ILLINOIS APPELLATE COURT DENIES LANCE G. JOHNSON MOTION TO HOLD STOLLER IN CIVIL CONTEMPT

3/17/2010

CHICAGO-(AEAE)- STOLLER FILED A 100 MILLION DOLLAR DEFAMATION AGAINST WASHINGTON D.C. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ATTORNEYS Lance. G. Johnson, David Abrams, Alfred Goodman, and their law firm of www.roylance.com Johnson, Abrams and Goodman were successful “dodging” and “evading” service of summons, convincing Illinois Circuit Court Judge Kathy Flanagan to vacate service of summons, which is now incidentally on Appeal with the Illinois Appellate Court First Judicial District Case No. 09-1868. Lance G. Johnson filed a motion to hold Stoller in “civil contempt and to award sanction against Stoller under Illinois Supreme Court Rule 137 for knowingly filing false affidavits of service with this court.” The Illinois Appellate court denied Johnson's frivolous motion on March 11, 2010. Judge Gillespie granted Johnson motion to strike a Motion for indirect criminal contempt Click on to see a copy of the complaint http://www.filefront.com/14756757/Lance-G.-Johnson-Charged-with-perjury0001.pdf
which is also up on appeal before the Illinois Appellate Court click to read the transcript of the January 129, 2010 hearing. See a copy of the official transcript http://www.filefront.com/15606995/1-29-%202010%20Johnson%20Contempt%20hearing%20Transcript.pdf

9 Comments

EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY
Internships not available now

Help the Equal Justice Party www. equaljusticeparty.org a registered political party in Illinois, support conservative candidates and endorses AEAE. Contribute today!
FREE SPEECH ON THE NET IS NOT 'FREE'. PEOPLE GO TO JAIL FOR BLOGGING ALL OF THE TIME. THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY IS FIGHTING TO MAINTAIN THE FIRST AMENDMENT WHICH IS SUPPOSE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. , the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content." Police Dep't of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95, 33 L. Ed. 2d 212, 92 S. Ct. 2286 (1972); see also Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n, 447 U.S. 530, 537, 65 L. Ed. 2d 319, 100 S. Ct. 2326 (1980)

YOU CAN SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH BY SUPPORTING THE EQUAL JUSTICE PARTY. DONATE ON-LINE
Supporting Equal Justice Party helps to maintain the Internet a free voice and EJ supports the First Amendment of the U.S Constitution.
The Equal Justice Party (EJ) is a registered Political Action Committee in Chicago, Illinois S 10127 L 15656. The EJ supports conservative causes, conservative candidates, small government.
Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) www.rentamark.net is a not for profit group that supports Equal Justice www.equaljustice.org and advocates the strict enforcement of attorney ethics since 1974.
The purpose of the AEAE Blog is to exalt the law, by holding to the fundamental right of “Equal Justice” for all. It keeps “watch” on attorney and judicial misconduct issues, evolving trademark and constitutional law. It assures all people with the “good news” that in American “right” will prevail especially for those who “never” give-up “fighting” to obtain “justice”. This site adheres to the Law and the Constitution as its authority. The AEAE, is a attorney rating Service. The comments made by AEAE are not actionable because they are statements of opinion Moriarty v. Greene 732 N.E.2d 730, 740 Ill.App), citing Owen v. Can 497 N.E.2d 1145, 1148 (Ill.1986) see Law offices of David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al No 18-3216 Seventh Circuit No 18-3216 decided 01-28-2022.
Ratings are non-actionable opinion statements David Freydin,PC v Vitoria Chamara et al citing Syngenta Seeds Inc v. Bung North America,Inc 773 F.3d 58 (8th Cir 2014) Illinois Law on expressions of Opinion , an unexplained one star review simply could not be actionable as defamation David Freydin case citing Cf. Kimzey v. Yelp!Inc. 836 F. 3d 1263, 1269-70 (9th Cir 2016)
AEAE LEGAL ETHICS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY EXPERTS, valuations, expert
witness testimony, trademark surveys, brief writer, Appellate Expert.
The author(s) graduated from Mayville State College with a BS Degree, North Dakota State University, MASTERS DEGREE and attended the University of Iowa a for a PHD. The Author(s) are the nation's most renowned
Legal Ethics experts and Intellectual Property Entrepreneur(s) with many years of experience in the field of brief writing, trademarks, licensing and
enforcement, expert witness testimony, trademark valuation Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics (AEAE) an attorney watch dog group since 1974. AEAE has appeared on FOX NEWS, CBS and in
numerous national news papers including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Chicago Sun Times etc and on many radio talk shows. AEAE accepts political contributions. AEAE, P.O. Box 60645, Chicago, Illinois 60660. Email [email protected]
312-545-4554
Copyright AEAE 2017, all rights reserved. AEAE accepts no liability for incorrect or inaccurate information appearing here. The opinions expressed here are those o f AEAE Use of this site is subject to our "terms of use" which is published here. Nothing can be duplicated without written permission.
"Litigation is the Sea We swim in,
Litigation is the Air We Breathe
Litigation is War,
Welcome to the Front!"

To Prove Defamation Case?
What Do You Have To Prove? There are two things you have to prove to be true in order to win a case of defamation of character in the court of law. First of all, you have to prove without a doubt that what was said or written about you is not true. Once you have proved that the statement is, in fact, false you have to prove that the other person said the false statement with the intent of causing you some form of harm.
The Fair Reporting Privilege is a defense to any claim of Defamation

The Fair Report Privilege applies to the information contained on this web site.

“[T]he fair report privilege has two requirements: (1) the report must be of an official proceeding; and (2) the report must be complete and accurate or a fair abridgment of the official proceeding. [Citation.] *** For a publication to be considered a fair abridgment, the report must convey to readers a substantially correct account of the official proceedings. [Citation.] A reporter is not privileged to make additions of his own that would convey a defamatory impression or to indict expressly or by innuendo the veracity or integrity of any of the parties. [Citation.] Finally, it is the accuracy of the summary, not the truth or falsity of the information being summarized, that is the benchmark of the privilege. [Citation.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Eubanks, 397 Ill. App. 3d at 749 (citing Solaia Technology, LLC v. Specialty Publishing Co., 221 Ill. 2d 558, 588-90 (2006)). ¶ 30
AEAE argues it reports on the law and law suits and it is the intent of AEAE to "fairly report" these official proceedings.

AEAE has the legal right to evaluate and rate attorneys, government officials, College educators, business leaders See JOHN HENRY BROWNE, et al., AVVO, INC., et al Case No. C07-0920RSL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 18th day of December, 2007. A Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge

VERITAS OMNIA VINCIT

DISCLAIMER: The AEAE does not provide legal services or legal advice. Discussions of legal principles and authority, including, but not limited to, constitutional provisions, statutes, legislative enactments, court rules, case law, and common-law doctrines are for informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice.

what a loser

3/17/2010 01:48:01 am

yes, Leo, you should probably blow your brains out, but hitting any brain tissue would be a one-in-a-million shot. hah haha haha haha hahaha ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhaha. You fat little mental patients are always a riot. Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

Quit it, leo, you're too funny

3/17/2010 02:40:16 am

Q. If Leo were to step in front of the "L" train, what would be the last thing to go through his mind?

A. His asshole.

Hahahhahahahahahaahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahhahahahahaahhahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahhahahahahahahahah, oh, my, god, hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

3/17/2010 11:40:59 am

In other words, Babe, you lost again. Lance is really cute by the way

Joshua R. Epstein III, Esq.

3/17/2010 12:34:08 pm

Leo, you are a very stupid man. You must have eaten a lot of paint chips when you were a kid. And you give being a member of the Tribe a bad name. The court did not deny anything. It merely tossed out a basket full of your cases and ordered that you must obtain leave from the lower courts before engaging in your habitually frivolous shenanigans. And the lower courts granting you leave to do anything is about as likely as you becoming an actual lawyer. In other words, zero. The court did not reach the issue of whether you should be held in contempt. That will probably be coming down soon in a separate and very detailed order. Lance Johnson-- being top-notch and nationally renowned attorney-- carved you up like a St. Pattie's day briscuit. You wouldn't know the truth if it came up to you and started plucking out your caterpillar-like eyebrows.

Adovoka

3/17/2010 05:31:01 pm

He's Tipesh!

Face

3/18/2010 11:00:46 am

You're going to get served in a few days and I look forward to you and your crew coming to court for the next five years "laughting" and "joking" on the other side of the court room. I have "never" lost, unless you consider spending a million dollars to beat me, "winning!"

Avenger

3/18/2010 11:06:53 am

I only like to sue "nice" looking, well to do people, after all my cases last between 5 and 10 years and it would get rather boring having to look accross the court room at "ugly" poor people all of the time. And good looking people usually have more assets than the "ugly" poor people.

Simon Wesienthal

3/19/2010 02:31:55 pm

Ya he's real cute, put a Swastika on his forehead and he would look exactly like you!

He does have the same "bulleseye" on his forehead that you have on yours.

Lighten it Up- True Story

3/19/2010 05:42:32 pm

The other day Stoller steps into an elevator in the Chicago Daley Center Court house. The elevator door starts to close on Stoller.
Suddenly a young lawyer hits the “Open” button.
Stoller walks into the elevator. Stoller says, “That the first time a lawyer in this building didn't hit the “close” button when I walk into an elevator.
An older attorney at the back of the elevator commented, “He only hit the open button Stoller because he didn't know who you were.”

Americans for the Enforcement of Attorney Ethics