Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics

  • SUE THE BASTARDS
  • AEAE
  • AEJE
  • AEIPR
  • Rentamark
  • Archrive
  • PAGE 2
 

THE NEW YORK STOCK MARKET IS RIGGED

11/16/2011

1 Comment

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-THE WALL STREET PROTESTORS ARE COMPLAINING THAT WALL STREET IS CORRUPT. This conclusion results from the fact that the New York Stock Market is not a level playing field for all investors. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) favors wealthy investors over less wealthy investors. Each year the SEC issues many million dollars favors to wealthy investors in the form of “confidential wavers” which allow the SEC favored investors to accumulate large shares of corporations without disclosures, under the ruse that “stock prices would be driven up” if regular investors knew that large blocks of various corporation stocks were being acquired by a single investor. Then after the large blocks of stock have been acquired the rich investor acknowledges its purchases. The stock price than shoots up and the wealthy investor makes a windfall profit. Just like Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway Company just did after quietly acquiring 5.4% of IBM stock at 10.7 billion dollars within the last year. Afterwords Warren Buffett acknowledged the acquisition and his stock value rose to 12 billion making a profit of 1.3 billion dollars in less than one year, thanks to the SEC. The reason for the Wall Street Protestors appearing in every city is the systemic corruption that permeates every level of our society and Wall Street and the Banks in particular. Story Continues
Buffett Bets $10.7 Billion in Biggest Tech Foray

1 Comment

GREEMBER TRAURIG PARTNER SENTENCED

11/15/2011

0 Comments

 
Picture
Former Greenberg Traurig Partner Sentenced to 20 Months

The National Law Journal
"Kevin Ring, a former Greenberg Traurig LLP partner   and lobbyist who worked with Jack Abramoff, has been sentenced to 20 months in prison. That's a fraction of the 17 years that federal prosecutors recommended, and it's below even the guideline range that Ring's lawyers said was appropriate."


0 Comments

PENN STATE TRUSTEES CAUSED PENN STATE TO LOSE TO NEBRASKA YESTERDAY!

11/14/2011

1 Comment

 
Picture
Picture
STATE COLLEGE-PA-(AEAE)-SATURDAYS LOSS TO NEBRASKA IS BEING PLACED SQUARELY AT THE HANDS OF THE PENN STATE TRUSTEES AND ASSISTANT COACH Mike McQueary. Especially the Penn State Trustees who “lynched” Coach Peterno, the Penn State Athletic Director Tim Curley and President Graham Spainer before there was any trial by jury or finding of “guilt beyond a reasonable doubt”, according to a University of Chicago Law Professor who did not want to disclose his name for fear of being fired from the University of Chicago Law School without the need for a hearing or finding of any guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.. The Penn State Trustees set “a unlawful precedent that it is “OK to find personnel guilty without the need for a trial, without the need for the accused to face their accused, without the need to cross examine witnesses and without the need of having a trier of fact to determine guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The Penn state Trustee's have brought “lynching” back into style while destroying the University's football program for the next 50 years!” according to the professor. McQueary placed on administrative leave








1 Comment

WHAT IS THE LESSON BEHIND PENN STATE ?

11/12/2011

2 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY)-THE LESSON IS THAT THE PENN STATE TRUSTEE'S COMMITTED THE GREATER CRIME BY  OVER RE-ACTING AND DISREGARDING THE DUE PROCESS AND EQUAL PROTECTION RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED. The critical error committed by the Penn State Trustee's in immediately firing the UniversityPresident, the Athletic Director and Coach Joe Peterno before anyone was even convicted of any crime, evidenced that the Trustee's disregarded the most basic fundamental American principle, the presumption of innocent, which requires the government to prove the guilt of the alleged criminal defendants, Jerry Sandusky, Athletics director Tim Curely and President Graham Spanier  and these defendants are relieved of any burden to prove their innocence.

Coach Joe Paterno did nothing wrong according to the Pennsylvania' attorney general. Paterno had met his obligation under state law by reporting the allegations to his boss. The Trustee's had no right to fire Joe Paterno under the circumstances. What ever crime may or may not have been committed by Sandusky and the two Penn State Officials, it pails in comparison to the crime committed by the Trustees of Penn State.

The Penn State Trustee's trashed what is referred to by the Latin expression Ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat,the presumption of innocence. Which is the American bed rock principle of U.S. Justice,  that everyone is considered innocent until proven guilty. Application of this principle in the U.S. "Is the most important legal right of the accused in a criminal trial. The burden of proof is thus on the Penn State prosecution, which has to collect and present enough compelling evidence to convince the trier of fact, who is restrained and ordered by law to consider only actual evidence and testimony that is legally admissible, and in most cases lawfully obtained, that the accused in this case are guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. If reasonable doubt remains, the accused are to be acquitted." The Penn State Trustees did not wait for anyone to be tried, they in effect lunched Coach Joe Paterno, Jerry Sandusky, Athletics director Tim Curely and President Graham Spanier and trashed the American principle of he presumption of innocence. It is the Penn State Trustees that are guilty of the biggest crime in this scandal and should all be terminated.


2 Comments

JOE PATERNO SUES TRUSTEES OF PENN STATE FOR 100 MILLION DOLLAR WRONGFUL TERMINATION

11/11/2011

1 Comment

 
Picture
STATE COLLEGE (AEAE)- JOE PATERNO THE LONGEST SERVING COLLEGE FOOTBALL COACH AND THE MOST WINNING COACH was wrongfully terminated by the Trustee's of Penn State.
Paterno, President Out at Penn State as Legal Fallout From Sex Abuse Case Continues

John Surma the Peen State's Board vice president stated “We felt we need to restore trust in the university”. Paterno was fired over an alleged sex abuse scandal. However Paterno complied with the law and informed his boss regarding the sex abuse allegation against a former coach. Paterno was under no other obligation. Further, there are only naked allegations of sex abuse, there has been no trial and everyone is presumed innocent under law. Yet the Trustee's felt they need to restore trust in the university so they terminated the most winning coach in American College Sports History giving Joe Paterno as prima facie and irrefutable case of wrongful termination against the Trustee of Penn State . The term "wrongful termination" means that Penn State has fired their Coach Joe Paterno for illegal reasons in the eyes of the law. Illegal reasons for termination by the Trustee's of Penn State include:Joe Paterno was fired in violation of federal and state anti-discrimination laws;

  • Joe Paterno was fired in violation of federal and state anti-discrimination laws;

  • Joe Paterno was wrongfully fired “to restore trust in the University” How did the firing of Joe Paterno restore trust in Penn State University?

  • Joe Paterno was fired in violation of oral and written employment agreements;

  • Joe Paterno was fired because of his age; and

  • Was fired in retaliation for Joe Paterno having complied with the law in reporting possible sex abuse to his boss.
           Fired Joe Paterno hires high-powered Washington lawyer J ...

1 Comment

LESSON IN MAKING MONEY IN REAL ESTATE IN 2011

11/10/2011

0 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-”Everyone thinks that you can't make money in real estate today,” said Professor Markom Rebound. “In 2004 New York Real-Estate Investors were told that they were crazy to buy the Sears Tower in Chicago. America's tallest building which was clearly on every Arab Terrorists list to be destroyed, in 2004 for $840 Million dollars. The New Yorkers went ahead and purchased the Sears Towers putting in only $60 million to date and financing the rest. The New Yorkers put the Sears Tower up for sale in January for 1.5 Billion. The New Yorkers stand to rake in a gross profit of $720 million dollars when they sell the building, after they pay off their loan. After 9/11 no one in Chicago though the Sears Tower was worth a dime,” according to Rebound.


0 Comments

HERMAN CAIN HAS LIBIDO TO BECOME PRESIDENT

11/8/2011

0 Comments

 
Picture
CHICAGO-(AEAE)-HERMAN CAIN HAS THE “LIBIDO TO BECOME PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES,” Expert says. With the fourth woman coming forward and charging Mr. Cain with sexual harassment, one authority on presidential libidos proclaimed that Herman Cain “has what it takes to become President of the United States.” That Expert stated that “Mr. Cain's libido exceeds that of Bill Clinton.” “The fact that Mr. Cain came from a period of time when sexual harassment was not considered a crime and when a woman said no, it meant yes, Mr. Cain should not now be held to today's standard of conduct toward women” according to Doctor Goldenrod, the leading authority on Presidential libido's dating back to the 19th Century.
USA Today
  • Sharon Bialek accuses Cain of "sexually inappropriate" behavior


  • 0 Comments

    ARIZONA ATTORNEY DAVID G. HEBERT CHARGED WITH INDIRECT CRIMINAL CONTEMPT

    11/7/2011

    0 Comments

     
    Picture
    PHOENIX-(AEAE)-Scottsdale Arizona Attorney David G Herbert who acts as Jerome Bergstrom's Arizona California Nevada Creditor Rights Attorney | Miles, Bauer ..           "bagman" was charged along with Jerome Bergstrom in a Petition with Indirect Criminal Contempt. David G. Herbert who also is a Certified Public Account who has his offices located at 7527 East First Street, Suite 11, Scottsdal, Arizona 85251. The Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics rates David G. Herbert as "unqualified".
    Herbert and Bergstrom deny the charges and and did not care to respond. They are considered innocient until proven guilty be

    0 Comments

    KRIS HUMPHRIES VOTED LUCKEST GUY OF THE WEEK

    11/5/2011

    0 Comments

     
    Picture
    CHICAGO-(AEAE)-KRIS HUMPHRIES WAS VOTED THE LUCKIEST GUY OF THE WEEK FOR BEING RELIEVED OF THE OBLIGATION OF HAVING TO SPEND A LIFE SENTENCE WITH A DEEPLY DISTURBED WOMAN, Kim Kardashian. Kris's 72 day marriage to Kim Kardashian ended with Mr. Kardashian doing Mr. Humphries the biggest favor in his life by filing for divorce after only 72 days of marriage. Mr. Humphries does not have to look at Kardashian face any longer, he had no children with her, he was not put in jail by her. Kris Humphries was voted the luckiest guy in the world this week.
    Sydney Morning Herald
  • Kim Kardashian, Kris Humphries Talked About Filing for Divorce





  • 0 Comments

    ILLINOIS POWER BROKER WILLIAM CELLINI WAS FOUND GUILTY

    11/5/2011

    0 Comments

     
    Picture
      CHICAGO-(AEAE)-EARLIER IN CHICAGO William Cellini A COLLOGUE OF THE FORMER CONVICTED ILLINOIS GOVERNOR Gov. Rob Blagojevich was also convicted of attempting to shake down Tom Rosenberg, a Hollywood producer in order to put money into Blagojevich's campaign fund. No money was ever collected from Mr. Rosenberg. Mr. Rosenberg even testified that Cellini never asked him directly for any money. The Chicago newspapers who sold thousands of additional papers running up and during the trial of Mr. Cellini hailed the conviction stating that it “struck a blow for clean government.” Mr. Cellini, it was not shown that he accepted any money in the deal. Nor was it ever established that Mr. Cellini knew that he was doing something wrong before he was found guilty under the doctrine known as mens rea. Which in Latin means “guilty mind”. Yet now Mr. Cellini a 76 year old man with no prior convictions is staring at 30 years in prison.
    Bill Cellini convicted in shakedown trial Jurors in Cellini extortion trial: The tapes told the tale
    As Federal Crime List Grows, Threshold of Guilt ... -

    SIDEBAR:  For those who come every day, this week we were in a Fire Fight, we many Federal Appeals, State Court hearings every minute of each day. It was not until just a few minutes ago that we brought everything under control.




    0 Comments
    Forward>>

      EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
      Internships not available now
      ​


       Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
      FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)
      ​
      YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
      Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
       The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
       Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that  supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
       The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a attorney rating Service. The comments made by AEAE are not actionable because they are statements of opinion Moriarty v. Greene 732 N.E.2d 730, 740 Ill.App), citing Owen  v. Can 497 N.E.2d 1145, 1148 (Ill.1986) see Law offices of David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al No 18-3216 Seventh Circuit No 18-3216 decided 01-28-2022.
      Ratings are non-actionable opinion statements 
      David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al citing  Syngenta Seeds Inc v. Bung North America,Inc 773 F.3d 58  (8th Cir 2014) Illinois Law  on expressions of Opinion , an unexplained  one star review simply could not be actionable as defamation David Freydin case citing  Cf. Kimzey v. Yelp!Inc. 836  F. 3d 1263, 1269-70 (9th Cir 2016)
      AEAE LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERTS, valuations, expert
      witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert. 
      The author(s)  graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE  and attended the University of Iowa a  for a PHD. The Author(s)  are the nation's most renowned
      Legal Ethics experts  and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
      enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation  Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
      numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions.  AEAE, P.O.  Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email [email protected]
      312-545-4554
      Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE  Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
       "Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
      Litigation is the Air We Breathe
      Litigation is War,

      Welcome to the Front!"


       To Prove Defamation Case?
      What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm. 
      The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation 

      The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

      “[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30 
      AEAE argues it reports on the  law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

      ​AEAE has the legal  right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators,  business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE  18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

      VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT


      DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.


      Archives

      October 2025
      September 2025
      August 2025
      April 2025
      March 2025
      January 2025
      March 2024
      February 2024
      September 2023
      July 2023
      May 2023
      April 2023
      March 2023
      February 2023
      July 2022
      March 2022
      February 2022
      October 2021
      July 2021
      April 2021
      March 2021
      February 2021
      January 2021
      August 2020
      July 2020
      June 2020
      April 2020
      February 2020
      January 2020
      December 2019
      November 2019
      June 2019
      April 2019
      January 2019
      December 2018
      November 2018
      October 2018
      June 2018
      May 2018
      April 2018
      March 2018
      January 2018
      December 2017
      November 2017
      October 2017
      September 2017
      June 2017
      May 2017
      March 2017
      February 2017
      January 2017
      January 2015
      April 2012
      March 2012
      February 2012
      January 2012
      December 2011
      November 2011
      October 2011
      September 2011
      August 2011
      July 2011
      June 2011
      May 2011
      April 2011
      January 2011
      December 2010
      November 2010
      October 2010
      September 2010
      August 2010
      July 2010
      June 2010
      May 2010
      April 2010
      March 2010
      February 2010
      January 2010
      December 2009
      November 2009
      October 2009
      September 2009

      Categories
      Disclaimer This website is not a solicitation for business. All content on the AEAE website is intended to provide general information about AEAE and an opportunity for interested  persons to contact AEAE. The content of this website is not offered as legal advice or legal opinion and it should not be relied upon for any specific situation.  AEAE is not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney client relationship is intended.  This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a complete description of AEAE services. While AEAE endeavors to keep the information updated and correct, AEAE makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the information contained in this website. 

      All
      Jewelry Frauds
      Scams
      Yellow Diamonds

      RSS Feed

    Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.