HANDWRITING ACKNOWLEDGES THAT THE Emancipation Proclamation WAS WRONG.
10 Comments

BARAK OBAMA HAS DONE MORE DAMAGE TO THE U.S. WAR EFFORT BY FIRING GENERAL McCRYSTAL THAN OUR ENEMIES COULD EVER DO

6/28/2010

12 Comments

 
Picture


CHICAGO-(AEAE)- PRESIDENT BARAK OBAMA HAS DONE MORE DAMAGE TO THE U.S WAR EFFORT IN AFGHANISTAN THAN OUR ENEMIES EVER COULD HAVE DONE. Click on the attached article http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/37952830/ns/us_news-washington_post
12 Comments

THE SHVARTZER CREATED HIS OWN WORST NIGHT MARE, McCRYSTAL IS RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT IN 2012

6/27/2010

9 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-In an interview with a University of Chicago Law Professor who claimed to have inside information regarding General McCrystal's future after Obama fired him stated,” The Shvartzer though he had problems with a little article in the Rolling Stone Magazine by General McCrystal so he fired General McCrystal in the most irresponsible decision that any president has ever made. Now General McCrystal is free to run for President in the 2012 Election. American Generals have made great presidents. I will vote for General McCrystal for president!”
9 Comments

SUPREME COURT DECISION TORPEDO'S THE GOVERNMENT'S CASE AGAINST FORMER ILLINOIS GOVERNER ROD BLAGOJEVICH

6/26/2010

9 Comments

 
Picture
WASHINGTO D.C. (AEAE)- Thursday, the U.S. Supreme Court significantly limited the scope of federal laws used by prosecutors and plaintiffs in pursuing alleged corporate fraud in four high-impact decisions effectively torpedoing the Government's Illinois case against former governor Rod Blagojevick 
  1. The Blagojevich Trial: The Tale of the FBI Tapes
     In the post-Enron case of     Skilling v. U.S. and the related cases of media mogul Conrad Black and Alaska legislator Bruce Weyhrauch, the high court redefined the "honest services" criminal fraud statute to cover only bribes and kickbacks, instead of the range of illicit activities prosecutors have used the law to punish. Click here to read the U.S. Supreme Court Decision that will free Skilling from a 20 year+ jail sentence, free Conrad Black from his 6 year jail sentence and has torpedo's the Illinois prosecution of former Governor Rod Blagojevick. The law does work in favor of those who also are willing to litigate "until the last court speaks!" Please click on the following link. You might learn something!  http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/09pdf/08-1394.pdf This Story continues In 4 Key Rulings, Supreme Court Limits Fraud Statutes' Reach

    Leo Stoller is an Appellate Expert and Supreme Court Expert
9 Comments

BARAK OBAMA ACCOMPLISHES WHAT ARE ENEMIES COULD NOT, KILL OFF OUR GREAT BATTLE FIELD GENERAL McCRYSTAL

6/25/2010

4 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-COMMENTARY-WE HAVE A WAR GOING ON IN AFGHANISTAN FOR 8 YEARS. American’s greatest enemy the Taliban and Al Queda would have given anything to “kill” their opposing enemy, our greatest General of our time, a graduate of West Point, who was leading our troops in Afghanistan, General McCrystal. The Taliban for eight years has tried to “kill” General McChrystal. He was on their list of the “most wanted dead!” Although American’s greatest enemy the Taliban has failed to “kill” General McChrystal, who had dedicated 38 years of exemplary service to this nation risking his life  to maintain our constitutional rights of free speech, individual liberty, that according to a University of Chicago Law professor who refused to give his name said, “That worthless piece of shit President, accomplished what our greatest enemies could not and that was to “kill off our greatest battle field General of the time, General McCrystal on the grounds that his “works on paper in a Rolling Stone Article were offensive to civil leaders!.” No where in the article does General McCrystal call Obama a stupid nigger!” No where in the article  does McCrystal call Vice President Biden the biggest incompetent buffoon of our time. Getting rid of General McChrystal during a war is in itself a war crime. Anyone who was anyone would have predicted prior to the last election that America after 250 years was in steep decline. That the majority had lost their mine and was supporting a worthless piece of shit for president, out of some collective guilt out of the past. But no none could have predicted that this "unfit" "unqualified" person who was elected president of the United States would have turned out to be so incompetent, a traitor who would do to American, what their enemies during a war could not have done, to "kill off our Star General in charge of our Battle, for the "unlawful" act of engaging in his "first" Amendment Right of Free Speech!" Gen. Stanley A. McCrystal has made no public comment since President Obama relieved him of his Afghan war command Wednesday, silently taking his lumps for the well deserved disparaging remarks he and his aides made about administration officials in the presence of a reporter from Rolling Stone magazine."
The Law Professor  who wrote this commentary said that if his name was known to Obama he probably would lose his job for saying what he said here on this blog. 
This story continues type on this link  http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/06/25/AR2010062504087.html?hpid=topnews

4 Comments

Enron CEO Jeffrey Skilling U.S. Supreme Court decision handed down today

6/25/2010

1 Comment

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-The U.S. Supreme Court, handed down seven decisions yesterday. Among them are the three "honest services" fraud cases -- including one involving former Enron CEO Jeffrey Skilling -- that resulted in a significant narrowing of the law to reach only bribery and kickback schemes.  The Supreme Court's decision to uphold part of Jeff Skilling's appeal — a federal judge's decision to keep the former Enron CEO's criminal trial in Houston - is hardly a surprise to most legal observers.
"Courts are hesitant to override a trial judge's venue decision," a professor at the University of Dayton's School of Law said.
But the dissenting opinion  http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/business/7079405.htmlon the issue by Justice Sonia Sotomayor was less predictable. It echoed many of the arguments of Skilling's defense team, including the impact of the company's 2001 collapse on Houston, the "relentless" local media coverage and the relatively speedy jury selection process before the 2005 trial.
 With four cases left to decide, including the long-awaited Bilski v. Kappos patent ruling, the Court confirmed that it will finish its work for the term next Monday. Stoller's Appeal of the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals looks like it will not be considered until next term. Stoller is a legal scholar,an expert on U.S. Supreme Court practice. Stoller takes every case up until "the last court speaks!" High Court Narrows 'Honest Services' Fraud Law
1 Comment

ILLINOIS ATTORNEY MARY T. GRIFFIN APPOINTED GUARDIAN AD LITEM NOT RECOMENDED!

6/25/2010

15 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-THE AMERICANS FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF ATTORNEY ETHICS AEAE, (since 1974) an attorney ethics watch dog group maintains a attorney data base of attorneys, Guardian Ad Litem, bankruptcy trustees who in the opinion of AEAE, are not recommended. Illinois attorney Mary T. Griffin who was appointed a Guardian ad litem is charged with violating the procedural due process rights of an allege disabled person and opposing the appointment of a temporary guardian who would represent th due process rights of the alleged disabled person. Mary T. Griffin was directed to recuse herself from the case or face a motion to discharge her and a lawsuit. Ms. Mary T. Griffin is employed by the North Barington, Illinois law firm of Kelleher & Buckley LLC. Www.kelleherbuckley.com The law firm of Kelleher & Buckley LLC. Is also listed in the opinion of AEAE NOT recommended.
15 Comments

BERAK OBAMA THE WORST COMMENDER IN CHIEF IN U.S. HISTORY

6/24/2010

6 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-OBAMA the most incompetent Commender in Chief in U.S. History fires the most incompetent General McChrystal, during the U.S.'s longest and most difficult war. Great move Obama. God your a good “leader”. A community organizer with no military or previous leadership experience and completely unable to stop a oil leak from destroying the Gulf Coast of our county. Obama is great, brilliant leader. Wish we would have had a guy like him during WWII in Office. Obama say, the “action was necessary to maintain military chain of command after a magazine article quoted the general and his aides making disparaging remarks about U.S. Civilian leaders” like Joe Biden who is also the most incompetent Vice President in the history of this country. Obama fires sthe best General we have over “words on paper”!
.During the Civil War General Grant made numerous disparaging remarks about Lincoln, calling him every name under the sun and members of his Cabinet.
Lincoln said,” As long as Grant is winning the war he can say anything he wants about me.”
A well known football Coach said, “ Obama is No Lincoln and you can't win a NFL game with a guy like Obama, who would fire the coach on the day before the Super Bowl, how does anyone think Obama can win a war!” “I don't blame Obama, everyone knew that he was unqualified to run a hot dog stand let alone this country, I blame the stupid suckers who voted for the guy.”
6 Comments

ILLINOIS CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE ALLEN GOLDBERG SET\'S HEARING IN COOK COUNTY SHERIFF THOMAS DART 100 MILLION DOLLAR MALICIOUS PROSECUTION CASE

6/23/2010

10 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-A YEAR AGO TODAY STOLLER WAS SITTING IN THE COOK COUNTY JAIL FROM JUNE 8TH, 2009 UNTIL JULY 15, 2009 UNLAWFULLY FOR THE PUBLICATION OF THIS BLOG. Today the parties responsible have been sued for malicious prosecution, false arrest, false imprisonment, intentional infliction of emotional stress, violations of Section 1983 Civil Rights, Conspiracy, Fraud etc. The case was filed in February. A substitution of the first judge Berkowitz was made. The case was assigned to Judge Lee Preston. One of the Defendants asked for another substitution. The case was assigned to Cook County Circuit Court Judge Allen Goldberg who has set a hearing for July 8, 2010 at 9:30am
10 Comments
<<Previous

    EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
    Internships not available now
    ​


     Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
    FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)
    ​
    YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
    Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
     The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
     Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that  supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
     The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a
    LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERT, valuations, expert
    witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert. 
    The author(s)  graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE  and attended the University of Iowa a  for a PHD. The Author(s)  are the nation's most renowned
    Legal Ethics experts  and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
    enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation  Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
    numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions.  AEAE, P.O.  Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email ldms4@hotmail.com
    312-545-4554
    Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE  Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
     "Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
    Litigation is the Air We Breathe
    Litigation is War,
    Welcome to the Front!"

     To Prove Defamation Case?
    What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm. 
    The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation 

    The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

    “[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30 
    AEAE argues it reports on the  law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

    ​AEAE has the legal  right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators,  business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE  18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

    VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

    DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.


    Archives

    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    July 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    October 2021
    July 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    April 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    June 2019
    April 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    January 2015
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010
    December 2009
    November 2009
    October 2009
    September 2009

    Categories
    Disclaimer This website is not a solicitation for business. All content on the AEAE website is intended to provide general information about AEAE and an opportunity for interested  persons to contact AEAE. The content of this website is not offered as legal advice or legal opinion and it should not be relied upon for any specific situation.  AEAE is not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney client relationship is intended.  This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a complete description of AEAE services. While AEAE endeavors to keep the information updated and correct, AEAE makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the information contained in this website. 

    All
    Jewelry Frauds
    Scams
    Yellow Diamonds

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.