REQUEST MADE BEFORE THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT TO BAR LANCE G. JOHNSON, DAVID ABRAMS AND ALFRED GOODMAN FROM PRACTICING BEFORE THE HIGH COURT

11/28/2009

CHICAGO-(AEAE)-THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT PROVIDES FOR PARTIES TO FILE COMPLAINTS AGAINST LAWYERS WHO ARE MEMBERS OF THE HIGH COURT BAR. A request was made before the United States Supreme to bar Lance G. Johnson, David Abrams, Alfred Goodman and attorneys from Gordon and Rees from practicing before the high court pending resolution of a "criminal" contempt petition pending against them in Chicago, Illinois. Lance G. Johnson, David Abrams and Alfred Goodman have been refused to accept service of summons of the criminal contempt citations. Their attorneys from Gordon and Rees has also refused to accept service of summons on behalf of the firm and Lance G. Johnson and his crowd www.roylance.com
Lance G. Johnson could not be reached for comment.
LEGAL DISCLAIMER: Lance G. Johnson, David Abrams, Alfred Goodman, the attorneys from Gordon and Rees are considered innoncient of all charges until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt at trial.

7 Comments

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY

Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)

YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a
LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERT, valuations, expert
witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert.
The author(s) graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE and attended the University of Iowa a for a PHD. The Author(s) are the nation's most renowned
Legal Ethics experts and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions. AEAE, P.O. Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email ldms4@hotmail.com
312-545-4554
Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
"Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
Litigation is the Air We Breathe
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front!"

To Prove Defamation Case?
What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm.
The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation

The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

Gandalf

11/27/2009 01:42:21 pm

Things are now in motion that cannot be undone

Arathorn

11/27/2009 01:45:37 pm

The great battle of our time has begun

Anon

11/27/2009 04:13:01 pm

Dream on, Stoller. This is the same Supreme Court that found you were a vexatious litigant and put an end to your filings there. I somehow doubt it'll put any stock in your latest blatherings.

Mike Hunt

11/28/2009 05:44:28 am

On May 27, 2008, the United States Supreme Court denied Stoller's motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissed his petition for certiorari. The court noted that he had "repeatedly abused this Court's process," and directed its clerk not to accept any further filings from Stoller in noncriminal matters unless Stoller made a compete filing in accordance with Supreme Court Rule 33.1 (i.e., forty copies in typeset booklet form) and accompanied by the required filing fee.

Other sanctions: In addition to being fined and sanctioned, Stoller or his entities have been ordered to pay their opponents' attorneys' fees in at least seven reported cases.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leo_Stoller

fed watcher

11/28/2009 11:00:13 pm

In case no one noticed, Stoller is simply a liar, Besides who cares what he does or claims to do

Boagrius

11/29/2009 07:40:51 am

The gods.....their "glory" walks hand in hand with their doom....

11/30/2009 12:01:30 am

Leo,

The only doom is that which is hovering over you like a dark cloud.

Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics

REQUEST MADE BEFORE THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT TO BAR LANCE G. JOHNSON, DAVID ABRAMS AND ALFRED GOODMAN FROM PRACTICING BEFORE THE HIGH COURT

Leave a Reply.

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY

Archives