Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics

  • SUE THE BASTARDS
  • AEAE
  • AEJE
  • AEIPR
  • Rentamark
  • Archrive
  • PAGE 2
 

Attorney Daniel C. Nedset Charged with Professional Misconduct

7/17/2023

0 Comments

 
Picture
​Milwaukee-(AEAE) Attorney Daniel C. Nedset, from the well know Wisconsin Criminal Law firm, www.Grievelaw.com  was charged in an Attorney Disbarment Complaint on July 18, 2023. The allegations are that Mr. Daniel C. Nedset is aiding and abetting a Defense Client in the commission of Forgery and Identity theft. See attached pdf file
The Attorney Disbarment Complaints are maintained confidential until a formal charge is made by the Attorney Disciplinary Commission.
Calls were made to the Grieve Law firm, but they refused comment.

NOTICE: iF THERE IS ANYONE WHO HAS ANY INFORMATION,evidence of professional misconduct on  ATTORNEY DANIEL C. NEDSET OR ANY OTHER LAWYER FROM THE LAWFIRM OF GRIEVElAW.COM PLEASE EMAIL [email protected]


Legal Disclaimer: Mr. Daniel C. Nedset charges at this time, are only allegations. Mr. Daniel C. Nedset denies the charges and is considered innoncient until he is convicted by a court of law.
exhibit_1_wisconsin_criminal_case.pdf
File Size: 873 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
0 Comments

Complaint filed to Cancel the Engineering License of Wisconsin Engineer Duane Keenan Jr

5/6/2023

0 Comments

 
Picture
​Chicago-(AEAE) A complaint was filed to cancel the Engineering License of Wisconsic Engineer Duane Keenan, a  recently hired Engineer by Aircuity. Duane has over 27 years of experience in building controls and automation including 15 years of leading engineering and development. He has a BS in Mechanical Engineering from Southern Illinois University-Carbondale.
The complaint seeks to have Duane Keenan Wisconsin Engineering Lice Terminated.
Legal Disclaimer: The complaint contains allegations. Duane Keenan denies the charges. Duane Keenan is considered innocient until proved guilty by a court of law. 
See attached Complaint
complaint_engineering_5-6-23.pdf
File Size: 126 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
0 Comments

COMPLAINT TO CANCEL THE LICENSE OF CVS PHARMACIST ERIC REID FILED

5/6/2023

0 Comments

 
Picture

​​Chicago _(AEAE) A Illinois Department of Professional Regulations Complaint to terminate the Pharmacy License  051294673 of Eric Reid, the in charge Pharmacists at the CVS pharmacy located at 5205 N. Broadway, Chicago, Illinois 60640. See attached a copy of the complaint.
Legal disclaimer: The complaint contains allegations. Mr. Eric Reid denies the Charges. Mr. Eric Reid is considered innocient until proven guilty in a court of law.
professional_regulation_complaint_intake_form_received.pdf
File Size: 45 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
0 Comments

Duane Keenan Jr. Wisconsin Broker and Vice President at Aircuity A Complaint was file to Cancel his Real Estate Brokers License

4/27/2023

4 Comments

 
Picture
​Chicago: (AEJE) A Complaint ID 2023027982 was filed with the State of Wisconsin Department of Safety and Professional Services on April 27, 2023 to Cancel the Real Estate Brokers License of Homestead Realty Inc., Broker Duane Keenan Jr.
  • Duane Keenan Jr was recently hired as Vice President of Engineering and InnovationVice President of Engineering and Innovation at 
    Aircuity ·Norwood, Massachusetts, United States · HybridNorwood, Massachusetts, United States · Hybrid
  • Duane Keenan Jr is a Residential Real Estate Agent Homestead Realty, Inc. · Full-timeHomestead Realty, Inc. · Full-timeMay 2021 - Present · 2 yrsMay 2021 - Present · 2 yrsLake Geneva, Wisconsin, United States
  • In the Professional Opinion of AEAE, aprofessional employment rating association it finds that Broker Duane Keenan Jr receives a "unqualified" 1/2 star rating
  • Legal Disclosure: Broker Duane Keenan Jr denies the charges and is considered innonicent until proven guilty in a court of law. See a copy of the complaint below:

complaintprintview.pdf
File Size: 123 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
court_order.pdf
File Size: 42 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
4 Comments

Illinois Sheriffs’ Association Opposes Gun Ban

3/1/2023

0 Comments

 
Picture
​Chicago-(AEAE)  – With four federal lawsuits consolidated and a schedule of responses and oral arguments set, the Illinois Sheriffs’ Association is officially taking sides in the case against the state’s gun ban.Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker enacted a gun and magazine ban Jan. 10. Residents are not allowed to purchase any of the more than 170 different semi-automatic firearms and magazines over a certain capacity.
Since before being enacted by the governor, the measure has been opposed by sheriffs from both sides of the aisle. Dozens of sheriffs have said they won’t enforce it.
“Many sheriffs across the state indicated their concern about this legislation passing and ultimately being signed into law and infringing upon the rights of those legal gun owners across the state,” Illinois Sheriffs’ Association Executive Director Jim Kaitschuk told The Center Square. “What the organization did is we filed an amicus brief in support of those efforts challenging House Bill 5471.”
Sheriffs are elected officials and their federal filing siding with challenging the gun ban recognizes the Second Amendment as a right to keep and bear arms.
“The ISA supports efforts to make Illinois and all of its citizens safe, but it also recognizes that those efforts must be within the bounds set by the Constitution. HB 5471 crosses those bounds, and in doing so, demands that sheriffs enforce a law that deprives the law-abiding citizens they serve of their constitutional right to keep and bear arms for lawful purposes, including sport and self-defense,” the filing said. “Because law enforcement should never be compelled to violate the constitutional rights of Illinois citizens, the ISA supports Plaintiffs’ action to enjoin the implementation of HB 5471 and to have the statute declared unconstitutional.”
Kaitschuk said there are several elements of the law they’re concerned about, including a requirement gun owners register with Illinois State Police that they are in possession of a gun defined as an “assault weapon.” The registry launches Oct. 1. 2023
“Developing a registration program and limiting the type of weapons people could have in common use, so those were some of the concerns that they had,” he said. “Even though there was an exemption provided for law enforcement, many of the sheriffs felt like how was a sheriff different than a general citizen and that was some of their concern.”
The federal judge has ordered the state to respond to a motion for preliminary injunction by Thursday February 23, 2023, and to the allegations the law violates the Second Amendment by March 16. Oral arguments are set for April 12, 2023 in East St. Louis.
amicius_brief_sheriff_3-1-23.pdf
File Size: 232 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
0 Comments

​Federal Court Rules that the Second Amendment is Absolute

2/3/2023

0 Comments

 
Picture
​Chicago (AEAE) Federal Court Rules that the Second Amendment is Absolute Strikes down domestic violence gun law. A federal appeals court has ruled that the government can’t stop people who have domestic violence restraining orders filed against them from owning guns
A federal appeals court ruled Thursday February 2, 2023, that the government can’t stop people who have domestic violence restraining orders against them from owning guns — the latest domino to fall after the U.S. Supreme Court’s conservative majority set new standards for reviewing the nation’s gun laws.
With over 900 mass shootings a year in this country the public has to armed and  be able take out active shooters, because the police cannot be everywhere. Therefore it is imperative  that the all members of the public be armed and ready to take out active shooters.
​Secondly when the Russians and China attack the US every citizen must be armed with an AR 15  rifle
See court Ruling below
united_states_v_rahimi__21-11001.pdf
File Size: 117 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
0 Comments

JUSTICE THOMAS AWARED EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY JUDGE OF THE YEAR AWARD

7/2/2022

0 Comments

 
Picture
​Chicago (AEAE) Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas—who sided with the majority on overturning Roe—made it clear what's next: to overturn high court rulings that establish gay rights and contraception rights. Clarence Thomas calls on Supreme Court to revisit gay marriage decision and to vacate it. The injunction that “man must not lie with man” (Leviticus 18:22, 20:13 is sufficient grounds to reverse the right to gay marriage.
Justice Clarence Thomas, the greatest Supreme Court justice of the 21st Century was awarded Justice of the Year by the Chicago based Equal Justice Party. 
The party worships the ground that  Justice Clarence Thomas walks on.
saul2.mp3
File Size: 949 kb
File Type: mp3
Download File
0 Comments

General Counsel John Schomberg and IDHS CHARGED BY U.S. EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION WITH CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS

3/27/2022

1 Comment

 
Picture
​CHICAGO-(AEAE) JOHN SCHOBBERG GENERAL COUNSEL FOR THE ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES IDHS  HAS been charged with violations of civil rights. Along with IDHS.
Attorney John Schomberg could not be reached for comment.

Americans for the Enforcement for Attorney Ethics awards Mr. John Schomberg its lowest 1/2 star rating for integrity and honesty,

DISCLAIMER: The complaint is allegations. John Schomberg and IDHS denies the charges, They are considered innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. 

​Please read the attached complaint

eeoc_reduced.pdf
File Size: 9437 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
1 Comment

The Left Wing Ratical ​Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson is Unqualified to Serve on the U.S. Supreme Court

3/22/2022

2 Comments

 
Picture

 
Chicago-(EJP)The Americans for the Enforcement of Judicial Ethics (AEJE) an association that advocates the Strict Enforcement of Judicial Ethics (AEJE) since 1974 asserts that Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson is unqualified to serve in the Supreme Court of the United States.
 Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson supported the  60’s Black Panther radical moment when before she became a lawyer and Angela Davis.
 
Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson has been masking her radical views, in Judges robes for ten years now and will unleash her extreme, left wing  un constitutional views on America once she is installed on the Supreme Court. Just one look at Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson and it screams “left wing radical!” However looks alone, are not enough to disqualify anyone, just look at her record.
  
U.S. Supreme Court nominee Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson did what was tantamount to labeling former President George W. Bush and the late Donald Rumsfeld, a former secretary of the Department of Defense, as war criminals.
During her service as a public defender, Jackson filed several habeas petitions on behalf of Guantanamo detainees that named Bush and Rumsfeld as defendants in their official capacities,
Jackson raised more than a dozen claims for relief. One of them, , was that the government had sanctioned torture against the individuals, which amounted to a war crime under a federal law that allows courts to hear cases alleging violations of the law of nations or treaties.

Would the famers of our constitution ever have considered a candidate like Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson for the Supreme Court ?
 
Jackson is unfit to serve in the Supreme Court, not because of what she looks like, but because of her  left leaning beliefs, that are contrary to our U.S. Constitution.

Is there any one who would not believe that the framers of our constitution Washington, Jefferson and Adams would all be turning over in their graves, at the mere thought that Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson was nominated for a position in the Supreme Court in 2022.
​
The Americans for the Enforcement of Judicial Ethics and the  Equal Justice Party urges all voters to note what senators vote to confirm Jackson and to vote against them in their next election for the senate.

If anyone has any information that the have on Judge Ketanji Brown that the would like to share please email [email protected]  

2 Comments

Judge Daniel B. Shanes is Unqualfied to serve on the Illinois Supreme Court

3/20/2022

0 Comments

 
Picture
Chicago- The Americans for the Enforcement of Judicial Ethics (AEJE), a judicial ethics watch dog group since 1974, that advocates the strict enforcement of Judicial Ethics (AEJE) has rated Judge Daniel B. Shanes as completely unqualified in their opinion to serve on the highest court in Illinois, the Illinois Supreme Court. See his web site www.judgeshanes.com
​
The Illinois Supreme Court is the last line of defense for our Constitutional rights in Illinois. 
One member of AEJE witnessed Judge Daniel B. Shanes sentence a person to prison for 8 years that Judge Daniel B. Shane knew or should have known had been declared mentally incompetent and was un fit to even stand trial.

You want this Judge Daniel B. Shanes on the Supreme Court?

Prior to his appointment to the bench in 2007, Judge Shanes served as an assistant State’s Attorney and division chief for nearly 12 years, becoming one of the lead prosecutors.  https://www.judgeshanes.com/

Former prosecutors generally make the worst judges, because they no longer have the constitution in their way, when dealing with a person who is charged with a crime. All prosecutors believe that each person that is charged with a crime is guilty  of that crime and should good to jail for the maximum amount of time, whether or not the person charged with that crime is guilty or not.

In the opinion of AEJE Judge Daniel B. Shanes is absolutely the last Judge that AEJE would want on a court that was "last line of defense for our constitutional rights in Illinois." https://www.judgeshanes.com/​

​Voters are strongly encouraged NOT to vote for Judge Daniel B. Shanes. 

​Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are of the Americans for the Enforcement of Judicial Ethics (AEJE)
0 Comments
<<Previous
Forward>>

    EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
    Internships not available now
    ​


     Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
    FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)
    ​
    YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
    Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
     The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
     Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that  supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
     The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a attorney rating Service. The comments made by AEAE are not actionable because they are statements of opinion Moriarty v. Greene 732 N.E.2d 730, 740 Ill.App), citing Owen  v. Can 497 N.E.2d 1145, 1148 (Ill.1986) see Law offices of David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al No 18-3216 Seventh Circuit No 18-3216 decided 01-28-2022.
    Ratings are non-actionable opinion statements     David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al citing  Syngenta Seeds Inc v. Bung North America,Inc 773 F.3d 58  (8th Cir 2014) Illinois Law  on expressions of Opinion , an unexplained  one star review simply could not be actionable as defamation David Freydin case citing  Cf. Kimzey v. Yelp!Inc. 836  F. 3d 1263, 1269-70 (9th Cir 2016)
    AEAE LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERTS, valuations, expert
    witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert. 
    The author(s)  graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE  and attended the University of Iowa a  for a PHD. The Author(s)  are the nation's most renowned
    Legal Ethics experts  and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
    enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation  Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
    numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions.  AEAE, P.O.  Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email [email protected]
    312-545-4554
    Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE  Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
     "Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
    Litigation is the Air We Breathe
    Litigation is War,
    Welcome to the Front!"

     To Prove Defamation Case?
    What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm. 
    The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation 

    The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

    “[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30 
    AEAE argues it reports on the  law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

    ​AEAE has the legal  right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators,  business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE  18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

    VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

    DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.


    Archives

    March 2024
    February 2024
    September 2023
    July 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    July 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    October 2021
    July 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    April 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    June 2019
    April 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    January 2015
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010
    December 2009
    November 2009
    October 2009
    September 2009

    Categories
    Disclaimer This website is not a solicitation for business. All content on the AEAE website is intended to provide general information about AEAE and an opportunity for interested  persons to contact AEAE. The content of this website is not offered as legal advice or legal opinion and it should not be relied upon for any specific situation.  AEAE is not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney client relationship is intended.  This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a complete description of AEAE services. While AEAE endeavors to keep the information updated and correct, AEAE makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the information contained in this website. 

    All
    Jewelry Frauds
    Scams
    Yellow Diamonds

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.