Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics

  • SUE THE BASTARDS
  • AEAE
  • AEJE
  • AEIPR
  • Rentamark
  • Archrive
  • PAGE 2
 

U.S SUPREME COURT WEAKEN THE MIRANDA RIGHTS, MAKING IT EASIER TO LOCK UP “DUMB” PEOPLE

2/28/2010

9 Comments

 
Picture
Fifth Amendment Right
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-THE U.S. SUPREME COURT HAVE FURTHER WEAKENED A PARTIES MIRANDA RIGHTS. The Court on Wednesday issued Maryland v. Shatzer (pdf), establishing new, more permissive rules for police who want to question a suspect for a second time after the suspect invokes Miranda's right to remain silent. The Maryland case came down a day after the justices decided Florida v. Powell (pdf), in which a 7-2 majority Court said that Florida's alternative wording of the Miranda warning is acceptable, even though it does not explicitly state that a suspect has a right to have a lawyer present during questioning. Since jails represent big “business” for the States and the Communities in which these prisons are located, it behooves the court to make it easier to fill these prisons with “dumb” and “dumber” criminals who can “self incriminate” themselves, according to one Prison watching group. One self defense lawyer said, “you never see any deaf people in prison, because they know how to keep there mouths shut!”

SIDEBAR-Monday set to file a Rico Law suit against a 1000 man law firm, stay tuned.
These are real “tough” guys, who were unable to “keep” their mouth shut and have been charged with in a Petition for Indirect Criminal Contempt! Now the Racketeering suit follows.
9 Comments

STOLLER SUES ILLINOIS COOK COUNTY SHERIFF THOMAS DART FOR FALSE ARREST, FALSE IMPRISONMENT AND VIOLATIONS OF SECTION 1983 CIVIL RIGHTS

2/27/2010

4 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-ON FEBRUARY 25, 2009 STOLLER APPEARED BEFORE ILLINOIS CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE RENEE GOLDFARB. An unnamed attorney and her client made misrepresentations of material fact, committed perjury and subornation of perjury before Judge Goldfarb causing Judge Goldfarb to order Leo Stoller taken into custody for a “BCX” examination in the Cook County Hospital of the Cook County Jail. Sheriff Dart http://www.cookcountysheriff.org/ through his employees are charged with manufacturing a false charge of “contempt” which was used by the Cook County Sheriff to incarcerate Stoller. Who had not been charged with any “contempt” on Feb. 25, 2009. Stoller spend 9 days unlawfully in the Cook County Jail from Feb. 25,2009 until March 6, 2009. Dr. Stine of the Cook County Jail Psychologists stated that the “Cook County Jail Hospital Cermack” does not perform BCX Examinations as well known to the Cook County Sheriff Thomas Dart.. On or about March 5, 2009Judge Goldfarb vacated her commitment order and Stoller was released from the custody of the Cook County Department of Corrections on March 6, 2009 almost one year. Stoller will be amending his complaint to add the additional party defendants, they all know who they are and they have just been waiting for the process service for the last year to show up with their summons.

SIDE BAR The Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) recomends Frederick Collins for election to the Cook Sheriff in the up coming election.
http://cookrepublicanparty.com/candidates.aspx
Picture
4 Comments

JUDGE CAROL K. BELLOWS COMMIT CLEAR ERROR AND REVERSABLE ERROR-STOLLER APPEALS TODAY

2/26/2010

13 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-IN A HEARING TODAY BEFORE ILLINOIS DOMESTIC JUDGE CAROL K. BELLOWS ON STOLLER MOTION TO VACATE HER JULY 15, 2009 decision which was achieved by having undue influence exerted on Stoller who had been in custody for 37 days and was forced to sign three settlement agreements in order to win his freedom from the Illinois Cook County Jail. Stoller immediately moved to set aside Judge Bellows July 15, 2009 by filing via mail a motion to vacate on August 12, 2009. Stoller also moved to substitute Judge Bellows for cause. In the hearing today, Judge Bellows refused to sent the case out for hearing on substitution, which is required and Judge Bellows denied Stoller's motion to vacate on the grounds that it was not docketed by the Illinois Cook County Clerk of the Court until August 22, 2009. Today Stoller argued according to Illinois Supreme Court Rules he was entitled to receive the date of his mailing August 12, 2009 which would have made his motion for reconsideration timely. In addition, in view of the fact that Judge Bellows order of July 15, 2009 was a coerced settlement, such a court order is void at any time. Stoller filed his appeal and looks forward to reverse on the above several grounds.
13 Comments

BANK OF AMERICA KEN LEWIS AND CFO JOE PRICE CHARGED WITH FRAUD

2/25/2010

3 Comments

 
Picture
Joe Price
Picture
New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo said Thursday it was bringing civil charges against senior Bank of America executives, including former company CEO Ken Lewis, for their role in the company's controversial purchase of Merrill Lynch. Cuomo's office, which has been aggressively pursuing an investigation into the merger and subsequent bonuses paid to former Merrill employees, said it was charging Lewis and Bank of America's former chief financial officer Joe Price with fraud.
You will be pleased to read Ex-BofA chief Lewis charged with fraud. In a related story, Ken Lewis and Joe Price are charged with fraud, conspiracy and civil racketeering in a civil lawsuit filed in Chicago, Illinois. Click on the attached link to continue with this story. http://www.rentamark.net/3/post/2010/02/bank-of-america-chairman-walter-e-massey-ceo-brian-moynhan-and-joe-l-price-charged-in-indirect-criminal-contempt-petition-in-chicago-illinois-court.html

Bank of America Chicago lawyer from Bryan Cave law firm Steven R. Smith is a defendant in a Indirect Criminal contempt petition charging him with “perjury” please click on the attached link to read further  http://www.rentamark.net/3/post/2010/02/bryan-cave-attorney-steven-r-smith-acknowledges-indirect-criminal-contempt-petition-with-email.html
http://www.rentamark.net/3/post/2010/02/bryan-cave-lp-partner-steven-r-smith-charged-with-indirect-criminal-contempt-and-perjury-smith-could-drag-down-the-president-of-bank-of-america-as-well.html
Picture
3 Comments

Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company President Gerald L. Hassell and CEO Robert P. Kelly to be charged in a Civil Racketeering Lawsuit along with Bank of America Executives in Chicago

2/24/2010

11 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-A CIVIL LAWSUIT TO BE FILED AGAINST THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELON TRUST COMPANY, is charging the company with exploiting foreclosure victims, engaging in conspiracy, fraud, deceptive trade practices in violation of Illinois. The Officers of Bank of New York are being name personally, Chairman Robert P. Kelly and its President Gerald L. Hassell  
Bank of New York Mellon would not return phone calls.
LEGAL DISCLAIMER: Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, its president Gerald L. Hassell and Chairman Robert P. Kelly are considered innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. This story continues please click on the attached link go view the alleged co-conspirators http://www.rentamark.net/3/post/2010/02/bank-of-america-chairman-walter-e-massey-ceo-brian-moynhan-and-joe-l-price-charged-in-indirect-criminal-contempt-petition-in-chicago-illinois-court.html
Picture
11 Comments

LANCE G. JOHNSON ESQ. MAKES DEMAND ORDER TO STOLLER REQUIRING A WRITTEN APOLOGY AND PAYMENT OF ALL OF HIS LEGAL EXPENSES

2/23/2010

3 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-TODAY ATTORNEY LANCE G. JOHNSON, DAVID ABRAMS AND ALFRED GOODMAN MADE A DEMAND OFFER TO STOLLER IN ORDER TO RESOLVE THE TWO CONTROVERSIES as between them. A 100 million dollar defamation lawsuit that Stoller brought against them and their firm Roylance, Abrams, Berdo and Goodman. The Indirect Criminal Contempt Petition which Stoller had filed against them charging them with perjury. On Feb. 2, 2010 Illinois Circuit Court Judge Kathy Flanagan dismissed Stoller 100 million dollar defamation case. On January 29, 2010 Illinois Associate Judge Gillespie granted the Gordon and Rees Motion to Strike Stoller Indirect Criminal Contempt Petition. In view of these turn of events the Lance G.Johnson crowd saw fit today to make a demand from Stoller which included a letter of Apology, which would demonstrate Stoller “true” regret and dislike for Stoller's actions in bringing these two actions against the Johnson crowd and to pay their attorneys fees of Gordon and Rees.This settlement demand was communicated to Stoller this morning in the Illinois Cook County Court Room of Judge Kathy Flanagan.

Judge Flanagan this morning re-instated Stoller's 100 Million dollar defamation case against Lance G. Johnson, David Abrams, Alfred Goodman and their well known Intellectual Property Washington D.C. Law firm of Roylance, Abrams, Berdo and Goodman www.roylance.com Stoller has filed 7 appeals before the Illinois Appellate Court contesting Judge Gillespie's Order Striking Stoller Indirect Criminal Contempt petitions.

Stoller told Johnson's lawyer from Gordon and Rees this morning to put in writing his settlement demand. Stoller also expressed his disappointment that the law firm of Gordon and Rees who threatened to sue Stoller for defamation and misrepresenting the “status” of a process server, were just idle threats and their chest “thumping”. Stoller had already opened two files on these matters and has “nothing” to put in them.

Lastly Stoller was also informed that the law firm of Bryan Cave LLP was “gunning” for Stoller. Stoller said, “I can't imagine what for?”


 
3 Comments

IRS DEPRIVES MAN OF DUE PROCESS, FLYS HIS PLANE INTO IRS BUILDING

2/22/2010

13 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-Joseph A Stack, a software engineer, flew his small single-engine Piper Cherokee aircraft into the Echelon building in north Austin, which houses the offices of the Internal Revenue Service — the US tax collection service — shortly before 10am Thursday. In a lengthy manifesto posted on a website he administered, he recounted his numerous struggles with the IRS and concludes: “I am finally ready to stop this insanity. Well, Mr Big Brother IRS man, let’s try something different; take my pound of flesh and sleep well.” One writer in response wrote, “Sounds like to me that Joe Stack finally got fed up with all of the thefts and intrusions done to him and many other people by the IRS and he just took matters into his own hands. I think Joe should be remember as a hero not as a criminal. I believe that the real criminals here are the IRS themselves.” “Any government who deprives its citizens of “due process” can expect its citizens to act similarly,” wrote one person. In a lengthy manifesto posted on a website Joseph A. Stack administered, he recounted his numerous struggles with the IRS and concludes: “I am finally ready to stop this insanity. Well, Mr Big Brother IRS man, let’s try something different; take my pound of flesh and sleep well.” They are calling Mr. Stack “an IRS martyr.” The only question left is “Whether Mr. Stack is with 78 virgins tonight?”
13 Comments

BRYAN CAVE ATTORNEY STEVEN R. SMITH ACKNOWLEDGES INDIRECT CRIMINAL CONTEMPT PETITION WITH EMAIL

2/22/2010

5 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-IN AN INDIRECT CRIMINAL PETITION FILED IN CHICAGO, BRYAN CAVE LP PARTNER STEVEN R. SMITH WAS CHARGED WITH FALSE SWEARING.
The nature of the charge against STEVEN R. SMITH is perjury, false swearing by a witness, 720 ILCS 5/32-2(a), a Class 3 felony; see a People v. Hagopian, 343 Ill. App. 640, 99 N.E.2d 726 (1st Dist. 1951), 720 ILCS 5/11-20.1, a Class 3 felony. See true and correct copy of a false Affidavit of Steven R. Smith executed on January 22, 2010, http://www.filefront.com/15555423/scan0001.pdf  Mr. Smith has acknowledged Stoller's Indirect Criminal Contempt Petition in an email sent yesterday:
"Mr. Stoller,   If you intend to present to the court your motion for extension or your motion for leave to file petition for adjudication of indirect criminal contempt, please give us the proper notice required under the court rules.  
Steven Smith
Steven R. Smith
Partner
Bryan Cave LLP
LEGAL DISCLAIMER: Illinois Attorney Steven R. Smith is considered innocent of all charges until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

This Story continues please click on the attached link http://www.rentamark.net/3/post/2010/02/bryan-cave-lp-partner-steven-r-smith-charged-with-indirect-criminal-contempt-and-perjury-smith-could-drag-down-the-president-of-bank-of-america-as-well.html
5 Comments

ILLINOIS JUDGE KATHY FLANAGAN TO HEAR MOTION TO RE-INSTATE LANCE G. JOHNSON 100 MILLION DOLLAR DEFAMATION CASE

2/22/2010

8 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-ON FEBRUARY 2, 2010 Illinois Judge Kathy Flanagan dismissed the Lance G. Johnson, David Abrams and Alfred Goodman 100 million dollar defamation case at a "status" hearing in which Stoller was unable to attend, due to a recent death of a friend. Stoller has moved to re-instate the case. The Motion is set today to be heard before Judge Kathy Flanagan. Stoller advised Haynes Ryan of Gordon and Rees of the motion which is up today before Judge Flanagan. See you in court boys.
8 Comments

ILLINOIS SUPREME COURT JUSTICE STEVENS GRANTS STOLLER'S MOTION

2/21/2010

3 Comments

 
Picture


CHICAGO-(AEAE)-STOLLER FILED A MOTION BEFORE THE U.S. SUPREME COURT http://origin.www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/09a757.htm IN ORDER TO FILE A PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI OF THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS DECISIONS DATED Dec. 4, 2009 to May 3, 2010. Stoller is appealing the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals Decisions date Dec. 4, 2009, Dec 17, 2009, Jan 7, 2010 and Jan 19, 2010. The four decisions effect about 30 Seventh Circuit Appeals. Stoller will argue that the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals issued an orders that clearly violate the Petitioner's due process rights under the First, Fifth, Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution .
3 Comments
<<Previous

    EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY


     Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
    FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)
    ​
    YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
    Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
     The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
     Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that  supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
     The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a
    LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERT, valuations, expert
    witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert. 
    The author(s)  graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE  and attended the University of Iowa a  for a PHD. The Author(s)  are the nation's most renowned
    Legal Ethics experts  and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
    enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation  Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
    numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions.  AEAE, P.O.  Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email ldms4@hotmail.com
    312-545-4554
    Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE  Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
     "Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
    Litigation is the Air We Breathe
    Litigation is War,
    Welcome to the Front!"

     To Prove Defamation Case?
    What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm. 
    The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation 

    The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

    “[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30 
    AEAE argues it reports on the  law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

    ​AEAE has the legal  right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators,  business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE  18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

    VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

    Archives

    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    June 2019
    April 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    January 2015
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010
    December 2009
    November 2009
    October 2009
    September 2009

    Categories
    Disclaimer This website is not a solicitation for business. All content on the AEAE website is intended to provide general information about AEAE and an opportunity for interested  persons to contact AEAE. The content of this website is not offered as legal advice or legal opinion and it should not be relied upon for any specific situation.  AEAE is not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney client relationship is intended.  This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a complete description of AEAE services. While AEAE endeavors to keep the information updated and correct, AEAE makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the information contained in this website. 

    All
    Jewelry Frauds
    Scams
    Yellow Diamonds

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.