GOOGLE INC 'S ATTORNEY MICHAEL T. ZELLER MAKES DESPERATE ATTEMPT TO BLOCK STOLLER'S APPEAL OF GOOGLE DECISION

10/25/2009

CHICAGO-(AEAE)-GOOGLE INC'S ATTORNEY MICHAEL T. ZELLER HAS MADE A DESPERATE ATTEMPT TO BLOCK STOLLER'S APPEAL OF JUDGE VIRGINIA KENDELL'S DECISION IN THE GOOGLE INC., CASE TO THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS. Two years ago Illinois Northern District Judge Virginia Kendell who was just appointed to the bench, ruled against Stoller. Stoller appealed and reversed her. Now Judge Kendell has ruled against Stoller again. Stoller has appealed. Google's attorney Michael T. Zeller who is famous for his ability to concoct outragious defenses when Zeller has a client who can pay any amount demanded to create and obfuscate . Stoller made a great record before Judge Kendell who ruled that "Stoller made no cognizable argument." Judge Kendell could not understand Stoller's argument the last time she ruled in favor of Google Inc. The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals did not buy the great Zeller's Appeal brief last time and Stoller is confident that he will reverse Judge Kendell again and Zeller's knows it. Consequently Zeller's last desperate attempt to block Stoller in forma pauperis Notice to the Court. This is what makes America jurisprudence so much fun, that a single individual with the knowledge of the law can be equal to an 80 billion dollar company and defeat that company under the law because we are all "equal".
SIDEBAR- So what did Stoller do Friday and Saturday--Stoller spent the time preparing his motions in appeals courts and in his divorce proceeding and researching the law on certain felonies. Stoller spend 1/2 this summer in the Cook County Jail for the Publication of articles on his former blog. Stoller is still facing indirect criminal charges and a possible sentence of 6 months in the Cook County Jail for publishing Speech on his blog. Stoller learned after 40 years in the litigation business that a person can go to jail for "nothing". Stoller spent the week-end preparing to file felony charges against the people who are responsible for Stoller's false arrest and false Imprisionment. Stay tuned within the next few weeks Stoller expects charge his opponents with several felonies carring 3-5 years in prision. Litigation is War, Weclome to the Front!

STOLLER IS GOING TO PUT THE PEOPLE WHO PUT HIM IN JAIL FOR 37 days for 3-5 years on two felony charges, waite and see...

20 Comments

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
Internships not available now

Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)

YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a
LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERT, valuations, expert
witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert.
The author(s) graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE and attended the University of Iowa a for a PHD. The Author(s) are the nation's most renowned
Legal Ethics experts and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions. AEAE, P.O. Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email ldms4@hotmail.com
312-545-4554
Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
"Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
Litigation is the Air We Breathe
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front!"

To Prove Defamation Case?
What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm.
The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation

The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.

Rita

10/24/2009 05:45:50 pm

I have read about Michael T. Zeller he is a trademark attorney

Anon

10/25/2009 04:50:30 am

For those of you new to Stoller's rantings or unable to untangle his convoluted English, here's the translation of Stoller's above post:

1. Stoller considers an appeal where the Seventh Circuit slammed him with a $10,000 sanction and barred from filing any papers in any court within the Seventh Circuit for over a year to be a "win."

2. When Stoller talks about having to proceed in forma pauperis, he is saying that he is so broke that he can't afford to pay even modest court filing fees. Yet, here is Stoller crowing about that fact as though it too were a good thing for him. Right now, the Seventh Circuit is also having Stoller investigated to determine if he made false financial statements under oath.

3. Stoller's long history of dishonest conduct already has led him into bankruptcy and resulted in jail time, court orders declaring him to be a vexatious litigant, court awards of more than a million dollars against him and a reputation as a joke. So his often repeated predictions of victory in the future can only be regarded as delusional. The more likely outcome is yet more sanctions against him, more court orders slamming him as the dishonest con man that he is and perhaps even more jail time for Stoller.

Leo The Toadstool

10/25/2009 10:33:30 am

Stoller, you haven't answered the earlier question about whether you wear a dress when you pose as Rita. Don't be shy. We all know you're a cross-dresser anyway.

Leo The Lion

10/25/2009 10:36:21 am

Leo The Toadstool, do you think Stoller started the cross-dressing before or after his prision stint?

10/25/2009 11:34:22 am

The only thing in life I think would be worst than death, would be spending a night with the "Toadstool!"

Jack

10/25/2009 11:38:12 am

Anon what do you have to say all those thinks, hasn't your mother thought you that "if you don't have anything nice to say about a person, you don't say anything at all!" What do want the world wide readers of Stoller's blog to get the wrong impression?

Earnie

10/25/2009 11:49:50 am

I have heard that this country's most famous lawyers, governmental officials, judges, come to Stoller's site each day why would you want to say such nasty things about Stoller Anon? Don't you know that must hurt Stoller's feelings I know that you would have hurt mine...remember everyone "judge not, less ye be judged..."

Sandra

10/25/2009 11:59:42 am

Chip Douglass what do you think, we need your input here, who's side are you on? Is Stoller such a "bad" litigator as Anon would have us all believe? I understand there was a time when you were buddies...what say you now Chip?
There is clear evidence that there is something in the California water that Anon drinks...

10/25/2009 02:01:16 pm

Got to love how dim-witted Stoller is. One can tell his comments on this blog where he poses as others by the fact they are colored blue. Yet Stoller is either oblivious to this or too stupid to change it. Oh, yeah, they also are given away by their unique brand of Stoller incoherence and lack of familiarity with even elementary school level spelling and grammar. So, Stoller, don't hurt yourself trying to mask your comments by figuring out how to avoid coloring them blue. Your inanity and delusional qualities will always shine right through anyway.

10/25/2009 02:34:15 pm

Rita/Leo, it is certainly laughable in itself that you don't recognize Leo The Toadstool is a name used to mock you as the object of ridicule that you are.

Leo the Lion

10/25/2009 03:41:09 pm

So Stoller posts four comments but doesn't deny the cross-dressing? Guess not even Stoller can bring himself to lie about that part of himself.

Ralph Retunza

10/26/2009 02:04:00 am

"Stoller learned after 40 years in the litigation business that a person can go to jail for "nothing"." Leo, that's what your 40 years of litigation amounts to: exactly nothing.

10/26/2009 08:57:04 am

If you want the rainbow
you gotta put up with the rain,
If we had no winter, the spring would not be so beautiful,
If we did not taste adversity
prosperity would not be so delectable

10/26/2009 09:32:11 am

It is obvious that Anon is not from Chicago but California...If Anon new about the west side of Chicago, people speak, dis (these) guys, dose (those) broads, dem (them) guys, Anon would under stand where Stoller came from, the west side of Chicago, the home of Tony Acardio, Joe Gagleano, Willie Mesine, Paul "the waiter" Rico, "if dose guys new, California Anon, dey would have to lov da guy, because he knows how to speak such good english!"

10/26/2009 02:37:54 pm

Stoller, you don't fool anyone when you pose as a man in making your fake comments. Go back to posing as Rita. That's much more plausible after your prison time. Plus that will get you ready for your next stretch in jail.

10/26/2009 03:23:32 pm

"Toad" you should also lay off the California "water"...

10/27/2009 02:57:52 am

Stoller from the West side? What a joke. He's a rube who tries to pretend he can play in the big city. And Stoller's posing as Jack only proves the point. All you are doing is mimicking parodies about Chicago you've seen on TV and aren't even funny doing it. West side my ass.

10/29/2009 03:24:33 pm

You have to read Stoller's new 375 page book that just came out titled JUICE FOR PEANUTS, it was his prison diary and life memoir.
When he was young, he lived above his Dad's jewelry store located at 3801 West Chicago Ave, Chicago, Illinois. In the 50's his neighborhood happened to be,according to his book, a popular hang out for the Chicago mob, for which he was not very proud of. Those guys, in Stoller's opinion were the scum of the earth and Stoller to this day, despies any TV or Films which glorify OC....

10/30/2009 07:56:47 am

Juice for Peanuts? Peanut-brain is more like it. And I guess the jewelry store is where Leo first discovered his real identity as Rita.

10/30/2009 05:21:31 pm

Now you have gone too far, Anon, you have crossed the line, you must have hurt his feelings...even someone like you knows better...didn't you mother ever teach you, say your sorry...

Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics