FORMER ILLINOIS GOVERNOR Blagojevich DEFENSE TEAM, ATTORNEYS Sam Adam Jr. and Sam Adam Sr. Bail out!

10/3/2010

CHICAGO-(AEAE)-ILLINOIS FORMER GOVERNOR BLAGOJEVICH WAS TRIED ON 27 counts of fraud and corruption in Chicago last month. Blagojevich was found guilty on only one court of lying to an FBI agent. The Illinois Federal Prosecutor has set to re-try Blago in January. Blago had 2 million dollars in his campaign fund, which the court allowed Blago to use to pay his attorneys. In todays economy a lawyer making $200 thousand a year would be considered great. However that was not sufficient for Blago's defense attorneys Sam Adam Jr. and Sam Adams Sr., after bleeding Blagojevich's campaign fund dry, have now bailed out of the case. In the opinion of the American's for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) lawyers like Sam Adams Jr. and Sam Adam Sr represent the worst in the legal profession. Running out on a client after they have learned his entire case in order to avoid representing that client in a second trial represents the lowest form of an attorney who is only interested in “greed” and transferring the wealth of his client to himself. AEAE has placed Sam Adam Jr. and Sam Adam Sr. in the legal pantheon of “shame”

7 Comments

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
Internships available
312-545-4554

Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)

YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a
LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERT, valuations, expert
witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert.
The author(s) graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE and attended the University of Iowa a for a PHD. The Author(s) are the nation's most renowned
Legal Ethics experts and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions. AEAE, P.O. Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email ldms4@hotmail.com
312-545-4554
Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
"Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
Litigation is the Air We Breathe
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front!"

To Prove Defamation Case?
What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm.
The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation

The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

Leo the Zero

10/2/2010 05:43:15 pm

Hey, Fat Ass, if you want people to contribute to the "Equal Justice Party" on your rag blog here, do them the courtesy of explaining how you had to reach a settlement on the Attorney General's charges that you set up a scam 9/11 charity. What was that about? Was it another conspiracy against you? Was it another example of you being persecuted by corrupt government officials? Was it another example of your Constitutional rights being violated?

Go ahead, douchebag, put this idiot blog to good use. Assure anyone who is stupid enough to give you a dime that you are a trustworthy custodian of their money and exactly how their "contributions" will be used.

LEO blows himself

10/2/2010 08:24:56 pm

Shame on you LEO!

How many people, did you drive into bankruptcy, when you filed baseless opposition to their trademark applications?

YOU SUCK, LEO~!!!!!

Yourself, that is!!

Paypal

10/2/2010 10:09:11 pm

No one in thier right mind would give your equal justice party a dime.

After 9/11/2001 you set up a phony internet charity claiming to help 911 victims. You kept the money- The Attorney General of the state of illinois shut you down.

You proved that you were the lowest of the bottom feeders.

What fool would donant a dime to you?

If they do we are going to attach the paypal account as just another alter-ego of you.

As for your opinion of the adams; give me a break, you have no idea of what you are talking about.
P.S.
Mr. Rubber says hi.

moron

10/3/2010 01:57:41 am

You can't talk to Leo about shame because Fat Ass Leo is shameless.

Any merchant services company (PayPal) who has been given notice that their account services may be being used for improper services will shut that account down faster than Leo swallows. The merchant services companies are extremely sensitive to getting notice of questionable use of its services, because they have to answer to Visa, Mastercard and the other major credit cards, who are hyper-vigilant in protecting their brand. If the merchant services companies don't exercise due diligence, they run the risk of Visa/Mastercard coming down on them.

Merchant Services

10/3/2010 04:48:49 am

Wikpedia article and consent decree from Attorney General regarding the phony 911 charity need to be sent ASAP, who volunteers, should be sent to pay pal but also to home offices of all major cards along with copy of the EJP solicitation and phony PAC filing

Note to the Left Wingers

10/3/2010 02:16:50 pm

You just want Obama and his crowd to win again and drive the country into bankruptcy! The EJ party does not care where supporters contribute as long as they contribute to Conserative Candidates!

Factoid

10/3/2010 02:20:57 pm

It is estimated by others that only about several hundred were forced out of business during those years...

Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics