STOLLER APPEALS SEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT ORDER ENDERED ON JAN 20, 2010 TO THE U.S. SUPEREME COURT

1/25/2010

CHICAGO-(AEAE)- JUSTICES FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, RICHARD A. POSNER DIANE S. SYKES ISSUED FROM THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ISSUED AN ORDER ON JANUAY 20, 2010 which Stoller has already moved to appeal it before the United States Supreme Court. Stoller has requested that the Seventh Circuit Court suspend the appeals pending Stoller Writ of Cert before the U.S. Supreme Court. The Seventh Circuit denied Stoller motion and a appealed followed. Stoller has moved before the U.S. Supreme court to consolidate his new appeal with his prior pending appeal.
Every adverse decision in every case, Stoller has appealed and will appeal "until the last court speaks". Leo Stoller is one of the most esperienced U.S. Supreme Court procedural expert. [email protected] 312-545-4554

17 Comments

Crackling Chemistry

1/24/2010 01:42:45 pm

He has been spending time with her, coast to coast. On Sunday they were spotted attending a play at the Chicago Goodman Theatre musical, according to people.com and Wednesday they attended a party in Lake Geneva where unnamed sources said they were into each other

What Is This Drek?

1/24/2010 02:28:51 pm

And why is there a picture of a disgusting bum at the top of every web page? The guy looks like he sexually molests household pets. Is this supposed to be a joke?

1/24/2010 02:42:56 pm

Way to keep deluding yourself, Leo-- it's one big conspiracy. The state courts, the district courts, the appellate courts, the U.S. Supreme Court, the trademark office, the attorney disciplinary commissions-- they have all conspired to come to the unanimous conclusion that you are a sociopathic clown. And Daffy Duck killed JFK by shooting a bullet out of his beak. Quit embarrassing yourself.

Kick Butt Attitude

1/24/2010 03:12:26 pm

...but will he get the last laugh?

Ms Law Enforcement

1/24/2010 08:35:44 pm

Oh LEO YOU SOUND LIKE SUCH A FOOL, I THOUGHT I'D BLOG FROM OUT HERE TO LET YOU KNOW I WAS JUST "FILLED" LIKE YOU COULD NEVER FILL ME AND AS IM USING MY FRIENDS COMPUTER HE IS ABOUT TO PLEASURE ME AGAIN. FOR OLD TIMES SAKE IM GOING TO CALL HIM CHRIS. OH? YOU DIDNT KNOW WHAT CHRIS DID?

1/24/2010 09:49:14 pm

How can you afford to do these things on a pauper income?

Stoller = Scum

1/25/2010 05:51:13 am

In fact, Stoller looks like he was actually sexually molesting a farm animal while his picture above was being taken. Stoller is just plain disgusting, inside and out.

Ms Law Enforcement

1/25/2010 11:24:30 am

Well he certainly wasn't man enough for me. He frequently was caught masturbating to warped fantasies

Jake

1/25/2010 01:17:21 pm

endered = entered

Leo the Fraud

1/25/2010 01:32:21 pm

The most "esperienced" U.S. Supreme Court appellate "expert" also was told off by that court for repeatedly abusing its process. The chances of getting the Supreme Court to actually listen to your crap is about the same as you getting a law degree, Leo. Any moron can file incoherent drivel with the court and have it scrapped. Idiot.

Full Flavor

1/25/2010 04:05:38 pm

In order to succeed one must expose themselves to failure, that is why it always pays to ask out the most beautiful girl and to take on the biggest opponents. We are all going to fail. But it always pays to fail climbing the "biggest" mountains then the smallest. Mr. Honda said, "success is 99% failure!" It's not over till its over.

1/25/2010 09:38:29 pm

The difference, of course, is failure is failures are overcome and success attained by hardwork, dedication and integrity. You, on the other hand, possess none of those qualities. You are simply a coward who the courts describe as a fraud, perjurer, pathological liar, and incoherent sociopath. You tried to take the easy route during the 60-plus years of your pathetic "life," and you got what you deserved--a reputation as lowlife scum, no respect from anyone, and the only mountains in front of you are peaks of legal trouble. That's why you are synonymous with dirtbag, and trying to pass yourself off as in pursuit of higher virtue is just another one of your frauds. You are a failure in every sense of the word.

Total Eclipse

1/26/2010 01:29:19 pm

ZQ must be a lawyer or judge because he sure knows how to hurt someone's feelings, but not the person that his diatribe was intended for

What a scmuck

1/27/2010 05:58:02 am

Sounds like ZQ hit a chord with you Leo. That would be funny if you even had feelings. I mean look what you did in your divorc: Made your xwife spend all the money you don't have and let your kids be stressed while you dragged her to court. For what? Justice?? Well she told me it was way worth the cost of getting rid of you while at dinner last night. What a complete scmuck you are for letting such a great family go. I'll tell you your boy has stopped stuttering and wetting his bed now that your gone. See you in court scmuck. Bring your briefcase...

Legal analyst

1/27/2010 02:45:00 pm

Woman who divorce their husbands who creat numerous causes of actions needs someone to assist them in paying their legal bills for the next "ten" years. Attorneys or men who aid parties who commit torts under Illinois Law will be invited to the "party"

Basic Psychology

1/27/2010 02:57:02 pm

If you never had a "old" car, say sixteen years old, that had a lot of problems, and you traded it in for a beautiful new car that had "no" problems, with a "great" sound system with all of the bells and whisles, you would be greatful that someone else had to deal with that old piece of junk, while you enjoyed that beautiful new car. But you wouldn't understand that because you "never" had an old piece of junk "car" that you were glade to have gotten rid of.

Karma

1/30/2010 10:16:37 am

When I ready to get rid of my latest "car" I'll pitch it to you because you like "second" hand junk!

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
Internships not available now

Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)

YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a attorney rating Service. The comments made by AEAE are not actionable because they are statements of opinion Moriarty v. Greene 732 N.E.2d 730, 740 Ill.App), citing Owen v. Can 497 N.E.2d 1145, 1148 (Ill.1986) see Law offices of David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al No 18-3216 Seventh Circuit No 18-3216 decided 01-28-2022.
Ratings are non-actionable opinion statements David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al citing Syngenta Seeds Inc v. Bung North America,Inc 773 F.3d 58 (8th Cir 2014) Illinois Law on expressions of Opinion , an unexplained one star review simply could not be actionable as defamation David Freydin case citing Cf. Kimzey v. Yelp!Inc. 836 F. 3d 1263, 1269-70 (9th Cir 2016)
AEAE LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERTS, valuations, expert
witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert.
The author(s) graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE and attended the University of Iowa a for a PHD. The Author(s) are the nation's most renowned
Legal Ethics experts and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions. AEAE, P.O. Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email [email protected]
312-545-4554
Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
"Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
Litigation is the Air We Breathe
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front!"

To Prove Defamation Case?
What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm.
The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation

The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.

Categories
Disclaimer This website is not a solicitation for business. All content on the AEAE website is intended to provide general information about AEAE and an opportunity for interested persons to contact AEAE. The content of this website is not offered as legal advice or legal opinion and it should not be relied upon for any specific situation. AEAE is not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney client relationship is intended. This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a complete description of AEAE services. While AEAE endeavors to keep the information updated and correct, AEAE makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the information contained in this website.

RSS Feed

Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics