ENRON PRESIDENT JEFFERY SKILLING VONVICTION CONFIRMED

4/18/2011

CHICAGO-(AEAE)-JEFFERY SKILLING, THE FORMER PRESIDENT OF ENRON CORPORATION CONVICTION FOR CONSPIRACY AND SECURITIES FRAUD IN 2006 in connection with the failure of energy company giant Enron corportion was confirmed by the U.S. 5th circuit court of appeals. This is dispite the fact that the U.S. Supreme Court invalidated the theroy underlying skillings conviction. The high court instructed the 5th Circuit to revisit Skilling's case to decide wheither it should be dismissed. However, the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals stated that the jury was presented with evidence that skilling "conspired" to commit conspiracy and fraud, the guilty verdict and 24 years prision sentence will stand. There was no evidence every presented that Skilling was bribed or actually took any kick backs. However because Skilling must have "thought" about taking bribes and kick backs that was sufficient evidence to warrent a 24 year sentense to a man who had no prior convictions according to a U of Chicago Law Professor. "In our system it is no longer necessary to actually commit a crime thinking about is all that is necessary in the 21st Century to get convicted, sent to jail for 24 years."

6 Comments

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
Internships available
312-545-4554

Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)

YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a
LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERT, valuations, expert
witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert.
The author(s) graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE and attended the University of Iowa a for a PHD. The Author(s) are the nation's most renowned
Legal Ethics experts and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions. AEAE, P.O. Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email ldms4@hotmail.com
312-545-4554
Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
"Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
Litigation is the Air We Breathe
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front!"

To Prove Defamation Case?
What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm.
The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation

The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

Face

4/16/2011 07:21:52 am

You just bought yourself 5 more years of litigation

HA!

4/16/2011 08:26:28 pm

Been here two months and sixteen hot ones
One more day and Leo's a free man walkin
Leavin from behind these gates, he paid my debt to the state
Fuck that, when he touch back I got plans
If I can't rock the courts, rock the fans
Give his Juice for Peanuts away, shake some hands
Hope he never sees none of them motherfuckers again
On all times take the long walk to the front gate
Dress out expandin shit, today Leo's release date

The Bull

4/17/2011 07:07:17 am

Hey dick face-- I think your forgetting the little problem you have with the feds, entirely different caliber of prosecutor disk face, that one gets you five years, minimum.

Did you like MCC dickface? you'll like Marion even less

Knock knock

4/19/2011 06:53:15 pm

Where did Leo go? I was looking forward to reading what he had written when he was locked up.

4/22/2011 07:00:56 am

There is a new book coming out....

U of C Prof

4/22/2011 07:04:22 am

Nobody is forgetting anything. He is looking forward to clearing his name. Remember he has never been convicted of anything in 64 years! Nothing!

Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics