ELMWOOD PARK RESIDENT JANE DOE “1” CHARGED WITH PERJURY, FALSE SWEARING BY A WITNESS ALONG WITH ARLINGTON PARK ATTORNEY “JANE DOE”

2/18/2010

CHICAGO-(AEAE)-AN ILLINOIS ELMWOOD PARK RESIDENT JANE DOE “1” is charged with perjury , false swearing by a witness 720 ILCS 5/32-2(a) a Class 3 Felony along with her attorney “Jane Doe “2” with subornation of perjury. A court order prevents the publication of their names on this blog. Charges are also being filed on Feb 16, 2010 against an Illinois Waconda Attorney John Doe “1” and an Chicago Attorney John doe “2”. The court order that bars the publication of their names is on Appeal with the Illinois Appellate Court. It is anticipated that the order will be found unconstitutional and vacated for violating the authors' First Amendment Rights. Stoller spend 37 days in the Illinois cook county Jail form June 8th, 2010 until July 15, 2010 for publishing “speech” on his Internet Blog in violation of Stoller's First Amendment rights. On February 25, 2009 Stoller was unlawfully incarcerated as a result of misrepresentations made in open court by his opponents. Stoller has been writing his Section 1983 Civil Right Lawsuit, False Arrest and False Imprisonment Case which must be filed be fore Feb 25, 2009 in Order to preserve his state claims.

SIDEBAR: Judges, prosecutors, attorneys and lying witnesses can successfully “lock” of anybody they choose. Our prisons are filled today with parties who have been falsely arrested and imprisoned, but these individuals do not have the knowledge, money or means to be able to seek lawful redress for the crime that has been and is being committed against. If every party who was unlawfully locked up was able to bring Section 1983 lawsuits are prisons would not have ½ of their current populations.

3 Comments

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
Internships not available now

Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)

YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a attorney rating Service. The comments made by AEAE are not actionable because they are statements of opinion Moriarty v. Greene 732 N.E.2d 730, 740 Ill.App), citing Owen v. Can 497 N.E.2d 1145, 1148 (Ill.1986) see Law offices of David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al No 18-3216 Seventh Circuit No 18-3216 decided 01-28-2022.
Ratings are non-actionable opinion statements David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al citing Syngenta Seeds Inc v. Bung North America,Inc 773 F.3d 58 (8th Cir 2014) Illinois Law on expressions of Opinion , an unexplained one star review simply could not be actionable as defamation David Freydin case citing Cf. Kimzey v. Yelp!Inc. 836 F. 3d 1263, 1269-70 (9th Cir 2016)
AEAE LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERTS, valuations, expert
witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert.
The author(s) graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE and attended the University of Iowa a for a PHD. The Author(s) are the nation's most renowned
Legal Ethics experts and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions. AEAE, P.O. Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email [email protected]
312-545-4554
Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
"Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
Litigation is the Air We Breathe
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front!"

To Prove Defamation Case?
What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm.
The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation

The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.

Step it up

2/15/2010 09:39:47 am

Time for the "Gal" to do some "time"!

GAL

2/16/2010 03:03:49 am

At the request of children who are mature andnearing the teen years frequently a GAL will petition a court to permanently terminate the parental rights of a parent who the children have come to dispise. Such a petition is about to be filed.

The Hunter

2/16/2010 04:38:22 am

Golly, gee, Leo, you were able to file some documents with the court. How impressive. Good news for all-- that just means your brainless crap will get dismissed with ridicule by the court (just like all your other stuff). Your so-called "legal career" is just another one of your fantasies. Why don't you call the doctor from your stay at the Cook County psychiatric ward and see if they can get you on some medication? Might be a good way to set up your cuckoo defense before you get sent to jail. You did it all to yourself, Leo-- and everything else out of your mouth just makes you sound like the whiny little bitch you are. See you in court, asshole.

Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics