Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics

  • SUE THE BASTARDS
  • AEAE
  • AEJE
  • AEIPR
  • Rentamark
  • Archrive
  • PAGE 2
 

STOLLER FILES HIS PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI WITH THE U.S. SUPREME COURT

4/20/2010

7 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ISSUED A UNCONSTITUTIONAL SANCTION AGAINST ON DECEMBER 4, 2009. Justice Stevens granted Stoller's Motion for an extension of time to file his Petition for Writ of Certiorari  http://www.filefront.com/16243089/writofcertiorari___%20stollervseventhcircuit_____doc.pdfup and until May 3, 2010. Stoller argued that the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals Dec. 4, 2009 decision violated his First, Fifth and Fourteen Amendment rights. If the High Court take his appeal, Stoller is confident that he will be able to reverse the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals. Stoller is an Appellate Expert who has been involved in over 400 appeals. [email protected] 
SIDEBAR:  Stoller has been writing appeals for 35 years. He writes legal briefs every day, six to seven days a week for over 35 years.
7 Comments

A DIVORCE JUDGE DOES NOT HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO PLACE PRECONDITIONS ON THE FILING OF A COMPLAINT AGAINST AN EX-WIFE AND HER LAWYER

4/19/2010

1 Comment

 
Picture


CHICAGO-(AEAE)- An New York Appellate decision issued on February 3rd this year in Parish v. Parish, the appellate division issued an important opinion on the limits of the authority of family court judges. In this case, the motion judge issued an order that the parties must first conduct a four-way settlement conference before all future post-judgment motions could be filed.
The appellate division, held this to be an abuse of discretion and a violation of due process since it fundamentally restricted access to the court. A father in a divorce has the constitutional right to sue his ex-wife and her attorney anytime and every time he has a valid cause of action without having to request leave of any court.
1 Comment

STOLLER FILES REQUEST FOR CUSTODY

4/19/2010

5 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-STOLLER A FATHER'S RIGHT ADVOCATE now moves the court for custody of his children. Stoller was deprived of visitation. Now he requests custody. This wii become a father's guide on how to win child custody. It will better prepare you, and every other father on how to establish a better advantaged position, focus you, and increase your chances of success long BEFORE you even begin the official evaluation and hearings. Click on the attached link to view a father's guide on how to win child custody. http://www.winningcustody.com/
5 Comments

REQUEST TO REMOVE ILLINOIS CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE Ronald F. Bartkowicz

4/17/2010

9 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)- STOLLER MOVED TODAY FOR substitution of the Honorable Ronald F. Bartkowicz as a matter of right and/or for cause.  On April 15, 2010, Judge Bartkowicz issued a deeply prejudicial Order, unlawfully quashing all previously issued summons in this matter which were lawfully served upon all of the defendants by Plaintiff’s duly appointed special process server at substantial cost to the Plaintiff. The plaintiff secured a Order appointing a special Processor Server on March 12, 2010 from the court see attached true and correct copy attached hereto and made a part hereof. The court on April 15, 2010 attempted to justify the sticking of the Order Appointing a special processor server by stating that the Plaintiff was under some type of obligation to first have the sheriff attempt service upon the defendants prior to obtaining permission to obtain a special process server, that this failure was some how in violation of the court’s standing order, which the Plaintiff was not made aware of and consequently, the court unconstitutionally justified the “sticking” of Plaintiff’s Order permitting him to have a special process server appointed. As a result of this court’s deeply prejudicial order on its fact, the court relieved the said defendant attorneys who are known to the court from the jurisdiction of the court and any obligation to have to respond to the complaint. Secondly, the court has placed the plaintiff’s cause of action for malicious prosecution into “limbo” depriving the Plaintiff of his First, Fifth and Fourth Amendment Rights under the U.S. Constitution.

9 Comments

Alpha Predator Banks seized 257,944 Homes last Quarter the Highest Number in History

4/16/2010

3 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-The foreclosure crisis hit a new peak in the first quarter, as banks took back the largest number of properties to date. The number of homes entering REO status (short for "real estate owned" by a bank) climbed 35% to 257,944 — the highest quarterly total ever — from 190,543 in the first quarter of last year and 9% from the previous quarter, according to real-estate data firm RealtyTrac. The increase comes as lenders seized more property that couldn’t qualify under the Obama administration’s Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP). Foreclosure filings — from notices of default to bank repossessions — were reported on 932,234 homes in the first quarter of this year, a 16% increase from the same period last year and a 7% jump from the previous quarter, according to RealtyTrac. What can be done about the largest seizure of private property in the history of America.? Twenty one State Attorney Generals have sue the largest mortgagor in the U.S. Countrywide Financial for deceptive trade practices, fraudulent loan practices. Countrywide is owned by Bank of America. The Attorney Generals received 8.4 billion dollar settlement which establishes that Countrywide engaged in a pattern of deceptive loan practices and that the foreclosure crisis is not entirely the fault of the Mortgagees. What has to be done to save American home ownership is for property owners to sue the banks for Civil Racketeering, loan fraud, deceptive trade practices. Modeling their complaints after the Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan's well plead complaint that generated a 8.4 Billion dollar settlement. The foreclosure crisis can be stopped in a day if every party that was being foreclosed on filed a Civil Racketeering lawsuit against the Banks and their officers. No bank, no matter how big could withstand 1 million Civil Racketeering lawsuits without going out of business. The banks would be forced to offer loan modifications in order to survive. Otherwise the banks remain Alpha Predators and will force American home ownership into extinction. Click on the attached link for the entire story http://realestate.msn.com/article.aspx?cp-documentid=23875844&GT1=35006
3 Comments

ROBERT P. KELLY CEO OF BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON SERVED WITH CIVIL RICO COMPLAINT

4/16/2010

0 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-A 100 MILLION DOLLAR CIVIL RACKETERRING LAWSUIT WAS FILED IN CHICAGO AGAINST BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST CO., ROBERT P. KELLY, GERALD L. HASSELL PRESIDENT, THOMAS P. GIBBONS CFO AND CARL KRASIK, General Counsel on March 2, 2010 Case No. 2010 L 002687. All of the parties have been evading service of process. Finally on April 14, 2010 Service on all of the defendants was effected. There is a hearing today on the case.
In a related case Illinois Judge Marry Ann Mason denied a motion to amend the case and a appeal was filed today with the Illinois Appellate Court. The judge also refused to transfer the case back to the Cook County Illinois Law Division.
LEGAL DISCLAIMER: All of the defendants in the above case are considered innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
0 Comments

FORCLOSURE LAWS FOR EVERY STATE

4/15/2010

0 Comments

 
View the foreclosure laws for anyther state AL | AK | AZ | AR | CA | CO | CT | DE | FL | GA | HI | IA | ID | IL | IN | KS | KY | LA | ME | MD | MA | MI | MN | MS | MO | MT | NE | NV | NH | NJ | NM | NY | NC | ND | OH | OK | OR | PA | RI | SC | SD | TN | TX | UT | VT | VA | WA | WV | WI | WY

0 Comments

ROBERT P. KELLY CEO OF BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CONTINUES TO DODGE SERVICE OF PROCESS

4/15/2010

0 Comments

 
Picture


CHICAGO-(AEAE)-THE EXECUTIVES OF THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST CO, Chairman Robert P. Kelly, Gerald L. Hassell, President, Thomas P. Gibbons,CFO and their General Counsel Carl Krasik continue to dodge service of process of a Chicago Civil Racketeering Lawsuit 2010L 002687 any one who has information as to any of these individuals please contact [email protected]
Picture
0 Comments

STOLLER, THE NAACP AND ILLINOIS ATTORNEY GENERAL LISA MADIGAN, ALL HAVE SUED WELLS FARGO AND CO

4/14/2010

3 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-THE WELLS FARGO AND CO BANK https://www.wellsfargo.com/ HAS BEEN SUED BY STOLLER, THE NAACP AND THE ILLINOIS ATTORNEY GENERAL LISA MADIGAN for discriminating lending practices, predatory lending and deceptive trade practices. The NAACP has scored its victory in a series of discrimination lawsuits against major financial institutions including Wells Fargo. Click on the attached link to read the NAACP story. http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202447776559&src=EMC-Email&et=editorial&bu=Law.com&pt=LAWCOM%20Newswire&cn=NW_20100409&kw=NAACP%20Resolves%20Dispute%20With%20Wells%20Fargo%20Over%20Lending%20Practices
3 Comments

PUTIN CLAIMS THE RUSSIAN PILOT WAS NOT DRUNK

4/13/2010

5 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)- PUTIN PUT HIMSELF IN CHARGE OF THE CRASH OF THE RUSSIAN PLANE THAT WIPED OUT THE POLISH GOVERNMENT stated that he has discovered the reason the plane crashed. “The plane was flying too low, clipped some trees and went down. The fact that the Russian Pilot had 4 times the alcoholic content in his body that would have in the U.S. Deemed him “drunk”, Russian has no such standard and the pilot was not drunk. On the other hand if the pilot was drunk, we are very sorry and express our regrets to all of the survivors. I can tell you with some certainty that the Russian pilot will never fly another plane again. You can rest assured of that fact.” Putin said that he has already planed a memorial meeting on the first year anniversary of this terrible tragedy." I have already invited the “new” Polish government to a “free” all expense paid memorial event next year. I am please to report that the “new” Polish government has already agreed to come next year. We send another plane to pick them all up!”
5 Comments
<<Previous
Forward>>

    EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
    Internships not available now
    ​


     Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
    FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)
    ​
    YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
    Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
     The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
     Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that  supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
     The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a attorney rating Service. The comments made by AEAE are not actionable because they are statements of opinion Moriarty v. Greene 732 N.E.2d 730, 740 Ill.App), citing Owen  v. Can 497 N.E.2d 1145, 1148 (Ill.1986) see Law offices of David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al No 18-3216 Seventh Circuit No 18-3216 decided 01-28-2022.
    Ratings are non-actionable opinion statements     David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al citing  Syngenta Seeds Inc v. Bung North America,Inc 773 F.3d 58  (8th Cir 2014) Illinois Law  on expressions of Opinion , an unexplained  one star review simply could not be actionable as defamation David Freydin case citing  Cf. Kimzey v. Yelp!Inc. 836  F. 3d 1263, 1269-70 (9th Cir 2016)
    AEAE LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERTS, valuations, expert
    witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert. 
    The author(s)  graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE  and attended the University of Iowa a  for a PHD. The Author(s)  are the nation's most renowned
    Legal Ethics experts  and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
    enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation  Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
    numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions.  AEAE, P.O.  Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email [email protected]
    312-545-4554
    Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE  Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
     "Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
    Litigation is the Air We Breathe
    Litigation is War,
    Welcome to the Front!"

     To Prove Defamation Case?
    What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm. 
    The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation 

    The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

    “[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30 
    AEAE argues it reports on the  law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

    ​AEAE has the legal  right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators,  business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE  18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

    VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

    DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.


    Archives

    April 2025
    March 2025
    January 2025
    March 2024
    February 2024
    September 2023
    July 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    July 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    October 2021
    July 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    April 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    June 2019
    April 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    January 2015
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010
    December 2009
    November 2009
    October 2009
    September 2009

    Categories
    Disclaimer This website is not a solicitation for business. All content on the AEAE website is intended to provide general information about AEAE and an opportunity for interested  persons to contact AEAE. The content of this website is not offered as legal advice or legal opinion and it should not be relied upon for any specific situation.  AEAE is not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney client relationship is intended.  This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a complete description of AEAE services. While AEAE endeavors to keep the information updated and correct, AEAE makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the information contained in this website. 

    All
    Jewelry Frauds
    Scams
    Yellow Diamonds

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.