Blog Posts - Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics

SCHWARTZ INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW FIRM LOCATED IN PORTLAND OREGON RATED 1/2 STAR

4/5/2021

CHICAGO-(AEAE) THE AMERCIANS FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF ATTORNEY ETHICS (AEAE) has give a rating of 1/2 star to the Schwartz Intellectual Property Law Firm. This rating is based upon the first hand experience that a AEAE member who had a dead line to file a Response to an Office Action from the Trademark Office contacted the Schwartz Intellectual Property Law Firm and attorney Matthew S. Crosby, who is also rated 1/2 star, never returned the call. The Schwartz Intellectual Property Law Firm is clearly not recommended and has received AEAE's lowest rating 1/2 Star.

AEAE has been rating lawyers since 1974 . See Court authority that grants AEAE the legal first amendment right to rate lawyers also:

court_order.pdf
File Size:	42 kb
File Type:	pdf

WISCONSIN ATTORNEYS BRETT A. EKES AND RICHARD SCHOLZE ARE CHARGED IN A DISBARMENT COMPLAINT FILED BEFORE THE WISCONSIN BAR

3/15/2021

CHICAGO-(AEAE)-BURLINGTON WISCONSIN ATTORNEYS BRETT A. EKES AND RICHARD SCHOLZE ARE CHARGED IN AN ATTORNEY DISBARMENT COMPLAINT BY A member of the Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) filed before the Wisconsin Bar Association Today.

The Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) is entitled to Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation

The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge. ATTORNEYS BRETT A. EKES AND RICHARD SCHOLZE are rated a 1/2 star on a five star rating system.

VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT
Legal Disclaimer: The Complaint consists of allegations. ATTORNEYS BRETT A. EKES AND RICHARD SCHOLZE are considered innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. ATTORNEYS BRETT A. EKES AND RICHARD SCHOLZE

appeal_brief_20-2204-compressed_compressed__1_.pdf
File Size:	7736 kb
File Type:	pdf

court_order.pdf
File Size:	42 kb
File Type:	pdf

WISCONSIN ATTORNEYS DAVID P. MUTH AND WILLIAM N.FOSHAG ARE CHARGED WITH PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT

2/11/2021

Chicago-(AEAE) WISCONSIN ATTORNEY DAVID P. MUTH with the law firm of Quarles Brady LLP and William N. Foshag have been charged with Professional Misconduct by a member of the Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) before the Wisconsin Office of Lawyer Regular. See attached Complaint and copies of an Opening Appeal Brief filed In the Wisconsin Court of Appeals that outlines the charges in detail.
Neither David P. Muth nor William N.Foshag could be reached for comment.
Legal Disclosure: David P. Muth and William N. Foshag charges are allegations and Mr. Muth and Mr. Foshag deny the charges and are considered innocent until proven guilty before a court of law.

attorney_disbarment_complaints.pdf
File Size:	1313 kb
File Type:	pdf

opening_brief_filed.pdf
File Size:	2517 kb
File Type:	pdf

appendix_to_brief.pdf
File Size:	8318 kb
File Type:	pdf

CMG MORTGAGE INC'S PRESIDENT CHRISTOPHER M. GEORGE, KIMBERLY CALLAS, PETER GILBERT, CHARLIE ROGERS CHARGED WITH BRINGING A FRAUDULENT FORCLOSURE LAWSUIT

2/2/2021

CHICAGO (AEAE) CMG MORTGAGE INC'S PRESIDENT CHRISTOPHER M. GEORGE, KIMBERLY CALLAS, PERTER GILBERT, CHARLIE ROGERS ARE CHARGED IN A COUNTER CLAIM IN A CHICAGO lawsuit Case No. 2019 CH03920 with bringing a fraudulent mortgage foreclosure lawsuit. See attached Complaint attached below. CMG Mortgage Inc could not be reached for comment.
Legal Disclosure: CHRISTOPHER M. GEORGE, KIMBERLY CALLAS, PERTER GILBERT, CHARLIE ROGERS deny the charges are considered innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

answer_and_amended_complaint.pdf
File Size:	251 kb
File Type:	pdf

WISCONSIN ATTORNEY DAVID P. MUTH RATED 1/2 STAR

1/26/2021

CHICAGO (AEAE) THE AMERICANS FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF ATTORNEY ETHICS (AEAE) HAS been rating attorneys since 1974. Wisconsin Attorney David P. Muth has been assigned a rating of 1/2 star, AEAE lowest rating. This rating is based upon AEAE members personal experience in dealing with Mr. David P. Muth.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

court_order.pdf
File Size:	42 kb
File Type:	pdf

Attorney Disbarment Complaint filed against Illinois Assistant Attorney General Brian Jant and Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul

8/22/2020

Chicago (AEAE) A Attorney Disbarment Complaint was filed against Illinois Assistant Attorney Brian T. Jant for alleged violations of the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct. Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul pictured below was charged in a related Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary complaint filed by the Director of the Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics. See attached Complaints.
Brian T. Jant could not be reached for comment.

The Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) is entitled to Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation

The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT
Legal Disclaimer: The Complaint consists of allegations. Brian T. Jant and Kwame Raoul are considered innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Brian T. Jant and Kwame Raoul denies all of the charges.

brian_jant_ardc_disbarment_complaint_filed_8-22-20.pdf
File Size:	5599 kb
File Type:	pdf

ardc_email_8-25-20.pdf
File Size:	32 kb
File Type:	pdf

kwame_raoul_disbarment_complaint_8-22-20.pdf
File Size:	5895 kb
File Type:	pdf

Kim R. Quam a/k/a Kim Lepore files her Response to the Charges Made by AEAE

7/29/2020

FROM : Kim R. (Lepore) Quam <klepore@zbslaw.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2020 1:50 PM
Cc: Joseph Tirello <jtirello@zbslaw.com>
Subject: RE: Wilmington Trust v. Stoller Appeal

Mr. Stoller,

IMMEDIATELY remove my name and picture from your rentamark.net website and any other websites or social media where it may appear. You have a picture of me with my name and “CHARGED” written on top. Above that, it says “Kim R. Quam Charged with Home Title Fraud.” This is NOT TRUE. I have not been charged with fraud or any other crime.

Below that, you have a picture of my associate, Joseph Tirello. You wrote his name Joseph J. Tirello Jr and “charged with perjury” on his picture. IMMEDIATELY remove his name and picture from your rentamark.net website and any other websites or social media where it may appear. This is NOT TRUE. Mr. Tirello has not been charged with perjury or any other crime.

Further down the main page of your rentamark.net website, you have a heading saying “Kim R. Lepore, Lepore

We demand that you IMMEDIATELY remove my name, Mr. Tirello’s name, Mr. Zieve’s name and any other mention of us or the law firm of Zieve, Brodnax & Steele or ZBS Law, LLP from any and all websites.

Kim R. (Lepore) Quam
Managing Partner - Arizona
P: 602-282-6188 Ext. 203|F: 602-865-8086
KLepore@ZBSLaw.com

AEAE RESPONSE:

LEGAL DISCLOSURE:
Kim R. Quam A/K/A Kim Lepore denies all charges. " You have a picture of me with my name and “CHARGED” written on top. Above that, it says “Kim R. Quam Charged with Home Title Fraud.” This is NOT TRUE. I have not been charged with fraud or any other crime." Ms. Kim R. Lepore-Quam, Mr. Joseph Triello, Les Zieve , the law firm of Zieve Brodnax & Steel. following attached Complaints which contain allegations only, all of the parties listed here have denied the charges and are considered innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Any reference to Arizona Attorney Beth Mulcahy should be disregarded. as she has not be charged with anything.

To Prove Defamation Case?
What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm.
The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation

The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

.

ardc_complaint__8-6-19.pdf
File Size:	7774 kb
File Type:	pdf

az_ag_complaint_verification__.pdf
File Size:	130 kb
File Type:	pdf

complaint_against_david_corbidge.pdf
File Size:	3635 kb
File Type:	pdf

justice_department_complaint.pdf
File Size:	812 kb
File Type:	pdf

motion_for_judicial_notice_7-24-20.pdf
File Size:	1724 kb
File Type:	pdf

motion_to_2disqualify_4-22-20.pdf
File Size:	1112 kb
File Type:	pdf

LEGAL DISCLAIMER: The attached complaints contain allegations, all of which have been denied by Kim Quam, Joseph Triello, Les Zieve,

Kim R. Quam Charged with Home Title Fraud

7/21/2020

Chicago (AEAE) Beth Mulcahy has been charged with Home Title Fraud. Ms. Mulcahy is charge with aledged co conspirators : Joseph J. Tirello Jr Esq, Pam Quam, the lawfirm of Zieve, Brodnax & Steel LLP, Jennifer Vigneri Esq Attorney No. 24821, Require Real Estate Solutions Inc, 5029 Corporate Woods Drive Suite 225, Virginia Beach Va 23462, Tiffanite Hobgood Manager, Fidelity National Title Insurance Company, Arizona Realtors Daniel J. Nickles and David Corbidge, Stix Realty Direct 480-464,0700. None of the the parties would return phone calls or could be reached for comment. FBI — House Stealing
https://www.experian.com/blogs/ask-experian/what-is-home-title-fraud/

LEGAL DISCLAIMER:The details contained in the Charging documents are allegations. Beth Mulcahy : Joseph J. Tirello Jr Esq, Zieve, Brodnax & Steel LLP, Jennifer Vigneri Esq Attorney No. 24821, Require Real Estate Solutions Inc, 5029 Corporate Woods Drive Suite 225, Virginia Beach Va 23462, Tiffanite Hobgood Manager, Fidelity National Title Insurance Company, Arizona Realtors Daniel J. Nickles and David Corbidge, Stix Realty Direct 480-464,0700. denies all of the charges and are considered Innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

Muhammad Ali's Son Calls Black Lives Matter 'Racist' 'Devils'

6/21/2020

The son of Muhammad Ali said his father would not agree with Black Lives Matter, referring to the cause as "racist" and its members as "devils," according to the New York Post.
Speaking on the fourth anniversary of the iconic boxer's death, Muhammad Ali Jr. talked about how the protests devolved into looting and violence in response to the death of George Floyd.
"Don't bust up s**t, don't trash the place," Ali told the Post. "You can peacefully protest.
"My father would have said, 'They ain't nothing but devils.' My father said all lives matter. I don't think he'd agree," Ali said.
Ali called the Black Lives Matter movement divisive.
"I think it's racist," Ali said. "It's not just Black Lives Matter, white lives matter, Chinese lives matter, all lives matter, everybody's life matters. God loves everyone — he never singled anyone out. Killing is wrong no matter who it is."
He praised President Donald Trump's leadership while in office, saying his father would approve of his work.
"I think Trump's a good president," Ali said. "My father would have supported him. Trump's not a racist. He's for all the people. Democrats are the ones who are racist and not for everybody."
Ali continued, "These [Democrat politicians] saying Black Lives Matter, who the hell are you to say that? You're not even black."
He went on to recount two instances where he was detained and questioned by the TSA after Trump issued a travel ban on seven Muslim-majority countries. Each time Ali was released.
Even after the detainment, Ali contends he has never been profiled by the police because of his race.
"Not all the police are bad, there's just a few," he said. "There's a handful of police that are crooked; they should be locked up. I never had a bad scene with a cop. They've always been nice and protect me. I don't have a problem with them."
He even called out former presidential candidate Hillary Clinton as a prime example of the apathy Democrats have for the black community.
"Democrats don't give a s**t about anybody. Hillary Clinton doesn't give a s**t; she's trying not to get locked up," Ali said.
He added, "Trump is much better than Clinton and Obama.
"The only one to do what he said he would do is Donald Trump."
© 2020 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Kwame Raoul the Illinois Attorney General Charged with Professional misconduct and fraud

6/8/2020

CHICAGO-TODAY THE ILLINOIS ATTORNEY GENERAL KWAME RAOUL was charged with Professional Misconduct in a Civil Case in DuPage County Illinois Case No.2020 MROOO349 where Mr. Kwame Raoul office is attempting to block a disabled white adult child from receiving 6 more hours of home care during the Covid 19 pendemic .
Kwame Raoul the Illinois Attorney General having direct supervisory authority over Mr. Brian Jant, an assistant Illinois Attorney General is charged with failing to make reasonable efforts to ensure that Mr. Brian Jant conforms to the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct. Instead. Kwame Raoul is charged with using Brian Jant, as a shield, to protect himself from charges of professional misconduct, associated with case No 2020 MROOO349 by directing Brian Jant to file frivolous pleading in this case to block a disabled adult child from receiving 6 additional hours of home health cared during the pendemic.
(c) Kwame Raoul is responsible for the charges of Brian Jant violation(s) of the Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 3.3(a) and 8.4(c) & (d) before the DuPage County Court. because Kawame Raoul is charged with : (1)ordering Brian Jant, with knowledge of the specific professional misconduct, ratifies the specific professional misconduct involved; and (2) Kwame Raoul is the Illinois Attorney General with managerial authority (ARDC Rule 5.1 violation) in the AG"s office which Brian Jant practices, and has direct supervisory authority over Brian Jant and knows of the conduct at a time when its consequences can be avoided or mitigated but is charged with failing to take reasonable remedial action by endorsing and re defying the professional misconduct conduct before the Dupage County court in filing fraudulent Motion(s).
LEGAL DISCLAIMER: Kwame Raoul and Brian Jant deny the charges and are considered innocent of all charges of professional misconduct and fraud until proven guilty before a court of law.

motion_for_rule_137_sanctions_.pdf
File Size:	884 kb
File Type:	pdf

memorandum_in_support_of_michael_stoller_motion_for_rule_137_sanctions.pdf
File Size:	9956 kb
File Type:	pdf

email_6-7-20_service_of_memorandum.pdf
File Size:	153 kb
File Type:	pdf

email_brian_-_stoller_v._idhs__2020_mr_000349.pdf
File Size:	88 kb
File Type:	pdf

ardc_email_8-25-20.pdf
File Size:	32 kb
File Type:	pdf

kwame_raoul_disbarment_complaint_8-22-20.pdf
File Size:	5895 kb
File Type:	pdf

joomla counter

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
Internships available
312-545-4554

Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)

YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a
LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERT, valuations, expert
witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert.
The author(s) graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE and attended the University of Iowa a for a PHD. The Author(s) are the nation's most renowned
Legal Ethics experts and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions. AEAE, P.O. Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email ldms4@hotmail.com
312-545-4554
Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
"Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
Litigation is the Air We Breathe
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front!"

To Prove Defamation Case?
What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm.
The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation

The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.

Archives

April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
October 2021
July 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
April 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
June 2019
April 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
June 2017
May 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
January 2015
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009

Categories
Disclaimer This website is not a solicitation for business. All content on the AEAE website is intended to provide general information about AEAE and an opportunity for interested persons to contact AEAE. The content of this website is not offered as legal advice or legal opinion and it should not be relied upon for any specific situation. AEAE is not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney client relationship is intended. This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a complete description of AEAE services. While AEAE endeavors to keep the information updated and correct, AEAE makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the information contained in this website.