THE SHVARTZER CREATED HIS OWN WORST NIGHT MARE, McCRYSTAL IS RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT IN 2012

6/27/2010

CHICAGO-(AEAE)-In an interview with a University of Chicago Law Professor who claimed to have inside information regarding General McCrystal's future after Obama fired him stated,” The Shvartzer though he had problems with a little article in the Rolling Stone Magazine by General McCrystal so he fired General McCrystal in the most irresponsible decision that any president has ever made. Now General McCrystal is free to run for President in the 2012 Election. American Generals have made great presidents. I will vote for General McCrystal for president!”

9 Comments

Spence

6/26/2010 03:46:23 pm

Litigation is just a lot of fun,
win or lose
there is nothing I would rather do
than sue
YOU,
You son of bitch!

Marine General

6/26/2010 03:51:06 pm

"Those Talaban Rebels are tough,
but there a hella lot of fun
to shoot!"

My brother back in the states is
a lawyer! He love's to sue those
Son of a Bitches!

hahahahahahahahaha

6/26/2010 07:52:29 pm

blahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

Later in the interview, the law professor was asked what Leo's chances at getting into law school were considering his still national record low of 29 on the Law School Admissions Test. The professor responded that he recently used a blank copy of the Law School Admissions Test to line his parakeet's cage, and that the bird had scored a 119 simply by crapping on it from its perch.

blahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

A question

6/26/2010 11:46:39 pm

whats a Shvartzer?

PS for all of you, the first two comments are Leo trying to be clever

Leo the Zero

6/27/2010 01:33:16 am

Leo is Jewish, so every once in a while he feels the need to mangle both Hebrew and the English language with equal degrees of illiteracy. For all he knows, a "shvartzer" could be a Jewish sourdough. Fat Boy is an equal opportunity imbecile.

6/27/2010 10:11:58 pm

shvartzer which should be spelled schwartzer means black. Schwartz means black in in German. When you say schwartzer you are referring to a black person in a derogatory sense. As for leo being Jewish, I understand Jewish law stipulates that you must be born to a Jewish mother in order to be Jewish. Paternity does not matter. From what I've heard his mother is Italian Catholic and he went to Catholic school as a child. So,not born of a Jewish mother, not Jewish.

Leo the Zero

6/28/2010 02:19:40 pm

If Leo isn't Jewish, mazeltoff to the Tribe. It's about time they caught a break.

Then again, it could be the mohel realized Leo was born without a shvantz, hence no Brit Milah.

A Real Mensch

6/28/2010 04:10:11 pm

I guess the name STOLLER must really be an Italian name then? And those hundreds of STOLLER'S who are doctors, lawyers and accountants must all be Italian. And of course there is Jerry Leiber and Mike Stoller who have written some of the most spirited and enduring rock and roll songs: “Hound Dog” Love Potion Number 9, Save the last Dance for me etc. Mike Stoller wasn't Jewish either, with that Italian last name of Stoller.
Leo Stoller is not a jew. His name should be removed from the "list" of famous Jewish People Born In American that appears at the bottom of his Wikipedia Entry.
Some one should inform Jewish List gathers of this outragious lie that a non-jew, some how got listed as a "famous" jew, born in America, with this Italian name, of STOLLER!

6/29/2010 12:02:38 am

Traditional Judasm maintains that a person is a Jew if his mother is a Jew, regardlass of who the father is. There are several passages in the Torah where it is understood that the child of a non Jewish woman and a Jewish man is not a Jew. Leo's mother is Italian. Stoller is his father's name. His name can be Rabinowitz. It does not make him a Jew is his mother is not.

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
Internships not available now

Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)

YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a attorney rating Service. The comments made by AEAE are not actionable because they are statements of opinion Moriarty v. Greene 732 N.E.2d 730, 740 Ill.App), citing Owen v. Can 497 N.E.2d 1145, 1148 (Ill.1986) see Law offices of David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al No 18-3216 Seventh Circuit No 18-3216 decided 01-28-2022.
Ratings are non-actionable opinion statements David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al citing Syngenta Seeds Inc v. Bung North America,Inc 773 F.3d 58 (8th Cir 2014) Illinois Law on expressions of Opinion , an unexplained one star review simply could not be actionable as defamation David Freydin case citing Cf. Kimzey v. Yelp!Inc. 836 F. 3d 1263, 1269-70 (9th Cir 2016)
AEAE LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERTS, valuations, expert
witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert.
The author(s) graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE and attended the University of Iowa a for a PHD. The Author(s) are the nation's most renowned
Legal Ethics experts and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions. AEAE, P.O. Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email [email protected]
312-545-4554
Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
"Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
Litigation is the Air We Breathe
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front!"

To Prove Defamation Case?
What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm.
The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation

The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.

Categories
Disclaimer This website is not a solicitation for business. All content on the AEAE website is intended to provide general information about AEAE and an opportunity for interested persons to contact AEAE. The content of this website is not offered as legal advice or legal opinion and it should not be relied upon for any specific situation. AEAE is not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney client relationship is intended. This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a complete description of AEAE services. While AEAE endeavors to keep the information updated and correct, AEAE makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the information contained in this website.

RSS Feed

Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics