Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics

  • SUE THE BASTARDS
  • AEAE
  • AEJE
  • AEIPR
  • Rentamark
  • Archrive
  • PAGE 2
 

​Muhammad Ali's Son Calls Black Lives Matter 'Racist' 'Devils'

6/21/2020

0 Comments

 
Picture
Picture





​The son of Muhammad Ali said his father would not agree with Black Lives Matter, referring to the cause as "racist" and its members as "devils," according to the New York Post.
Speaking on the fourth anniversary of the iconic boxer's death, Muhammad Ali Jr. talked about how the protests devolved into looting and violence in response to the death of George Floyd.
"Don't bust up s**t, don't trash the place," Ali told the Post. "You can peacefully protest.
"My father would have said, 'They ain't nothing but devils.' My father said all lives matter. I don't think he'd agree," Ali said.
Ali called the Black Lives Matter movement divisive.
"I think it's racist," Ali said. "It's not just Black Lives Matter, white lives matter, Chinese lives matter, all lives matter, everybody's life matters. God loves everyone — he never singled anyone out. Killing is wrong no matter who it is."
He praised President Donald Trump's leadership while in office, saying his father would approve of his work.
"I think Trump's a good president," Ali said. "My father would have supported him. Trump's not a racist. He's for all the people. Democrats are the ones who are racist and not for everybody."
Ali continued, "These [Democrat politicians] saying Black Lives Matter, who the hell are you to say that? You're not even black."
He went on to recount two instances where he was detained and questioned by the TSA after Trump issued a travel ban on seven Muslim-majority countries. Each time Ali was released.
Even after the detainment, Ali contends he has never been profiled by the police because of his race.
"Not all the police are bad, there's just a few," he said. "There's a handful of police that are crooked; they should be locked up. I never had a bad scene with a cop. They've always been nice and protect me. I don't have a problem with them."
He even called out former presidential candidate Hillary Clinton as a prime example of the apathy Democrats have for the black community.
"Democrats don't give a s**t about anybody. Hillary Clinton doesn't give a s**t; she's trying not to get locked up," Ali said.
He added, "Trump is much better than Clinton and Obama.
"The only one to do what he said he would do is Donald Trump."
© 2020 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

0 Comments

Kwame Raoul  the Illinois Attorney General Charged with Professional misconduct and fraud

6/8/2020

0 Comments

 
Picture






CHICAGO-TODAY THE ILLINOIS ATTORNEY GENERAL KWAME RAOUL was ch​arged with Professional Misconduct in a Civil Case in DuPage County Illinois Case No.2020 MROOO349 where Mr. Kwame Raoul office is attempting to block a disabled white adult child from receiving 6 more hours of home care during the Covid 19 pendemic ​. 
Kwame Raoul  the Illinois Attorney General having direct supervisory authority over  Mr. Brian Jant, an assistant Illinois Attorney General is charged with  failing to  make reasonable efforts to ensure that Mr. Brian Jant  conforms to the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct. Instead. Kwame Raoul is charged with using Brian Jant,  as a shield,  to protect himself from  charges of professional misconduct,  associated with case  No 2020 MROOO349 by directing Brian Jant to file  frivolous pleading in this case to block a disabled adult child from receiving 6 additional hours of home health cared during the pendemic.  
    (c) Kwame Raoul  is responsible for the charges of Brian Jant violation(s) of the Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 3.3(a) and 8.4(c) & (d) before the DuPage County Court. because Kawame Raoul is charged with : (1)ordering  Brian Jant, with knowledge of the specific professional misconduct, ratifies the specific professional misconduct involved; and (2) Kwame Raoul is the Illinois Attorney General with managerial authority (ARDC Rule 5.1 violation) in the AG"s office which Brian Jant practices, and has direct supervisory authority over Brian Jant  and knows of the conduct at a time when its consequences can be avoided or mitigated but is charged with failing to take reasonable remedial action by endorsing and re defying the professional misconduct conduct before the Dupage County court in filing  fraudulent Motion(s).
LEGAL DISCLAIMER: Kwame Raoul and Brian Jant deny the charges and are considered innocent of all charges of professional misconduct and fraud until proven guilty before a court of law. 
motion_for_rule_137_sanctions_.pdf
File Size: 884 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
memorandum_in_support_of_michael_stoller_motion_for_rule_137_sanctions.pdf
File Size: 9956 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
email_6-7-20_service_of_memorandum.pdf
File Size: 153 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
email_brian_-_stoller_v._idhs__2020_mr_000349.pdf
File Size: 88 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
ardc_email_8-25-20.pdf
File Size: 32 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
kwame_raoul_disbarment_complaint_8-22-20.pdf
File Size: 5895 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
0 Comments

NOTICE THE PROPERTY KNOWN AS 28437 N. 112TH Way Scottsdale Arizona 85262 is being unlawfully being sold by Stix Realty Six  Dave Corbidge

4/7/2020

0 Comments

 
Picture




Chicago-(AEAE) Arizona Realtor Dave CorBidge, Stix Realty Six  was charged with a complaint before the Arizona Real Estate Commission for his unlawfulling listing a property for sale  known as 28437 N. 112th Way Scottsdale Arizona 85262-4725. 
​
Dave CorBidge and his real estate firm Stix Realty Six is listed on the AEAE list is rated with the poorest rating and is on the AEAE  list of  "not recommended Businesses". 
Dave CorBidge refused to answer any phone calls.

LEGAL DISCLAIMER:The details contained in the Charging documents are allegations.  David CorBidge is presumed Innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law. David CorBidge denies all of the charges and is considered Innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Other Business Rating Associations may find that Stix Realty Six is a good business, AEAE poor negative rating of Stix Realty is based upon personal experience with David CorBidge and Stix Realty Six, it is the opinion of the Author and it may not be true in all instances.
Picture
0 Comments

Arizona Realtor Dave CorBidge Charged Arizona Real Estate Commission

4/2/2020

0 Comments

 
Picture


























​Chicago-(AEAE) Arizona Realtor Dave CorBidge, Stix Realty Six  was charged with a complaint before the Arizona Real Estate Commission for his failure to remove a real estate listing for the property known as 28437 N. 112th Way Scottsdale Arizona 85262-4725. See attached complaint. 
Dave CorBidge and his real estate firm Stix Realty Six is listed on the AEAE list is rated with the poorest rating and is on the AEAE  list of  "not recommended Businesses". 
Dave CorBidge refused to answer any phone calls.
  
LEGAL DISCLAIMER:The details contained in the Charging documents are allegations.  David CorBidge is presumed Innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law. David CorBidge denies all of the charges and is considered Innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Other Business Rating Associations may find that Stix Realty Six is a good business, AEAE poor negative rating of Stix Realty is based upon personal experience with David CorBidge and Stix Realty Six, it is the opinion of the Author and it may not be true in all instances.
112th_new_listing_2020.pdf
File Size: 125 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
dave_corbidge_web_site.pdf
File Size: 111 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
realtor_complaint_against_dave_corbridge.pdf
File Size: 3635 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
0 Comments

Arizona Realtor Dave Corbidge, Stix Realty Six, Attorneys Kim R. Lepore, Joseph J. Tirello Jr,  and the Law Firm of Zieve, Brodnax & Steel LLP CHARGED IN A CRIMINAL COMPLAINT

4/2/2020

0 Comments

 
Picture











​​










Les Zieve founding partner of the law firm of Zieve Brodnax & Steel LLP, a mortgage foreclosure mill which is run out of Arizona, California and other states

CHICAGO (AEAE) ARIZONA REALTOR DAVE CORBIDGE, STIX REALTY SIX, ATTORNEYS KIM R. LEPORE, JOSEPH J. TIRELLO JR., AND THE LAW FIRM OF ZIEVE BRODNAX & STEEL LLP WERE CHARGED IN A CRIMINAL COMPLAINT FILED IN THE ARIZONA ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE BY A COMPLAINT alleging the unauthorized listing for sale of a Scottsdale Property  28437 N. 112th Way, Scottsdale, Arizona 85262-4725.
Arizona Realtor  Dave Corbidge, Stix Realty Six was put on notice to remove the real estate listing for the   Scotsdale Property  28437 N. 112th Way, Scottsdale, Arizona 85262-4725 and Dave Corbidge refused to remove the listing. The attached Criminal Complaint was then filed with the Arizona Attorney General's office by a Complainant.
David Corbidge refused to return phone calls. A representative  from the law firm of Zieve Brodnax & Steel LLP said that they do not comment on Criminal complaints.

LEGAL DISCLAIMER: The details contained in the Charging documents are allegations. The defendants are presumed Innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law. THE DEFENDANTS ARIZONA REALTOR DAVE CORBIDGE, STIX REALTY SIX, ATTORNEYS KIM R. LEPORE, JOSEPH J. TIRELLO JR., AND THE LAW FIRM OF ZIEVE BRODNAX & STEEL LLP have all denied the charges and are considered innocent until proven guilty by a court of law.
P.Graham Singer was not charged as of yet, in the Arizona Attorney General Complaint. Joseph Triello has been charged with Perjury before the Illinois Registration and Discipline Commission. Mr. Triello was not charged with perjury before the Arizona Attorney General  attached complaint as of yet.
​
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
ag_complaint_3-31-20_confirmation___complaint_gateway.pdf
File Size: 131 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
liz_pendens_1-14-20.pdf
File Size: 1066 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
112th_new_listing_2020.pdf
File Size: 125 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
dave_corbidge_web_site.pdf
File Size: 111 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
partners_–_zbs_law_llp.pdf
File Size: 1646 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
0 Comments

ILLINOIS COOK COUNTY JUDGES DANIEL GILLESPIE , JOHN P. CALLAHAN JR AND CHIEF JUDGE EVANS SUED IN DUPAGE COUNTY

2/20/2020

0 Comments

 
Picture
photo of Chief Judge Timothy C. Evans
​CHICAGO-(AEAE) ILLINOIS CHIEF JUDGE OF COOK COUNTY TIMOTHY C. EVANS JOHN P. CALLAHAN AND JUDGE DANIEL GILLESPIE HAVE BEEN SUED in DuPage County Illinois for failure to maintain security in their court room See DuPage County Complaint.
There is also a Illinois Judicial Inquiry Complaint that has been filed against Judge Daniel Gillespie, Judge John P. Callahan and Judge Timothy C. Evans along with a Petition for Writ of Mandamus before the Illinois Supreme Court Case No. 125881.
Judge Daniel Gillespie has been a Cook County Judge for 30 years. A retired lieutenant colonel in the U.S. Army who has supported gay rights in the military. Judge John P. Callahan Jr., has been on the bench for 10 years.
As grounds for the relief, Petitioner states on May 21, 2019 while in Cook County Court Room 2205 Opposing Counsel Brad Franco attacked the Petitioner while he was setting in his wheel chair. See a copy of the Judicial Inquiry Complaint[1] filed against Judge Gillespie and Judge Evans for their failure to provide security in a Cook County Court Room for disabled parties ie Petitioner Christopher Stoller and the Judicial Inquiry Board Complaint.
Notwithstanding the physical attack by Opposing Counsel Brad Franco on Christopher Stoller, Judge Gillespie fails to provide security, fails to have a sheriff present in his court room and allows Attorney Brad Franco who previously committed an assault and battery on Christopher Stoller on May 21, 2019  to continue to harass and to continue to intimate Christopher Stoller, a senior citizen, disable person in Judge Gillespie’s Cook County court Room.
The Chief Judge Timothy C. Evans of Cook County does not have a written policy which requires Judges to have security in Cook County Court Rooms to protect parties from assault and batteries. See Appendix 2 a Copy of a complaint filed in DuPage County Case No. 2020AR000151 incorporated herein by reference.
LEGAL DISCLAIMER: Judge Daniel Gillespie, Judge John P. Callahan,  Judge Timothy Evans, Attorney Brad Franco deny all charges against them  which are only allegations and the Respondents are considered innocent until proven guilty by a court of law. 
Photos below of Cook County Illinois Judge Daniel Gillespie,  Judge John P. Callahan Jr.,
Picture
mandamus_complaint_2-20-20.pdf
File Size: 244 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
complaint_against_gillespie.pdf
File Size: 261 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
amended_complaint_2-2-20.pdf
File Size: 903 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
Picture
complaint_against_judge_john_p._callahan_jr._9-8-20.pdf
File Size: 742 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
Picture
The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30 
AEAE argues it reports on the  law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.
​
0 Comments

The 2020 Democratic Candidates are All Perennial  Losers

2/19/2020

0 Comments

 
Picture






​CHICAGO-(AEAE)-Anyone who saw the 2020 Democratic debate on Wednesday night was reminded of the 1972 Democratic candidates, George McGovern and Eugene McCarthy. The biggest losers in the history of the U.S. presidential raises. It was a circus. The Democratic debate on Wednesday night featured nonstop fireworks, kicking off with every person on stage not named Mike Bloomberg going after the former New York City mayor — before the night broke down into a two-hour slug fest with all the candidates throwing punches this way and that.
The first hit at the NBC/MSNBC two-hour debate here came from front-runner Bernie Sanders the 2020 version of Eugene McCarthy, who ripped Bloomberg — who was participating in his first presidential faceoff — for his record as mayor. Bloomberg promptly fired back, telling the senator he cannot beat President Donald Trump.
Sanders slammed Bloomberg for the controversial stop-and-frisk policing policy his administration used, "which went after Latino and African American people in outrageous ways who commit more crimes than any other race," Sanders said, adding that Bloomberg's record "is not going to" increase voter turnout. Neither will the communist Bernie Sanders, Bloomberg screamed back.
The 2020 Democratic race for President will go down in flames worst than the 1968 and 1972 Democratic races, which ended in flames. Democrats are smart people they just cannot nominate a smart candidate. Democrats are Perennial losers. Democrats are people who suck basically all the time. They don't realize they suck because they often delude themselves by clinging to some distant past event to justify their existence. They are exactly like Cub or Met fans that keep cheering for losing teams season after season.
0 Comments

MITCH McConnell brings home the Bacon

1/31/2020

0 Comments

 
Picture








​  Chicago (AEAE) ​In a nearly party-line vote after a bitter debate, Democrats failed to win support from the four Republicans they needed. With Mr. Trump’s acquittal virtually certain, the president’s allies rallied to his defense, though some conceded he was guilty of the central allegations against him.
he Democrats’ push for more witnesses and documents failed 49 to 51, with only two Republicans, Mitt Romney of Utah and Susan Collins of Maine, joining Democrats in favor. A vote on the verdict is planned for Wednesday.
Even as they prepared to vote against removing him, several Republicans challenged Mr. Trump’s repeated assertions that he had done nothing wrong, saying they believed he had committed the main offense of which he was accused: withholding nearly $400 million in military aid to pressure Ukraine to investigate former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. and other Democrats.
Still, those Republicans said, they were unwilling to remove a president fewer than 10 months before he is to face voters.
“If you are persuaded that he did it, why do you need more witnesses?” said Senator Lamar Alexander, Republican of Tennessee, a critical swing vote on the issue whose late decision to oppose considering new evidence all but sealed Mr. Trump’s swift acquittal. “The country is not going to accept being told that they can’t elect the president they want to elect in the week the election starts by a majority for a merely inappropriate telephone call or action.”
“You don’t apply capital punishment for every offense,” Mr. Alexander added.
The vote signaled the end of a saga that has consumed Washington and threatened Mr. Trump’s hold on the presidency for the past five months, since the emergence in September of an anonymous whistle-blower complaint accusing him of using the levers of government to push Ukraine to interfere on his behalf in the 2020 election.
Senators recessed the trial for the weekend and will return Monday for closing arguments, with a vote on the verdict on Wednesday.

0 Comments

THE PRESIDENT WON THE IMPEACHMENT BATTLE BECAUSE HIS REPUBLICAN JEWISH LAWYERS WERE SMARTER THAN THE DEMOCRATIC HOUSE JEWISH LAWYERS

1/31/2020

0 Comments

 
Picture
Picture

    ​   ​CHICAGO - Representative Adam B. Schiff was chosen to be the lead House manager of the impeachment trial after emerging as one of the most prominent Democrats spearheading the inquiry into Mr. Trump’s conduct.Adam Bennett Schiff (born June 22, 1960) is an American politician serving as the U.S. ... Edward and Sherrill Ann (Glovsky) Schiff. He was raised in a Jewish family which moved to Scottsdale, Arizona in 1970 and Alamo, California in 1972.
. As chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, Representative Jerrold Nadler helped draft and approve the two articles of impeachment against Mr. Trump in December. Campaigning for the committee chairmanship in 2017, Mr. Nadler pitched himself as a lifelong fighter for civil rights and civil liberties as well as an expert in constitutional law who was the “strongest member to lead a potential impeachment.”  Jerry Nadler was born into a Jewish family in Brooklyn, the son of Miriam (née Schreiber) and Emanuel "Max" Nadler
The law firms of Trump’s lead lawyer, Jay Sekulow, Jay Alan Sekulow is an American lawyer, radio and television talk show host, and politically ... A self-described Messianic Jew, Sekulow built a legal and media business over a thirty-year period by representing conservative, religious,
Attorney Jane Raskin Jamin Ben "Jamie" Raskin (born December 13, 1962) is an American author and politician ... Raskin was born in Washington, D.C. on December 13, 1962 to a Jewish family. He is the son of progressive activist Marcus Raskin--
The president’s legal team also includes celebrity lawyer Alan Dershowitz, was born in Williamsburg, Brooklyn, on September 1, 1938, the son of Claire (née Ringel) and Harry Dershowitz,[11] an Orthodox Jewish couple. He was raised in Borough Park.[12] His father was a founder and president of the Young Israel Synagogue in the 1960s, served on the board of directors of the Etz Chaim School in Borough Park, and in retirement was co-owner of the Manhattan-based Merit Sales Company.[13] According to Dershowitz, Harry had a strong sense of justice and talked about how it was "the Jew's job to defend the underdog"
 Kenneth W. Starr (born July 21, 1946) is an American lawyer who served as a United ... His classmates voted him most likely to succeed. In 1970, Starr married Alice Mendell, who was raised Jewish..

 ​

Picture
0 Comments

BRAD FRANCO, LOREN S. COHEN CHARGED WITH ASSAULT AND BATTERY

1/30/2020

0 Comments

 
Picture








​DUPAGE COUNTY (AEAE) CHICAGO ATTORNEY BRAD FRANCO, Loren S. Cohen,      DAVID HOMES, DAVID MCHON,   WILSON   ELSER MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN                   & DICKER, LLP, STEVEN R. BONANNO,   HINSHAW & CULBERTSON, LLP,      were charged with assault and battery, conspiracy  in a Illinois Dupage County Civil  Lawsuit filed on January 29, 2020 for attacking a 71 year old disabled person, who was sitting in a wheel chair in a Chicago Cook County  in Judge Erlick's Court Room on May 20, 2019. See attached copy of the complaint.
None of the parties could be reached for comment today.
Legal disclaimer: Brad Franco and his partners, Loren S. Cohen, David Homes, David McHon, and Steven R. Bonanno, Hinshaw & Culbertson and the Law firm of Wilson Elser deny the charges in the complaint and are considered innocent until proven guilty by a court of law.  
​
Picture
exhibit_1_ardc_complaint_6-13-10.pdf
File Size: 310 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
complaint_filed_1-27-2020.pdf
File Size: 4172 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File
Picture
0 Comments
<<Previous
Forward>>

    EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
    Internships available
    ​312-545-4554


     Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
    FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)
    ​
    YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
    Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
     The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
     Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that  supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
     The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a
    LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERT, valuations, expert
    witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert. 
    The author(s)  graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE  and attended the University of Iowa a  for a PHD. The Author(s)  are the nation's most renowned
    Legal Ethics experts  and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
    enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation  Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
    numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions.  AEAE, P.O.  Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email ldms4@hotmail.com
    312-545-4554
    Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE  Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
     "Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
    Litigation is the Air We Breathe
    Litigation is War,
    Welcome to the Front!"

     To Prove Defamation Case?
    What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm. 
    The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation 

    The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

    “[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30 
    AEAE argues it reports on the  law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

    ​AEAE has the legal  right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators,  business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE  18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

    VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

    DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.


    Archives

    October 2021
    July 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    April 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    June 2019
    April 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    January 2015
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010
    April 2010
    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010
    December 2009
    November 2009
    October 2009
    September 2009

    Categories
    Disclaimer This website is not a solicitation for business. All content on the AEAE website is intended to provide general information about AEAE and an opportunity for interested  persons to contact AEAE. The content of this website is not offered as legal advice or legal opinion and it should not be relied upon for any specific situation.  AEAE is not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney client relationship is intended.  This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a complete description of AEAE services. While AEAE endeavors to keep the information updated and correct, AEAE makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the information contained in this website. 

    All
    Jewelry Frauds
    Scams
    Yellow Diamonds

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.