ILLINOIS JUDGE McGrath OK'S AMENDMENT TO LAW SUIT CHARGING BRYANT CAVE, STEVEN R. SMITH ESQ., MICHAEL WERICH WITH CIVIL RACKETEERING

7/30/2010

CHICAGO-(AEAE)-TODAY IN A COURT HEARING BEFORE ILLINOIS ASSOCIATE JUDGE McGRATH ISSUED AN ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO TO STOLLER TO AMEND ITS COMPLAINT TO CHARGE the Bank of American officers, Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company officers and their law firm of Bryant Cave LLP, senior partner Steven R. Smith and Michael Werich Esq with Civil Racketeering (RICO).

Illinois Judge Peter Flynn denied a motion to substitute Illinois Chancery judge Mary Mason. An appeal was immediately filed.

The hearing before Illinois Judge Gerald Bender was continued until September 21, 2010.

13 Comments

Leo SUCKS

7/29/2010 05:51:36 pm

These court dates all end the same. Leo files a ludicrous petition. The judge denies it. Leo says the judge is biased and out to get him, and moves for a substitution of judge. The next judge denies the motion and sets a date for the original petition. Leo files an appeal and demands another substitution of judge.

Has Leo Stoller ever won anything he has filed?

7/29/2010 06:18:58 pm

Yes

7/30/2010 05:50:36 am

If Stoller was a prize fighter, over the course of his career, he has won over 94% of his fights.

Everyone in the country however always dewells on the 6% of the cases he lost because they are the most bloody!

Winning in Litigation

7/30/2010 05:53:52 am

In litigation, winning is not always defined by a judge writing a favorable order. It's defined by one's oponent throwing in the towl!

Having more fun than is allowed!

7/30/2010 06:20:18 am

You just don’t get do you.

Look at it this way.

Every guy since time immemorial,
Either directly or indirectly get rid of every women in his life that says “no” to him.

Likewise if a judge acts like a recalcitrant woman, What do you do? “You get rid of her!”

(She thinks that she got rid of him, think again! Sucker! You just became another target)

What is so abnormal about that? Every man only wants women in their life that say “yes!”
Life is too short to knowingly and willfully subject oneself to neurotic ugly menopausal women who say “No!”

Leo the Blogger

7/30/2010 07:11:43 am

Leo in typical fashion is again posting comments to his own comment. Why?

Because no one cares

Dawn

7/30/2010 07:46:24 am

I still care

Feeling femmy Leo?

7/30/2010 08:40:05 am

Dawn is another girls name you like to use, have your panties on tonight Leo waiting for Tyrone with the 12 ' black snake to come over?

The Bull

7/30/2010 12:58:53 pm

guess what I did tonight and with who putz?

She called me Chris when I entered her. When I sodomized her I called her Beatrice.

She laughed

How's that make you feel, putz?

leo SUCKS IT

7/30/2010 02:28:48 pm

'In litigation, winning is not always defined by a judge writing a favorable order. It's defined by one's oponent throwing in the towl!"

You call being barred from the court of appeals and the Supreme court, as well as being jailed twice for contempt on suspision of insanity, you call that winning???????????1

click here link

7/30/2010 03:51:55 pm

wow is this getting lame.

I Love Leo

7/31/2010 03:16:47 am

Fraud big boy
You are nothing but a fraud
The end is near

Turning lemons into lemonade

7/31/2010 05:39:48 am

"You call being barred from the court of appeals and the Supreme court, as well as being jailed twice for contempt on suspision of insanity, you call that winning???????????"

"Barred from the court of appeals." Decision is now before the U.S. Supreme Court.

"...being jailed twice for contempt on suspision of insanity"

The parties responsible are now being sued for $100 million dollars and have "no" valid defense!

It is called turning lemons into lemonade

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
Internships not available now

Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)

YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a attorney rating Service. The comments made by AEAE are not actionable because they are statements of opinion Moriarty v. Greene 732 N.E.2d 730, 740 Ill.App), citing Owen v. Can 497 N.E.2d 1145, 1148 (Ill.1986) see Law offices of David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al No 18-3216 Seventh Circuit No 18-3216 decided 01-28-2022.
Ratings are non-actionable opinion statements David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al citing Syngenta Seeds Inc v. Bung North America,Inc 773 F.3d 58 (8th Cir 2014) Illinois Law on expressions of Opinion , an unexplained one star review simply could not be actionable as defamation David Freydin case citing Cf. Kimzey v. Yelp!Inc. 836 F. 3d 1263, 1269-70 (9th Cir 2016)
AEAE LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERTS, valuations, expert
witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert.
The author(s) graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE and attended the University of Iowa a for a PHD. The Author(s) are the nation's most renowned
Legal Ethics experts and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions. AEAE, P.O. Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email [email protected]
312-545-4554
Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
"Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
Litigation is the Air We Breathe
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front!"

To Prove Defamation Case?
What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm.
The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation

The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.

Categories
Disclaimer This website is not a solicitation for business. All content on the AEAE website is intended to provide general information about AEAE and an opportunity for interested persons to contact AEAE. The content of this website is not offered as legal advice or legal opinion and it should not be relied upon for any specific situation. AEAE is not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney client relationship is intended. This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a complete description of AEAE services. While AEAE endeavors to keep the information updated and correct, AEAE makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the information contained in this website.

RSS Feed

Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics