Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics

  • SUE THE BASTARDS
  • AEAE
  • AEJE
  • AEIPR
  • Rentamark
  • Archrive
  • PAGE 2
 

MANDAMUS ACTION FILED BEFORE THE ILLINOIS SUPREME COURT

11/30/2009

4 Comments

 
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-A MANDAMUS ACTION BEING LODGED BEFORE THE ILLINOIS SUPREME COURT REQUESTING THAT ILLINOIS'S HIGHEST COURT ORDER A COOK COUNTY JUDGE TO PERMIT STOLLER TO FILE AN INDIRECT CRIMINAL CONTEMPT PROCEEDING AGAINST ATTORNEYS. Stoller had moved to filed another indirect criminal contempt proceeding against a group of attorneys. The circuit court Judge in Cook County Illinois deferred action on Stoller Petition for Indirect Criminal Court in order to force the Circuit Court Judge to immediately permit the filing of the Indirect Criminal Contempt Charges. The Illinois Circuit Court Judge by deferring the petition of indirect Criminal contempt has given the attorneys the opportunity to "hide" and/or distroy incriminating evidence. Indirect Criminal contempt charges are the most serious charges that an individual can bring against a party and thus those charges need to be addressed immediately....
4 Comments

REQUEST MADE BEFORE THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT TO BAR LANCE G. JOHNSON, DAVID ABRAMS AND ALFRED GOODMAN FROM PRACTICING BEFORE THE HIGH COURT

11/28/2009

7 Comments

 
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT PROVIDES FOR PARTIES TO FILE COMPLAINTS AGAINST LAWYERS WHO ARE MEMBERS OF THE HIGH COURT BAR. A request was made before the United States Supreme to bar Lance G. Johnson, David Abrams, Alfred Goodman and attorneys from Gordon and Rees from practicing before the high court pending resolution of a "criminal" contempt petition pending against them in Chicago, Illinois.  Lance G. Johnson, David Abrams and Alfred Goodman have been refused to accept service of summons of the criminal contempt citations. Their attorneys from Gordon and  Rees has also refused to accept service of summons on behalf of the firm and Lance G. Johnson and his crowd www.roylance.com 
Lance G. Johnson could not be reached for comment.
LEGAL DISCLAIMER: Lance G. Johnson, David Abrams, Alfred Goodman, the attorneys from Gordon and Rees are considered innoncient of all charges until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt at trial.
7 Comments

REQUEST FILED BEFORE THE D.C. BAR TO SUSPEND LANCE G. JOHNSON, DAVID ABRAMS AND ALFRED GOODMAN FROM THE PRACTICE OF LAW

11/27/2009

4 Comments

 
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-A REQUEST WAS FILED BEFORE THE .D.C. BAR AND THE VIRGINIA BAR TO SUSPEND WASHINGTON D.C. ATTORNEYS LANCE G. JOHNSON, DAVID ABRAMS AND ALFRED GOODMAN  www.roylance.com  FROM THE PRACTICE OF LAW PENDING A FULL HEARING ON THE ILLINOIS COOK COUNTY CRIMINAL CONTEMPT CHARGE PENDING AGAINST THEM IN ILLINOIS. Lance G. Johnson, David Abrams and Alfred Goodman have been according to charges filed against them refusing to accept service of process of the Chicago Illiinois "Criminal" contempt summons. The Illinois Law firm of Gordon and Rees also has refused to accept service of process of the criminal contempt summons on behalf of them selves and on behalf of their Washington D.C. Clients Roylance, Abrams, Berdo and Goodman LLC. One lawyer from the law firm of Gordon and Rees did accept service on behalf of himself and has moved to dismiss the Criminal Contempt pleading, believing that it will be dismissed and the other members of Gordon and Rees and their clients Roylance, Abrams, Berdon and Goodman, Lance G. Johnson, David and Alfred Goodman can continue to refuse to accept service of summons. The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals and the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals have both been notified of Lance G. Johnson and his crowds dodging service. Motions to suspend Johnson , Abrams and Goodman from practice before are pending before these appeals courts. There is also a motion to suspend Gordon and Rees from the practice of law which has been filed before the Illinois Appellate Court First Division and the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission (ARDC) www.iardc.org 
4 Comments

HAPPY THANKS GIVING 2009

11/26/2009

3 Comments

 
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-HAPPY THANKS GIVING TO ALL. 2009 Thanks Giving is the "best"thanks giving of all in view of the fact that we all enjoyed it with ourselves, family and friends. Just a year ago some of the people that we loved and cared about and enjoyed thanksgiving with us were NOT here this year. Those friends and relatives were sorely missed. We were grateful to be with those family and friends that were here and hope and pray that everyone we love with be with us for Thanksgiving 2010.

3 Comments

AEAE - PSYCHIC LITIGATOR-HOW TO WIN YOUR CASE EVERY TIME

11/25/2009

5 Comments

 
 CHICAGO-(AEAE)-IN A NEW STUDY SOON TO BE RELEASED BY THE AMERICANS FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF ATTORNEY ETHICS (AEAE), A ATTORNEY ETHICS WATCH DOG GROUP SINCE 1974, "WILL CHANGE THE LIFE OF A LITIGATOR, IT WILL NEVER BE THE SAME". Adapting the techniques employed by the "Stargate" U.S. Government top secret, psychic espionage progrom to the field of "litigation",  it will assist attorneys to "transcend time and space, to view opponents, opposing counsel, witnesses, evidence, documents and things remotely in time and space...and to gather evidence information on the same." The current movie "Men Who Stair at Goats" . The new litigation techniques which have been developed      from top secret U.S. Military psychic espionage programs described in the following books , Reading the enemy's mind by Paul H. Smith, the Psychic Warrior by David Morehouse and the Seventh Sense, the secrets of remote viewing as told by a Psychic spy for the U.S. Military by Lyn Buchanan. People who have developed the "power" to bend spoons with their "mind" are now able to teach lawyers "new"  dangerous lawful litigation techniques heither for unknown.....
5 Comments

REQUEST TO SUSPEND THE LAW FIRM OF GORDON AND REES FROM THE PRACTICE OF LAW FILE WITH THE ARDC

11/22/2009

8 Comments

 
CHICAGO-(AEAE)  THE AMERICANS FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF ATTORNEY ETHICS  (AEAE)  an
 ATTORNEY WATCH DOG GROUP member has filed a request before the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission (ARDC) www.iardc.org . In a appeal brief filed before the Illinois Appellate Court last week in the Stoller v. Johnson 100 million dollar defamation appeal a clear misstatement of material fact and/or law has  been identified, a violation of Illinois Supreme Court Rule 3.3(a) has been identified by Stoller consequently he has now moved to have Gordon and Rees disqualified from the practice of law pending the resolution of the ARDC complaint. It is not uncommon for the ARDC to suspend lawyers from the practice of law pending resolution of an ARDC complaint. 
Stoller has asserted that Gordon and Rees made three big mistakes. The first was to take the cas. The second according to allegations in  a criminal contempt proceeding involving Gordon and Rees attorneys was to engage in subornation of perjury and the third mistake was to file a response appeal brief containing a misstatement  of material fact or law.
8 Comments

SELF INCRIMINATION IN CIVIL CASES?

11/21/2009

13 Comments

 
CHICAGO-(AEAE) THE ISSUE TODAY IS WHETHER A PERSON WHO TAKES THE FIFTH AMENDMENT IN A ALLEGED CIVIL CASE CAN HAVE THE JUDGE HOLD LAWFULLY HOLD IT AGAINST THE PERSON IN A RULING? We know the states my no constitutionaly compel an individual to testify himself Twining v. New Jersey 1908. In  Ullman v United States (1956) The High Court  stated protection against compulsory self incrimination applies only to prosecution for crimes. But in a civil case where the Court warns an individual that case has "criminal" consequences can that individual take the 5th when there is a related grand jury invistigation proceeding against the same individual and not have the parties position become prejudiced by exercising a persons first amendment rights of self incrimination. It is the position of AEAE that it is fundamentally unfair to allow a defendant's silence be used against him in a civil case when that defendant is facing a criminal grand jury investigation in which he is the target. What is your opinion? Please comment. Stoller can always be reached at ldms4@hotmail.com  Stoller is a constitutional scholar, appellate and trademark expert. Stoller has a new book out called Juice for Peanuts a true story of a false arrest and false imprisionment  in which a party can learn to turn a "no win" situation in your favor.
13 Comments

ATT GEN. ERIC HOLDER SAYS FAILURE TO CONVICT TERROR SUSPECTS \\\"NOT AN OPTION\\\"

11/20/2009

1 Comment

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-PRESIDENT OBAMA PREDICTED THAT PROFESSED SEPT 11 MASTERMIND KHALID SHEIKH MOHAMMED WILL BE CONVICTED AND EXECUTED. Attorney General holder proclaimed:"Failure is not an option." How then can Mr. Mohammed get a "fair" trial? The fact that the Government officials can attest in public before a trial is heard that a defendant will be convicted and executed is a terrifying proposition. In America everyone is presumed  innocent until proven guilty. In the case of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed       There  should be no exception. The president and the Attorney General Eric Holder should not attempt to poison the jury pool  by making such incriminating statements. The message they are sending to all U.S. Citizens is that all trials in American are Political. If your on the wrong side of the political equation, "We will give you a trial than we will hang you!" Today its Ok to kill Mr. Mohammed, tomorrow the message that is now being sent tell us that it will be Ok to kill anyone who they want to kill.


This is your new blog post. Click here and start typing, or drag in elements from the top bar.
1 Comment

ILLINOIS ATTORNEY ROBERT TEPPER INDIRECT CRIMINAL CONTEMPT PROCEEDING SET

11/19/2009

7 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-INDIRECT CRIMINAL CONTEMPT CHARGES AGAINST ILLINOIS ATTORNEY ROBERT TEPPER SET FOR HEARING NEXT WEEK. Cook County Judge Talmaire scheduled a hearing in order to perfect the Indirect Criminal Contempt Charges against Illinois Attorney Robert Tepper.

7 Comments

MOTION FILED BEFORE THE ILLINOIS APPELLATE COURT TO DISQUALIFY GORDON AND REES

11/18/2009

5 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-THE LAW FIRM OF GORDON AND REES who represent Lance G. Johnson, David Abrams and Alfred Goodman in a 100 million dollar defamation case have been charged with CRIMINAL CONTEMPT. They have refused to accept service of Summons. A motion to disqualify them has been filed before the Illinois Appellate Court along with copies of the Summons that Gordon and Rees have refused to accept service. Motions have been filed before the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals and the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals against Lance G. Johnson, David Abrams and Alfred Goodman for refusing to Accept Service of Summons. The Appellate Courts where Johnson and his crew practice and where Gordon and Rees attorney practice here in Illinois have been made aware of Gordon and Rees blatant abuse of the jurisdiction of the Cook County Court System according to the allegations contained in the motion. Every court, every appellate court where the law firm of Roylance, Abrams, Berdo and Goodman and Gordon and Rees practice will be made aware of the Cook County pending "criminal" contempt citation which they refuse to accept service of summons....

5 Comments
<<Previous

    EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
    Internships available
    ​312-545-4554


     Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
    FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)
    ​
    YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
    Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
     The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
     Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that  supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
     The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a
    LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERT, valuations, expert
    witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert. 
    The author(s)  graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE  and attended the University of Iowa a  for a PHD. The Author(s)  are the nation's most renowned
    Legal Ethics experts  and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
    enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation  Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
    numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions.  AEAE, P.O.  Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email ldms4@hotmail.com
    312-545-4554
    Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE  Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
     "Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
    Litigation is the Air We Breathe
    Litigation is War,

    Welcome to the Front!"


     To Prove Defamation Case?
    What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm. 
    The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation 

    The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

    “[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30 
    AEAE argues it reports on the  law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

    ​AEAE has the legal  right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators,  business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE  18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

    VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

    DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.



    Archives

    July 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    October 2021
    July 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    April 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    June 2019
    April 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    January 2015
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010
    December 2009
    November 2009
    October 2009
    September 2009

    Categories
    Disclaimer This website is not a solicitation for business. All content on the AEAE website is intended to provide general information about AEAE and an opportunity for interested  persons to contact AEAE. The content of this website is not offered as legal advice or legal opinion and it should not be relied upon for any specific situation.  AEAE is not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney client relationship is intended.  This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a complete description of AEAE services. While AEAE endeavors to keep the information updated and correct, AEAE makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the information contained in this website. 

    All
    Jewelry Frauds
    Scams
    Yellow Diamonds

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.