A SECOND MOTION FOR SUBSTATION OF ILLINOIS COOK COUNTY JUDGE MARY ANN MASON AS BEEN FILED

4/26/2010

CHICAGO-(AEAE)-ILLINOIS CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE LEROY MARTIN HAD PREVIOUSLY DENIED A MOTION FOR SUBSTITUTION OF JUDGE MARY ANN MARTIN. Today a second motion for substitution of Judge Mary Ann Mason has been lodged based upon new allegations of bias and prejudice actions. According to the Americans for the enforcement of Judicial Ethics (AEJE) any judge who refuses to recuse himself or herself in the face of serious charges of bias and prejudice could be view as violating the Code of Judicial Conduct. "Citizens should vote these judges out of office", said one law professor who did not want to give his name.

6 Comments

Face

4/24/2010 03:21:49 pm

I've been waiting for this Monday's 9:30AM hearing since June 6, 2005. Remember you brought it upon yourself, you lied each and every time you appeared in court. You got your lawyers to lie. On Tuesday be prepared to hand over to your lawyers about $100,000 grand if they still want to work for you, because I'm going to sue them again with just a few weeks. Lastly there are no threats that appear here. Everything that is said here happens! Remember there are "never" any threats ever only predictions of events that always come to pass. What ever you think you are earing tonight, you will just have to turn it over to them plus a hundred time more

Marathon

4/24/2010 03:36:55 pm

Prediction, eventually the preasure is going to become so great because of all of your unlawful actions, that you will eventually be incarcerated and/or file bankruptcy. You will eventually bolt Illinois by yourself, just like you bolted California 24 years ago. Everyone in Illinois when they learn the "truth" will say, "Good riddance to bad garbage!"

Reality

4/24/2010 09:03:15 pm

Dream on, fat boy, dream on. You can wish upon a star from that rat-infested closet you live in, but that won't change a thing. Her lawyers aren't going anywhere. Your bogus lawsuits will evaporate into thin air like a fart in an elevator-- just like always-- and in all likelihood, you will find yourself back in jail guarding your backside from being treated like a ride at an amusement park.

Just take a shower before your inevitable humiliation in court. Every day you smell more and more like roadkill. What, can't afford a water bill anymore, Leo? Grab a bar of soap and go down to North Avenue Beach if you have to. Your odor arrives five minutes before you do these days. Time to get a job, you frickin' derelect-- your life has been subsidized by the government for long enough.

The Bull

4/24/2010 11:22:51 pm

The lawyers won't quit untill you are completely broken.

Incidentally, how was your Saturday night? Who do you think the kids were with?

and what do you think she was doing?

The Watchdog

4/24/2010 11:26:13 pm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leo_Stoller

the early years of Leo's criminal activities can be found here.

Face

4/25/2010 04:05:48 pm

The Judge wants to see you in Court at 10:00PM today. Secondly anyone that you become involved and assist you with your illegal conduct or aids in covering it up will be named in the next law suit. Tell them that, aiding and abeding, conspiracy, racketerring etc. Looking forward to our hearing today.

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
Internships not available now

Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)

YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a
LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERT, valuations, expert
witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert.
The author(s) graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE and attended the University of Iowa a for a PHD. The Author(s) are the nation's most renowned
Legal Ethics experts and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions. AEAE, P.O. Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email ldms4@hotmail.com
312-545-4554
Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
"Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
Litigation is the Air We Breathe
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front!"

To Prove Defamation Case?
What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm.
The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation

The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.

Categories
Disclaimer This website is not a solicitation for business. All content on the AEAE website is intended to provide general information about AEAE and an opportunity for interested persons to contact AEAE. The content of this website is not offered as legal advice or legal opinion and it should not be relied upon for any specific situation. AEAE is not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney client relationship is intended. This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a complete description of AEAE services. While AEAE endeavors to keep the information updated and correct, AEAE makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the information contained in this website.

RSS Feed

Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics