WILL GOOGLE INC'S ATTORNEY MICHAEL T. ZELLER BE CHARGED WITH PERJURY? WILL STOLLER GO TO JAIL FOR THE "CRIME" OF PUBLISHING SPEECH ON THE INTERNET

10/25/2009

CHICAGO-(AEAE)-COMMENTARY- FOR THOSE READERS WHO HAVE BEEN FOLLOWING THE CONTROVERSIES ON THIS BLOG, THEY HAVE ALL BEEN HEATING UP. The Google Inc., case has moved to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 09-3569. Stoller won the last appeal. Will he win again? The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals has docketed Stoller's Appeal of a recent Tradmark Trial and Appeal Court Decision. Case No. 2010-1031. On the other side are the usual opponents the famous Washington D.C. Trademark Attorney Lance G. Johnson. That appeal where Stoller will plead a "fraud" case against good olde Lance G. Johnson. Will Lance G. Johnson be convicted of "fraud" on the Patent and Trademark Office or will the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals send Stoller packing? On Nov. 13, Illinois Criminal Court Judge Dennis Porter will issue his decision on whether Stoller will be convicted of Indirect Criminal Contempt for the "crime" of publishing articles on his blog and be sent to the Cook County Jail for six months? Stoller's opponents in his divorce proceeding would like nothing more than to see Stoller spend another 6 months in the Illinois Cook County Jail for there aware that Stoller intends to file "felony" charges against them for perjury and another charge which cannot be disclosed here at this time. Litigation is a "blood" sport and all those with a Coliseum menality are welcome to watch the Lion Devourer the christians or the christians devourer the Lion..

9 Comments

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
Internships not available now

Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)

YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a attorney rating Service. The comments made by AEAE are not actionable because they are statements of opinion Moriarty v. Greene 732 N.E.2d 730, 740 Ill.App), citing Owen v. Can 497 N.E.2d 1145, 1148 (Ill.1986) see Law offices of David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al No 18-3216 Seventh Circuit No 18-3216 decided 01-28-2022.
Ratings are non-actionable opinion statements David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al citing Syngenta Seeds Inc v. Bung North America,Inc 773 F.3d 58 (8th Cir 2014) Illinois Law on expressions of Opinion , an unexplained one star review simply could not be actionable as defamation David Freydin case citing Cf. Kimzey v. Yelp!Inc. 836 F. 3d 1263, 1269-70 (9th Cir 2016)
AEAE LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERTS, valuations, expert
witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert.
The author(s) graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE and attended the University of Iowa a for a PHD. The Author(s) are the nation's most renowned
Legal Ethics experts and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions. AEAE, P.O. Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email [email protected]
312-545-4554
Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
"Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
Litigation is the Air We Breathe
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front!"

To Prove Defamation Case?
What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm.
The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation

The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.

Rita

10/23/2009 04:01:14 pm

I have visited the Coliseum in Rome...

Anon

10/24/2009 02:21:51 am

So, Stoller, when you post comments posing as "Rita," do you actually wear a dress? Or do you just feel pretty?

Rita's Girdle

10/24/2009 02:24:38 am

Leo, you "won" an appeal where you were sanctioned $10,000 by the Seventh Circuit and barred from filing papers with any court within the Seventh Circuit for over a year? That's a win for you?

Leo the Toadstool

10/24/2009 02:33:03 am

Based on your track record, Stoller, these aren't even close questions. The courts will sanction you and send you packing. After all, as the courts have said now many times, your lack of credibility is a matter of public record. Oh, yeah, and then there are those vexatious litigant injunctions against you, your time in jail, your bankruptcy, etc. I guess the only real question is how much deeper of a hole can you dig for yourself. Yet more time in jail? Yet more sanctions against you? Stay tuned for more of the Stoller train wreck.

Chip Douglas

10/24/2009 03:23:15 am

Do you hear that sound Leo? It's your world crashing down around you. You are so fond of blogging, tell everyone why your ex & kids are not interested in having any contact with you. The world is waiting. The real story, not the parental alienation BS.

Jack

10/24/2009 05:58:22 pm

He deluded himself for four years into believing that a reconciliation was possible. But you have become one of them and his going to put you in jail on charges that carry 3-5 years, that's coming count on it...he spent the entire week-end working on those charges and when you lease expect it, your going to be arrested at your First Ave and Roosevelt location because he does not want the young ones to have to witness that event unlike you did to him....It's 2:58AM Sunday morning and the Subpoena's were mailed a few minutes ago...you hear about this week...

10/24/2009 06:24:02 pm

By the way you should keep a couple hundred dollars on you because when you get locked up it nice to have some money go into your "commissary" account so that you can buy some shampoo and soap which I know is so important to you..I am putting a full court press on these knew charges against you, seven days a week...it's coming and the unfortunate fact is when you get out you will be barred from doing the type of work that you have been doing...you been warrned your on notice and he gave you over four years...but used that time to become more "evil" every day and continue to commit additional felonies....now he is going to make sure that you account for each felony...

Johnny Law

10/25/2009 03:27:17 am

It appears someone has multiple personalities. Going from third person to first person in the same paragraph. Comical.

If you think anyone will be charged based an allegations made by you, you are completely delusional. The courts and law enforcement view you as a fraud.

Earnie

10/25/2009 11:42:43 am

Since when does a bipolar person not have rights?

Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics