EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS LOOKING FOR CONSERVATIVE WRITERS TO WRITE ARTICLES FOR THE EJ BLOG

9/27/2010

CHICAGO-(EJ)-THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS LOOKING FOR CONCERATIVE WRITERS TO WRITE ARTICLES ON CONSERVATIVE ISSUES FOR THE EQUAL JUSTICE BLOG. To write articles about conservative candidates who are running for election in November on conservative issues The Equal Justice Party is a crowd pleasing party especially great when paired with like minded conservative constituents. The conservative writers can write from their homes and post their conservative articles on the official EJ Blog. EJ want to get its conservative message out and needs writers from every state in the Union to write conservative articles about their local conservative candidates running for office and on conservative issues relating to their communities. Please email [email protected] for more details. www.rentamark.net

1 Comment

Rider I

6/21/2011 08:36:37 pm

Could you send this to every major church. I am very tired. I have been sending this to over 10,000 people. I need lots of help.

Error 1.
It is unconstitutional to allow in or have the government give privilege to a specific religion. Communist Chinese State Owned Religion Confucius has been allowed into our schools.

Outline
Show their Temples, Followers, Churches, how they pray to and leave offerings to Confucius like we do for Christ or Buddha, and then go to public schools and show how we allow them to teach not only language, but culture and religion. I learned Chinese culture in school without their Confucius religion. Serious intelligence foundational coding.

My thoughts on the matter I would like you to master.

These are my thoughts and opinions.
Hammer being used in many Communist Chinese districts after I tried to rebut Confucius into US schools, with Lockean in their schools, makes me think it is heartable to take them out of our schools.

Foreign Coding of our children brains through Character, Culture and Religious teachings.

I am only backing this up with research properly for you lazy non willing to pay folks, cause they killed children and teachers to keep my code out. Yes, I can prove preponderance of brain coding and killing to stop my codes. Easy I started to give orders to prepare cognition of code to lobby for Chinese teachers unions and governance. So instead of them doing the Democracy thing to allow my marketing of lobbying to be brought to debate. They coded death, to get military into the schools to stop any dissent to pure Marxist code in schools. Nobody pays me though, the would rather starve me out. This was easily traced as I had traced a couple other international brain coding's I had thought the MSS was doing to prepare puppet game. In which the every District in Communist China had the same action taken out in their schools against their teachers and Children. A Hammer to their children's skulls and teachers brains. Exactly like the Soviets would do in Gulags to those trying to teach to stop the brain washing.I actually proved it against myself in dark court, because I felt so bad about the non ability to understand their level of intelligence.

How bad does it have to become when a DK has to not give a whoot about telling the truth about the dark courts. I mean nobody is listening and nobody will pay me to do a proper job. All of sudden it is like Soviet style economic implosion is gone from out countries memory. That nobody remembers it or the cycles, and for some god loving reason a civilian analysis does. Oh I forgot just because the Communist Chinese allow a little bit more free enterprises that are still controlled by death or jail by the party do to exactly like they are told. They are not like the Soviets and Communist world domination is dead and gone. Bull shit. read the cite. The best part is when I get some punk kid trying to tell me that the Soviet Cold War was a political thing, or the McCarthy was trying to destroy free speech. Then I say, well, no communism is not political it is economic terrorism at is most refined, McCarthy did not try and hurt anybody for like Karl's Marx's or its principles. He based his theories on those that acted out wishes to be foreign espionage agents through contacts to foreign espionage agents. Trust me McCarthy could have had every Marxist book in the country burned, he did not want that. He was trying to stop the Communist Soviets from destroying free speech all for all those that hated his him so much.

The basic idea is that there is a Communist Propaganda news machine in this country that dwarfs all free enterprise news media along with small state ones. Which you should see the algo they have to destroy free enterprise news agencies. But you are all to blind to it. you like your freedom to say when somebody hurts you, you know nothing of what political and economic powers in Communist centralized countries get to get away with because nobody can tell others to protect you.

Hellow Camp my name is the Rider I
I am a Communist Cold War Activities Analysis. Which just means I watch their Political and Economic movements. As they still are a Single Totalitarian, Fascist, Genocidal, Monopolistic Regime (2). Therefore, I am calling today with regards to a document:
http://asiasociety.org/education-learning/chinese-language-initiatives/20-schools-named-confucius-classrooms

There is an Emphases on Confuscisism. However, I have no problem with the teaching of Chinese Character teaching is find. Along with that their great Culture of that great country great is a great study too. I know I have studied it. Those books had little to do with Confucius as they where created for public schools use. However, religion along with other three, in public grammar schools and high, no. The problem them becomes that we are priveleging the Communist Chinese State Run Religion of Confuscism as it has:
Temple's
5 million Followers that t

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
Internships not available now

Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)

YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a attorney rating Service. The comments made by AEAE are not actionable because they are statements of opinion Moriarty v. Greene 732 N.E.2d 730, 740 Ill.App), citing Owen v. Can 497 N.E.2d 1145, 1148 (Ill.1986) see Law offices of David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al No 18-3216 Seventh Circuit No 18-3216 decided 01-28-2022.
Ratings are non-actionable opinion statements David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al citing Syngenta Seeds Inc v. Bung North America,Inc 773 F.3d 58 (8th Cir 2014) Illinois Law on expressions of Opinion , an unexplained one star review simply could not be actionable as defamation David Freydin case citing Cf. Kimzey v. Yelp!Inc. 836 F. 3d 1263, 1269-70 (9th Cir 2016)
AEAE LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERTS, valuations, expert
witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert.
The author(s) graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE and attended the University of Iowa a for a PHD. The Author(s) are the nation's most renowned
Legal Ethics experts and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions. AEAE, P.O. Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email [email protected]
312-545-4554
Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
"Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
Litigation is the Air We Breathe
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front!"

To Prove Defamation Case?
What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm.
The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation

The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.

Categories
Disclaimer This website is not a solicitation for business. All content on the AEAE website is intended to provide general information about AEAE and an opportunity for interested persons to contact AEAE. The content of this website is not offered as legal advice or legal opinion and it should not be relied upon for any specific situation. AEAE is not engaged in the practice of law and no attorney client relationship is intended. This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a complete description of AEAE services. While AEAE endeavors to keep the information updated and correct, AEAE makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the information contained in this website.

RSS Feed

Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics