SUPREME COURT DECISION TORPEDO'S THE GOVERNMENT'S CASE AGAINST FORMER ILLINOIS GOVERNER ROD BLAGOJEVICH

6/26/2010

WASHINGTO D.C. (AEAE)- Thursday, the U.S. Supreme Court significantly limited the scope of federal laws used by prosecutors and plaintiffs in pursuing alleged corporate fraud in four high-impact decisions effectively torpedoing the Government's Illinois case against former governor Rod Blagojevick

The Blagojevich Trial: The Tale of the FBI Tapes
In the post-Enron case of Skilling v. U.S. and the related cases of media mogul Conrad Black and Alaska legislator Bruce Weyhrauch, the high court redefined the "honest services" criminal fraud statute to cover only bribes and kickbacks, instead of the range of illicit activities prosecutors have used the law to punish. Click here to read the U.S. Supreme Court Decision that will free Skilling from a 20 year+ jail sentence, free Conrad Black from his 6 year jail sentence and has torpedo's the Illinois prosecution of former Governor Rod Blagojevick. The law does work in favor of those who also are willing to litigate "until the last court speaks!" Please click on the following link. You might learn something! http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/09pdf/08-1394.pdf This Story continues In 4 Key Rulings, Supreme Court Limits Fraud Statutes' Reach

Leo Stoller is an Appellate Expert and Supreme Court Expert

9 Comments

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
Internships not available now

Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)

YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a attorney rating Service. The comments made by AEAE are not actionable because they are statements of opinion Moriarty v. Greene 732 N.E.2d 730, 740 Ill.App), citing Owen v. Can 497 N.E.2d 1145, 1148 (Ill.1986) see Law offices of David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al No 18-3216 Seventh Circuit No 18-3216 decided 01-28-2022.
Ratings are non-actionable opinion statements David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al citing Syngenta Seeds Inc v. Bung North America,Inc 773 F.3d 58 (8th Cir 2014) Illinois Law on expressions of Opinion , an unexplained one star review simply could not be actionable as defamation David Freydin case citing Cf. Kimzey v. Yelp!Inc. 836 F. 3d 1263, 1269-70 (9th Cir 2016)
AEAE LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERTS, valuations, expert
witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert.
The author(s) graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE and attended the University of Iowa a for a PHD. The Author(s) are the nation's most renowned
Legal Ethics experts and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions. AEAE, P.O. Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email [email protected]
312-545-4554
Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
"Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
Litigation is the Air We Breathe
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front!"

To Prove Defamation Case?
What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm.
The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation

The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.

Question

6/25/2010 04:12:48 pm

Is this Leo Stoller guy mentally retarded? If he is, I don't think it's very nice of you to make fun of him. I think it's wonderful that our court system is compassionate enough to allow someone who is mentally retarded to be heard. Even if the judges are just humoring him out of politeness and know they are going to dismiss his cases. Please be nicer to this Leo Stoller fellow, mentally retarded people have feelings too.

leo sucks

6/25/2010 06:03:01 pm

"until the last court speaks!" MY ASS.

Leo stoller does nothing more than file substitution of judge requests, appeals of decisions against him, appeals for more time to appeal his appeals, and more time to appeal the fact that he lied about being broke and was tossed in JAIL.

Game over, assclown.

Reality

6/25/2010 06:21:27 pm

Anyone who has ever had a case with this circus midget knows how easy it is. All you have to do is let him talk. All of his bullshit about him filing appeal after appeal is just that-- fat ass Leo filing appeal after appeal. All you have to do is stand on the record. Then his appeals are laughed at, so he files another appeal whining about how the previous one was laughed at. Then that goes nowhere too. Leo's appellate "expertise" is just like his love life-- it's just him and his right hand trying to gratify himself. Oh, the court usually speaks-- as to what a complete moron fat boy really is.

P.S.

6/25/2010 06:24:52 pm

P.S. I hit that again-- she is awesome!

info

6/25/2010 10:13:01 pm

Your family is arranginging an involuntary commitment for you. You will be taken from court directly to a mental institution.

Tempest

6/26/2010 01:42:35 am

What a crock. You do a search on Leo Stoller and his AEAE and he is a complete lie. Who is that guy
who posts all those documents? They should give him a medal.

Face

6/26/2010 03:08:34 pm

Hense forth
You are my Enemy,
and I am yours

The average cost of defending a case
runs over 1 million dollars, just ask anyone who has had to defend one, I expect your cost to exceed that by 5 times

Incoming

6/26/2010 03:13:52 pm

He has no family. They are all dead. Any way the Cook County Psychologists recently found him to be competent! You couldn't be so lucky.

hahahahahaha

6/26/2010 07:42:19 pm

blahahahahahahahahahaha

with all due respect, Incoming, you
need to be more specific

blahahahahahahahahahahahaha

they may have found fat boy Leo
competent to stand trial

blahahahahahahahahahahahaha

but incompetent at everything else

blahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics