DIVORCED WOMAN WHO WAS CHARGED WITH MAKING FALSE SEXUAL ALLEGATIONS AGAINST HER FORMER HUSBAND WAS EVICTED FROM HER HOME TODAY AFTER LOSING CUSTODY A WEEK BEFORE MOTHER\'S DAY

4/30/2010

NEW YORK-(AEAE)- A DIVORCED WOMAN WHO HAD MADE FALSE SEXUAL ABUSE ALLEGATIONS AGAINST HER FORMER HUSBAND TODAY WAS FINALLY EVICTED FROM THE FAMILY HOME WHEN THE NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS RULED FRIDAY. The court in a 6-1 ruling found the wife's conduct after the divorce to be “adulterous” when the court vacated the martial settlement agreement and final judgment. Since the parties were now considered “married” and the ex-wife engaged in an “affair” after the final martial judgment was entered into, the court held the wife's conduct “adulterous” when the final martial settlement agreement was set aside and ordered her out of the house! The court found that the wife's “adulterous behavior rose to egregious levels that gave rise to disturb the domestic relations law in favor of equitable distribution of martial actions. The wife was also forced to turn over custody of the minor children to the husband this afternoon. When the media asked the husband, "How long did it take to win your case?" The husband replied, "It took me five years of litigation to get the scum out of my house and away from my children!" Is it true that your ex-wife left with only the cloths on her back?" "Yes", replied the husband. "Now I am charging her in the criminal court, she and her lawyer are going to go to jail!".

6 Comments

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
Internships not available now

Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)

YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a
LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERT, valuations, expert
witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert.
The author(s) graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE and attended the University of Iowa a for a PHD. The Author(s) are the nation's most renowned
Legal Ethics experts and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions. AEAE, P.O. Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email ldms4@hotmail.com
312-545-4554
Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
"Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
Litigation is the Air We Breathe
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front!"

To Prove Defamation Case?
What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm.
The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation

The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.

Winning at all Cost

4/30/2010 02:53:23 pm

This case is right on point. It is going to be your future too and it is coming sooner than you think!

The Bull

4/30/2010 09:35:48 pm

So Leo is it true that your mother hung around on 47th street?

What a Joke

5/1/2010 01:45:57 am

The reason Leo could never be a lawyer-- and would be hard-pressed to break a 100 on the Law School Admissions Test-- is he does not have the intellectual capacity to draw distinctions between apples and manhole covers. It's the same reason he has never prevailed on the merits in any legal matter, loses all his appeals, and the sum total of any "victories" he claims are procedural asides such as a motion for reconsideration or some other procedural triviality that a judge would give to any other retard. That's why he had to try to forge a "legal career" where harassment and lies are his only tools of trade. He's too big of an idiot to produce anything of actual substance. Fat Boy will be going bye-bye again real soon.

But, just to be Polite

5/1/2010 04:58:22 am

The meanest girl I've ever met
and if a Lion can along and
ate her with one bite
I'd cry and
cry and
and cry,
(But, just to be Polite)

These are for you

5/1/2010 05:11:43 am

Owls hoot
Wolves howl
You don't like pumpkins,
You don't like horseshoes
Broom sticks

The Law

5/1/2010 06:10:15 am

When a "final" judgment is vacated, the parties positions are "restored" to the position that they were in prior to the final judgment. Therefore if a party was infact divorced as a result of a "final" judgment and that judgment get vacated, guest what? The parties are still married and any affair is then considered "adultry". But since your not a lawyer you would not understand how a divorced person can be charged with "adultry" even after a judgment for divorce has been entered, once that judgment is vacated.

Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics